Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1437781
This article is part of the Research Topic Infertility and Endometriosis View all 18 articles

The effect of number of endometrial CD138+ cells on the pregnancy outcomes of infertile patients in the proliferative phase

Provisionally accepted
Yuye Li Yuye Li 1,2Shuyi Yu Shuyi Yu 1,2Wenjuan Liu Wenjuan Liu 3Yawen Chen Yawen Chen 1,2Xiaobing Yang Xiaobing Yang 1,2Juanhua Wu Juanhua Wu 1,2Mingjuan Xu Mingjuan Xu 1,2Guanying You Guanying You 1,2Ruochun Lian Ruochun Lian 1,2Huang Chunyu Huang Chunyu 1,2Wanru Chen Wanru Chen 1,2Yong Zeng Yong Zeng 1,2Fenghua Liu Fenghua Liu 3*Lianghui Diao Lianghui Diao 1*
  • 1 Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 2 Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, shenzhen, China
  • 3 Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This study was conducted for determining how many CD138 + cells in the proliferative endometrium have an influence on pregnancy outcomes.Methods:This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January to August in 2018. A total of 664 infertile women without doing CE analysis and without receiving respective antibiotic treatment were studied. Immunostaining was performed for the plasmacyte marker CD138. The amount of CD138+ cells was compared in the proliferative and mid-luteal phases of the same patients without antibiotic therapy.Infertile patients were separated into three groups based on the number of positive lesions (the number of high power fields (HPFs) containing not less than five CD138 + cells): 0 ( n = 474), 1-2 (n = 125) and ≥ 3 positive lesions (n = 104). Then, the pregnancy outcomes of infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) among three groups were compared.Results:CD138+ cells during proliferation demonstrated a greatly higher level than those during the mid-luteal phase (P <0.0001). Pregnancy outcomes did not differ between 0 and 1-2 positive lesions. However, the ≥ 3 positive lesions group (P =0.006, P =0.029) had significantly lower ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates compared with the 0 positive lesion one. Although 0 and ≥ 3 positive lesions groups showed a trend toward higher rates of clinical pregnancy (P =0.132), these differences failed to reach statistical significance. After the age, body mass index (BMI) and clinical features were adjusted, the ≥ 3 positive lesions group showed significantly lower live birth rates (aOR, 1.84; 95%CI, 1.08-3.15; P =0.026), clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-2.95; P =0.028) and ongoing pregnancy (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.09-3.15; P =0.024). The analysis above demonstrated that the smallest number of stromal CD138 + cells suggestive of CE patients requiring treatment was defined as ≥ 3 positive lesions during proliferation.Conclusions:Different diagnostic criteria for CE should be set up in both proliferative and mid-luteal phases. The analysis above demonstrated that the smallest number of stromal CD138 + cells suggestive of CE patients was defined as ≥ 3 positive lesions during the proliferative phase.

    Keywords: Infertile women, IVF-ET, CE, CD138, Pregnancy Outcome, Proliferative phase, midluteal phases

    Received: 24 May 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Yu, Liu, Chen, Yang, Wu, Xu, You, Lian, Chunyu, Chen, Zeng, Liu and Diao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Fenghua Liu, Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong Province, China
    Lianghui Diao, Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.