Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 06 August 2024
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology

Microwave ablation for lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer: the impact of lymph node diameter

Xiaoyi XiaoXiaoyi Xiao1Xi Chen,Xi Chen2,3Jingwei Li&#x;Jingwei Li4‡Pei Li*&#x;Pei Li1*†Yun Zhu*&#x;Yun Zhu5*†
  • 1Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • 2School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 3Joint Research Centre for Primary Health Care, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 4Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsa, China
  • 5Department of Ultrasound, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China

Objectives: To explore the impact of lymph node diameter on the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes (CMLNs) from thyroid cancer.

Methods: A total of 32 patients with 58 CMLNs from thyroid cancer underwent ultrasound-guided MWA and were included in the retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups based on the mean largest diameter of the CMLNs: Group A (diameter ≤10mm), Group B (10mm < diameter ≤20mm), and Group C (diameter >20mm). The research involved comparing changes in cervical metastatic lymph nodes and serum thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, as well as the incidence of complications, before and after microwave ablation across three groups of patients.

Results: The technical success rate of this study was 100% (32/32), and they showed no major complications. Compared with measurements taken before MWA, the mean largest diameter and volume of CMLNs, as well as the sTg level, showed significant reductions (p <0.05) at the last follow-up in all three patient groups. Group A and B exhibited higher lymph node volume reduction rates and complete disappearance rates compared to Group C. However, the recurrence rate in the three groups were in the following order: Group C > Group B > Group A. The occurrence rate of mild complications was Group A > Group C > Group B.

Conclusion: MWA is a safe and effective method for treating CMLNs, with advantages for localized nodes but limitations for larger ones. Careful consideration and personalized plans are advised, based on comprehensive evidence assessment.

Introduction

Thyroid cancer is one of the most common endocrine malignant tumors globally, and its incidence has been rapidly increasing in recent years (1, 2). Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common histological type, with a high cure rate. The 10-year survival rate exceeds 91%, and the 15-year survival rate exceeds 87% (3, 4). However, after surgical resection, 20-90% of PTC patients may develop cervical lymph node metastasis (CMLN), which is crucial for prognosis (5, 6). Currently, conventional treatments for CMLN from PTC include surgical resection, radioiodine ablation, and systemic therapy (79). However, repeat surgery carries a high risk of complications due to fibrosis and scar formation from previous surgeries (10, 11). Therefore, some non-invasive alternative techniques have been proposed, such as thermal ablation (12).

In recent years, ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (WMA) has gained significant attention as a thermal ablation therapy with good efficacy and safety in the management of CMLN from PTC (13, 14). The European Thyroid Association guidelines recommend it as one of the alternative surgical options for CMLN (15). Furthermore, as the size of the lymph nodes is crucial in treatment selection, the guidelines suggest: 1) CMLN smaller than 10mm may be considered for active surveillance (AS). However, some patients may eventually seek intervention due to factors such as psychological stress, leading to treatments like microwave ablation (16). 2) CMLN sized between 10-20mm may be considered for thermal ablation. Additionally, in clinical practice, many patients with CMLN larger than 20mm choose microwave ablation treatment out of concern for the risks of complications during repeat surgery.

Currently, there is insufficient direct evidence to explore the relationship between the efficacy and safety of MWA and CMLNs. Therefore, further investigation into the impact of CMLN diameter on the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided MWA treatment is crucial. This research will provide important insights to optimize the treatment strategies for CMLN from PTC.

Methods

Study population

This study included a total of 32 patients with 58 CMLNs from PTC who underwent MWA treatment at The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine from December 2021 to December 2022. The study was divided into three groups: Group A with the mean largest CMLN diameter ≤10mm, Group B with the mean largest diameter greater than 10mm and less than or equal to 20mm, and Group C with the mean largest diameter greater than 20mm. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC followed by at least one neck lymph node dissection; (2) patients continuously taking levothyroxine postoperatively to suppress serum thyroid-stimulating hormone; (3) patients with contraindications to surgery or refusal of surgical excision of CMLNs; (4) CMLNs detected by ultrasound (US) and diagnosed as PTC metastases using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or washout thyroglobulin (Tg) concentration in FNA; (5) follow-up for at least 12 months after ablation. Exclusion criteria were: (1) children or pregnant women; (2) patients with distant metastases; (3) patients with severe bleeding tendencies; (4) patients with contraindications to the use of ultrasound contrast agents. This retrospective study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for informed consent was waived. All patients signed a written informed consent form for treatment before undergoing MWA.

Equipment and methods

The MyLab Twice color Doppler ultrasound system (Esaote, Italy) utilized high-resolution linear probes (6-12 MHz) to monitor and guide various procedures, including cytological or histological examinations, pre-ablation assessments, ablation therapy, and follow-up. Additionally, the system was equipped with contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging technology to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide better medical care for patients.

The KY-2000 2450 MHz microwave system (KY-2000, Kangyou Medical, Nanjing, China) manufactured by Nanjing Kangyou Medical was employed for microwave ablation (MWA). This system was specifically modified for the ablation of superficial organs. It consisted of a 16-gauge, Teflon-coated, internal-cooled microwave antenna with a 3-mm active tip and a 10-cm shaft.

Pre-MWA assessment

Prior to microwave ablation (MWA), all patients underwent a detailed ultrasound examination. During this examination, we documented the location, size, blood flow, and surrounding characteristics of the cervical lymph nodes (LNs). The volumes of the lymph nodes were calculated using the formula V = πabc/6, where V represents volume, and a, b, and c represent the largest diameter and the two remaining perpendicular diameters, respectively. Additionally, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was used to assess the perfusion of the lymph nodes, and Tg testing was conducted before MWA.

Procedure of MWA

The MWA procedure was conducted under ultrasound guidance by a doctor with five years of experience in MWA. Patients were positioned in the supine position, and their necks were fully exposed. Before the procedure, local infiltration anesthesia with 1% lidocaine was administered, followed by an injection of normal saline around the lymph nodes such that the lymph nodes were moved to the safe side to protect nerves, blood vessels, and other important organs from burning (17). A 16 G sharp needle, 4 cm in length, was used to puncture the skin, and the antenna was inserted into the target lymph node via the tunnel that appeared after the needle was removed. In cases where insertion of the antenna was challenging due to small lymph nodes, the “ablating puncture” technique was employed, turning on the ablated mode after the antenna needle reached the surface of the lesion, followed by insertion into the lesion. For small lesions, fixed ablation was sufficient, while the “moving-shot” technique was applied for some larger lesions. The output power started at 10w or 15 w for small LN and gradually increased in steps to 30 w. The selection of the moving-shot, pull-back, or fixed applicator technique depends on the tumor’s specific characteristics (18). An ultrasound was used to observe a hyperechoic area during the ablation process, and ablation was terminated once the hyperechoic area covered the LN entirely (14). Afterward, CEUS was used to assess the efficacy of the ablation. If the contrast agent remained within the LN, the perfusion area was re-ablated. The MWA procedure was considered completed if no contrast agent was present in the LN. All patients in this study were hospitalized for the MWA. Patients were observed for two hours after MWA to monitor for any potential complications, such as bleeding, hoarseness, or skin burns. If a patient reports pain above 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after surgery, oral painkillers like ibuprofen are provided. The pre-ablation B-mode US and ablation process are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 A 48-year-old woman, who had a total thyroidectomy three years ago due to papillary thyroid cancer, received microwave ablation (MWA) for cervical metastatic lymph nodes. (A), Prior to MWA treatment, B-mode ultrasonography (US) showed a hypoechoic LN (arrow); (B), The LN was punctured with a MWA needle (arrow); (C) During MWA, a hyperechoic pattern (arrow) was observed in the LN.

Follow-up

Following MWA, cervical ultrasound was conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, followed by every six months thereafter. We documented the size of the lesions and calculated the volume and volume reduction rate (VRR) of the ablated LNs using the VRR equation: VRR (%) = ([initial volume – final volume] × 100%)/initial volume. At the three-month mark, all patients underwent another thyroglobulin test. For ablation areas, routine cervical B-mode ultrasound is performed, and CEUS and FNA are performed if metastasis or recurrence of the target LN is suspected. To rule out distant metastasis, computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) examination was conducted every six months after MWA.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.2.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). To compare the measurements of cervical metastatic lymph nodes before and after microwave ablation (MWA), Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed on the data. If the distribution is normal, a paired T-test is used; If not, the Wilcoxon signed rank test is used. Next, to evaluate the differences in Volume Reduction Rate (VRR) between the three groups, we first evaluated the Shapiro-Wilk normality Test and Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance of the data. If all are satisfied, One-way ANOVA statistical analysis is selected. If neither is satisfied, Kruskal-Wallis test is used for comparison. Chi-square test was used to compare the difference in complete disappearance rates among the three groups. Graphical representation using GraphPad Prism software 8.0 for Windows (GraphPad software, San Diego, California, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical and lymph node characteristics of participants

Table 1 summarizes the demographic baseline data and lymph node characteristics of patients before MWA. The study included patients from three groups: Group A with 10 individuals, including 1 male and 9 females, with an average age of 42.00 ± 3.26 years; Group B with 14 individuals, including 3 males and 11 females, with an average age of 42.40 ± 7.66 years; Group C with 8 individuals, including 1 male and 7 females, with an average age of 43.11 ± 7.97 years. In the study population, the distribution of the primary tumor location was as follows: Group A had 7 cases on the right side of the neck and 3 cases on the left side of the neck; Group B had 9 cases on the right side of the neck and 5 cases on the left side of the neck; Group C had 2 cases on the right side of the neck and 5 cases on the left side of the neck. A total of 58 enlarged metastatic lymph nodes were included in the study, with 19 nodes in the left neck (32.76%) and 39 nodes in the right neck (67.24%). The number of lymph node metastases per person ranged from 1 to 3, with the quantities in each lymph node region (II, III, IV, V, VI) being 4, 15, 24, 4, and 11, respectively.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population and cervical metastatic lymph nodes.

Treatment response of WMA

After confirming the CMLNs with FNAB, they were ablated. No enhancement was found on CEUS after ablation, indicating complete ablation of all CMLNs. Table 2 shows that at the last follow-up, the mean largest diameter of CMLNs decreased from 7.76 ± 1.03 mm to 0.68 ± 1.66 mm (Group A) after MWA (p <0.05), from 13.33 ± 3.96 mm to 2.01 ± 4.54 mm (Group B) (p <0.05), and from 22.53 ± 5.69 mm to 5.67 ± 6.84 mm (Group C) (p <0.05); the mean volume decreased from 137.09 ± 55.50 mm3 to 8.00 ± 33.27 mm3 (Group A) (p <0.05), from 665.03 ± 536.72 mm3 to 93.63 ± 323.60 mm3 (Group B) (p <0.05), and from 1712.03 ± 1565.33 mm3 to 339.31 ± 567.31 mm3 (Group C) (p <0.05). Our results suggest that WMA is effective in reducing the diameter and volume of CMLNs. Compared with pre-ablation, which is shown in Table 3, the mean VRR% was 95.43 ± 19.49% (group A), 87.93 ± 34.36% (group B) and 81.44 ± 36.79% (group C), respectively. Our results showed that smaller diameter (Group A and Group B) lymph nodes, especially Group A, showed better volume reduction than the larger diameter CMLNs nodes.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Changes in cervical metastatic lymph nodes and sTg level post-ablation.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Changes in the VRR and complete disappearance rate after MWA of CMLNs.

After ablation, during the subsequent ultrasound follow-up, a total of 31 lymph nodes disappeared at 6 months, and a total of 39 lymph nodes disappeared at 12 months. In addition, 6 patients were found to have new CMLNs during follow-up after the initial ablation, which were subsequently ablated using MWA. No enhancement was seen on CEUS, and they disappeared at the 12-month follow-up. The complete disappearance rate of lymph nodes among the three groups were 12/19 (63.16%), 20/25(80%) and 7/15(46.67%), respectively, which is shown in Table 3. This suggests that lymph nodes in the 11-20 mm diameter range are more likely to disappear completely after MWA treatment, compared to smaller or larger lymph nodes. In terms of long-term efficacy, the tumor recurrence rate was Group C (2 cases, 14.29%) > Group B (2 cases, 8%)> Group A (1 case, 5.3%).

As shown in Table 2, compared to before ablation, the average levels of Serologic thyroglobulin (sTg) of the Group A, B and C at the last follow-up decreased from 5.69 ± 1.65 (ng/mL) to 1.20 ± 0.66 (ng/mL) (p <0.05), from 7.44 ± 2.53 (ng/mL) to 1.16 ± 0.53 (ng/mL) (p <0.05), and from 7.78 ± 2.02 (ng/mL) to 1.79 ± 0.74 (ng/mL) (p <0.05). As an indicator for monitoring the treatment efficacy and recurrence of thyroid cancer, the level of sTg will significantly decrease after microwave ablation. Furthermore, larger lymph nodes may face a higher risk of disease recurrence.

Complications

After MWA, no serious complications such as bleeding or local hematoma occurred. Six patients (Group A/Group B/Group C: 3/2/1) experienced mild pain and/or burning sensation, while three patients (Group A/Group B/Group C:1/0/2) experienced transient hoarseness, which was verified by fiberoptic laryngoscopy after MWA. Therefore, the total number of complications in the three groups in this study was 4 cases (Group A), 2 cases (Group B), and 3 cases (Group C) respectively. All discomfort disappeared within one month. No local infection, cervical hematoma, skin burns, or injury to the trachea, vagus nerve, or esophagus were observed.

Discussion

Given the difficulty of reoperation, minimally invasive thermal ablation techniques can locally control small lesions and become a new method for treating method (19, 20). In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of research on thermal ablation in the treatment of CMLNs of thyroid cancer, mostly including CMLNs between 10-20mm. Subgroup analyses are mostly based on the type of thermal ablation, such as MWA, radiofrequency ablation, and laser ablation (2123). Additionally, current studies indicate that MWA for treating LNM is an effective and safe strategy (24, 25). Therefore, this article will, for the first time, group based on the diameter of metastatic lymph nodes to explore the effectiveness and safety of MWA of LNs.

MWA for CMLN can be used as a safe and effective alternative treatment for high-risk patients or those who refuse surgery. Our research has found that MWA is an effective method for treating cervical lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer, with a low incidence of complications. When using the mean largest diameter and volume of MLN as grouping criteria, it was found that, compared to before surgery, the postoperative mean largest diameter and volume in the three groups were significantly reduced compared to before ablation (as shown in Table 2). The volume reduction rate (VRR) is commonly used as an indicator of ablation treatment efficacy, with treatment success defined as a reduction in tumor volume of over 50% (26, 27). It was found after the final follow-up that the VRR of groups A and B was greater than that of group C. CEUS examination at the final follow-up revealed that the complete disappearance rate of enlarged lymph nodes after ablation was higher in the first two groups (Group B > Group A) compared to the C group, with those not cleared showing small scar formation. And the tumor recurrence rate was Group C > Group B> Group A. Additionally, this study shows that sTg levels have significant predictive value in predicting disease metastasis and recurrence in patients with PTC (28, 29). However, due to difficulties in collecting complete data, TgAb can only be included in future studies to jointly evaluate tumor recurrence. From Table 2, it can be seen that there were statistically significant (p <0.05) differences in the pre- and post-ablation variables for all three groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that MWA is an effective method for treating PTC-CMLNs. Regarding the safety of ablation treatment, the overall complication rates for the three groups were 4/10, 2/25, and 3/14, respectively. The primary complications included mild pain and/or a burning sensation, as well as temporary voice changes. This indicates that while ablation therapy might introduce some side effects, these effects are generally mild and mostly temporary in nature. Overall, the safety of ablation therapy is relatively high, with a low incidence rate of complications, and the main complications are comparatively mild, having minimal long-term impact on patients’ health. Therefore, for patients with appropriate indications, ablation therapy can be considered a safe and effective treatment option.

MWA, as an invasive therapeutic technique, shows a certain relationship between its effectiveness and the size of the lesion (30, 31). Our research and previous studies (9, 15, 23) indicate that for smaller enlarged lymph nodes, microwave ablation can achieve good therapeutic effects. This is because their regular morphology and uniform heat conduction are conducive to complete thermal coagulation and reduced damage to surrounding tissues. However, the effectiveness of microwave ablation may be limited for larger diameter lymph node metastases, as their irregular shapes and complex internal structures, along with uneven heat conduction, may result in residual active tumor cells and complications. Additionally, for patients with larger diameter lymph nodes, after thermal ablation, the tumor size can decrease, which helps control tumor growth, alleviate patient symptoms and discomfort, increase the feasibility of surgery or radiotherapy/chemotherapy, and protect organ function. Therefore, it is important to note that although smaller lymph nodes have better treatment results, this does not mean that all patients with larger lymph nodes cannot benefit from microwave ablation. Microwave ablation remains a viable treatment option for patients whose surgical risks are too high or for whom other treatments are ineffective. Therefore, when selecting microwave ablation for the treatment of enlarged lymph nodes, it can be an effective treatment method that benefits patients, whether they have smaller or larger diameters. For patients with larger diameters who wish to achieve better therapeutic effects, it may be necessary to combine other treatment methods, such as surgical resection, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, to achieve optimal results (32).

There are some limitations in this study. Firstly, it is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size. Potential biases in comparing the efficacy and safety among the three groups of patients may have affected the objectivity and generalizability of the research results. Furthermore, this study focuses on the treatment of cancer with a follow-up period of only 1 year, lacking long-term follow-up observations on treatment outcomes. This limitation may have affected the comprehensive assessment of the treatment efficacy. Therefore, conclusions should be drawn with caution. Lastly, therefore, prospective, large-sample, and long-term follow-up studies are needed for future research.

In conclusion, microwave ablation (MWA) emerges as a safe and effective treatment for cervical metastatic lymph nodes from papillary carcinoma. Our study, supported by a 12-month follow-up, underscores the significant short-term benefits of managing localized lymph nodes affected by oncological diseases. Although MWA demonstrates advantages in treating smaller localized lymph nodes, its efficacy may diminish for larger diameters. Therefore, cautious consideration is advised in practical applications, and personalized treatment plans should be tailored based on a thorough evaluation of additional evidence.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

XX: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft. XC: Validation, Writing – original draft. JW: Writing – review & editing. PL: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration. YZ: Writing – original draft, Software, Visualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Boucai L, Zafereo M, Cabanillas ME. Thyroid cancer: A review. JAMA. (2024) 331:425–35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Welch HG, Doherty GM. Saving thyroids - overtreatment of small papillary cancers. N Engl J Med. (2018) 379:310–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1804426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Ward MH, Sabra MM, Devesa SS. Thyroid cancer incidence patterns in the United States by histologic type, 1992-2006. Thyroid. (2011) 21:125–34. doi: 10.1089/thy.2010.0021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wang Y, Duan Y, Li H, Yue K, Liu J, Lai Q, et al. Detection of thyroglobulin in fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of metastatic lateral cervical lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective study. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:909723. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.909723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Chung SR, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Sung TY, Song DE, Kim TY, et al. Risk factors for metastasis in indeterminate lymph nodes in preoperative patients with thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol. (2022) 32:3863–8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08478-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Davies L, Hoang JK. Thyroid cancer in the USA: current trends and outstanding questions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2021) 9:11–2. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30372-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Xu D, Ge M, Yang A, Cheng R, Sun H, Wang H, et al. Expert consensus workshop report: Guidelines for thermal ablation of thyroid tumors (2019 edition). J Cancer Res Ther. (2020) 16:960–6. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_558_19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cabanillas ME, McFadden DG, Durante C. Thyroid cancer. Lancet. (2016) 388:2783–95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30172-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 american thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the american thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. (2016) 26:1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Burman KD. Treatment of recurrent or persistent cervical node metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer: deceptively simple options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:2623–5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tufano RP, Mohamed Ali K. The year in surgical thyroidology: recent technological developments and future challenges. Thyroid. (2022) 32:14–8. doi: 10.1089/thy.2021.0590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mauri G, Orsi F, Carriero S, Della Vigna P, De Fiori E, Monzani D, et al. Image-guided thermal ablation as an alternative to surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: preliminary results of an Italian experience. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2020) 11:575152. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.575152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Teng D, Ding L, Wang Y, Liu C, Xia Y, Wang H. Safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided low power microwave ablation in the treatment of cervical metastatic lymph node from papillary thyroid carcinoma: a mean of 32 months follow-up study. Endocrine. (2018) 62:648–54. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1711-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cao XJ, Wei Y, Zhao ZL, Peng LL, Li Y, Yu MA. Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for cervical metastatic lymph nodes arising post resection of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. (2020) 37:450–5. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1759829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Mauri G, Hegedus L, Bandula S, Cazzato RL, Czarniecka A, Dudeck O, et al. European thyroid association and cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of europe 2021 clinical practice guideline for the use of minimally invasive treatments in Malignant thyroid lesions. Eur Thyroid J. (2021) 10:185–97. doi: 10.1159/000516469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ito Y, Miyauchi A. Active surveillance as first-line management of papillary microcarcinoma. Annu Rev Med. (2019) 70:369–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051517-125510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Shin JE, Baek JH, Lee JH. Radiofrequency and ethanol ablation for the treatment of recurrent thyroid cancers: current status and challenges. Curr Opin Oncol. (2013) 25:14–9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32835a583d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mauri G, Pacella CM, Papini E, Solbiati L, Goldberg SN, Ahmed M, et al. Image-guided thyroid ablation: proposal for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Thyroid. (2019) 29:611–8. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Cho SJ, Baek SM, Na DG, Lee KD, Shong YK, Baek JH. Five-year follow-up results of thermal ablation for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. (2021) 31:6446–56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07808-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Dong P, Teng DK, Sui GQ, Lin YQ, Luo Q, Wang QM, et al. Long-term efficacy of microwave ablation for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a 5-year follow-up study. Eur Radiol. (2024) 34:715–23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10117-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Offi C, Misso C, Antonelli G, Esposito MG, Brancaccio U, Spiezia S. Laser ablation treatment of recurrent lymph node metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:5295. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Guang Y, Luo YK, Zhang Y, Zhang MB, Li N, Zhang Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for cervical lymph nodes metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. (2018) 40:67–71. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2018.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Han ZY, Dou JP, Cheng ZG, Liu FY, Yu J, Yu XL, et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for cervical metastatic lymph nodes from papillary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. (2020) 37:971–5. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1805128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gao X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Huang Y. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency, microwave and laser ablation for the treatment of T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma on a large scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia. (2023) 40:2244713. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2244713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhu Y, Wang Y, Liu F, Liao Y, Wang Q, Xiao X. Thermal ablation for cervical lymph node metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Med (Baltimore). (2022) 101:e32193. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032193

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yue W, Chen L, Wang S, Yu S. Locoregional control of recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma by ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation: A prospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. (2015) 31:403–8. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1014433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Baek JH, Kim YS, Sung JY, Choi H, Lee JH. Locoregional control of metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer by ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2011) 197:W331–6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5345

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Peiris AN, Medlock D, Gavin M. Thyroglobulin for monitoring for thyroid cancer recurrence. JAMA. (2019) 321:1228. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Woeber KA. The significance of thyroglobulin antibodies in papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Pract. (2016) 22:1132–3. doi: 10.4158/EP161367.CO

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Shakeri S, Afshari Mirak S, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, Pantuck A, Sisk A, Ahuja P, et al. The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas. Abdom Radiol (NY). (2019) 44:2308–15. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Guo MH, Dou JP, Zheng L, Liu FY, Yu J, Cheng ZG, et al. Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation versus surgery for solitary T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. (2024) 34:569–78. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09908-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Han ZY, Dou JP, Zheng L, Che Y, Yu MA, Wang SR, et al. Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation for the treatment of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. (2023) 33:7942–51. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09802-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microwave ablation, lymph node, papillary thyroid carcinoma, ultrasound, metastasis

Citation: Xiao X, Chen X, Li J, Li P and Zhu Y (2024) Microwave ablation for lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer: the impact of lymph node diameter. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1430693. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1430693

Received: 10 May 2024; Accepted: 19 July 2024;
Published: 06 August 2024.

Edited by:

Claudio Casella, University of Brescia, Italy

Reviewed by:

Leonardo Rossi, University of Pisa, Italy
Adnan Işgör, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Türkiye

Copyright © 2024 Xiao, Chen, Li, Li and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Pei Li, 1074615323@qq.com; Yun Zhu, zhuyun@hnucm.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

ORCID: Jingwei Li, orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-6723

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.