The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1429193
Causes of Embryo Implantation Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Procedures to Increase Embryo Implantation Potential
Provisionally accepted- 1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
- 2 University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Campania, Italy
- 3 National Institute of Health (ISS), Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 4 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- 5 Centre for Assisted Fertilization (CFA), Naples, Campania, Italy
- 6 Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 7 Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Infertility is characterized by the failure to conceive after 12 months of unprotected sexual intercourse. In assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs), in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) are pivotal, with the quality of embryo quality essential for successful implantation.Objective: This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to explore the prevalence of embryonic factors involved in the implantation process, concentrating on the following research inquiries: 1) the implantation rates of euploid versus untested embryo transfers; 2) the efficiency of transferring good embryos in different age groups; 3) the impact of age on good embryo transfers to gestational carriers; and 4) the transfer of donated gametes/embryos. The goal is to identify critical points in implantation to improve therapies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified 1474 relevant papers, 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. The information was gathered using a standardized form, and the risk of bias was evaluated. A meta-analysis of subgroups to determine euploid embryo transfer efficiency was conducted to synthesize and explore the results. Furthermore, data extracted from registries document the persistent secondary role of extraembryonic determinants in successful implantation. Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) significantly increased the odds of implantation. Age was found to influence extraembryonic factors, with older women experiencing reduced embryo implantation as gestational carriers. However, the overall incidence of extraembryonic factors was low. This review highlights the need to focus on PGT-A, diagnostic hysteroscopy, and endometrial receptivity for improving implantation rates. Conclusion: Implantation success in ARTs largely depends on embryo euploidy.While achieving three euploid embryos greatly increases success rates, it is challenging in older women. Extraembryonic factors, although present, have a marginal impact. Subsequent studies ought to concentrate on modulating endometrial responses immunologically and developing algorithms to improve the precision of predicting implantation success; as well as the timing of endometrial receptivity and the occurrence of dormant embryo phenomena also warrants further investigation.
Keywords: Gestational Carriers, Clinical pregnancy outcomes, assisted reproductive technologies, Infertility, Implantation failure, euploid embryo transfer
Received: 07 May 2024; Accepted: 31 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Bulletti, Sciorio, Conforti, De Luca, Bulletti, Palagiano, Berrettini, Scaravelli and Pierson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Romualdo Sciorio, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, 1011, Vaud, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.