Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1423227
This article is part of the Research Topic Cardiovascular Diseases Related to Diabetes and Obesity - Volume V View all 8 articles

The predictive value of triglyceride glucose index combined with Cystatin C for the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome

Provisionally accepted
Chen Wang Chen Wang Pinliang Liao Pinliang Liao *Chuanqin Tang Chuanqin Tang Chunlin Chen Chunlin Chen Xiaoyu Zhang Xiaoyu Zhang Pinliang Liao Pinliang Liao
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Army Medical University, Chongqing,China, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Recent studies have shown that the triglyceride glucose index (TyG) and cystatin C (CysC) are closely related to cardiovascular disease, but there is limited research on the prognosis of patients who with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study is to explore the predictive value of the combination of TyG index and CysC in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in ACS patients who underwent PCI. Methods: This retrospective study included 319 ACS patients who underwent PCI. The clinical endpoint is the occurrence of MACEs, including all-cause mortality, heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and angina requiring hospitalization. Patients were classified into MACEs group (65 cases) and non-MACEs group (254 cases). Univariate factor and multivariate analysis were used to identify predictors of MACEs. Receiver operating curve (ROC curve) of prediction model of MACEs were drew. Additionally, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index were calculated to further assess the additional predictive value of the risk factors for MACEs. Subgroup and interaction analysis between the TyG index and CysC with MACEs were draw in various subgroups. Patients were stratified according to the optimal cutoff point value of the TyG index and the CysC determined by ROC curve analysis. The Kaplan Meier analysis method was used to construct a survival curve one year after PCI. Results: During a median follow-up period of 14 months, 65 (20.38%) patients had experienced at least one primary end-point event. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated the TyG index and the CysC were independently associated with the increased risk of MACEs after PCI(OR, 2.513; 95% CI 1.451–4.351; P= 0.001, OR, 4.741; 95% CI 1.344–16.731; P=0.016,respectively). The addition of the TyG index and the CysC to the baseline risk model had the strongest incremental effect for predicting MACEs in terms of the C-statistic from 0.789 (95% CI 0.723-0.855, P<0.001) to 0.799 (95% CI 0.733-0.865, P<0.001). Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated the TyG index greater than 9.325, and the CysC greater than 1.065mg/ml were significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs (log‐rank, all P < 0.01).

    Keywords: Triglyceride glucose index, Cystatin C, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Major adverse cardiovascular event, predictive biomarkers

    Received: 25 Apr 2024; Accepted: 22 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Liao, Tang, Chen, Zhang and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Pinliang Liao, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Army Medical University, Chongqing,China, Chongqing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.