Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1420499
This article is part of the Research Topic The Association of Other Autoimmune Diseases in Patients with Thyroid Autoimmunity: Volume II View all 17 articles

Evaluating the causal effects between Grave's disease and diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Provisionally accepted
Yuhan Zhang Yuhan Zhang 1,2,3Liuxiang Fu Liuxiang Fu 1*
  • 1 Emergency Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No.1 Minde Road, Nanchang 330006, China., Nanchang, China
  • 2 General Surgery Center, Department of Thyroid Surgery, The 1st Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, China, Changchun, China
  • 3 Department of General Surgery, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: To investigate the causality between Grave's Disease (GD) and Diabetes mellitus (DM), we designed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) studies.Methods: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GD, thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), type 1 diabetes (T1D), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS and FinnGen biobank databases. For the forward MR study, we used GD (sample size = 458,620) as the exposure and T1D (sample size = 520,580) and T2D (sample size = 211,766) as the outcomes. Next, high risk of T1D and T2D were used as exposure variables, and GD was used as the outcome variable for the reverse MR analysis. Finally, MVMR analysis was conducted to investigate the probable relationship between DM and indicators for thyroid function like TPO, Tg, and TSH. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main method. Finally, the heterogeneity and sensitivity were assessed.Results: There were 27, 88, and 55 SNPs associated with GD, T1D, and T2D, respectively. A significant causal connection between higher genetic liability of GD and the risk of T1D (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval, CI] = 1.411 [1.077-1.848], P = 0.012) and T2D (OR [95% CI] = 1.059 [1.025-1.095], P = 5.53e-04) was found in the forward MR analysis. However, reverse MR suggested that there was a genetic susceptibility to T1D that increased the likelihood of developing GD (OR [95% CI] = 1.059 [1.025-1.095], P = 5.53e-04), while T2D did not (OR [95% CI] = 0.963 [0.870-1.066], P = 0.468). Furthermore, there was inadequate evidence to suggest that abnormal TSH, TPO, and Tg levels increase the risk of incident T1D or T2D in individuals with GD. MVMR revealed no causal relationship among Tg, TSH, TPO, T1D, or T2D.There was no increased risk of T1D with an increase in genetic susceptibility to GD, although higher genetic susceptibility to T1D has been shown to be associated with increased risk of developing GD. A unidirectional causal relationship between the genetic liability for GD and increased risk of T2D was observed using MR analyses.

    Keywords: Graves' disease, Mendelian randomization, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, autoimmune disease

    Received: 20 Apr 2024; Accepted: 01 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Liuxiang Fu, Emergency Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No.1 Minde Road, Nanchang 330006, China., Nanchang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.