Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Endocrinol., 05 June 2024
Sec. Obesity
This article is part of the Research Topic Multi-organ Linkage Pathophysiology and Therapy for NAFLD and NASH View all 12 articles

Editorial: Multi-organ linkage pathophysiology and therapy for NAFLD and NASH

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
  • 2Consultation Center for Liver Diseases, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
  • 3Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • 4Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Discipline of Neuroscience, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), now referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), respectively, are major public health problems associated with obesity and diabetes (1, 2). Their complex pathophysiology involves multiple organs and metabolic pathways, challenging diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment. This Research Topic, “Multi-organ linkage pathophysiology and therapy for NAFLD and NASH”, provides new perspectives on organ linkages, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies for the management of NAFLD/MASLD and NASH/MASH.

Extrahepatic malignancy risk

Previous studies have examined extrahepatic malignancy risk in NAFLD (3, 4), but often overlooked the influence of obesity on cancer risk. To address this gap, Albhaisi et al. matched NAFLD patients with a non-NAFLD group to minimize confounding and found no increased extrahepatic cancer risk in NAFLD. However, given the robust negative impact of obesity on carcinogenesis and the strong association between NAFLD and obesity, carcinogenesis in NAFLD warrants some attention in general practice, as previous studies have shown.

Algorithm for assessing liver fibrosis risk in non-obese MAFLD

Asians, due to their genetic background, may encounter unique circumstances regarding the prognosis of non-obese (lean) NAFLD (5). Lee et al., researchers in Hong Kong, have proposed a distinctive sequential algorithm to assess liver fibrosis risk in non-diabetic overweight/obese individuals with metabolic dysfunction-related fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This algorithm integrates aspartate aminotransferase (AST) abnormalities and HOMA-IR≥2.5, alongside elastography, to stratify liver fibrosis risk in this population. Similar AST levels and liver fibrosis associations have been noted in other Asian cohorts, supporting these findings (6).

Predicting fibrosis stage undergoing bariatric surgery

Bariatric surgery is emerging as a beneficial treatment for NAFLD/NASH. Huang et al. studied 373 patients who underwent intraoperative liver biopsy during bariatric surgery in China. They aimed to predict fibrosis stage F2 or higher (9.1%) using noninvasive models. In multivariate analysis, age, diabetes, c-peptide, and AST were significant predictors. Models like APRI, FIB-4, and HFS showed predictive accuracies (AUC: 0.745–0.781). These predictive abilities are expected to improve combined with MRI/US elastography and previously reported markers (7, 8).

Comparative efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in NAFLD

Novel therapeutics targeting G protein-coupled receptors are in development for obesity and diabetes (9). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for managing obesity and diabetes mellitus, necessitating an understanding of how different GLP-1RA formulations impact outcomes. Yuan et al. conducted a network meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials, finding that twice-daily exenatide was most effective in reducing liver fat content, while once-daily semaglutide showed superior efficacy in reducing AST and ALT levels.

Folate levels and NAFLD risk in adolescents

Folic acid deficiency heightens NAFLD risk in adults (10). Wen et al. used NHANES to study folate levels and NAFLD in adolescents (12–19 years). They found serum total folate or 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate negatively correlated with CAP or liver stiffness. Mechanisms explored included inhibited lipid metabolism, impaired lipid transport, and folate-induced reductions in blood glucose and lipid concentrations.

The liver-brain axis

Mai and Mao conducted a study investigating the causal relationship between NAFLD and cortical structure. They used Mendelian randomization methodology, incorporating genetic predictors of NAFLD and liver adiposity, alongside summary statistics from the ENIGMA Consortium’s genome-wide association study (GWAS). The findings revealed associations between NAFLD and liver adiposity with decreased surface area of the parahippocampal gyrus and increased thickness of the entorhinal cortex. These results suggest that NAFLD is linked to structural alterations in specific brain regions, emphasizing the potential influence of the hepatic-brain axis.

The liver-bone axis

In a review by Chondrogianni et al., the link between NAFLD and osteoporosis was explored through experimental and clinical evidence. Both diseases are prevalent globally, often coexisting. Emerging data suggest common molecular pathways like sarcopenia, the RANKL-OPG-RANK pathway, and the Wnt pathway (11). However, not all epidemiological studies confirm a direct association. Comprehensive understanding of the liver-bone axis requires large prospective cohort studies and intervention trials supported by robust basic research.

Closing remarks

This Research Topic incorporates a variety of research articles utilizing database studies, a valuable method for examining numerous cases and outcomes. However, we also stress the importance of cohort studies for the certainty of NAFLD diagnosis and detailed presentation of individual cases, supported by liver biopsy tissue diagnosis. By uncovering key mechanisms and identifying novel therapeutic targets, these studies will aid in developing personalized approaches for managing NAFLD/MASLD and NASH/MASH.

Author contributions

TK: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. TY: Writing – review & editing. GE: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

As Guest Editor of the Research Topic, I would like to express my deep appreciation to all authors whose valuable work was published under this issue and thus contributed to the success of the edition.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Suzuki K, Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Takahashi Y, Yamazaki Y, Uchihara N, et al. Concordance between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. (2024). doi: 10.1111/hepr.14011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tamaki N, Wakabayashi SI, Kimura T, Yasui Y, Tsuchiya K, Nakanishi H, et al. Glycemic control target for liver and cardiovascular events risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Hepatol Res. (2024). doi: 10.1111/hepr.14025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Allen AM, Hicks SB, Mara KC, Larson JJ, Therneau TM. The risk of incident extrahepatic cancers is higher in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease than obesity - A longitudinal cohort study. J Hepatol. (2019) 71:1229–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kim GA, Lee HC, Choe J, Kim MJ, Lee MJ, Chang HS, et al. Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cancer incidence rate. J Hepatol. (2017) S0168-8278(17):32294–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.09.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Cho Y, Chang Y, Ryu S, Wild SH, Byrne CD. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease without overlapping metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes. Liver Int. (2023) 43:2445–54. doi: 10.1111/liv.15661

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fujimori N, Kimura T, Tanaka N, Yamazaki T, Okumura T, Kobayashi H, et al. 2-Step PLT16-AST44 method: Simplified liver fibrosis detection system in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. (2022) 52:352–63. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13745

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tamaki N, Imajo K, Sharpton S, Jung J, Kawamura N, Yoneda M, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography plus Fibrosis-4 versus FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase in detection of candidates for pharmacological treatment of NASH-related fibrosis. Hepatology. (2022) 75:661–72. doi: 10.1002/hep.32145

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kozumi K, Kodama T, Murai H, Sakane S, Govaere O, Cockell S, et al. Transcriptomics identify thrombospondin-2 as a biomarker for NASH and advanced liver fibrosis. Hepatology. (2021) 74:2452–66. doi: 10.1002/hep.31995

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kimura T, Singh S, Tanaka N, Umemura T. Role of G protein-coupled receptors in hepatic stellate cells and approaches to anti-fibrotic treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:773432. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.773432

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sid V, Siow YL, O K. Role of folate in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. (2017) 95:1141–8. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2016-0681

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lee HJ, Lee DC, Kim CO. Association between 10-year fracture probability and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with or without sarcopenia in korean men: A nationwide population-based cross-sectional study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:599339. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.599339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), multi-organ linkage

Citation: Kimura T, Yamazaki T and Estrela GR (2024) Editorial: Multi-organ linkage pathophysiology and therapy for NAFLD and NASH. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1418066. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1418066

Received: 16 April 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2024;
Published: 05 June 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Katherine Samaras, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Australia

Copyright © 2024 Kimura, Yamazaki and Estrela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Takefumi Kimura, kimuratakefumii@yahoo.co.jp; t_kimura@shinshu-u.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.