Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1412369

A Comprehensive Analysis of Erectile Dysfunction Prevalence and the Impact of Prostate Conditions on ED Among US Adults: Evidence from NHANES 2001-2004

Provisionally accepted
Yuhao Zhang Yuhao Zhang 1Fanlu Lin Fanlu Lin 1*Xue Liu Xue Liu 2*Jing Zhang Jing Zhang 3*
  • 1 Linyi Central Hospital, Yishui, China
  • 2 Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Erectile dysfunction (ED) is characterized by the inability to achieve or maintain penile erection sufficient for intercourse. While previous research suggests a potential link between ED and prostate pathologies, the association between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, prostatic cancer (PCa), and ED remains to be elucidated.Data from participants (40-80 years, n=2225) were extracted from the NHANES [2001][2002][2003][2004] for this observational study. The investigation encompassed the following aspects: assessment of ED prevalence within subgroups, comparison of baseline characteristics between individuals with and without ED, analysis of associations between BPH, prostatitis, PCa, and ED using multivariable weighted logistic regression in the 40-60 and 60-80 age groups and subgroup analysis based on body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status.Among the 2225 participants, the weighted prevalence of ED was 27.47%, with 16.17% in the 40-60 years age group and 56.98% in the 60-80 years age group. BPH had an ED prevalence of 47.57%, prostatitis 34.62%, and PCa 85.62%. Comparative analysis between ED and non-ED groups revealed significant differences in education levels, PIR, smoking and alcohol status, creatinine, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, BPH, and PCa. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified BPH as an independent risk factor for ED in the 60-80 years age group (OR=1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.18, P=0.02), and PCa was positively associated with ED in both the 40-60 years group (OR=11.90; 95% CI, 1.41-100.50, P=0.03) and the 40-80 years group (OR=7.30; 95% CI, 2.12-25.08, P=0.01). No clear correlation was found between prostatitis and ED. Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between BPH and ED was significant in non-diabetic, overweight/obese, and smoking groups, while the association between PCa and ED was more pronounced in non-diabetic, hypertensive individuals across all body mass index (BMI) categories, and in both smoking and non-smoking groups. Prostatitis showed no significant relationship with ED in any subgroup.The study established BPH and PCa as significant risk factors for ED, with no substantial link detected between prostatitis and ED. This finding highlights the necessity for tailored screening and management protocols for individuals with BPH and PCa to mitigate the burden of ED.

    Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Prostatitis, Prostatic cancer (Pca), Erectile Dysfunction, national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

    Received: 04 Apr 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Lin, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Fanlu Lin, Linyi Central Hospital, Yishui, 276400, China
    Xue Liu, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, Shandong Province, China
    Jing Zhang, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, Shanghai Municipality, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.