Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1407329

Casual Effects of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Site-specific Digestive Cancers: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Weiming Deng Weiming Deng 1*Jinli Zhao Jinli Zhao 1Wenjin Li Wenjin Li 2Libo Chen Libo Chen 3Mingyong Li Mingyong Li 3
  • 1 The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China
  • 2 Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China
  • 3 Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: Despite several observational studies attempting to investigate the potential association between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and the risk of digestive cancers, the results remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a causal relationship between T1DM and the risk of digestive cancers.We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to systematically investigate the effect of T1DM on six most prevalent types of digestive cancers (oesophageal cancer, stomach cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer). A total of 1,588,872 individuals were enrolled in this analysis, with 372,756 being the highest number for oesophageal cancer and 3,835 being the lowest for pancreatic cancer. Multiple MR methods were performed to evaluate the causal association of T1DM with the risk of six site-specific cancers using genome-wide association study summary data. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to assess the robustness of the observed associations.We selected 35 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with T1DM as instrumental variables. Our findings indicate no significant effect of T1DM on the overall risk of oesophageal cancer (OR= 0.99992, 95% CI: 0.99979-1.00006, P= 0.2866), stomach cancer (OR=0.9298 ,95% CI: 0.92065-1.09466, P= 0.9298), hepatocellular carcinoma (OR= 0.99994 ,95% CI: 0.99987-1.00001, P= 0.1125), biliary tract cancer (OR=0.97348 ,95% CI: 0.8079-1.1729, P= 0.7775)), or pancreatic cancer (OR =1.01258 , 95% CI: 0.96243-1.06533, P= 0.6294). However, we observed a causal association between T1DM and colorectal cancer (OR=1.000, 95% CI: 1.00045-1.0012, P<0.001), indicating that T1DM increases the risk of colorectal cancer. We also performed sensitivity analyses, which showed no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. For the reverse MR from T1DM to six digestive cancers, no significant causal relationships were identified.In this MR study with a large number of digestive cancer cases, we found no evidence to support the causal role of T1DM in the risk of oesophageal cancer, stomach cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, or pancreatic cancer. However, we found a causal positive association between T1DM and colorectal cancer. Further large-scale prospective studies are necessary to replicate our findings.

    Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, Oesophageal cancer, stomach cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Biliary tract cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, colorectal cancer, Mendelian randomization

    Received: 26 Mar 2024; Accepted: 17 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Deng, Zhao, Li, Chen and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Weiming Deng, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.