Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 03 June 2024
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology

18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in the localization of tumor-induced osteomalacia: case series and literature review

  • Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Introduction: This study explores tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) through a case series and literature review, assessing the diagnostic potential of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (18F-OC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

Methods: We analyzed TIO patients who underwent 18F-OC PET/CT. Parameters such as tumor dimension, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were meticulously assessed. Clinical features and imaging characteristics pertinent to TIO were reviewed.

Results: 6 patients with clinical suspicion of TIO exhibited hypophosphatemia (0.25 to 0.64 mmol/L), elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (142 to 506 U/L), and increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (92.9 to 281.7 pg/mL). Of these patients, two underwent FGF-23 testing, with results of 3185.00 pg/ml and 17.56 pg/ml, respectively. Conventional imaging modalities depicted widespread osteoporosis, with several cases demonstrating fractures indicative of osteomalacic and associated pathological fractures. Subsequent 18F-OC PET/CT facilitated the accurate localization of causative tumors, with histopathological examination confirming the diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT). The interval from initial clinical presentation to definitive TIO diagnosis spanned approximately 2.5 years (range: 1 - 4 years), with tumors varying in size (maximum diameter: 7.8 to 40.0 mm), SUVmax (5.47 to 25.69), SUVmean (3.43 to 7.26), and MTV (1.27 to 18.59 cm3).

Conclusion: The implementation of whole-body 18F-OC PET/CT imaging emerges as a critical tool in the identification of occult tumors causing TIO. Future investigations incorporating a broader cohort are imperative to further delineate the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of 18F-OC PET/CT in managing TIO.

Introduction

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome, primarily caused by the overproduction of phosphatonins, such as fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), by mesenchymal tumors. The biochemical hallmark of TIO includes renal phosphate wasting-induced hypophosphatemia, elevated levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), inappropriately normal or frankly low 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and inappropriately normal or elevated FGF23 levels (1, 2). The surgical excision of the tumor represents the definitive therapeutic intervention, necessitating the precise detection and localization of the tumors as a prerequisite for the potential curative approach to TIO (3, 4). Nonetheless, these tumors frequently present asymptomatically, are diminutive in size, exhibit slow growth, and can be located anywhere within the body, from the skull to the feet, rendering the diagnostic process exceedingly challenging (5). This necessitates the employment of multimodal imaging techniques for accurate tumor localization. The general unfamiliarity with TIO among clinicians often leads to diagnostic inaccuracies and overlooked diagnoses. 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (18F-OC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) represents a novel molecular imaging modality, targeting somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors, and holds promise for application in evaluating neuroendocrine tumors. However, its efficacy in the assessment of TIO remains to be fully ascertained (6). This article delineates 6 cases of TIO accurately localized and pathologically diagnosed using 18F-OC PET/CT imaging, coupled with an analytical summary based on relevant literature to augment understanding of this condition.

Methods

This study retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical and imaging data for 6 patients with suspected TIO, who underwent 18F-OC PET/CT imaging at the PET Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2022 and January 2024. All cases were pathologically confirmed as PMT. We gathered data on demographic details (gender and age), clinical manifestations, disease duration, tumor location, and serum levels of phosphate, ALP, PTH,1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D, and FGF23. Additionally, information on tumor biopsy and imaging findings from CT and MRI scans was compiled. The 18F-OC PET/CT examination data were processed using Siemens syngo software at the imaging station. PMTs typically occur in a wide range of locations, hence patients suspected of having PMTs usually require a PET/CT scan that covers the entire body from the skull to the feet. The tumor region of interest (ROI) was manually delineated, and with a threshold set at a standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2.5, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were automatically calculated. Informed consent for the publication of case reports and associated images was obtained from all participating patients, who are currently under follow-up. The study received approval from the institutional ethics committee (approval number: 2023–1234).

Results

Case 1

A 75-year-old woman presented with a two-year history of progressive polyarticular pain. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT scan conducted one year prior identified multiple non-traumatic fractures across the right ilium, left femur, and bilateral pubic bones. Bone scintigraphy showed several areas of increased bone metabolism, initially suggestive of old fractures. Laboratory analyses revealed hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.25 to 0.64 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), elevated ALP levels ranging from 173 to 257 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), and increased PTH at 104.8 pg/mL (normal range, 15- 65 pg/mL). Subsequent investigation with an 18F-OC PET/CT scan identified a soft tissue tumor (Figures 1A–D) measuring 27.0 × 22.0 mm in the right sphenoid sinus, characterized by a markedly high metabolic uptake (SUVmax = 14.24, SUVmean = 4.78, MTV = 18.59 cm3). Common metabolic parameters in PET imaging, such as SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV, are crucial for assessing tumor diagnostics and therapy. A CT scan of the sphenoid sinus revealed a mass-like lesion with patchy high-density calcifications, well-defined margins, and partial osseous destruction of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses, extending to the medial wall of the right orbit. Contrast-enhanced MRI showed the lesion in the right nasal cavity-ethmoid sinus exhibiting heterogeneous T1 and T2 signals with uneven enhancement. Reviewing prior 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, the lesion was initially misinterpreted as inflammation due to its low metabolic uptake. An endoscopic biopsy of the sinonasal cavity was performed, with histopathology indicating a spindle cell tumor in the right nasal cavity. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for Beta-catenin, BRG1, INI-1, CD34, H3K27me3, DOG-1, Cyclin D1, ERG, SSTR2, Vimentin, CD56, and SATB2, and negative for S-100, SOX10, STAT6, SMA, Desmin, CD99, CK(AE1/AE3), ER, PR, GFAP, EMA, P53, HMB45, and Melan-A. The proliferation index Ki-67 was noted at 15%.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Representation of different locations of the tumors of all patients. (A, E, I, M, Q, U) Axial view of the tumors in 18F-OC PET (black arrow). (B, F, J, N, R, V) Axial view of the tumors in CT. (C, G, K, O, S, W) Fusion image. (D, H, L, P, T, X) Maximum-intensity projection (MIP) image of the patients (black arrow).

Case 2

A 44-year-old man presented with activity-related pain in his left hip joint, persisting for over three years. Initially diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, attributed to an elevated rheumatoid factor, the patient experienced symptomatic relief following treatment. Nonetheless, upon self-discontinuation of medication, the pain extended to the right hip joint, lumbar-sacral region, and bilateral intercosal areas. Bone density evaluation indicated osteoporosis. Laboratory investigation revealed a rheumatoid factor of 227.0 IU/ml (normal range, <19.5 IU/ml), hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), elevated ALP levels ranging from 229 to 328 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), PTH at 92.88 pg/mL (normal range, 15- 65 pg/mL), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ranging from 12.7 to 17.6 mg/L (normal range, < 5 mg/L). An 18F-OC PET/CT scan revealed a quasi-circular, metabolically active bone tumor (Figures 1E–H) measuring 16.2 × 11.9 mm on the left femoral neck with significant metabolic uptake (SUVmax = 18.01, SUVmean = 6.16, MTV = 1.95 cm3). Hip joint CT scans displayed no discernible abnormalities. Contrast-enhanced MRI identified intertrochanteric sheet-like changes in the left femoral neck, exhibiting prolonged T1 and T2 signals and uneven enhancement, indicative of a potential left femoral neck base and intertrochanteric fracture, accompanied by surrounding bone marrow edema and localized granuloma proliferation. Subsequent left femoral tumor excision surgery was performed, with histopathological examination revealing spindle cell proliferation with mild atypia and a presence of basophilic material. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for SATB2, and negative for H3.3G34W, CD68, SMA, Desmin, S-100, and CD34. The proliferation index Ki-67 was 1%. Remarkably, the patient’s serum phosphate levels normalized within one week post-operatively.

Case 3

A 65-year-old woman presented with a two-year history of chronic hypophosphatemia and escalating bone pain. Bone densitometry revealed significant mass loss, documented as -1.4 at the right hip joint and -1.8 at the spine, unresponsive to calcium supplementation. Laboratory analyses revealed hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.38 to 0.55 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), elevated ALP levels ranging from 166 to 206 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), elevated PTH levels ranging from 115.0 to 244.0 pg/mL (normal range, 15- 65 pg/mL), with a positive syphilis antibody. An 18F-FDG PET/CT scan conducted one month prior revealed multiple non-traumatic fractures in both ribs and the right pubic bone. Subsequent 18F-OC PET/CT scan identified a highly metabolic, quasi-circular bone tumor (Figures 1I–L) measuring 7.8 × 6.1 mm at the proximal left femur with significant uptake (SUVmax= 23.65, SUVmean = 7.13, MTV = 1.27 cm3). CT scans showed the tumor’s irregular shape and indistinct boundaries, involving the posterior cortex and subcortex with slight peripheral sclerosis, suggesting a potential tumor in the posterior segment of the left femoral proximal lesser trochanter. Enhanced MRI revealed abnormal signals beneath both the left femoral trochanter and the right pubic branch, characterized by long T1 and T2 signals, marked enhancement, and a pathological fracture beneath the right pubic branch. Reviewing the previous 18F-FDG PET/CT scans revealed a slight increase in metabolic activity at the proximal end of the left femoral (SUVmax = 4.27). The patient underwent surgical resection of the affected area at the left femoral proximal end, with pathology indicating clustered small round cell formation within the tumor. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for Beta-catenin, SMA, CD34, CD56, ERG, SSTR2 and SATB2, and negative for Desmin, P53, S-100, SOX10, STAT6 and CK(AE1/AE3). The proliferation index Ki-67 was 5%.

Case 4

A 64-year-old woman was admitted with a year-long history of general malaise and two months of untreated hypophosphatemia. Laboratory analyses revealed hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.42 to 0.55 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), ALP at 142 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), and PTH at 281.7 pg/mL (normal range, 15- 65 pg/mL). An 18F-OC PET/CT scan detected a soft tissue tumor (Figures 1M–P) measuring 16.6 × 11.9 mm within the left nasal cavity and ethmoid sinus, showing abnormal metabolic uptake (SUVmax = 25.69, SUVmean = 7.26, MTV = 3.66 cm3). Enhanced CT imaging revealed the tumor’s presence across the left frontal sinus-anterior ethmoid sinus-maxillary sinus, characterized by uneven density and linear, punctate calcifications, with notable ring and strip enhancement post-contrast. MRI findings suggested inflammation in the left maxillary, frontal, and ethmoid sinuses, raising suspicions of a concurrent fungal infection. Focal resection of the left ethmoid sinus was performed, with pathology identifying a spindle cell lesion, chronic mucosal inflammation in the left ethmoid bulla, and a likely Aspergillus infection in the left maxillary sinus. Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for CD34, CK(AE1/AE3), CD56, SATB2, ERG, and SSTR2, and negative for S-100, SOX10, Beta-catenin, SMA, Desmin, Calponin, P63, STAT6, EMA, Syn, and PAX3(2q36). Postoperative management led to normalization of phosphate levels within two weeks, and PTH levels within 6 weeks.

Case 5

A 53-year-old man developed left foot pain after a sprain, which was followed by widespread body pains, including the right foot, both hip joints, and the lumbar spine, over four years. Bilateral femoral neck fractures from an accidental fall five months prior showed no improvement after conservative treatment. Laboratory analyses revealed hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.32 to 0.63 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), elevated ALP levels ranging from 442 to 506 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein at 132.3 mg/L (normal range, < 5 mg/L), and FGF-23 at 3185.0 pg/ml (normal range, 23.3- 95.4 pg/ml). An 18F-OC PET/CT scan identified a significantly metabolically active soft tissue tumor (Figures 1Q–T) measuring 40.0 × 30.0 mm in the left foot with increased uptake (SUVmax = 5.47, SUVmean = 3.43, MTV = 11.82 cm3). CT imaging showed the mass with heterogeneous internal density. Surgical resection of the left foot tumor was performed, revealing proliferative ovoid cells with mild atypia, indistinct nucleoli, osteoclastic multinucleated giant cell reaction, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposition. Immunohistochemistry was positive for SSTR2, SATB2, CD56, CD163, CD68, and ERG, and negative for S-100, Syn, Desmin, P63, CD34, H3.3G34W, SMA, and CK(AE1/AE3). Despite two months of outpatient phosphorus supplementation, the patient remained hypophosphatemic, with persistent elevated ALP, PTH, and reduced FGF-23 levels. Nodular enhancement in the surgical area, observed via CT and MRI, suggested tumor recurrence, prompting recommendations for a second surgery intervention.

Case 6

A 60-year-old man presented with a three-year history of unexplained weakness in both lower limbs, progressively exacerbated by pain in the knees and feet during ambulation. Laboratory investigations revealed hypophosphatemia with serum phosphate levels ranging from 0.30 to 0.46 mmol/L (normal range, 0.85- 1.51 mmol/L), elevated ALP levels ranging from 366 to 463 U/L (normal range, 30- 120 U/L), FGF-23 at 17.56 pg/ml (normal range, 23.3- 95.4 pg/ml) and total procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (tP1NP) at 92.37 ng/ml (normal range, 15.1- 58.6 ng/ml). An 18F-OC PET/CT scan disclosed osseous destruction (Figures 1U–X) measuring 17.0 × 10.0 mm on the left side of the occipital bone, displaying significantly increased metabolic activity (SUVmax = 13.15, SUVmean = 5.69, MTV = 1.31 cm3). Corroborated by MRI, the lesion suggested a benign or low-grade malignant tumor base on T1 isotensity, and T2 hyperintensity, and significant enhancement. Histopathological examination post-resection of the left occipital skull lesion revealed a benign vascular-rich spindle cell neoplasm with mild atypia. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for SATB2, FLI1, and CD34, and negative for STAT6, H3.3G34W, CD99, S-100, Desmin, and SMA. The proliferation index Ki-67 was 5%. Postoperatively, the patient’s serum phosphate levels normalized by the fifth day.

Discussion

Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia (HO) consists of hypophosphatemia, elevated ALP, muscular weakness, and bone pain. Misdiagnosis of HO is common, with an average delay of about 5 years before diagnosis (7). It is often caused by severe vitamin D deficiency, hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets syndromes, renal tubular acidosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, medications, and TIO (8). TIO-related tumors primarily originate from mesenchymal tissues, mostly located in bone and soft tissue (5, 9). Zhang et al. (10) reported that among 135 cases, 54.5% of the causative tumors originated from bone, predominantly in the femur and jawbone, while 45.5% originated from soft tissues, located in areas such as the nasal cavity, sinuses, and periosteum. The most common pathological type is PMT, among others like giant cell tumor, prostate cancer, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, vasopericytoma, neurofibroma, hemangiopericytomas and osteofibrous dysplasia, etc (5, 7, 1115). In 1947, McCance (16). reported the first case of osteomalacia caused by a femoral tumor, but the relationship between the tumor and osteomalacia was not clear. In 1959, Prader et al. (17) first elucidated the relationship between mesenchymal tumors and osteomalacia. In 1987, Weidner and Santa (18). coined the term ‘phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor-mixed connective tissue variant (PMTMCT)’ for osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors. In 2004, Folpe et al. (19) first proposed classifying the mesenchymal tumor that causes TIO as an independent pathological hisological type, and it was included in the WHO (2013) Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors in 2013 (20).

Despite pathologic confirmation, locating TIO tumors is challenging due to their small size and indolence, requiring advanced imaging such as CT, whole-body MRI, bone scintigraphy, and 18F-FDG PET/CT (2123). Conventional anatomical imaging modalities exhibit limited diagnostic accuracy for TIO and typically rely on the guidance provided by functional imaging techniques (24). In 1996, Reubi et al. (25) reported that a variety of mesenchymal-derived tumors express somatostatin receptor (SSTR), especially SSTR2 receptors, establishing SSTR imaging as a pivotal method for identifying causative tumors (26). Agents for single-photon imaging include 111In and 99mTc-labeled SSTR (2729). Positron imaging agents primarily consist of 68Ga-labeled SSTR octreotide variants (27, 30, 31). Particularly, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE, with stronger affinity to SSTR2 receptors, has become the preferred imaging choice for detecting causing tumors (32, 33). Zhang et al. (34) reported that in a study of 56 patients suspected of having TIO, the 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT scans demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.13%, and a specificity of 60.00% for detecting TIO. In another study by Zhang et al. (10) involving 159 patients suspected of TIO, the 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT scans achieved a sensitivity of 99.3% (134/135), a specificity of 79.2% (19/24), and an accuracy of 96.2% (153/159) in identifying TIO. These findings highlight the high efficacy and potential of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in accurately diagnosing TIO in suspected cases. However, the limited production capacity of 68Ga through germanium-gallium generators and the challenges associated with post-elution labeling, with a half-life of 68 minutes, has hindered the widespread use of 68Ga-labeled PET tracers, prompting the exploration of other radiotracer for SSTR imaging (35). 18F, a radionuclide commonly employed in clinical PET imaging, can be produced in bulk by cyclotrons, featuring a relatively longer half-life, thereby offering superior inherent resolution (36). In 2010, Laverman et al. (37, 38) presented a labeling method for 18F-OC and demonstrated its high in vitro binding affinity to SSTR in a preclinical model. In 2019, Long et al. (6) reported their initial clinical experience with 18F-OC in three healthy volunteers and twenty-two patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The tracer was proven safe with favorable pharmacokinetics and biodistribution characteristics, offering good detection of tumors with high tumor-to-background ratios. The application of 18F-OC PET/CT has significantly impacted the clinical diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors (3941), marking it as a valuable molecular imaging tool for identifying tumors expressing SSTR. Nonetheless, the use of 18F-OC PET/CT for the diagnosis and treatment of TIO remains limited by the small number of cases studied (42).

This study details the imaging characteristics of identifying TIO using 18F-OC PET/CT, underscoring the technique’s proficiency in locating elusive, solitary tumors predominantly found in the lower extremities. These slow-growing tumors, often small in size, can nonetheless provoke systemic symptoms. Our study revealed that among the 6 causative tumors identified, three originated from soft tissue and remaining three from bones, with soft tissue tumors presenting larger volumes than their bony counterparts. Notably, the smallest detected TIO tumor, overlooked by both conventional imaging modalities and 18F-FDG PET/CT, was successfully identified by 18F-OC PET/CT. This tumor, nestled in the femoral neck, measured just 1.27 cm3 in volume and 7.8 mm in maximum diameter. This finding supports the notion that the majority of TIO tumors are benign, non-invasive growths confined within bone structures. The study emphasizes that 18F-OC PET/CT, offering whole-body tomographic imaging from the skull to the feet, is crucial for patients suspected of having TIO, as it can detect tumors that may be missed by conventional imaging techniques focused on specific locations. Moreover, 18F-OC, serving as a targeted imaging agent, demonstrated higher metabolic uptake than nonspecific agents like 18F-FDG in TIO tumors, highlighting its utility in detecting tumors with increased SSTR expression. SUVmax and SUVmean are commonly employed to discriminate between malignant tumors and benign lesions, offering insights into the malignancy gradient of the tumor. Meanwhile, MTV is frequently employed to ascertain the metabolic volume of diseases exhibiting high uptake. These three metabolic parameters, ubiquitous in PET imaging, play a critical role in tumor diagnosis and treatment (43). Within this study, 18F-OC PET/CT identified tumors with SSTR overexpression, with SUVmax ranging from 5.47 to 25.69, SUVmean ranging from 3.43 to 7.26, and MTV ranging from 1.27 to 18.59 cm3. Additionally, the CT component aided in the localization of these tumors, particularly those that might be overlooked due to low metabolic uptake. Despite the benign nature of TIO tumors, there have been instances of malignancy, underscoring the necessity of complete surgical removal for a curative outcome, albeit with a risk of recurrence (44, 45). The study concludes with a follow-up on a patient who experienced tumor recurrence post-surgery, highlighting the importance of ongoing monitoring after treatment.

Conclusion

Whole-body 18F-OC PET/CT imaging emerges as a groundbreaking SSTR-specific technique pivotal in pinpointing TIO. However, the study acknowledges the limitation posed by its small sample size, advocating for future research encompassing a larger cohort to refine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-OC PET/CT for TIO. Such research would furnish clinicians with a more comprehensive diagnostic tool, potentially enhancing patient care, treatment strategies, and prognostic assessments.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from a legally authorized representative(s) for anonymized patient information to be published in this article.

Author contributions

JL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Florenzano P, Hartley IR, Jimenez M, Roszko K, Gafni RI, Collins MT. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. Calcif Tissue Int. (2021) 108:128–42. doi: 10.1007/s00223–020-00691–6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bergwitz C, Jüppner H. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by PTH, vitamin D, and FGF23. Annu Rev Med. (2010) 61:91–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.051308.111339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hana T, Tanaka S, Nakatomi H, Shojima M, Fukumoto S, Ikemura M, et al. Definitive surgical treatment of osteomalacia induced by skull base tumor and determination of the half-life of serum fibroblast growth factor 23. Endocr J. (2017) 64:1033–9. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17–0177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dahir K, Zanchetta MB, Stanciu I, Robinson C, Lee JY, Dhaliwal R, et al. Diagnosis and management of tumor-induced osteomalacia: perspectives from clinical experience. J Endocr Soc. (2021) 5:bvab099. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Jiang Y, Xia WB, Xing XP, Silva BC, Li M, Wang O, et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: an important cause of adult-onset hypophosphatemic osteomalacia in China: Report of 39 cases and review of the literature. J Bone Miner Res. (2012) 27:1967–75. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Long T, Yang N, Zhou M, Chen D, Li Y, Li J, et al. Clinical application of 18F-alF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in combination with 18F-FDG PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine neoplasms. Clin Nucl Med. (2019) 44:452–8. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Weidner N. Review and update: oncogenic osteomalacia-rickets. Ultrastruct Pathol. (1991) 15:317–33. doi: 10.3109/01913129109016242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chong WH, Molinolo AA, Chen CC, Collins MT. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2011) 18:R53–77. doi: 10.1530/ERC-11–0006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wan E, Marks J, Wagner T, Gallimore A, Gane S, Walsh SB. Oncogenic osteomalacia: diagnosis, localisation, and cure. Lancet Oncol. (2018) 19:e365. doi: 10.1016/S1470–2045(18)30276–6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhang S, Huo L, Wang L, Jing HL, Li F. Application of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging combined with MRI in the diagnosis of tumor-induced osteomalacia. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2019) 39(8):458–63. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095–2848.2019.08.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Folpe AL. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: A review and update. Semin Diagn Pathol. (2019) 36:260–8. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2019.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Harish S, Jurriaans E, Jan E, Sur M, Colterjohn N. Giant cell tumour of soft tissue causing oncogenic osteomalacia: report demonstrating the use of octreotide scintigraphy in tumour localization. Clin Radiol. (2008) 63:101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mak MP, da Costa e Silva VT, Martin RM, Lerario AM, Yu L, Hoff PM, et al. Advanced prostate cancer as a cause of oncogenic osteomalacia: an underdiagnosed condition. Support Care Cancer. (2012) 20:2195–7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1474-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Elderman JH, Wabbijn M, de Jongh F. Hypophosphataemia due to FGF-23 producing B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. BMJ Case Rep. (2016) 2016:bcr2015213954. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015–213954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nuovo MA, Dorfman HD, Sun CC, Chalew SA. Tumor-induced osteomalacia and rickets. Am J Surg Pathol. (1989) 13:588–99. doi: 10.1097/00000478–198907000–00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McCANCE RA. Osteomalacia with Looser's nodes (Milkman's syndrome) due to a raised resistance to vitamin D acquired about the age of 15 years. Q J Med. (1947) 16:33–46

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

17. Prader A, Illig R, Uehlinger E, Stalder G. Rickets following bone tumor. Helv Paediatr Acta. (1959) 14:554–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Weidner N, Santa Cruz D. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. A polymorphous group causing osteomalacia or rickets. Cancer. (1987) 59:1442–54. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Billings SD, Bisceglia M, Bertoni F, Cho JY, et al. Most osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors are a single histopathologic entity: an analysis of 32 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. (2004) 28:1–30. doi: 10.1097/00000478–200401000–00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoom PCW, Mertens F. WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press (2013) p. 239–394.

Google Scholar

21. Nakanishi K, Sakai M, Tanaka H, Tsuboi H, Hashimoto J, Hashimoto N, et al. Whole-body MR imaging in detecting phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT) in tumor-induced hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Magn Reson Med Sci. (2013) 12:47–52. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2011–0006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang L, Zhang S, Jing H, Chen L, Wang Z, Li F. The findings on bone scintigraphy in patients with suspected tumor-induced osteomalacia should not be overlooked. Clin Nucl Med. (2018) 43:239–45. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bosman A, Palermo A, Vanderhulst J, De Beur SMJ, Fukumoto S, Minisola S, et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: A systematic clinical review of 895 cases. Calcif Tissue Int. (2022) 111:367–79. doi: 10.1007/s00223–022-01005–8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chong WH, Andreopoulou P, Chen CC, Reynolds J, Guthrie L, Kelly M, et al. Tumor localization and biochemical response to cure in tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Bone Miner Res. (2013) 28:1386–98. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Reubi JC, Waser B, Laissue JA, Gebbers JO. Somatostatin and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors in human mesenchymal tumors: in vitro identification. Cancer Res. (1996) 56:1922–31

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Jan de Beur SM, Streeten EA, Civelek AC, McCarthy EF, Uribe L, Marx SJ, et al. Localisation of mesenchymal tumours by somatostatin receptor imaging. Lancet. (2002) 359:761–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140–6736(02)07846–7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Baum RP, Reubi JC, et al. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2007) 34:982–93. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0317-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Seufert J, Ebert K, Müller J, Eulert J, Hendrich C, Werner E, et al. Octreotide therapy for tumor-induced osteomalacia. N Engl J Med. (2001) 345:1883–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jing H, Li F, Zhuang H, Wang Z, Tian J, Xing X, et al. Effective detection of the tumors causing osteomalacia using [Tc-99m]-HYNIC-octreotide (99mTc-HYNIC-TOC) whole body scan. Eur J Radiol. (2013) 82:2028–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hou G, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang P, Xia W, Xing X, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT in patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia: A prospective study. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:811209. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.811209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hesse E, Moessinger E, Rosenthal H, Laenger F, Brabant G, Petrich T, et al. Oncogenic osteomalacia: exact tumor localization by co-registration of positron emission and computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. (2007) 22:158–62. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060909

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. El-Maouche D, Sadowski SM, Papadakis GZ, Guthrie L, Cottle-Delisle C, Merkel R, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE for tumor localization in tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:3575–81. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016–2052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Zhang J, Zhu Z, Zhong D, Dang Y, Xing H, Du Y, et al. 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality in the detection of culprit tumors causing osteomalacia. Clin Nucl Med. (2015) 40:642–6. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang W, Huang Z, Chen Y. Diagnostic value of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT imaging for tumor- induced osteomalacia. Ann Palliat Med. (2020) 9:3350–6. doi: 10.21037/apm-20–1466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Goffin K. Al18F-NOTA-octreotide and 18F-SiFAlin-TATE: two 'new kids on the block' in somatostatin receptor imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2019) 46:2225–7. doi: 10.1007/s00259–019-04474–6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Conti M, Eriksson L. Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion. EJNMMI Phys. (2016) 3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40658–016-0144–5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Laverman P, McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Eek A, Joosten L, Oyen WJ, et al. A novel facile method of labeling octreotide with (18)F-fluorine. J Nucl Med. (2010) 51:454–61. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Laverman P, D'Souza CA, Eek A, McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Oyen WJ, et al. Optimized labeling of NOTA-conjugated octreotide with F-18. Tumour Biol. (2012) 33:427–34. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0250-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Pauwels E, Cleeren F, Tshibangu T, Koole M, Serdons K, Boeckxstaens L, et al. 18F-alF-NOTA-octreotide outperforms 68Ga-DOTATATE/NOC PET in neuroendocrine tumor patients: Results from a prospective, multicenter study. J Nucl Med. (2023) 64:632–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Pauwels E, Cleeren F, Tshibangu T, Koole M, Serdons K, Boeckxstaens L, et al. [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET imaging: biodistribution, dosimetry and first comparison with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumour patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2020) 47:3033–46. doi: 10.1007/s00259–020-04918–4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Boeckxstaens L, Pauwels E, Vandecaveye V, Deckers W, Cleeren F, Dekervel J, et al. Prospective comparison of [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients. EJNMMI Res. (2023) 13:53. doi: 10.1186/s13550–023-01003–3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Long T, Hou J, Yang N, Zhou M, Li Y, Li J, et al. Utility of 18F-alF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in the localization of tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2021) 106:e4202–9. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hou J, Long T, Yang Y, Chen D, Hu S. The potential prognostic value of dual-imaging PET parameters based on 18F-FDG and 18F-OC for neuroendocrine neoplasms. Mol Imaging. (2022) 2022:6511179. doi: 10.1155/2022/6511179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kurien R, Manipadam MT, Rupa V. Oncogenic osteomalacia in a patient with an ethmoid sinus tumour. J Laryngol Otol. (2010) 124:799–803. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109992313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zuo QY, Wang H, Li W, Niu XH, Huang YH, Chen J, et al. Treatment and outcomes of tumor-induced osteomalacia associated with phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: retrospective review of 12 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2017) 18:403. doi: 10.1186/s12891–017-1756–1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide, PET/CT, hypophosphatemia, tumor-induced oseteomalacia, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors

Citation: Li J (2024) 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in the localization of tumor-induced osteomalacia: case series and literature review. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1400751. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1400751

Received: 14 March 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2024;
Published: 03 June 2024.

Edited by:

Luigi Aloj, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Hina Shah, Mass General Brigham, United States

Copyright © 2024 Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jing Li, robertlsm22626117@zju.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.