Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Endocrinology of Aging
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1399936
This article is part of the Research Topic Hormones and Aging related diseases View all 5 articles

Association between Sarcopenia and Osteoporosis: the cross-sectional study from NHANES 1999-2020 and a Bi-directions Mendelian Randomization Study

Provisionally accepted
Yuan Zhu Yuan Zhu Qingyue Zeng Qingyue Zeng Yi Shi Yi Shi *Yi Shi Yi Shi Simin Liu Simin Liu Yuhao Yang Yuhao Yang Yu Qiu Yu Qiu *Mengjia Pan Mengjia Pan *Zhenmei An Zhenmei An *Shuangqing Li Shuangqing Li *
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Osteoporosis (OP) and sarcopenia are prevalent musculoskeletal conditions among the elderly. Nevertheless, the causal relationship between sarcopenia and OP remains a subject of controversy and uncertainty. In this study, we employed cross-sectional analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the intricate relationship between sarcopenia and OP. The cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 1999-2020, which involved in 116,876 participants. It assessed the correlation between sarcopenia, osteoporosis (OP), and bone mineral density (BMD) using Chi-square tests, T-tests, and a multiple logistic regression model. Additionally, we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal effects of sarcopenia-related characteristics (ALM) on OP. We employed IVW, sensitivity analysis, heterogeneity testing, and other methods for MR. The ALM data was sourced from the UK Biobank (n=450,243), while the aggregated data on OP was obtained from GWAS statistics (n=53,236).In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed that in the multivariate logistic regression model, without adjusting for any variables, OP emerged as a risk factor for sarcopenia [OR 95% CI = 1.90 (1.13-3.18), P = 0.02]. Following adjustments for gender, age, BMI, and biochemical variables, OP retained its status as a risk factor for sarcopenia [OR 95% CI = 3.54 (1.91-6.54), P < 0.001]. Moreover, after accounting for all variables, OP emerged as an independent risk factor for sarcopenia [OR 95% CI = 4.57 (1.47-14.22), P = 0.01].In the MR analysis, we uncovered that femoral neck BMD (FN BMD), lumbar spine BMD (LS BMD), and forearm bone mineral density (FA BMD) exerted a direct causal influence on ALM [FA BMD: OR 95% CI = 1.028 (1.008, 1.049), p = 0.006; FN BMD: OR (95% CI) = 1.131 (1.092, 1.170), p = 3.18E-12; LS BMD: OR (95% CI) = 1.080 (1.062, 1.098), p = 2.86E-19]. Our study has revealed a positive correlation between OP and the prevalence of sarcopenia. It suggests a potentially robust causal relationship between OP and sarcopenia.

    Keywords: Sarcopenia, NHANES, MR, ALM, Osteoporosis

    Received: 12 Mar 2024; Accepted: 17 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhu, Zeng, Shi, Shi, Liu, Yang, Qiu, Pan, An and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yi Shi, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Yu Qiu, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Mengjia Pan, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Zhenmei An, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Shuangqing Li, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.