Linqiao Tang1†Qianyu Yang2,3†Rong Ma4†Ping Zhou2,3Cong Peng2,3Chunpeng Xie2,3Qiyuan Liang2,3Tingyu Wu2,3Wuyu Gao2,3Haiyan Yu2,3Guifei Deng2,3Zhen Dai2,3Nan Mao2,3*
Xiang Xiao1,2,3*- 1Research Core Facility of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 2Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- 3Department of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- 4Department of Nephrology, People’s Hospital of Xindu District, Chengdu, China
Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: The study enrolled patients with diagnosis of T2D between 2009 and 2018 from the National Nutrition and Health Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Demographic information, laboratory test, and diagnostic data were collected. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots were used to assess the dose-effect relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D. Based on LDH levels, individuals were divided into higher and lower groups using dichotomy, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between different LDH levels and the risk of DKD in T2D patients. Stratified analysis was performed to assess the consistency of the result.
Results: A total of 4888 patients were included in the study, with 2976 (60.9%) patients without DKD and 1912 (39.1%) patients with DKD. RCS plots showed that the risk of DKD increased with increasing LDH levels. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that T2D patients with higher LDH levels had a 45% increased risk of DKD compared to those with lower LDH levels (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.11-1.89). Furthermore, each standard deviation increase in LDH level was associated with a 24% increase in DKD incidence among T2D patients (OR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.07-1.44). Stratified analysis consistently supported these findings.
Conclusions: LDH can serve as a valuable biomarker for screening DKD in patients with T2D.
1 Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by impaired insulin secretion and function. It was considered irreversible and has become one of the leading causes of death worldwide (1, 2). The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) predicts that the number of diabetic patients will increase from 240 million in 2007 to 380 million in 2025, further rising to 439 million in 2030 (3). Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), found in approximately 40% of diabetic patients, was the main cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally (4, 5). This condition imposes a significant social and economic burden, highlighting the importance of early identification of DKD.
LDH is an enzyme belonging to the family of 2-hydroxy acid oxidoreductases. It plays a crucial role in both anaerobic and aerobic glycolysis, converting pyruvate into lactic acid and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), thereby affecting metabolism (6). LDH was commonly used for diagnosing such as myocardial infarction, vascular injury, tissue injury, advanced sarcoma, and other mesenchymal tumors (7). It has now been found that LDH can be used as a biomarker for the prognosis of diseases such as tumors, metabolism-associated fatty liver disease, and malaria (8–10), and it can also be used as a biomarker for predicting the pathological status of the lungs (11) and for the possibility of DM (12).
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an enzyme composed of four subtypes, namely LDH-A, LDH-B, LDH-C, and LDH-D. LDH-A is mainly expressed in muscle and heart tissue, and is involved in the production and dehydrogenation of lactate. It promotes glycolysis to produce ATP under aerobic conditions, while converting lactate to pyruvate under hypoxic conditions to maintain intracellular acid-base balance. LDH-B mainly expressed in the liver and kidneys, involved in lactate metabolism and clearance. which participates in the gluconeogenesis pathway by converting lactate into glucose in the liver, and helps clear excess lactate in the kidneys. LDH-C and LDH-D are expressed in embryonic and germ cells, and their functions are not fully understood, but they may be related to cell proliferation and differentiation. Their proportion in the blood is usually 25-35% for LDH-A (LDH-1), 30-40% for LDH-B (LDH-2), 20-30% for LDH-C (LDH-3), and 5-10% for LDH-D. These proportions may have slight variations, and the specific proportions may also be influenced by different laboratories and measurement methods (13). More and more studies found that LDH may be associated with the development of DKD. Al-Rubeaan K et al. (14)found that the progression of DKD was associated with elevated levels of LDH, and elevated uric acid and LDH were associated with microalbuminuria and an increased risk of ESRD. Mohammadi-Karakani et al (15) observed significantly elevated urinary LDH and microalbuminuria levels in diabetic patients compared to healthy individuals. Lee DY et al. (16) found that elevated levels of LDHA were associated with renal insufficiency in DKD patients. LDHA was expressed at high levels in both glomerular and tubular epithelial cells of renal tissues in DKD patients. The decrease in glomerular filtration rate was associated with increased urinary lactate levels and LDHA expression as well as increased fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels. In addition, LDH has considerable potential value in early warning of rejection in renal transplant recipients, screening for renal disease, and detection of renal injury secondary to hypertension, diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis (17).
Therefore, LDH activity and expression levels were elevated in DKD and may be involved in the onset and progression of DKD. However, there were no studies that clearly show the relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between LDH and the risk of DKD in T2D patients.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and participants
The data for this study were obtained from the National Nutrition and Health Survey (NHANES) database from 2009 to 2018, which includes information on patients with T2D. NHANES aims to explore the individual-level demographic, health, and nutritional information through personal interviews and standardized physical exams at specialized Mobile Examination Centers (MECs), as well as evaluate the health and nutritional status of non-hospitalized civilians in the United States (18).
In this study, a total of 4,888 patients were included, consisting of 2976 (60.9%) T2D patients without DKD and 1912 (39.1%) T2D patients with DKD. To ensure the accuracy of the study, specific diagnostic criteria were employed to determine the presence of diabetes and DKD. The diagnostic criteria for diabetes included: 1) doctor diagnosis of diabetes, 2) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level > 6.5%, 3) fasting blood glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, 4) random blood glucose level ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, or 5) random blood glucose level after a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, meet any one of the above (19). Antidiabetic drugs administration was obtained through a questionnaire.
The diagnostic criteria for DKD were based on the diagnosis of diabetes and met the guidelines for CKD established by the working group for kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO). These criteria included a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) exceeding 30 mg/g or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (20). Exclusion criteria for the study were: 1) age under 18 years, 2) pregnancy, 3) type 1 diabetes mellitus, 4) missing lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) data or abnormally high LDH values, and 5) missing diagnoses of T2D or CKD. NHANES is a survey project conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Review Board. The study protocol conformed to the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments and was approved by the National Ethics Review Board for Health Statistics Research. All participants had signed an informed consent form (19).
2.2 Statistical analysis
Following the guidelines of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the study utilized weighted samples and employed stratification and clustering techniques to generate estimates representative of the overall US population. Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard errors, while classified variables were expressed as percentages and standard errors. To assess differences between different groups, weighted t-tests and chi-square tests were used for continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively.
The relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in T2D patients was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot of complex sampling. Individuals were classified into two groups, higher LDH group and lower LDH group, through dichotomy. Additionally, a complex sampling multivariate linear regression model was established to evaluate the correlation between LDH and clinical variables after adjusting for multiple factors. Furthermore, a weighted multivariate Cox regression model analysis was performed to identify risk factors for DKD in T2D patients, and the consistency of the results was evaluated through subgroup analysis. Weights were calculated by determining the smallest subset of variables based on their inclusion in the study and selecting the corresponding weights. Finally, the weights were combined over the years. All statistical analyses were performed with R version 4.3.1 software. A significance level of P<0.05 was used for all statistical analyses.
3 Results
3.1 Baseline characteristics
In our study, we utilized the data of 49,693 individuals registered in the NHANES database from 2009 to 2018. In this dataset, we included 4,888 patients diagnosed with T2D (Figure 1). The patients enrolled were both male and female, the percentage of males was 51.58. And the average age of T2D patients was 59.59 years. The mean level of LDH was 138.85 U/L. When comparing T2D patients without DKD, we observed that those with DKD were older and had a higher proportion of hypertension and smoking, as well as a lower proportion of drinkers (All P<0.05). Additionally, T2D patients with DKD showed lower eGFR, higher levels of LDH, uric acid, triglyceride, glycosylated hemoglobin, and ACR, and lower levels of hemoglobin and serum albumin (All P<0.05) (Table 1). Among the use of antidiabetic drugs, 43.73% of the patients used the oral hypoglycemic agents, 10.87% of the patients used insulin while 6.04% of the patients used each of them. Furthermore, compared with patients with lower LDH, patients with higher LDH were older, had a higher prevalence of women and hypertension, had lower rates of alcohol use and smoking, higher levels of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and lower levels of hemoglobin, eGFR, and triglycerides. (all P<0.05) (Table 2).
Figure 1 Flowchart of included individuals in this study.
Table 1 Baseline clinical features of enrolled T2D patients without and with CKD.
Table 2 Baseline clinical features of enrolled T2D patients with various LDH levels.
3.2 Association of LDH with clinical characteristics
After adjusting for age, sex, race, alcohol use (“Yes” or “No”), smoking (“Yes” or “No”), multivariate linear regression model analysis showed that LDH significantly impacted serum albumin, ACR, and eGFR. The level of LDH was positively correlated with urinary ACR (β=1.48, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with serum albumin (β=-0.01, P<0.001) and eGFR (β=-0.06, P<0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3 Relationship between LDH and clinical indicators in T2D patients.
3.3 Association between LDH and risk of DKD
In the 4888 T2D patients, 1912 (39.1%) of T2D patients without DKD, whereas 2976 (60.9%) of T2D patients with DKD. The patients were grouped into a lower LDH level group (<134 U/L) (n=2452) and a higher LDH level group (≥134 U/L) (n=2436) based on dichotomization. The results of RCS plots showed a linear relationship between LDH and the risk of DKD in T2D, with the risk of DKD increased in patients with T2D as LDH was elevated (Figure 2). Compared with T2D patients with lower LDH, the risk of DKD in T2D with higher LDH (134 < LDH ≤ 367)(U/L) was 39% higher (OR: 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.68, P < 0.001) (Figure 3). After adjusting for baseline age, sex, and race, Model 1a revealed that the risk of DKD in T2D patients with higher LDH was 48% higher compared to those with lower LDH (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.77, P<0.001). Model 2b, which included adjustments for covariates from Model 1a as well as alcohol use (“Yes” or “No”) and smoking (“Yes” or “No”), demonstrated that the risk of DKD in T2D patients with higher LDH was 43% higher than those with lower LDH (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.18-1.74, P<0.001). Model 3c was adjusted for covariates from Model 2b as well as hypertension (“Yes” or “No”), hemoglobin, serum albumin, and uric acid. The results indicated that the risk of DKD in T2D patients with higher LDH was 45% higher than those with lower LDH (OR: 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11-1.89, P=0.01) (Figure 3; Supplementary Tables 1, 2). Furthermore, each standard deviation (SD) increase in LDH was associated with a 24% increase in the risk of DKD (OR=1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.44, P=0.005) (Figure 3; Supplementary Tables 1, 2). Stratified analyses showed that the association between LDH and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D varied by age (‘<60’,’≥60’ years), sex (‘male,’ ‘female’), serum albumin (‘<35’,’≥35’ g/L), anemia (‘yes’. ‘No’), and HbA1c (‘<7.0’, ‘≥7.0’) were consistent (all P>0.05) (Figure 4).
Figure 2 The dose-effect relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D.
Figure 3 Associations between SII and the risk of CKD in individuals. Model 1a adjusted for baseline age, gender, race; Model 2b adjusted for covariates in model 1 plus alcohol user (‘yes’ or ‘no’), smoke (‘yes’ or ‘no’). Model 3c adjusted for adjusted for covariates in model 2 plus hypertension (‘yes’ or ‘no’), hemoglobin, serum albumin, uric acid. OR, odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; BMI, Body Mass Index; CRP, C-reaction protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; CKD, chronic kidney disease; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 4 Stratified analysis of the risk of the CKD in individuals with T2D. Adjust for age, sex (‘Female’, ‘Male’), race, BMI. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, Body Mass Index; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
4 Discussion
In this study, we found that LDH was associated with the conventional markers of kidney injury, ACR and eGFR. With increasing levels of LDH, the risk of DKD in T2D patients increased, and higher levels of LDH were an independent risk factor for the risk of DKD in T2D patients.
LDH is an enzyme involved in glycolysis, and there are four isozymes in the human genome: LDHA, LDHB, LDHC, and LDHD. Among these isozymes, LDHA, LDHB and LDHC are L isomers, whereas LDHD is a D isomer (6). The expression of LDH increases with age, and it plays a crucial role in promoting glycolysis by converting pyruvate to lactate and NADH to NAD (21). Numerous studies showed that LDH is closely related to the occurrence, development and prognosis of various tumors. For example, it has been found that elevated expression of LDHA was positively correlated with tumor size, clinical stage, and histological grade, and that its elevated expression was associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients (22, 23). In addition, LDH, as a target of many oncogenes and tumor factors, has shown potential as a therapeutic target for cancer (24).
Moreover, the role of LDH in kidney disease-related mortality has also been reported. Ryu SY et al (25) showed that LDH levels above 280 U/L were positively associated with increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients, while levels below 240 U/L were associated with improved survival. Shen J et al. (26) found that elevated serum LDH levels were associated to shorter overall survival in renal cell carcinoma patients, suggesting LDH as a valuable biomarker for monitoring prognosis. Zhang D et al (27) found an independent association between LDH levels and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), where mortality increased with higher LDH levels. Similarly, Xiao X et al. found that high LDH levels were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with DKD (28).
Some studies have also found associations between LDH and disease-induced kidney involvement. Cai X et al. (29) demonstrated a positive correlation between LDH and albuminuria severity in hypertensive patients, highlighting high LDH levels as an early marker for increased risk of kidney involvement. Zager RA et al. (30) demonstrated that LDH was released from cells during injury, making it a potential marker for renal injury. In addition, LDH has been considered as a biomarker to predict acute kidney injury in patients with rhabdomyolysis, sickle cell anemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (31–34). These findings are consistent with that of our study, which showed a significant association between LDH and proteinuria as well as eGFR in patients with T2DM.
In the status of DM, serum LDH levels can be used as a reference marker for short-term glucose monitoring. Changes in serum glycated albumin (GA) and abnormal elevations in LDH levels often occurred simultaneously with the glycemic changes. Therefore, the use of LDH as a biomarker can be more convenient and rapid in assessing glycemic changes in patients with T2D (35). In addition, studies have shown a close relationship between LDH and DKD. Azushima K et al. (36) found that LDH isoenzymes, especially LDHA and LDHB isoenzymes, were increased in patients with DKD. Uslu S et al. (37) found that a significant positive correlation between urinary LDH activity and serum creatinine (Cr) levels, and when creatinine clearance (CCr) decreased, urinary LDH activity began to increase, which suggested that measurement of urinary LDH activity could be used as a screening marker for glomerular and tubular dysfunction in diabetic patients during follow-up. And Jung K et al. (38) found that renal tubular dysfunction can be used as an early indicator of early DKD. These suggested that high LDH levels are associated with early renal function decline in diabetic patients. Xiao X et al (28) found that the risk of progression to ESRD was higher in DKD patients with high levels of LDH. However, few studies have investigated the association between LDH and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D. The association was evidenced in our study, where the risk of DKD in adult T2D patients in the United States increased with elevated LDH, and higher LDH levels were an independent risk factor for the risk of DKD in patients with T2D.
However, why the risk of DKD development is higher in T2D patients with higher LDH needs to be further explored. Firstly, LDH is a catalytic enzyme for lactate formation, and lactate production can contribute to the progression of kidney disease. Lee DY et al. (16) suggested that LDHA-mediated lactic acidosis may be associated with renal failure and fibrosis. Azushima K et al. (36) also conducted targeted metabolomics analysis in a mouse model of DKD and found that LDHA and LDHB isoforms in the DKD mouse was significantly increased in kidneys, and elevated lactate levels and impaired energy metabolism may lead to renal injury in mice. Secondly, Yu SL et al. (39) found that high serum LDH levels were associated with systemic inflammatory responses, and the development of DKD involves inflammatory processes (40). Finally, LDH may influence the lactylation of proteins and consequently the progression of kidney disease (18). Zhang D et al. (41) inhibited lactate production by suppressing LDH activity, and found that intracellular lactate levels and histone lactylation were reduced, and that LDHA-deficient cells had decreased levels of both lactate production and histone lactation levels. Li X et al. (42) found that high lactate concentration and lactylation levels affect energy metabolism, which in turn serves as a predictor of renal injury.
In addition, some of the studies showed that the use of antidiabetic drugs may also affect LDH levels (43). Metformin was shown to decrease LDH activity in cardiomyocytes as well as serum LDH levels (44). In addition, cagliflozin decreased serum LDH levels in diabetic myocardial injury mice. Similar results were observed for other SGLT2i (45, 46). GLP-1/GIP dual agonist has also been shown to decrease serum LDH levels (47). These findings suggest that glucose-lowering drugs may effect LDH levels, but the mechanism is not clear. However, we additionally corrected for the variable of glucose-lowering drug classification in a multivariate logstic regression analysis, which showed that glucose-lowering drug classification did not affect the predictive value of LDH for the risk of CKD in patients with T2DM. Moreover, besides SGLT2i, some studies showed that other renoprotective drugs may also affect LDH (48). Perindopril decreased LDH in serum of mice with diabetic myocardial injury (48). Zahler et al. (49) also found that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) attenuated myocardial injury as well as serum levels of LDH. In addition, Ibrahim MA et al. (50) also showed that ACEI and angiotensin AT(1)-receptor antagonism in ameliorating adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity decreased the level of LDH. However, non-selective saline corticotropin receptor antagonists have not yet been reported to have an effect on LDH. In view of the fact that all these nephroprotective drugs can lower LDH, it is also suggested that LDH plays an important role in kidney injury and hence it can be used to screen patients with DKD in T2DM.
However, we also need to be aware of some limitations of the study. Firstly, due to cross-sectional design, we were unable to establish a cause-effect relationship between LDH levels and the risk of DKD in patients with T2D. We recommend future longer-term follow-up studies to determine the predictive ability of LDH for the occurrence of DKD. Secondly, there was some selection bias due to the retrospective character of the study. Thirdly, although we controlled for some factors that may have influenced the results, there are still some other factors that may have had an impact on the results. Finally, further research is needed on the possible relationship between variations in LDH concentrations and the development of DKD in patients with T2D.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that higher LDH levels were associated with the risk of DKD in T2D patients. It will be necessary for clinicians to monitor LDH levels in patients with T2D, which can assist in screening for DKD in patients with T2D.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics statement
The study protocol conformed to the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments and was approved by the National Ethics Review Board for Health Statistics Research. All participants had signed an informed consent form. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
XX: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. LT: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Validation. QY: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology. RM: Writing – original draft. PZ: Writing – original draft. CP: Writing – original draft. CX: Writing – original draft. QL: Writing – original draft. TW: Writing – original draft. WG: Writing – original draft. HY: Writing – original draft. GD: Writing – original draft. ZD: Writing – original draft. NM: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The Science and technology fund of Chengdu Medical College (CYZYB22-02). The research fund of Sichuan Medical and Health Care Promotion institute (KY2022QN0309).
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all the participants of this study for their important contributions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1369968/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Shakoor H, Apostolopoulos V, Feehan J, Ali HI, Ismail LC, Al Dhaheri A, et al. Effect of calorie restriction and exercise on type 2 diabetes. Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite Oddelenie za medicinski nauki). (2021) 42:109–26. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2021-0010
2. Reed J, Bain S, Kanamarlapudi V. A review of current trends with type 2 diabetes epidemiology, aetiology, pathogenesis, treatments and future perspectives. Diabetes Metab syndrome Obes Targets Ther. (2021) 14:3567–602. doi: 10.2147/dmso.S319895
3. Yang L, Shao J, Bian Y, Wu H, Shi L, Zeng L, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among inland residents in China (2000-2014): A meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. (2016) 7:845–52. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12514
4. Zhang XX, Kong J, Yun K. Prevalence of diabetic nephropathy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Diabetes Res. (2020) 2020:2315607. doi: 10.1155/2020/2315607
5. Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN. (2017) 12:2032–45. doi: 10.2215/cjn.11491116
6. Valvona CJ, Fillmore HL, Nunn PB, Pilkington GJ. The regulation and function of lactate dehydrogenase A: therapeutic potential in brain tumor. Brain Pathol. (2016) 26:3–17. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12299
7. Cassier PA, Polivka V, Judson I, Soria JC, Penel N, Marsoni S, et al. Outcome of patients with sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumours participating in phase I trials: a subset analysis of a European Phase I database. Ann Oncol. (2014) 25:1222–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu108
8. Comandatore A, Franczak M, Smolenski RT, Morelli L, Peters GJ, Giovannetti E. Lactate Dehydrogenase and its clinical significance in pancreatic and thoracic cancers. Semin Cancer Biol. (2022) 86:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.09.001
9. Lv J, Zhou Z, Wang J, Yu H, Lu H, Yuan B, et al. Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase expression in different cancers: A meta-analysis. Am J Med Sci. (2019) 358:412–21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.09.012
10. Macías-Rodríguez RU, Solís-Ortega AA, Ornelas-Arroyo VJ, Ruiz-Margáin A, González-Huezo MS, Urdiales-Morán NA, et al. Prognostic performance of an index based on lactic dehydrogenase and transaminases for patients with liver steatosis and COVID-19. World J Gastroenterol. (2022) 28:5444–56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5444
11. Drent M, Cobben NA, Henderson RF, Wouters EF, van Dieijen-Visser M. Usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzymes as indicators of lung damage or inflammation. Eur Respir J. (1996) 9:1736–42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09081736
12. Wang Z, Nielsen PM, Laustsen C, Bertelsen LB. Metabolic consequences of lactate dehydrogenase inhibition by oxamate in hyperglycemic proximal tubular cells. Exp Cell Res. (2019) 378:51–6. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.03.001
13. Osis G, Traylor AM, Black LM, Spangler D, George JF, Zarjou A, et al. Expression of lactate dehydrogenase A and B isoforms in the mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. (2021) 320:F706–f18. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00628.2020
14. Al-Rubeaan K, Siddiqui K, Alghonaim M, Youssef AM, AlNaqeb D. The Saudi Diabetic Kidney Disease study (Saudi-DKD): clinical characteristics and biochemical parameters. Ann Saudi Med. (2018) 38:46–56. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.03.01.1010
15. Mohammadi-Karakani A, Asgharzadeh-Haghighi S, Ghazi-Khansari M, Hosseini R. Determination of urinary enzymes as a marker of early renal damage in diabetic patients. J Clin Lab Anal. (2007) 21:413–7. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20212
16. Lee DY, Kim JY, Ahn E, Hyeon JS, Kim GH, Park KJ, et al. Associations between local acidosis induced by renal LDHA and renal fibrosis and mitochondrial abnormalities in patients with diabetic kidney disease. Trans Res J Lab Clin Med. (2022) 249:88–109. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.06.015
17. Price RG. Urinary enzymes, nephrotoxicity and renal disease. Toxicology. (1982) 23:99–134. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(82)90092-0
18. Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ. The inadmissibility of what we eat in america and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clinic Proc. (2015) 90:911–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009
19. Ma R, Xie C, Wang S, Xiao X. Retinol intake is associated with the risk of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from NHANES. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:11567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38582-z
20. Kang H, Lee JP, Choi K. Exposure to phthalates and environmental phenols in association with chronic kidney disease (CKD) among the general US population participating in multi-cycle NHANES (2005-2016). Sci total Environ. (2021) 791:148343. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148343
21. Hunt LC, Demontis F. Age-related increase in lactate dehydrogenase activity in skeletal muscle reduces life span in drosophila. journals gerontology Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2022) 77:259–67. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab260
22. Girgis H, Masui O, White NM, Scorilas A, Rotondo F, Seivwright A, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase A is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer. (2014) 13:101. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-101
23. Brand A, Singer K, Koehl GE, Kolitzus M, Schoenhammer G, Thiel A, et al. LDHA-associated lactic acid production blunts tumor immunosurveillance by T and NK cells. Cell Metab. (2016) 24:657–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.011
24. Ye Y, Chen M, Chen X, Xiao J, Liao L, Lin F. Clinical significance and prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase expression in cervical cancer. Genet testing Mol Biomarkers. (2022) 26:107–17. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2021.0006
25. Ryu SY, Kleine CE, Hsiung JT, Park C, Rhee CM, Moradi H, et al. Association of lactate dehydrogenase with mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. Nephrology dialysis Transplant. (2021) 36:704–12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa277
26. Shen J, Chen Z, Zhuang Q, Fan M, Ding T, Lu H, et al. Prognostic value of serum lactate dehydrogenase in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0166482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166482
27. Zhang D, Shi L. Serum lactate dehydrogenase level is associated with in-hospital mortality in critically Ill patients with acute kidney injury. Int Urol Nephrol. (2021) 53:2341–48. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02792-z
28. Xiao X, Zhang J, Lang Y, Cai L, Yang Q, Liu K, et al. Associations of lactate dehydrogenase with risk of renal outcomes and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2023) 203:110838. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110838
29. Cai X, Wang T, Ye C, Xu G, Xie L. Relationship between lactate dehydrogenase and albuminuria in Chinese hypertensive patients. J Clin hypertension (Greenwich Conn). (2021) 23:128–36. doi: 10.1111/jch.14118
30. Zager RA, Johnson AC, Becker K. Renal cortical lactate dehydrogenase: A useful, accurate, quantitative marker of in vivo tubular injury and acute renal failure. PloS One. (2013) 8:e66776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066776
31. Heidari Beigvand H, Heidari K, Hashemi B, Saberinia A. The value of lactate dehydrogenase in predicting rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure; a narrative review. Arch Acad Emergency Med. (2021) 9:e24. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1096
32. Alzahri MS, Mousa SA, Almomen AM, Hasanato RM, Polimeni JM, Racz MJ. Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for early renal damage in patients with sickle cell disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. (2015) 26:1161–8. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.168596
33. Saraf SL, Zhang X, Kanias T, Lash JP, Molokie RE, Oza B, et al. Haemoglobinuria is associated with chronic kidney disease and its progression in patients with sickle cell anaemia. Br J haematology. (2014) 164:729–39. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12690
34. Pedersen LM, Sørensen PG. Clinical significance of urinary albumin excretion in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J haematology. (1999) 107:889–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01772.x
35. Hsieh YS, Yeh MC, Lin YY, Weng SF, Hsu CH, Huang CL, et al. Is the level of serum lactate dehydrogenase a potential biomarker for glucose monitoring with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:1099805. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1099805
36. Azushima K, Kovalik JP, Yamaji T, Ching J, Chng TW, Guo J, et al. Abnormal lactate metabolism is linked to albuminuria and kidney injury in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. (2023) 104:1135–49. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.08.006
37. Uslu S, Efe B, Alataş O, Kebapçi N, Colak O, Demirüstü C, et al. Serum cystatin C and urinary enzymes as screening markers of renal dysfunction in diabetic patients. J Nephrol. (2005) 18:559–67.
38. Jung K, Pergande M, Schimke E, Ratzmann KP. [Urine enzymes and low molecular weight proteins as indicators of diabetic nephropathy]. Klinische Wochenschrift. (1989) 67 Suppl 17:27–30.
39. Yu SL, Xu LT, Qi Q, Geng YW, Chen H, Meng ZQ, et al. Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts prognosis and correlates with systemic inflammatory response in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:45194. doi: 10.1038/srep45194
40. Zheng W, Guo J, Liu ZS. Effects of metabolic memory on inflammation and fibrosis associated with diabetic kidney disease: an epigenetic perspective. Clin Epigenet. (2021) 13:87. doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01079-5
41. Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. (2019) 574:575–80. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1
42. Li X, Yang Y, Zhang B, Lin X, Fu X, An Y, et al. Lactate metabolism in human health and disease. Signal transduction targeted Ther. (2022) 7:305. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01151-3
43. Zhang J, Huang L, Shi X, Yang L, Hua F, Ma J, et al. Metformin protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and cell pyroptosis via AMPK/NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Aging. (2020) 12:24270–87. doi: 10.18632/aging.202143
44. Du S, Shi H, Xiong L, Wang P, Shi Y. Canagliflozin mitigates ferroptosis and improves myocardial oxidative stress in mice with diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:1011669. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1011669
45. Zhang Z, Jin X, Yang C, Li Y. Teneligliptin protects against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced endothelial cell injury. Biomedicine pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine pharmacotherapie. (2019) 109:468–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.016
46. Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Qusty N, Alexiou A, Batiha GE. Impact of sitagliptin on non-diabetic covid-19 patients. Curr Mol Pharmacol. (2022) 15:683–92. doi: 10.2174/1874467214666210902115650
47. Wang Y, Cai F, Li G, Tao Y. Novel dual glucagon-like peptide-1/ glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist attenuates diabetes and myocardial injury through inhibiting hyperglycemia, inflammation and oxidative stress in rodent animals. Bioengineered. (2022) 13:9184–96. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2051859
48. Patel BM, Agarwal SS, Bhadada SV. Perindopril protects against streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemic myocardial damage/alterations. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2012) 31:1132–43. doi: 10.1177/0960327112446817
49. Koszegi S, Molnar A, Lenart L, Hodrea J, Balogh DB, Lakat T, et al. RAAS inhibitors directly reduce diabetes-induced renal fibrosis via growth factor inhibition. J Physiol. (2019) 597:193–209. doi: 10.1113/jp277002
Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic kidney disease, database research, NHANES, risk factors
Citation: Tang L, Yang Q, Ma R, Zhou P, Peng C, Xie C, Liang Q, Wu T, Gao W, Yu H, Deng G, Dai Z, Mao N and Xiao X (2024) Association between lactate dehydrogenase and the risk of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1369968. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1369968
Received: 13 January 2024; Accepted: 28 February 2024;
Published: 19 March 2024.
Edited by:
Md Abdul Hye Khan, University of Missouri, United StatesReviewed by:
Alieh Gholaminejad, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, IranAdriana Grismaldo Rodríguez, Pontifical Javeriana University, Colombia
Copyright © 2024 Tang, Yang, Ma, Zhou, Peng, Xie, Liang, Wu, Gao, Yu, Deng, Dai, Mao and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nan Mao, bWFvbmFubHliQDE2My5jb20=; Xiang Xiao, eHhpYW5nMTAwMUAxNjMuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work