Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 04 October 2023
Sec. Systems Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic Integrated Diagnostics and Biomarker Discovery in Endocrinology and Biomedical Sciences View all 17 articles

Copeptin analysis in endocrine disorders

  • 1Department of Chemical Pathology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, National Health Laboratory Services, Durban, South Africa
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine (Chemical Pathology), University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa

Copeptin is cleaved from the same precursor as arginine vasopressin and is released in equimolar amounts with arginine vasopressin from the posterior pituitary in response to the same stimuli. Its level of stability in the blood, quick and simple analysis, and ease of automation make it much easier to analyze than arginine vasopressin, thereby offering a suitable alternative to measuring arginine vasopressin in endocrine disorders. Research has demonstrated the suitability of copeptin in adults for the differentiation of arginine vasopressin resistance and arginine vasopressin deficiency from primary polydipsia, in addition to the early identification of arginine vasopressin deficiency following pituitary surgery; however, further research is still required in the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH) and the pediatric population.

1 Introduction

Copeptin is the 39-amino acid glycopeptide C-terminal portion of the precursor peptides preprovasopressin and provasopressin, from which arginine vasopressin (AVP) is also cleaved for release. AVP plays a pivotal role in the endocrine stress response by stimulating adrenocorticotrophic hormone release and in osmotic and cardiovascular homeostasis by promoting water conservation in the body via the kidney. It is predominantly produced in the hypothalamus but also in other tissues like the sympathetic ganglia, adrenal glands, and testes. The short plasma half-life of AVP of 5-20 min, high instability in plasma even when frozen, and high degree of platelet binding (over 90%) requiring complete pre-analytical removal of platelets make AVP difficult to measure. Copeptin is stable in plasma, needs no special pre-analytical treatment, and can be easily measured using many assays with small sample volumes and results in as little as 0.5-2.5 hours (13). Studies have found that blood copeptin levels are similar to blood AVP levels, making copeptin a suitable alternative to AVP (4, 5). Balanescu et al. reported that copeptin concentrations correlated more closely with plasma osmolality than AVP (5). Copeptin has also been shown to be stable for at least 7 days at room temperature and 14 days at 4°C (3, 6).

2 What we know about copeptin, the molecule

2.1 Formation

The precursor peptides preprovasopressin and provasopressin are mainly produced in the magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamus and are enzymatically separated into the nine-amino acid peptide arginine vasopressin (AVP), 39 amino acid copeptin (CTproAVP), and neurophysin II, all of which are released into the blood in equimolar concentrations from the posterior lobe of the pituitary gland primarily in response to decreased blood volume, high blood osmolality, stress, and/or low blood pressure (Figure 1) (1, 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Pre-provasopressin is the precursor hormone of arginine Vasopressin (AVP) which is formed in the magnocellular nuclei of the hypothalamus, where the signal peptide is cleaved to form pro-AVP. Pro-AVP folds to place AVP in the binding pocket neurophysin II, so that it is protected from proteolysis. During transport to the posterior pituitary, AVP is cleaved off pro-AVP and finally another cleavage step seperates neurophysin II from copeptin with complete processing of the precursor hormones at the level of the posterior pituitary where all three molecules are stored and released into the blood in response to stimuli such as increased Osmolality, decreased blood pressure, decreased blood volume and/or stress.

2.2 Physiological function

The physiological role of copeptin is not fully defined; however, studies have shown that it is a chaperone-like molecule for pro-AVP formation and that it monitors protein folding and interacts with many glycosylated proteins through interaction with the calnexin/calreticulin system, thus increasing the formation of active hormone and decreasing the production of inactive hormone (2).

2.3 Elimination

The elimination of copeptin is also not fully understood; however, it is eliminated at least in part by the kidneys, with an inverse relationship between copeptin blood levels and glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease (2).

2.4 Measurement

Numerous copeptin immunoassays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assays have been developed. The two most studied immunoassays are an original sandwich immunoluminometric assay (LIA) and an automated immunofluorescent immunoassay (on the KRYPTOR platform), which show good correlation with very low and high levels of copeptin. However, the ELISA assay correlates poorly with both immunoassay methods, and therefore cut-offs developed on the immunoassay systems cannot be used for the ELISA assay results (2, 3).

3 Clinical applications in endocrinology

3.1 Diabetes insipidus

Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a condition characterized by disordered arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion or action, resulting in the production of hypotonic urine (<300 mOsm/kg H2O) >50 ml/kg/day, with concurrent polydipsia (>3 L/day). It results from either decreased secretion of AVP (AVP deficiency) or resistance to AVP action (7).

AVP deficiency has various etiologies, such as pituitary or hypothalamic median eminence lesions, trauma, pituitary surgery, neoplastic, vascular, autoimmune, infectious, granulomatous, or hereditary forms (2, 7). Complete AVP resistance is due to a lack of aquaporin 2‐mediated water reabsorption in the renal collecting duct, which may be due to electrolyte disturbances (hypercalcemia or hypokalemia, renal pathologies, gene mutations in the key proteins vasopressin V2 receptor or aquaporin 2) or secondary to adverse drug effects (e.g., lithium) (2, 3).

Patients with primary polydipsia have chronic excessive fluid intake (which can occur in health-conscious people who want to drink large amounts of water, who have dependency disorders or reduced thirst thresholds, and in psychiatric patients) with subsequent excretion of hypotonic urine, hence presenting similarly to DI. It is important to differentiate between AVP resistance, AVP deficiency, and primary polydipsia as their treatment differs and incorrect management could have dire consequences (2, 3).

The water deprivation test is the diagnostic gold standard for differentiating DI from its main differential diagnosis, primary polydipsia. During this test, patients are not allowed to ingest any water for a maximum period of 17 hours or until blood sodium concentrations exceed 150 mmol/l or 3-5% of the patient’s initial body weight is lost, with measurements of urine excretion, urine osmolality, blood sodium, and blood osmolality during the water deprivation period. At the end of the water deprivation period, exogenous AVP is administered, and changes in urine osmolality are assessed for a period of time according to institutional protocols. Complete AVP deficiency is diagnosed based on the recommendations of Miller et al. for a urine osmolality that does not rise to >300 mOsm/kg during the water deprivation period with a >50% increase post-exogenous AVP administration. AVP-resistant patients have no increase in urine osmolality after exogenous AVP administration, and partially AVP-deficient patients have a urine osmolality between 300 and 800 mOsm/kg during water deprivation with a >9% increase after AVP injection; however, this test has only 70% diagnostic accuracy and was developed in a small cohort of 29 patients. Current methods utilized to assess post-operative DI (serum and urine sodium, and osmolality and fluid balance determination) have low sensitivity and specificity (<50%) (3, 8). Studies have reported that copeptin is useful in various clinical conditions, especially in the differential diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (2, 9, 10).

Research has shown that an unstimulated, random copeptin cut-off of >21.4 pmol/L can diagnose AVP resistance with 100% sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis. Differentiating AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia does require stimulation testing due to the similar baseline copeptin values in these two conditions. The copeptin-based hypertonic saline stimulation test and the arginine stimulation test have been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy of 97% and 93%, respectively, for DI. The copeptin-based hypertonic saline infusion test has a diagnostic accuracy of 95-96.5% for partial DI and is safe and better tolerated than the water deprivation test (2, 10). Arginine is a less effective stimulus than copeptin, and therefore has a lower diagnostic accuracy but requires less blood sodium monitoring and is better tolerated (2). Atila et al. also assessed the copeptin-based glucagon stimulation test and found that glucagon-stimulated copeptin in healthy participants, using a copeptin cut-off level of 4.6 pmol/l, had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90% to discriminate between AVP deficiency and primary polydipsia (11). It has also been shown that post-operative copeptin results in patients after pituitary surgery are much lower in those who develop AVP deficiency than in those who do not (2, 8, 1214); therefore, it could greatly assist in the prompt diagnosis of AVP deficiency in these subjects.

3.2 Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone

SIADH is characterized by inappropriately elevated plasma AVP levels, decreased blood osmolality, inappropriately high urine osmolality, and normal or increased blood volume. It is a common cause of euvolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. Causes of SIADH include brain pathology (such as surgery, tumors, infection, prolonged seizures, psychiatric disease, and stress), non-CNS tumors, lung disease, and certain medications (anticonvulsants, antiparkinsonian drugs, antipsychotics, antipyretics, antidepressants, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antineoplastic drugs, and first-generation sulfonylureas) (15).

SIADH is diagnosed when blood osmolality is <275 mOsm/kg, blood sodium is ≤130 mmol/l, urine osmolality is greater than blood osmolality, urine sodium is high (usually >40 to 60 mmol/l), and cardiac, hepatic, renal, thyroid or adrenal failure, effects of pituitary surgery, diuretic therapy, or medications known to stimulate AVP have been excluded (15).

One study found persistently high copeptin values (>38 pmol/l) in patients with lung cancer and SIADH; however, cancer patients have many other reasons for increased AVP secretion, such as comorbidities, medications, vomiting, nausea, dehydration, or stress, and there is still insufficient evidence to support this (2). Nevertheless, this is an area of interest for future studies involving copeptin.

There has been one study that showed that the ratio of copeptin to urinary sodium could help differentiate SIADH from conditions with decreased blood volume; however, copeptin alone was insufficient (3). More research is required in this area to confirm this.

4 Physiologic range and pathologic cut-offs

Plasma concentrations of copeptin show a wide range between 1 and 13.8 pmol/l, with a median concentration of 4.2 pmol/l in healthy, normal-osmotic volunteers. Men have slightly but significantly higher copeptin levels than women. Copeptin has not been shown to be influenced by age, circadian rhythm, food intake or phases of the menstrual cycle, but copeptin levels decrease with oral fluid intake as low as 200 to 300ml (2, 3). There were no gender differences in copeptin levels during hypertonic saline infusion tests (3).

A random copeptin value of 21.4 pmol/l was found to have a diagnostic accuracy of 100% for AVP resistance (9). Another study also found random copeptin levels >20 pmol/l as good cut-offs for AVP resistance, with post-overnight water deprivation levels of <2.6 pmol/l indicating AVP deficiency (diagnostic accuracy of 78%), and a ratio of Δplasma copeptin levels before and after water deprivation to plasma sodium post water deprivation had a high diagnostic accuracy of 94% for AVP deficiency (3).

Stimulated copeptin values for differentiating AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia depend on the type of stimulation test performed. A cut-off of ≤4.9 pmol/l post-hypertonic saline infusion test has been suggested to diagnose AVP deficiency with high diagnostic accuracy of 96% (3, 9, 10). An arginine infusion test cut-off of ≤3.8 pmol/l has been used to diagnose AVP deficiency (2), and the possible cut-off for the glucagon stimulation test was found to be 4.6 pmol/l (11).

Initially, an insulin tolerance test was used to induce hypoglycemia in patients 3 months after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, which showed low copeptin levels in patients with AVP deficiency of 3.7 ± 0.7 pmol/l, with hypoglycemic copeptin levels of <4.75 pmol/l having the best diagnostic accuracy of 100%. The surgery itself is a stressful event that can trigger AVP release; therefore, unstimulated post-surgery cut-offs were assessed. Suggested post-pituitary surgery cut-offs on day 1 post-op are <2.5 pmol/l for AVP deficiency and >30 pmol/l indicate no AVP deficiency (3, 8) or <3.6 pmol/l for AVP deficiency (14), whereas one study by Jang et al. found that day 2 copeptin values <3.1 pmol/l showed the best performance in predicting permanent AVP deficiency (13). Kim et al. found that 3 months after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, copeptin values of <1.9 pmol/l with normal serum sodium results were the best cut-off value for permanent AVP deficiency with a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%; however, a copeptin value of ≥3.5 pmol/l excluded AVP deficiency with a negative predictive value of 100% (16). The cut-off values are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Published copeptin cut-off values.

5 Discussion

In the field of endocrinology, copeptin has been shown to play an important role in differentiating DI from primary polydipsia (2, 9, 10) and there are promising results regarding its utility in the diagnosis of post-pituitary surgery DI (2, 8, 1214). The determination of appropriate cut-offs in a larger cohort and different populations is still needed. Another area that requires more research is the utility of copeptin in SIADH with other biomarkers. There are very few studies in the pediatric population, which is an important area to highlight in future studies on the utility of copeptin in endocrinology.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bolignano D, Cabassi A, Fiaccadori E, Ghigo E, Pasquali R, Peracino A, et al. Copeptin (CTproAVP), a new tool for understanding the role of vasopressin in pathophysiology. Clin Chem Lab Med (CCLM) (2014) 52(10):1447–56. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0379

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Christ-Crain M, Refardt J, Winzeler B. Approach to the patient:”Utility of the copeptin assay”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2022) 107(6):1727–38. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Refardt J, Winzeler B, Christ-Crain M. Copeptin and its role in the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. Clin Endocrinol (2019) 91(1):22–32. doi: 10.1111/cen.13991

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Jochberger S, Luckner G, Mayr VD, Wenzel V, Morgenthaler NG, Friesenecker BE, et al. Course of vasopressin and copeptin plasma concentrations in a patient with severe septic shock. Anaesthesia Intensive Care (2006) 34(4):498–500. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Balanescu S, Kopp P, Gaskill MB, Morgenthaler NG, Schindler C, Rutishauser J. Correlation of plasma copeptin and vasopressin concentrations in hypo-, iso-, and hyperosmolar States. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96(4):1046–52. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Alonso C, Bergmann A. Assay for the measurement of copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin. Clin Chem (2006) 52(1):112–9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.060038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Christ-Crain M. Diabetes insipidus: new concepts for diagnosis. Neuroendocrinology (2020) 110(9-10):859–67. doi: 10.1159/000505548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Winzeler B, Zweifel C, Nigro N, Arici B, Bally M, Schuetz P, et al. Postoperative copeptin concentration predicts diabetes insipidus after pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100(6):2275–82. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Timper K, Fenske W, Kühn F, Frech N, Arici B, Rutishauser J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100(6):2268–74. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fenske W, Refardt J, Chifu I, Schnyder I, Winzeler B, Drummond J, et al. A copeptin-based approach in the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus. New Engl J Med (2018) 379(5):428–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Atila C, Christ-Crain M, Gaisl O, Szinnai G, Vogt D, Werlen L. ODP313 glucagon-stimulated copeptin measurements in the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Endocr Soc (2022) 6(Suppl 1):A492. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. de Vries F, Lobatto DJ, Verstegen MJ, van Furth WR, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR. Postoperative diabetes insipidus: how to define and grade this complication? Pituitary (2021) 24(2):284–91. doi: 10.1007/s11102-020-01083-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Jang HN, Kang H, Kim YH, Lim HS, Lee MK, Lee KR, et al. Serum copeptin levels at day two after pituitary surgery and ratio to baseline predict postoperative central diabetes insipidus. Pituitary (2022) 2:1–1. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01278-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Rostom H, Noronha S, Jafar-Mohammadi B, May C, Borg A, Halliday J, et al. Post-pituitary surgery copeptin analysis as a ‘rule-out’test for post-operative diabetes insipidus. Endocrine (2023) 79(2):358–64. doi: 10.1007/s12020-022-03220-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rifai N. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics-e-book. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences (2017).

Google Scholar

16. Kim YH, Kim YH, Je YS, Lee KR, Lim HS, Kim JH. Changes in copeptin levels before and 3 months after transsphenoidal surgery according to the presence of postoperative central diabetes insipidus. Sci Rep (2021) 11(1):17240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95500-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: copeptin, diabetes insipidus, arginine vasopressin, endocrine, biomarker

Citation: Moodley N (2023) Copeptin analysis in endocrine disorders. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1230045. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1230045

Received: 27 May 2023; Accepted: 21 August 2023;
Published: 04 October 2023.

Edited by:

Sijung Yun, Predictiv Care, Inc., United States

Reviewed by:

Leandro Kasuki, Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (IECPN), Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Moodley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nareshni Moodley, nareshni.moodley@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.