Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Endocrinol., 30 June 2023
Sec. Obesity
This article is part of the Research Topic Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease: Clinical Perspectives From Pathogenesis to Diagnosis and Treatment View all 8 articles

Editorial: Metabolic associated fatty liver disease: clinical perspectives from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment

  • 1Department of Genetics and Developmental Science, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Metabolic Phenotyping in Model Animals, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3School of Biological Sciences and Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 4Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 5School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Obesity is a global epidemic (1, 2) with profound pathological implications for the liver, leading to a spectrum of liver abnormalities now named metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) (3). The “multiple hit” hypothesis proposes that MAFLD arises through multiple insults acting together (4). However, the exact identities of these “hits”, their interplay and dynamic changes, together with the onset and progression of MAFLD are far from clear. Accordingly, it is not surprising that pharmacological treatment agents for MAFLD are still lacking. In addition, diagnosis of MAFLD remains a challenge since no specific diagnostic markers are yet available to achieve non-invasive diagnosis and staging of the disease.

As a key integrator of the body’s energy needs and metabolic homeostasis, the liver receives multiple afferent metabolic signals from metabolically active organs. Within the context of MAFLD pathogenesis, there is increasing research focus on the dysregulated organ crosstalk between the liver and other peripheral organs, including adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, gut, and microbiome (5). In particular, various mechanisms, such as chronic inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, cellular senescence, insulin resistance, aberrant lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, are implicated in the development and progression of the disease (69). A better understanding of the pathogenic events during the initiation and progression of MAFLD is therefore of great importance to establish more precise and non-invasive diagnostic methods and to inspire novel approaches for the management and prevention of MAFLD.

This Research Topic focuses on how insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying MAFLD are improving our knowledge of diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic interventions for the disease. This Research Topic contains seven articles: six original research papers and one systematic review.

The actual prevalence of MAFLD is probably underestimated due to a limitation in diagnosis. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of MAFLD but suffers from poor patient acceptance due to its invasive nature (10). Therefore, non-invasive and highly-sensitive diagnostic approaches are warranted for early diagnosis of MAFLD. In a cross-sectional study conducted by Duan et al., the authors identify a positive association between cardiometabolic index (CMI) and MAFLD risk. CMI is calculated by multiplying the ratio of triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) by waist-to-height ratio. High CMI shows excellent predictive value for MAFLD. Although MAFLD is strongly associated with obesity, there is nevertheless 8-19% of the population with MAFLD that are non-obese (11). Non-obese individuals with MAFLD have a significantly higher risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) than obese individuals with MAFLD (12). Studies on the prediction of MAFLD in the non-obese population are more limited than studies in the obese population. In a longitudinal study analyzed by Li K. et al., the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), calculated by the logarithm of TG/HDL-C, was identified as a strong independent risk factor for new-onset MAFLD in non-obese individuals, especially in those with low body mass index (BMI). These studies suggest CMI and AIP as potential markers for the diagnosis of MAFLD in obese and non-obese individuals, respectively.

Another retrospective case-control study that included 1,058 Chinese participants was conducted by Liu et al. The correlation between MAFLD and 22 metabolism-related indexes and the predictive values of these 22 indicators were calculated. The authors’ findings revealed that the best predictors of overall MAFLD, obesity, lean diabetes mellitus, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) MAFLD subgroups were fatty liver index (FLI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), waist circumference-triglyceride index (WTI), and FLI, respectively.

MAFLD is not only associated with obesity and metabolic disorders but also strongly correlates with CVDs. From their cross-sectional datasets, Lei et al. found that MAFLD is significantly associated with 12-lead ECG-diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, in the retrospective cohort, MAFLD was closely associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

Most patients with MAFLD start from simple steatosis, which is generally a benign condition. Approximately one-third of these patients develop NASH, the advanced form of MAFLD that can prompt collagen synthesis and deposition, leading to cirrhosis and even hepatocellular carcinoma (13). Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that govern the transition from simple steatosis to NASH is critical for the potential prevention of NASH progression. This is the focus of the study by Li X. et al., which analyzed gene expression profiles of liver tissues from patients with MAFLD obtained from various publicly available datasets. The authors identify a downregulation of the metallothionein pathway during the transition from steatosis to NASH. Interestingly, overexpression of metallothionein 1M in vitro protects hepatocytes from palmitate-induced lipotoxicity suggesting metallothionein as a potential intervention target for MAFLD progression.

The Ca2+ signaling pathway, especially abnormal Ca2+ transport within the mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM) region, is closely associated with cellular activities such as lipid synthesis and transportation, regulation of mitochondrial dynamics, inflammatory vesicle formation, ERS, autophagy and apoptosis (14, 15). Furthermore, Ca2+ signaling within the MAM region is implicated in hepatic gluconeogenesis, adipogenesis, inflammation, and other biological processes (16). Tang et al. interrogated the potential role of Ca2+ signaling within the MAM region in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathogenesis. To this end, a case-control study was conducted in which 2,701 subjects from the Chinese Han population were enrolled and genotyped for six genetic variants of the Ca2+ transport-associated genes, HSPA5 and ITPR2, and the impact of these variants on NAFLD risk was assessed. The study identified a correlation between NAFLD risk and the variant genotypes of HSPA5 (rs12009 and rs430397) and ITPR2 (rs11048570), thereby implicating Ca2+ signaling in NAFLD pathogenesis.

In the review article by Wang et al., a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of MAFLD, mainly in terms of liver function, glucose and lipid metabolism, and inflammation. This meta-analysis included 772 patients from 15 studies and found that the probiotic therapies efficiently decreased concentrations of liver injury markers and insulin resistance in patients with MAFLD versus control individuals. These findings indicate that probiotic supplementation can decrease liver enzyme concentrations and beneficially regulate glucose metabolism in patients with MAFLD. Subsequent analyses revealed that age, baseline body mass index, and the duration of intervention, may influence the outcomes of the probiotic therapy.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all authors who submitted their research articles and all reviewers for their contributions to this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Allison DB, Downey M, Atkinson RL, Billington CJ, Bray GA, Eckel RH, et al. Obesity as a disease: a white paper on evidence and arguments commissioned by the council of the obesity society. Obesity (2008) 16:1161–77. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Crewe C, An YA, Scherer PE. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired angiogenesis. J Clin Invest (2017) 127:74–82. doi: 10.1172/JCI88883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol (2020) 73:202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Buzzetti E, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis EA. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism (2016) 65:1038–48. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang X, Ji X, Wang Q, Li JZ. New insight into inter-organ crosstalk contributing to the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Protein Cell (2018) 9:164–77. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0436-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lebeaupin C, Vallee D, Hazari Y, Hetz C, Chevet E, Bailly-Maitre B. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol (2018) 69:927–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Carotti S, Aquilano K, Valentini F, Ruggiero S, Alletto F, Morini S, et al. An overview of deregulated lipid metabolism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with special focus on lysosomal acid lipase. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2020) 319:G469–80. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00049.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ogrodnik M, Miwa S, Tchkonia T, Tiniakos D, Wilson CL, Lahat A, et al. Cellular senescence drives age-dependent hepatic steatosis. Nat Commun (2017) 8:15691. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lin H, Wang L, Liu Z, Long K, Kong M, Ye D, et al. Hepatic MDM2 causes metabolic associated fatty liver disease by blocking triglyceride-VLDL secretion via ApoB degradation. Adv Sci (Weinh) (2022) 9:e2200742. doi: 10.1002/advs.202200742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ando Y, Jou JH. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and recent guideline updates. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) (2021) 17:23–8. doi: 10.1002/cld.1045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Drew L. Fighting the fatty liver. Nature (2017) 550:S102–s103. doi: 10.1038/550S102a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yoshitaka H, Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Fukuda T, Ohbora A, Fukui M. Nonoverweight nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incident cardiovascular disease: a post hoc analysis of a cohort study. Med (Baltimore) (2017) 96:e6712. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006712

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Diehl AM, Day C. Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med (2017) 377:2063–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1503519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Filadi R, Theurey P, Pizzo P. The endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling in health and disease: molecules, functions and significance. Cell Calcium (2017) 62:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hayashi T, Rizzuto R, Hajnoczky G, Su TP. MAM: more than just a housekeeper. Trends Cell Biol (2009) 19:81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Arruda AP, Hotamisligil GS. Calcium homeostasis and organelle function in the pathogenesis of obesity and diabetes. Cell Metab (2015) 22:381–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MAFLD, obesity, biological marker, calcium signalling, metabolic disorders

Citation: Huang Z, Ye D, Loomes K, Cheng KK and Hui HX (2023) Editorial: Metabolic associated fatty liver disease: clinical perspectives from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1206642. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1206642

Received: 16 April 2023; Accepted: 21 June 2023;
Published: 30 June 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Katherine Samaras, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Huang, Ye, Loomes, Cheng and Hui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hannah Xiaoyan Hui, hannahhui@cuhk.edu.hk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.