- 1Research Group Developmental Genetics of the Nervous System, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany
- 2Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
- 3Living Systems Institute, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- 4School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Introduction: The transcription factor rx3 is important for the formation of the pituitary and parts of the hypothalamus. Mutant animals lacking rx3 function have been well characterized in developmental studies, but relatively little is known about their behavioral phenotypes.
Methods: We used cell type staining to reveal differences in stress axis architecture, and performed cortisol measurements and behavior analysis to study both hormonal and behavioral stress responses in rx3 mutants.
Results and Discussion: Consistent with the role of rx3 in hypothalamus and pituitary development, we show a distinct loss of corticotrope cells involved in stress regulation, severe reduction of pituitary innervation by hypothalamic cells, and lack of stress-induced cortisol release in rx3 mutants. Interestingly, despite these deficits, we report that rx3-/- larval zebrafish can still display nominal behavioral responses to both stressful and non-stressful stimuli. However, unlike wildtypes, mutants lacking proper pituitary-interrenal function do not show enhanced behavioral performance under moderate stress level, supporting the view that corticotroph cells are not required for behavioral responses to some types of stressful stimuli but modulate subtle behavioral adjustments under moderate stress.
Introduction
The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis integrates sensory inputs and generates a hormonal response to support an animal’s struggle against stressors (1, 2). The hypothalamic control center mediating this response is the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in mammals, or the homologous neurosecretory preoptic area (NPO) in fish (3–5). The pituitary of fish is homologous to the pituitary of other vertebrates, and the homolog of the adrenal gland in fish is known as the interrenal gland (6). The fish version of the HPA axis is therefore termed HPI axis (7–9) and is already functional in larval zebrafish (10, 11). Neuroendocrine cells in the PVN/NPO release corticotropin-releasing-hormone (CRH) and arginine-vasopressin (AVP) in the pituitary, triggering the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from corticotrope cells, which then acts on steroidogenic cells of the adrenal/interrenal gland, causing the release of glucocorticoids like cortisol as the final stress axis effectors (12). Important PVN/NPO cell types relevant for stress regulation are those producing CRH [primary stress peptide (13)] AVP [known for osmoregulation and vasoconstriction, but also co-acting with CRH (14, 15)] and oxytocin [OXT, mostly known for social functions, but also involved in stress (16)]. OXT has also been implied in promoting the formation of pituitary vascularization (17).
The neurohypophysis in teleosts consists of fiber bundles protruding dorsally into the larger adenohypophysis (17, 18). Adenohypophyseal cells are arranged in distinct subregions [rostral lactotropes and corticotropes; intermediate somatotropes, thyrotropes, gonadotropes; caudal melanotropes and corticotropes (19–21)]. Corticotropes express proopiomelanocortin (POMC), a precursor of ACTH in mammals and fish (22–24). One essential transcription factor for the development of the pituitary and part of the hypothalamus is Rax (mouse) or rx3 (zebrafish), which also is essential for optic cup formation and eye development (25, 26). Loss of Rax/rx3 function appears to prevent proper hypothalamic patterning, since transcription factors and cell type markers including pomc and avp are not expressed in the hypothalamus of mutants (26–29). oxt expression was however reported not to be affected (27) in rx3 mutants. The pituitary fails to develop properly as well, with inhibited formation of the neurohypophysis (30, 31) and malformation of the adenohypophysis that however still produces secretory cells (32). The rx3 mutant fish adenohypophysis has seemingly normal pomc-expressing caudal melanotropes, but lacks rostral corticotropes, leading to glucocorticoid deficiency (27).
Corticotroph cells produce several active peptides derived from the cleavage and processing of the precursor gene POMC (33). These POMC-derived peptides can lead to behavioral change when injected into rats (34). Furthermore, ACTH fragments devoid of adrenal function can also prompt behavioral change (35), although mechanisms responsible for rapid behavioral effects of pituitary peptides have yet to be reported. Also, fast glucocorticoid effects on neural activity have been documented in multiple brain areas in mammals (36–38), and behavioral correlates of glucocorticoid injections occurring within minutes after injection have also been reported (39–41). However, despite these advances, the limited accessibility of the hypothalamus, pituitary, and adrenal gland along with the coupled release of brain neuropeptides and peripheral hormones upon stress onset has made it difficult to specify rapid behavioral modulation by the pituitary-adrenal leg of the HPA axis.
Larval zebrafish are particularly suitable for neuroendocrine research since the tissues involved are functionally conserved and optically accessible and behavioral testing can be performed with full control of the environment (11, 42–45). Recent evidence from larval zebrafish highlights the role of the pituitary-interrenal leg of the HPI axis in rapidly modulating adaptive responses to stressors (43). Using optogenetic manipulation of pituitary corticotrophs in combination with novel assays for measuring goal-directed actions in short timescales, we showed that increased corticotroph cell activity upon the onset of stress can enhance cortisol release from steroidogenic cells and allow rapid adjustments of locomotion, stressor avoidance, and stimulus responsiveness (i.e., performance), which aid in coping with stressors (43). We hypothesized that such enhanced performance (43, 46) may be absent in rx3-/- mutants due to the lack of the rostral pomc cluster. Here, we first tested behavioral responses to both stressful and non-stressful stimuli in rx3-/- mutant larvae and show that they respond to thermal (stressful) and subtle mechanosensory (non-stressful) inputs as wild-type (rx3+/+) larvae do. Then, we report the absence of stress-induced performance enhancement along with changes in neurosecretory cell projections, neurohypophyseal innervation, and stress hormone release when rx3 function is lost.
Results
Larvae lacking rx3 do not show increased levels of circulating cortisol after stressor exposure
We deployed three main approaches. Firstly, we exposed wild-type (rx3+/+) and mutant (rx3-/-) larvae to a stressor of moderate intensity. To pinpoint effects invariant to stressor identity, we used not just one, but three different stressors: pH drop (pH), hyperosmotic medium (salt), or fast water flows (flows) evoking mechanosensory stress (see also Methods). Each of these stimulations causes cortisol, the final effector of the HPI axis in humans and zebrafish, to increase in a stimulus intensity-dependent manner, as established elsewhere (10, 43, 46–49). To compare the level of HPI axis activation produced by these stimulations, we measured whole-body cortisol directly after stressor exposure. We found that rx3-/- mutants did not show increased levels of cortisol after stressor exposure, in contrast to wild-type larvae (Figure 1), confirming altered HPI axis function upon stress onset in rx3-/- mutants.
Figure 1 Glucocorticoid reactivity in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- zebrafish larvae. Whole-body cortisol in rx3+/+ (left) and rx3-/- (right) larvae (all data points shown, mean in red, sample size in parentheses) after exposure to a pH drop (pH), hyperosmotic medium (salt) or stress-evoking fast water flows (flows). Baseline levels are those of control (unexposed) larvae (unexp.), which were equally handled, omitting stressor exposure. Letters indicate results of Bonferroni’s tests (p < 0.001) after one-way ANOVAs (left, rx3+/+: F(3,59)=42.8, p < 0.0001, right, rx3-/-: F(3,59)=2.7, p = 0.1), followed by post hoc comparisons.
HPI axis elements in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- larvae
Secondly, we examined the expression of specific hypothalamic, pituitary and interrenal markers in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- mutants (Figure 2): corticotropin-releasing hormone (Crh), arginine vasopressin (Avp) and oxytocin (Oxt) in the NPO, POMC in the pituitary (19), and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in the interrenal gland. Previous work showed that NPO cells in rx3 -/- mutant larvae express Oxt or Crh (27). Using specific antibodies against Avp, Oxt and Crh, we confirmed the presence of somata producing these peptides in rx3 -/- mutants and found that, compared to rx3+/+ larvae, the cell numbers appeared reduced in larvae lacking rx3 (rx3+/+: averages of 10 avp cells, n=3; 25.25 oxt cells, n=4; 8.33 crh cells, n=3; rx3-/-: 5 avp, 9 oxt, 3.7 crh cells, n=3; Figures 2A-F’). Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) also revealed alterations in the projection patterns of NPO cells producing Avp, Oxt or Crh in rx3 -/- mutants. Fibers of the hypothalamohypophyseal tract connecting the NPO to the pituitary (Figures 2A’, C’, E’) were much less organized (Figure 2B, B’, F, F’), and pituitary innervation was not always detectable (e.g., Figure 2B’’, D-D’’, F’’). Fluorescent in situ hybridization (ISH) confirmed the drastic reduction of the rostral pomc cluster in the adenohypophysis of rx3 -/- mutants (Figure 2G-H’’) found previously (27). In addition, the remaining caudal cluster of pomc cells appeared to be enlarged in comparison to wildtype larvae (rx3+/+: averages of 27 rostral and 32.75 caudal pomc cells, n=4; rx3-/-: 2 rostral and 47 caudal pomc cells, n=3). Furthermore, analysis of the interrenal gland combining ISH for star-positive steroidogenic cells (homologous to the adrenal cortex) and IHC for intermingled TH-positive chromaffin cells (homologous to the adrenal medulla) showed that both cell types are present and appear to be unaffected in rx3-/- mutants (Figure 2I- J’’). These observations are consistent with the view that altered HPI axis function in rx3 -/- mutants emerges from incomplete pituitary innervation and the absence of the rostral pomc cluster, and not from analogous morphological alterations of the interrenal gland.
Figure 2 HPI axis elements in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- zebrafish larvae. A-F’’, The hypothalamic part of the HPI axis, illustrated by dorsal (A, B, C, D, E, F) and lateral (A’, B’, C’, D’, E’, F’) views of dorsally imaged IHC stainings of three NPO cell types. Cells producing Avp (A-A’), Oxt (C-C’), or Crh (E-E’) form a cluster in the NPO (arrowheads), and many of their fibers innervate the pituitary (arrows) in rx3+/+ wild-types (wt) via the hypothalamo-hypophyseal tract (red dotted lines). See also dense innervation in dorsal pituitary closeup views of more examples (A’’, C’’, E’’). In rx3-/- mutant larvae, cells producing Avp (B-B’), Oxt (D-D’), or Crh (F-F’) cluster less densely in the NPO (arrowheads) and their numbers are reduced. Pituitary innervation is present in some of the stainings (e.g., arrows in B, B’, F, F’) but not in others (e.g., D, D’); generally, the projection patterns appear drastically different. See also complete lack of innervation in dorsal pituitary closeup views of more examples (B’’, D’’, F’’). G-H, The pituitary part of the HPI axis, illustrated by dorsal (G, H) and lateral (G’, H’) images of ISH stainings for pomc. Two pituitary clusters are formed by pomc-positive cells in rx3+/+ wild-types (G-G’). The rostral cluster is absent, and the caudal cluster appears larger in rx3-/- mutants (H-H’). Another example is shown for each case as well (G’’, H’’). I-J’, The interrenal part of the HPI axis, illustrated by combined staining for star (I’, J’, ISH, steroidogenic part) and TH (I’’, J’’, IHC, chromaffin part). The interrenal gland is intact and both cell types are present in rx3+/+ wild-types (I-I’’) and rx3-/- mutants (J-J’’). Abbreviations: Avp, arginine vasopressin; Crh, corticotropic hormone; Oxt, oxytocin; PO, preoptic area; pomc, proopiomelanocortin; Pit, pituitary; PT, posterior tuberculum; Tel, telencephalon; Th, thalamus. Rostral to the left. Scale bars: 100 µm (A-D’, E-F’), 25 µm (A’’-D’’, E’’, F’’, G-H’’, I, J).
rx3-/- mutants respond to stressful and non-stressful stimuli, but do not show stress-induced performance enhancement
Thirdly, using established protocols (43, 46, 50), we exposed rx3+/+ vs. rx3-/- larvae to the above three different stressors of moderate intensity (Figure 1, see also Figures 1A-C in 46) and compared their post-stress onset performance on distinct innate behaviors driven by either thermal (stressful) or subtle mechanosensory (non-stressful) stimuli. We chose these behaviors because they entail teleonomic actions that can occur in the dark without optical stimulation, thus fitting the eyeless phenotype of the rx3-/- larvae. Prior to the behavioral tests, we confirmed that rx3+/+ and rx3-/- larvae had similar levels of basal swimming at 28 °C under infrared illumination (See Methods) (Unpaired two-tailed t-test, t(28)=0.18, p = 0.86; mean distance (mm) swum in 120 s ± S.E.M: rx3+/+, 484.5 ± 21, N = 15; rx3-/-, 489.7 ± 20.7, N = 15), in line with previous data (51).
Larval zebrafish can select best conditions in a thermal-gradient environment (46) and react to rising temperature with fast turns and increased swim velocity (43). Therefore, in a first assay, we examined the relationship between pre-exposure to either ‘pH’, ‘salt’, or ‘flows’, and the actions of individual larvae encountering increasing temperature. For this, we monitored the movements of single larvae swimming in darkness in a cylindrical chamber with opposite inlet/outlet before and after a sharp increase in the temperature of a slowly flowing medium (Figure 3A, see also Methods). Due to both heat conduction and the layout of the chamber, the rapidly increasing temperature of the flowing medium caused a substantial temperature difference between the surroundings of the inlet (high temperature, zone 1) and the outlet (low temperature, zone 2). As a result, larvae moving into zone 1 under increasing temperature displayed fast turns and increased swim velocity. To quantify their response to varying temperature, we measured ‘differential speed’ (ΔS) as the difference (in %) between the swim velocity (mm × (40 ms)−1) in zones 1 and 2 for each larva, or ((swim velocity in zone 1−swim velocity in zone 2)/swim velocity in zone 2) × 100, before (30 s) and after (60–90 s) the onset of the rise in temperature (for details, see Methods and Figures 3C–E in 43). In rx3+/+ larvae, the distribution of ΔS values across groups showed that, under increasing temperature, unexposed (control) subjects swam faster in zone 1, and that larvae pre-exposed to any of the above stressors had equally distributed ΔS values that were, on average, 353.1% higher than those of control larvae (Figure 3B). In rx3-/- larvae, ΔS values also revealed that unexposed subjects swam faster in zone 1 under increasing temperature. However, stressor exposure did not change the distribution of ΔS values across groups of rx3-/- larvae (Figure 3C).
Figure 3 Response to rising temperature in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- zebrafish larvae under basal and stressed conditions. (A) Representative 1 s swim paths from larvae showing increased speed and turns near the inlet (bottom right arrow) as the temperature inside the swimming chamber increases faster in zone 1. White dots indicate start positions. Scale bar, 2.5 mm. Adapted from 43. (B, C) Differential speed, i.e., the difference between swim velocity (mm per 40 ms) in zones 1 and 2 (in %), across groups of unexposed (control) and pre-exposed (to either ‘pH’, ‘salt’ or ‘flows’) rx3+/+ (B) and rx3-/- (C) larvae before and after the onset of temperature rise (see also Methods). Sample size in parentheses. (B, C) Letters and asterisks indicate results of Bonferroni’s tests (P<0.001) after two-way repeated measures ANOVAs; (B) time factor: F(1,56)=215.2, P<0.0001, treatment factor: F(3,56)=7.7, P=0.0002, time × treatment factor: F(3,56)=9.2, P<0.000; (C) time factor: F(1,56)=163.0, P<0.0001, treatment factor: F(3,56)=0.2, P=0.91, time × treatment factor: F(3,56)=0.3, P=0.83.
Hydrodynamic sensing provides fish with various benefits (52) and larval zebrafish have been shown to respond to subtle, structured (i.e., 1-5 Hz), locally generated water motions (henceforth minute water motions, or mWMs) with reduced locomotion and positive taxis towards the stimulus source (Figures 4A, B), a response that is highly sensitive to stimulus features and sensory background (50). In contrast to the above stressful ‘flows’, mWMs are non-stressful (50); they cause structured interactions between a larva’s surroundings and its mechanosensory machinery. Therefore, in a second assay, we compared the response to mWMs of both unexposed (control) and pre-exposed rx3+/+ and rx3-/- larvae. To quantify a larva’s response to mWMs, we measured integrals of distance swum against time for equal periods before and during stimulation (see also Methods and Figures 3F, G in 43). In rx3+/+ larvae, the distribution of motion values across groups gave responses for pre-exposed subjects that were, on average, 176.9% greater than those of unexposed subjects (Figure 4C), in line with previous work (43, 46). In rx3-/- larvae, by contrast, both unexposed and pre-exposed subjects showed equally distributed values like those of unexposed rx3+/+ larvae (Figure 4D). Thus, in rx3-/- larvae, enhanced performance did not follow the onset of stress. Altogether, the results showed that the (three) different stressors of moderate intensity caused positively correlated changes in cortisol, ΔS and motion values in rx3+/+, but not in rx3-/- larvae.
Figure 4 Response to minute water motions in rx3+/+ and rx3-/- zebrafish larvae under basal and stressed conditions. (A) Representative average trace of a wildtype larva’s distance to the stimulus source (top) and swimming activity (bottom) after the onset of mWMs. Red arrow heads in A depict the onset of stimulation. (See also Figure 3 in 50.) (B) Representative examples of consecutive x-y coordinates (swim trajectories) measured every 40 msec from rx3+/+ and rx3-/- larvae without (top) and with (bottom) mWMs. Top, 50 x-y coordinates per larva without mWMs (source off) measured over the last 2 s before the onset of mWMs. Bottom, 500 x-y coordinates per larva with mWMs (source on) measured over the last 20 s before the offset of mWMs. The time window in bottom (20 s) is enlarged 10 times relative to top (2 s) with the sole purpose of highlighting the mWMs-derived lack of locomotion observed typically at the end of a 2 min stimulation period. (C, D) Motion level, i.e., the area under the swim velocity-time curve over 120 s, across groups of unexposed and pre-exposed (same groups as in Figure 3B, C) rx3+/+ (C) and rx3-/- (D) larvae before and during mWMs (see also Methods). Sample size in parentheses. (C, D) Letters and asterisks indicate results of Bonferroni’s tests (P<0.001) after two-way repeated measures ANOVAs; (C) time factor: F(1,56)=359.3, P<0.0001, treatment factor: F(3,56)=1.6, P=0.20, time × treatment factor: F(3,56)=5.6, P=0.002; (D) time factor: F(1,56)=317.0, P<0.0001, treatment factor: F(3,56)=0.03, P=0.99, time × treatment factor: F(3,56)=0.14, P=0.94.
Discussion
Consistent with the HPI axis functioning as a cascade of one element triggering release from the next, the loss of pomc cells in the rostral pituitary (and reduced neuroendocrine cell projections) prevents the increased release of cortisol under stress. This effect resembles impaired cortisol release following ablation of the NPO or the interrenal (42, 44) and supports the assumption that the rostral cluster of pomc cells is the part of the pituitary required for HPI axis function.
It was previously reported that avp expression is lost in rx3 mutants, and that oxt cells seemed to be unaffected (27, 28). Our results show that Crh, Avp, and Oxt are still detectable, but with reduced cell numbers (avp -50%, oxt -64%, crh -56%) and drastically altered projection patterns in rx3 mutants. Formation of the neurohypophysis was shown to be blocked in rx3 mutants (30, 31), which agrees with our observation that Oxt projections do not seem to innervate the pituitary, while Crh and Avp projections to the pituitary are strongly reduced. It is plausible that, like Oxt projections, a neurohypophysiotropic subpopulation of Avp cells no longer projects to the pituitary, since Oxt and Avp are known as the typical magnocellular cell types that project to this part of the pituitary that fails to develop. Avp is however also coexpressed in Crh cells (53–57), and those cells project to the adenohypophysis, which does form at least partially and would explain the sparse and faint innervation we see there. The specific loss of pomc expression in the rostral adenohypophyseal corticotrope cluster (rostral pomc -93%, caudal pomc +44%) was also observed after treatment with the GR agonist dexamethasone (8, 9, 58) and after chronic optogenetic interrenal steroidogenic cell activation (59).
While we focus on the HPI axis, it should be noted that loss of rx3 affects hypothalamic patterning and cell type specification beyond the NPO, pituitary, and interrenal gland. The transcription factors otpa and otpb are expressed in the NPO and both required for NPO cell differentiation (60). Otpb expression is lost in rostral hypothalamic regions in rx3-/- (29). It is possible that otpa is still expressed and compensates the loss of otpb. Previous results suggested that rx3 is required for proper avp cell differentiation (28), but that oxt and crh are still expressed when rx3 is lost (27). Our results demonstrating the presence of NPO cells do however also show that their neuronal projections are much less organized in rx3-/- and often fail to reach the pituitary. While both hypothalamic and pituitary development are affected (26), other indirect effects on the stress regulation system, such as impaired axonal pathfinding during development, or changes to forebrain structures beyond the NPO and pituitary, cannot be ruled out.
Apart from experiments on their locomotor reaction to light (61, 62), the behavior of rx3-/- larvae has remained unexplored until now. Here, we present behavioral data that support the view that rx3-/- larvae can display complex behavioral schemes like those of wild-type larvae. Further studies focusing on other behavioral reactions/responses to the environment could elucidate how impaired these mutants are, and which types of behavioral motifs remain unaffected despite major alterations in brain development. It is conceivable, for example, that fast reactions involving reflex circuits via unaffected brain regions operate just as well as in wild-types, and that more elaborate responses that require suitably developed brain regions like the hypothalamus are significantly hampered in mutants. It is likely that various stress processing pathways (like catecholamine release via the sympathetic nervous system) enable mutants to deal with antagonistic environments. Several mutant alleles of rx3 have been described besides the ‘strong’ allele (chkt25327, 66) studied here, including a ‘weak’ allele (chkt25181) that lacks the severe reduction in corticotrope cells seen in the strong rx3 mutants. While still lacking eyes, the weak rx3 mutant larvae retain a wild-type appearance of corticotrope cells and of cells expressing pomc in the arcuate nucleus and show normal basal cortisol levels as well as circadian changes in cortisol (27). It would be interesting to examine projection patterns of hypothalamic neurons as well as stressor-derived cortisol reactivity and behavioral task performance in weak rx3 mutants. The strong rx3 mutant’s failure to show enhanced performance upon stress onset (43, 46) however supports the idea that the pituitary-interrenal leg of the HPI axis plays a role in rapidly modulating responses to stressors (43) and opens an opportunity for further analysis of acute stress and behavior under deficient pituitary-adrenal/interrenal interaction. Genetic tools to modify corticotroph and steroidogenic cell activity are being developed (43, 44, 59) and more mutants relevant for steroidogenesis are now available (63, 64). These tools and mutants can be combined with phenotyping, pERK immunostaining, and optogenetics to provide further insights into neuroendocrine and behavioral reactions under altered pituitary/interrenal function.
Methods
Zebrafish husbandry and handling
Zebrafish breeding and maintenance were performed under standard conditions (65). Heterozygous rx3+/- fish (‘strong’ allele chkt25327, 66) were in-crossed and embryos collected in the morning and raised on a 12:12 light/dark cycle in E2 medium at 28 °C. rx3+/- offspring was screened for homozygous mutants based on morphology (i.e., strong pigmentation and absence of eyes in rx3-/-), as described elsewhere (66). All experiments were carried out with larvae at 6 days post fertilization (dpf). Tests were performed between 09:00 hours and 18:00 hours, with different experimental groups intermixed throughout the day. Zebrafish experimental procedures were performed according to the guidelines of the German animal welfare law and approved by the local government (Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe; G-29/12).
Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and imaging
Riboprobes for the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (star) (9) and pomc (19) were synthesized from linearized plasmids following instructions provided with the digoxygenin labeling mix (Roche, #11277073910). Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were performed as described elsewhere (67, 68), using primary rabbit antibodies labeling Avp, Oxt (5), Crh (Advanced Targeting Systems AB-02, RRID : AB_171828), TH [(69), RRID : AB_2631248] and the secondary anti-rabbit antibody Alexa 488 (invitrogen). For imaging, specimens were cleared in 80% glycerol (Gerbu) in PBS for 1 h. Confocal stacks were recorded using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope with a Nikon 20x glycerol objective. Each channel was recorded sequentially to reduce interfering signals from overlapping emission spectra. Zoom, dimensions, gain, offset, average, and speed were adjusted for each stack to obtain the optimal image quality of the desired volume. Stacks were evaluated using Amira 5.4 (Thermo Fisher, SCR_007353) to create maximum intensity projections and rotated voxel views. They were spatially restricted to the volume of interest, excluding signals from planes in front or behind. Brightness and contrast were adjusted for each channel, and somata were counted by eye.
Stressors
Groups of thirty larvae in 30 mm Petri dishes were exposed to three different stress protocols of moderate intensity using known protocols (11, 43, 46, 47, 70, 71), each based on one of the following stimuli: HCl (pH drop, ‘pH’), NaCl (hyperosmotic medium, ‘salt’), or fast water flows preventing normal swimming (‘flows’). Larvae were then used for cortisol measurement or transferred to a custom-made swimming chamber for behavioral testing. pH: larvae were incubated for 3 min in either steady-state E2 medium (unexposed) or E2 + hydrochloric acid (Merck, #109063) (pH = 4) at 28 °C under white-light illumination. They were then washed three times with E2 medium and kept in a small container for cortisol detection (6 min later) or transferred to the swimming chamber for behavioral testing (12 min later). The wash and transfer period lasted 3 min (± 10 s) and was performed at room temperature. Salt: larvae were incubated for 10 min in either steady state E2 medium (unexposed) or E2 + NaCl (Merck, #106404) (NaCl concentration = 25 mM) at 28°C under white light illumination. They were also washed three times with E2 medium and kept in a small container for immediate cortisol detection or transferred to the test chamber (5 min later). The wash and transfer period also took 3 min (± 10 s) and was performed at room temperature. Flows: larvae were presented with stress-evoking fast water flows (71) caused by the rapid lateral displacements of a silica bar (Polymicro Technologies, AZ, 360 µm OD, Optronis GmbH; Kehl, Germany) fixed to a multilayer piezo bender actuator (PICMA® PL140.10, Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH and Co. KG; Karlsruhe, Germany). The actuator had an operating voltage of 0–60V, a maximum displacement of ±1000 µm, and an unloaded resonant frequency of 160 Hz. The bender was connected to a dual-piezo-amplifier (maximum voltage: 10 V), a pulse generator and a TTL control box (USB-IO box, Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands) allowing for computer control. The tip of the silica bar was submerged (2 mm) at the centre of a 30 mm Petri dish, half filled (1.8 ml) with E2 medium (orientation relative to water surface: 90°). The voltage applied to the bender (Vact) determined the speed of the capillary’s lateral displacements, or stimulus strength (in % relative to maximum voltage). Groups of 30 larvae were exposed to 6 stimulation units delivered with an inter-stimulation-interval of 250 ms. Each unit consisted of 99 repetitions of 40 ms lateral displacements. We used a Vact of 3. Stimulations were carried out under white illumination at 28°C. After stimulation, larvae were kept in Petri dishes for cortisol measurement (9.5 min later), or transferred to the swimming chamber for behavioral testing, where they remained without perturbation for 10 min before recordings.
Independent sampling
Cortisol and behavioral measurements were made on different groups of equally treated larvae and therefore constitute fully independent samples. For the behavioral measurements, each replicate involved a single larva. These individual measurements were made on larvae that had also been kept in wells containing a total of thirty larvae per well. The number of single larvae thus matched the number of independent wells. In this manner, the density of larvae per well during stressor exposure remained a constant factor for both the cortisol and behavioral measurements. For each cortisol measurement, all thirty larvae in a well were used, whereas each behavioral measurement involved only one larva - the remaining twenty-nine larvae in the well were used elsewhere. Each replication was fully independent from the others thus avoiding pseudo-replication.
Whole-body cortisol
Cortisol extraction and detection were carried out using a customized ELISA protocol, as described elsewhere (70). Each replicate consisted of a well with 30 larvae. The groups of thirty larvae were immobilized in ice water after being exposed to either ‘pH’, ‘salt’, or ‘flows’, as described above. Unexposed larvae (control samples) were collected after equal handling, omitting stressor exposure. Samples were then frozen in an ethanol/dry-ice bath and stored at −20 °C for subsequent extraction.
Test overview
Behavioral experiments using increasing temperature of the flowing medium or minute water motions were conducted under infrared illumination delivered through a custom-made array of infrared-LEDs mounted inside a light-proof enclosure. The complete behavioral setup was placed on a vibration-free platform (Newport Corp, Irvine, CA, USA). Larvae were imaged at 25 frames s−1 (camera: ICD-49E B/W, Ikegami Tsushinki Co, Ltd, Japan) with a lens (TV Lens, Computer VARI FOCAL H3Z4512 CS-IR, CBC; Commak, NY, USA) positioned above a cylindrical custom-made swimming chamber. The swimming chamber (internal diameter: 10 mm, height: 10 mm) had a transparent bottom and two opposite overtures, inlet and outlet (width: 2.5 mm, height: 400 μm; (see also Figure S7B, C in 43), allowing E2 medium to constantly flow at 200 μl min−1 by means of a peristaltic pump (IPC Ismatec, IDEX Health and Science GmbH, Wertheim, Germany). The chamber also had two cylindrical side channels (internal diameter: 400 μm) opposite to each other opening 200 μm above the transparent glass bottom, with their longest axis oriented at an angle of 30° relative to horizontal. One such channel held a thermocouple (TS200, npi electronics GmbH, Tamm, Germany) monitoring the temperature inside the chamber and providing feedback to a control system (PTC 20, npi electronics GmbH; Exos-2 V2 liquid cooling system, Koolance, Auburn, WA, USA) that either kept the flowing medium at 28 °C ( ± 0.1 °C) or increased its temperature rapidly in a highly controlled manner (see below). The second side channel allowed passage of the end of a rigid silica capillary tube, or stimulus source (outer diameter: 350 μm, full length: 25 mm, Polymicro Technologies), submerged ∼400 μm into the chamber’s inner medium (depth: 5 mm). The opposite end of the capillary tube was fixed to a multilayer bender actuator (PICMA PL140.10, Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH+Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) with an operating voltage of 0–60 V, a maximum displacement of ±1,000 μm and an unloaded resonant frequency of 160 Hz. The bender, coupled to a pulse generator, a dual piezo amplifier and a TTL control system, produced unidirectional lateral displacements (of 50 μm and controllable speed) of the capillary’s submerged end, creating minute water motions (mWMs) within the chamber. The input voltage applied to the actuator (0.5 V) determined the speed of the capillary’s lateral displacements (see also 50). EthoVision XT 7 software (Noldus Information Technology, SCR_000441) was used to monitor the movements of individually swimming larvae. Prior to the test, each larva was given an initial time of ten minutes to adapt to the chamber’s conditions. Experiments were conducted at 28 ± 1°C, unless otherwise stated. A thermocouple (npi electronics GmbH; Tamm, Germany) connected to a temperature control system (PTC 20, npi electronics GmbH; Tamm, Germany; Exos-2 V2 liquid cooling system, Koolance; Auburn, WA, USA) monitored the temperature inside the swimming chamber. All the experiments were performed in a blind fashion as to group identity. Control animals for each group were handled in the same fashion but omitting stressor presentation.
Thermal input
Single larvae were video recorded for 240 s with the temperature of the flowing medium kept at 28 °C ( ± 0.1 °C). The input of the temperature control system was then stepped up by 10 °C, causing the temperature of the flowing medium to reach 34 °C after 120 s. The rising temperature produced a temperature difference between the area near the inlet (zones 1, high temperature) and the area near the outlet (zone 2, low temperature). Such temperature difference reached its maximum 60–90 s after the onset of temperature rise, a time window used to measure ‘differential speed’. See also Figures 3C, D in 43.
Minute water motions
Single larvae in the swimming chamber were video recorded for 120 s under infrared light and constant temperature. They were presented with mWMs caused by 1 ms lateral displacements of the silica capillary tube delivered at 1 Hz (input voltage: 0.5 V) for 120 s, as described above and elsewhere (50). Motion before and during stimulation was calculated using the integrals of motion over 120 s.
Statistics
All data are shown as boxplots (Figure 1, median and whiskers: min to max) or as single measurement points (Figures 3, 4). We used a random experimental design and ANOVAs for multiple group comparisons (followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests). Normality was tested using Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Shapiro–Wilk and D’Agostino tests. Analyses were made with MS-Excel (Microsoft Corp; Redmond, WA, USA, SCR_016137) and Prism 9 (Graphpad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA, SCR_002798).
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe; G-29/12.
Author contributions
RM and SR conceived experiments, RM designed experiments, RM and UH performed experiments, analyzed results, and wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Max Planck Society, the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, and the German federal office for education and research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung).
Acknowledgments
We thank R. Singer and A. Schoell for expert fish care, K. Schmidt, R. Rödel and M. Lukat for technical support, and C.-M. Yeh and A.H. Groneberg for assistance with the experiments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1187327/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Chrousos GP. Stressors, stress, and neuroendocrine integration of the adaptive response. Ann NY Acad Sci (1997) 851:311–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09006.x
2. Barton BA. Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integ Comp Biol (2002) 42:517–25. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.3.517
3. Charmandari E, Tsigos C, Chrousos G. Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu Rev Physiol (2005) 67:259–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.120816
4. Ferguson AV, Latchford KJ, Samson WK. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus - a potential target for integrative treatment of autonomic dysfunction. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2008) 12(6):717–27. doi: 10.1517/14728222.12.6.717
5. Herget U, Wolf A, Wullimann MF, Ryu S. Molecular neuroanatomy and chemoarchitecture of the neurosecretory preoptic-hypothalamic area in zebrafish larvae. J Comp Neurol (2014) 522(7):1542–64. doi: 10.1002/cne.23480
6. Liem KF, Bemis WE, Walker WF, Grande L. Functional anatomy of the vertebrates: an evolutionary perspective, 3rd Ed. Thomson/Brooks Cole (2000).
7. Grassi Milano E, Basari F, Chimenti C. Adrenocortical and adrenomedullary homologs in eight species of adult and developing teleosts: morphology, histology, and immunohistochemistry. Gen Comp Endocrinol (1997) 108(3):483–96. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1997.7005
8. Liu NA, Huang H, Yang Z, Herzog W, Hammerschmidt M, Lin S, et al. Pituitary corticotroph ontogeny and regulation in transgenic zebrafish. Mol Endocrinol (2003) 17(5):959–66. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0392
9. To TT, Hahner S, Nica G, Rohr KB, Hammerschmidt M, Winkler C, et al. Pituitary-interrenal interaction in zebrafish interrenal organ development. Mol Endocrinol (2007) 21(2):472–85. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0216
10. Alsop D, Vijayan MM. Development of the corticosteroid stress axis and receptor expression in zebrafish. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2008) 294(3):R711–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00671.2007
11. De Marco RJ, Groneberg AH, Yeh CM, Castillo Ramirez LA, Ryu S. Optogenetic elevation of endogenous glucocorticoid level in larval zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits (2013) 7:82. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00082
12. Vitale G, Salvioli S, Franceschi C. Oxidative stress and the ageing endocrine system. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2013) 9:228–40. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.29
13. Vale W, Vaughan J, Smith M, Yamamoto G, Rivier J, Rivier C. Effects of synthetic ovine corticotropin-releasing factor, glucocorticoids, catecholamines, neurohypophysial peptides, and other substances on cultured corticotropic cells. Endocrinology (1983) 113(3):1121–31. doi: 10.1210/endo-113-3-1121
14. Gillies G, Lowry P. Corticotrophin releasing factor may be modulated vasopressin. Nature (1979) 278(5703):463–4. doi: 10.1038/278463a0
15. Rivier C, Vale W. Interaction of corticotropin-releasing factor and arginine vasopressin on adrenocorticotropin secretion in vivo. Endocrinology (1983) 113(3):939–42. doi: 10.1210/endo-113-3-939
16. Onaka T, Takayanagi Y, Yoshida M. Roles of oxytocin neurones in the control of stress, energy metabolism, and social behaviour. J Neuroendocrinol (2012) 24:587–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02300.x
17. Gutnick A, Blechman J, Kaslin J, Herwig L, Belting HG, Affolter M, et al. The hypothalamic neuropeptide oxytocin is required for formation of the neurovascular interface of the pituitary. Dev Cell (2011) 21:642–54. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.004
18. Norris DO. Vertebrate endocrinology. 4th edition. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier Academic Press (2007).
19. Herzog W, Zeng X, Lele Z, Sonntag C, Ting JW, Chang CY, et al. Adenohypophysis formation in the zebrafish and its dependence on sonic hedgehog. Dev Biol (2003) 254:36–49. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(02)00124-0
20. Pogoda HM, Hammerschmidt M. Molecular genetics of pituitary development in zebrafish. Semin Cell Dev Biol (2007) 18:543–58. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.04.004
21. Löhr H, Hammerschmidt M. Zebrafish in endocrine systems: recent advances and implications for human disease. Annu Rev Physiol (2011) 73:183–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142320
22. Arends RJ, Vermeer H, Martens GJM, Leunissen JAM, Wendelaar Bonga SE, Flik G. Cloning and expression of two proopiomelanocortin mRNAs in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio l.). Mol Cell Endocrinol (1998) 143:23–31. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(98)00139-7
23. Gonzalez-Nunez V, Gonzalez-Sarmiento R, Rodriguez RE. Identification of two proopiomelanocortin genes in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Brain Res Mol Brain Res (2003) 120:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.09.012
24. Chang AC, Cochet M, Cohen SN. Structural organization of human genomic DNA encoding the pro-opiomelanocortin peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1980) 77:4890–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4890
25. Mathers PH, Grinberg A, Mahon KA, Jamrich M. The rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature (1997) 387:603–7. doi: 10.1038/42475
26. De Souza FSJ, Placzek M. Conserved roles of Rax/rx3 genes in hypothalamus and pituitary development. Int J Dev Biol (2021) 65:195–205. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.200081fd
27. Dickmeis T, Lahiri K, Nica G, Vallone D, Santoriello C, Neumann CJ, et al. Glucocorticoids play a key role in circadian cell cycle rhythms. PloS Biol (2007) 5:e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050078
28. Tessmar-Raible K, Raible F, Christodoulou F, Guy K, Rembold M, Hausen H, et al. Conserved sensory-neurosecretory cell types in annelid and fish forebrain: insights into hypothalamus evolution. Cell (2007) 129:1389–400. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.041
29. Muthu V, Eachus H, Ellis P, Brown S, Placzek M. Rx3 and shh direct anisotropic growth and specification in the zebrafish tuberal/anterior hypothalamus. Development (2016) 143:2651–63. doi: 10.1242/dev.138305
30. Medina-Martinez O, Amaya-Manzanares F, Liu C, Mendoza M, Shah R, Zhang L, et al. Cellautonomous requirement for rx function in the mammalian retina and posterior pituitary. PloS One (2009) 4:e4513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004513
31. Orquera DP, Nasif S, Low MJ, Rubinstein M, de Souza FS. Essential function of the transcription factor rax in the early patterning of the mammalian hypothalamus. Dev Biol (2016) 416(1):212–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.021
32. Brachet C, Kozhemyakina EA, Boros E, Heinrichs C, Ablikova I, Soblet J, et al. Truncating RAX mutations: anophthalmia, hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus, and cleft palate in mice and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2019) 104:2925–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02316
33. Bicknell AB. The tissue-specific processing of pro-opiomelanocortin. J Neuroendocrinol (2008) 20:692–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01709.x
34. de Wied D, Jolles J. Neuropeptides derived from pro-opiocortin: behavioral, physiological, and neurochemical effects. Physiol Rev (1982) 62:976–1059. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1982.62.3.976
35. Mezey E, Palkovits M, de Kloet ER, Verhoef J, de Wied D. Evidence for pituitary-brain transport of a behaviorally potent ACTH analog. Life Sci (1978) 22:831–8. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(78)90606-9
36. Groeneweg FL, Karst H, de Kloet ER, Joëls M. Rapid non-genomic effects of corticosteroids and their role in the central stress response. J Endocrinol (2011) 209:153–67. doi: 10.1530/JOE-10-0472
37. Tasker JG, Di S, Malcher-Lopes R. Minireview: rapid glucocorticoid signaling via membrane-associated receptors. Endocrinology (2006) 147:5549–56. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0981
38. Joëls M, Sarabdjitsingh RA, Karst H. Unraveling the time domains of corticosteroid hormone influences on brain activity: rapid, slow, and chronic modes. Pharmacol Rev (2012) 64:901–38. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.005892
39. Sandi C, Venero C, Guaza C. Novelty-related rapid locomotor effects of corticosterone in rats. Eur J Neurosci (1996) 8:794–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01264.x
40. Rose JD, Marrs GS, Moore FL. Rapid, corticosterone-induced disruption of medullary sensorimotor integration related to suppression of amplectic clasping in behaving roughskin newts (Taricha granulosa). Horm Behav (1998) 34:268–82. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1483
41. Mikics E, Barsy B, Barsvari B, Haller J. Behavioral specificity of non-genomic glucocorticoid effects in rats: effects on risk assessment in the elevated plus-maze and the open-field. Horm Behav (2005) 48:152–62. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.02.002
42. Gutierrez-Triana JA, Herget U, Lichtner P, Castillo-Ramirez LA, Ryu S. A vertebrate-conserved cis-regulatory module for targeted expression in the main hypothalamic regulatory region for the stress response. BMC Dev Biol (2014) 14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12861-014-0041-x
43. De Marco RJ, Thiemann T, Groneberg AH, Herget U, Ryu S. Optogenetically enhanced pituitary corticotroph cell activity post-stress onset causes rapid organizing effects on behaviour. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12620. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12620
44. Gutierrez-Triana JA, Herget U, Castillo-Ramirez LA, Lutz M, Yeh CM, De Marco RJ, et al. Manipulation of interrenal cell function in developing zebrafish using genetically targeted ablation and an optogenetic tool. Endocrinology (2015) 156:3394–401. doi: 10.1210/EN.2015-1021
45. Eachus H, Choi M-K, Ryu S. The effects of early life stress on the brain and behaviour: insights from zebrafish models. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9:657591. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.657591
46. Ryu S, De Marco RJ. Performance on innate behaviour during early development as a function of stress level. Sci Rep (2017) 7:7840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08400-4
47. vom Berg-Maurer C, Trivedi C, Bollmann J, De Marco RJ, Ryu S. The severity of acute stress is represented by increased synchronous activity and recruitment of hypothalamic CRH neurons. J Neurosci (2016) 36:3350–62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3390-15.2016
48. Castillo-Ramírez LA, Ryu S, De Marco RJ. Active behaviour during early development shapes glucocorticoid reactivity. Sci Rep (2019) 9:12796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49388-3
49. Alderman SL, Bernier NJ. Ontogeny of the corticotropin-releasing factor system in zebrafish. Gen Comp Endocrinol (2009) 164(1):61–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.007
50. Groneberg AH, Herget U, Ryu S, De Marco RJ. Positive taxis and sustained responsiveness to water motions in larval zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits (2015) 9:9. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2015.00009
51. Norton WHJ. Measuring larval zebrafish behavior: locomotion, thigmotaxis, and startle. In: Kalueff A, Stewart A, editors. Zebrafish protocols for neurobehavioral research. neuromethods, vol. vol 66 . Totowa, NJ: Humana Press (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-597-8_1
52. Kalmijn AJ. Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN, editors. Sensory biology of aquatic animals. New York: Springer (1988). p. 83–130.
53. Yulis CR, Lederis K. Co-Localization of the immunoreactivities of corticotropinreleasing factor and arginine vasotocin in the brain and pituitary system of the teleost catostomus commersoni. Cell Tissue Res (1987) 247(2):267–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00218308
54. Olivereau M, Moons L, Olivereau J, Vandesande F. Coexistence of corticotropin releasing factor-like immunoreactivity and vasotocin in perikarya of the preoptic nucleus in the eel. Gen Comp Endocrinol (1988) 70(1):41–8. doi: 10.1016/0016-6480(88)90092-5
55. Fryer JN. Neuropeptides regulating the activity of goldfish corticotropes and melanotropes. Fish Physiol Biochem (1989) 7(1-6):21–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00004686
56. Dabrowska J, Hazra R, Guo JD, Dewitt S, Rainnie DG. Central CRF neurons are not created equal: phenotypic differences in CRF-containing neurons of the rat paraventricular hypothalamus and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Front Neurosci (2013) 7:156. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00156
57. Herget U, Ryu S. Coexpression analysis of nine neuropeptides in the neurosecretory preoptic area of larval zebrafish. Front Neuroanat (2015) 9:2. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00002
58. Peles G, Swaminathan A, Levkowitz G. Glucocorticoid-sensitive period of corticotroph development – implications in early life stress. BioRxiv [Preprint] (2022). doi: 10.1101/2022.06.13.495881
59. Nagpal J, Eachus H, Lityagina O, Ryu S. Optogenetic induction of chronic glucocorticoid exposure in early-life impairs stress-response in larval zebrafish. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2022). doi: 10.1101/2022.09.09.507267
60. Fernandes AM, Beddows E, Filippi A, Driever W. Orthopedia transcription factor otpa and otpb paralogous genes function during dopaminergic and neuroendocrine cell specification in larval zebrafish. PloS One (2013) 8(9):e75002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.00750022013
61. Guggiana-Nilo DA, Engert F. Properties of the visible light phototaxis and UV avoidance behaviors in the larval zebrafish. Front Behav Neurosci (2016) 10:160. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00160
62. Venkatraman P, Mills-Henry I, Padmanabhan KR, Pascuzzi P, Hassan M, Zhang J, et al. Rods contribute to visual behavior in larval zebrafish. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2020) 61(12):11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.12.11
63. Griffin A, Parajes S, Weger M, Zaucker A, Taylor AE, O’Neil DM, et al. Ferredoxin 1b (Fdx1b) is the essential mitochondrial redox partner for cortisol biosynthesis in zebrafish. Endocrinology (2016) 157(3):1122–34. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1480
64. Eachus H, Zaucker A, Oakes JA, Griffin A, Weger M, Güran T, et al. Genetic disruption of 21-hydroxylase in zebrafish causes interrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinology (2017) 158(12):4165–73. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00549
65. Westerfield M. The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 4th ed. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Press (2000).
66. Rojas-Muñoz A, Dahm R, Nüsslein-Volhard C. chokh/rx3 specifies the retinal pigment epithelium fate independently of eye morphogenesis. Dev Biol (2005) 288(2):348–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.046
67. Lauter G, Söll I, Hauptmann G. Multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization to define abutting and overlapping gene expression in the embryonic zebrafish brain. Neural Dev (2011) 6:10. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-6-10
68. Kastenhuber E, Kratochwil CF, Ryu S, Schweitzer J, Driever W. Genetic dissection of dopaminergic and noradrenergic contributions to catecholaminergic tracts in early larval zebrafish. J Comp Neurol (2010) 518(4):439–58. doi: 10.1002/cne.22214
69. Ryu S, Mahler J, Acampora D, Holzschuh J, Erhardt S, Omodei D, et al. Orthopedia homeodomain protein is essential for diencephalic dopaminergic neuron development. Curr Biol (2007) 17:873–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.003
70. Yeh CM, Glöck M, Ryu S. An optimized whole-body cortisol quantification method for assessing stress levels in larval zebrafish. PloS One (2013) 8(11):e79406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079406
Keywords: pituitary, rx3, stress, cortisol, zebrafish, HPA axis, glucocorticoid
Citation: Herget U, Ryu S and De Marco RJ (2023) Altered glucocorticoid reactivity and behavioral phenotype in rx3-/- larval zebrafish. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1187327. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1187327
Received: 15 March 2023; Accepted: 21 June 2023;
Published: 06 July 2023.
Edited by:
Stefano Loizzo, National Institute of Health (ISS), ItalyReviewed by:
Thomas Dickmeis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), GermanyGil Levkowitz, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Satoshi Ogawa, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia
Copyright © 2023 Herget, Ryu and De Marco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ulrich Herget, uherget@caltech.edu; Rodrigo J. De Marco, r.j.demarco@ljmu.ac.uk