AUTHOR=Zhan Gouling , Hu Jianbing , Da Shijian , Weng Jie , Zhou Chuanyi , Wen Fang , Liu Songlian , Fang Fang , Shen Erdong , Zhou Qiang , Luo Pan , Xu Min , Zhan Dahe , Su Yuqi TITLE=A real-world study of anlotinib combined with GS regimen as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer JOURNAL=Frontiers in Endocrinology VOLUME=14 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1110624 DOI=10.3389/fendo.2023.1110624 ISSN=1664-2392 ABSTRACT=Background

Anlotinib may boost the efficacy of pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment if timely added to the GS regimen (Gemcitabine, Tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium); however, no data has been published. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in combination with the GS regimen(hereafter referred to as the A+GS regimen) in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic PC.

Methods

Patients with unresectable or metastatic PC treated at Yueyang Central Hospital and Yueyang People’s Hospital between October 2018 and June 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective real-world investigation. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR), while the treatment safety was assessed by the frequency of major adverse events (AEs).

Results

Seventy-one patients were included in this study, 41 in the GS group and 30 in the A+GS group. The A+GS group had a longer mPFS than the GS group (12.0 months (95% CI, 6.0–18.0) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.0–8.1)), respectively (P = 0.005). mOS was longer in the GS+A group) when compared with the GS group (17.0 months (95%CI, 14.0–20.0) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.5–12.5)), respectively (P = 0.018). The GS+A group had higher ORR (50.0% vs 26.8%, P = 0.045) and DCR (83.3% vs 58.5%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, there were no grade 4-5 AEs and no treatment-related deaths, and no discernible increase in AEs in the GS+A group when compared with the GS group.

Conclusion

The A+GS regimen therapy holds great promise in managing treatment-naive advanced PC, except that future prospective studies with larger sample sizes and multiple centers are required to determine its efficacy and safety.