Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 27 September 2022
Sec. Pediatric Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Problem of Childhood Hypoglycemia View all 14 articles

Somatostatin receptors in congenital hyperinsulinism: Biology to bedside

  • 1Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 2Universitätskinderklinik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Germany
  • 3Department of Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital and Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 5Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, United States

Congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI), although a rare disease, is an important cause of severe hypoglycemia in early infancy and childhood, causing preventable morbidity and mortality. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment is necessary to prevent hypoglycaemia mediated brain damage. At present, the medical treatment of CHI is limited to diazoxide as first line and synthetic somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) as second line options; therefore understanding somatostatin biology and treatment perspectives is important. Under healthy conditions, somatostatin secreted from pancreatic islet δ-cells reduces insulin release through somatostatin receptor induced cAMP-mediated downregulation and paracrine inhibition of β- cells. Several SRLs with extended duration of action are now commercially available and are being used off-label in CHI patients. Efficacy remains variable with the present generation of SRLs, with treatment effect often being compromised by loss of initial response and adverse effects such as bowel ischaemia and hepatobiliary dysfunction. In this review we have addressed the biology of the somatostatin system contexualised to CHI. We have discussed the clinical use, limitations, and complications of somatostatin agonists and new and emerging therapies for CHI.

Somatostatin perspectives in congenital hyperinsulinism

Congenital hyperinsulinism is a rare disease with a significant genetic component causing unregulated overproduction of insulin through defects in the insulin-releasing pathway. The coupling of insulin secretion to glucose concentration is not tightly regulated, leading to episodes of severe and recurrent hypoglycemia. Several causative mutations in multiple genes have been described to date. The most severe forms are caused by recessive mutations in ABCC8 and KCNJ11 coding for the subunits SUR1 and Kir6.2 of the ATP-sensitive K+ (K-ATP) channel on the pancreatic β-cell membrane. Homozygous and compound heterozygous mutations, as well as dominantly inherited mutations in ABCC8/KCNJ11 cause diffuse CHI, which is often unresponsive to first line diazoxide treatment and therefore suitable for therapy with second line somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). In contrast, a subgroup of patients with paternally inherited recessive mutations in ABCC8/KCNJ11 may have focal disease, potentially curable by surgical excision of a solitary lesion.

Excess insulin in CHI precludes the development of ketones. Therefore, in CHI there is the absence of both glucose and ketones as primary and alternative fuel sources for brain cells, leading to brain damage. In the short term, intravenous high concentration dextrose and in some patients, continuous administration of feeds with a high carbohydrate content are used to prevent hypoglycemia. Excess carbohydrate administration has the propensity to cause obesity and interfere with the normal development of oral feeding. In many such patients, diazoxide is ineffective, resulting in the need for a trial of SRL to reduce excess insulin secretion, before resorting to irreversible sub-total pancreatectomy with consequent development of insulin dependent diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

Biology of the somatostatin system

Somatostatin is a peptide hormone first isolated from the ovine hypothalamus and noted to be a somatotroph release-inhibiting factor (SRIF) (1, 2). Outside the central nervous system, somatostatin is also produced in δ-cells of the pancreas, in close proximity to α- and β-cells (3, 4), setting up opportunities for fine paracrine regulation of both insulin and glucagon secretion (5, 6), Figure 1. In the gut, somatostatin inhibits in particular the secretion of gastrin, secretin, and VIP, delaying gastric emptying. While the tetradecapeptide somatostatin-14 is the prominent isoform in the hypothalamus, in the gut the larger molecule somatostatin-28 is more prevalent. Somatostatin exhibits pleiotropic actions thoughout the body, many of which involve the inhibition of secretion of several hormones, hence its name ‘endocrine cyanide’ (7).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 The somatostatin induced inhibitory paracrine regulation of the islet system comprising of α, β and δ-cells, with δ-cells inhibiting sustained insulin secretion and so preventing hyperinsulinism in the normal state.

Somatostatin has a wide range of therapeutic possibilities in different tissues; to capitalize on the diversity of its actions, many stabilized analogs and agonists have been synthesized over the years, extending the half life of somatostatin for sustained treatment effects (8). Octreotide is a first generation SRL, with a greater potency than native somatostatin for the specific somatostatin subtype 2 receptor and has a half-life of 90-120 minutes. While short-acting octreotide continues to be used in therapeutic practice in CHI, longer acting depot formulations have been developed, and are approved for the treatment of pituitary and neuroendocrine tumours (5, 9), but increasingly used in the treatment of CHI.

The wide array of effects of somatostatin is mediated by five somatostatin receptor (SST) subtypes (SST1-5), each encoded by a different gene (10). All somatostatin receptors are members of the class-A subgroup of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and activate Gi/o resulting in inhibition of adenylate cyclase and a decrease in cAMP levels. In response to agonists, SST2 is known to be phosphorylated by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs) and recruits β-arrestins resulting in receptor desensitization and internalization (11). These events and others trigger a range of additional downstream signaling and anti-proliferative effects. However, inhibition of the second messenger cAMP is the primary pathway responsible for its anti-secretory effects. SST2 on islet α-cells suppress glucagon (12), while SST2 and SST5 are primarily responsible for the suppression of insulin in β-cells (6) (Figure 1). In the β-cell, cAMP is hypothesized to be an amplifier of insulin secretion triggered by Ca2+ elevation (13); this process is targeted by SRLs to reduce insulin release (Figure 2). It is likely that the somatostatin actions are dependent on the density and distribution of SST receptor subtypes in different tissues (6) as well as variable receptor expression in CHI patients (14).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 The pancreatic β-cell in Congenital Hyperinsulinism showing somatostatin action through G-protein coupled somatostatin receptors on the cell membrane. Elevation of intracellular ATP level drives K-ATP channel closure, membrane depolarization, and subsequent influx of Ca++ ions. Increases in intracellular Ca++ and cAMP levels lead to the release of insulin. Somatostatin receptor activation induces the formation of Gi-GTP, which inhibits adenylate cyclase, preventing the formation of cAMP, thus reducing insulin secretion.

Intra-islet actions of somatostatin

The human pancreas includes 1-3 million pancreatic islets (15) with a complex interplay between cell types. The secretion of insulin and glucagon by β-cells and α-cells varies reciprocally as a response to plasma glucose levels. Somatostatin-secreting δ-cells are the third most common cell type, representing ~5-10% of islet cells. They possess long neurite-like processes, which can interact with many α- and β-cells (3, 16) making them suitable candidates to exert paracrine regulation (Figure 1).

In isolated human islets, somatostatin is released in response to increasing glucose concentrations (17). The regulation of somatostatin secretion resembles that of insulin secretion from β-cells (18, 19). Like β-cells, δ-cells possess K-ATP channels that close with increasing glucose concentrations resulting in membrane depolarization and somatostatin secretion. These cells similarly respond to sulfonylureas, such as tolbutamide. Indeed diazoxide, which keeps the K-ATP channel complex in the open conformation to prevent depolarization and inhibit insulin secretion in β-cells, also inhibits somatostatin secretion from δ-cells (20). Like other pancreatic hormones, somatostatin is stored temporarily in secretory granules within δ-cells (21) and are released in response to perturbations in inhibitory and excitatory influences.

Endogenous somatostatin is regulated by intra-islet paracrine influences (22) and provides negative feedback to β-cells soon after glucose stimulated insulin release to prevent persistent insulin secretion in physiological states (2326).

The emerging picture of healthy glucose-insulin secretion coupling is less an isolated β-cell driven action, but more a finely tuned paracrine counterbalance between all islet cell components. In CHI, many of the genes that are mutated in the β-cells of patients are also mutated in both α- and δ-cells. The net effect of the breakdown of this intra-islet homeostasis results in the dysregulation of insulin secretion, leading to significant hypoglycemia (26). More work is needed to unravel how the effects of α-cell and δ-cell dysfunction in CHI pancreatic islets contribute to the overall pathophysiology of CHI and determine individual phenotypes of disease.

Somatostatin receptor distribution

A large number of studies have sought to characterize the expression of SSTs in human pancreatic tissues, but cataloging the differences between them is beyond the scope of this review (6, 12, 27, 28). Taken together, somatostatin effects in β-cells are predominantly mediated by SST2, SST5 and perhaps SST1, while the impact of SST3 is unclear. SST4 does not appear to have functional expression in the pancreas. In the α-cell, most histological, expression and functional data points to the conclusion that SST2 is the dominant receptor.

Recent work from islets isolated from CHI patients undergoing pancreatectomy for focal, diffuse, or anomalous CHI (29) suggested less somatostatin activity than matched controls (30). Intriguingly, SST2 was expressed in nearly all CHI patients, while SST5 was expressed less frequently, although one patient with diffuse CHI did not express either SST2 or SST5 (29). This observation needs to be replicated in other cohorts to understand the real frequency of SST receptor expression variation and the potential implication of selective SST expression for optimal treatment of patients. Further, SST receptor downregulation mechanisms need to be explored, with initial work (14) suggesting a role for treatment related expression variability in non-focal CHI.

Somatostatin receptor ligand use in congenital hyperinsulinism

Somatostatin treatment was first described in a child with CHI after 80% pancreatectomy (31), followed by use of a continuous subcutaneous infusion via a pump in a 6-month old infant with insulin excess (32). Following initial demonstration of effect and the synthesis of compounds with extended activity, SRLs are now available for many patients with CHI unresponsive to diazoxide. The short acting SRL octreotide has been used in the treatment of CHI (33, 34) as second line therapy over the last two decades to prevent hypoglycemia and subtotal/near-total pancreatectomy. Currently, SRL therapy is not generally used as first line treatment, except in situations where diazoxide treatment is contraindicated or in countries where diazoxide is not readily available.

Short acting SRL treatment

The strategy to use octreotide subcutaneous injections administered every 4 to 8 hours (35) or as continuous infusions (36) brought some benefit in early observational studies, but response to doses up to 40 mcg/kg/day were not clinically effective to prevent pancreatectomy in the majority of patients. However, following wider use, reports of improved outcomes and avoidance of pancreatectomy were noted (37, 38), establishing octreotide as standard, albeit off-label therapy for CHI. Octreotide is now commonly used as subcutaneous bolus injections or by continuous subcutaneous infusions (using insulin pumps) in doses typically ranging from 5 to 40 microgram/kg/day (39). While the use of higher doses have been reported, treatment effect is rare beyond 20 micrograms/kg/day in most patients. For patients requiring frequent injections or higher doses, short-acting octreotide may be substituted by long acting SRL formulations such as octreotide long acting release (e.g. Sandostatin™, Olatuton™) or lanreotide autogel (Somatuline™).

Long acting SRL treatment

Long acting SRLs have been tried in small groups of patients with reported success (40, 41) in obervational studies. They have the advantage of reduced frequency of administration and therefore the potential to improve patient quality of life (42). However, depot injection can be painful and inefficiently dosed, even when administered by trained staff (43). A number of observational studies have reported on different markers of efficacy (44, 45), but in the absence of a comparative or control arm, the efficacy of such long acting SRLs cannot be calibrated to meaningful outcomes such as the achievement of normoglycaemia and harm-free survival. Further, objective assessments of short and long acting SRLs have not been undertaken to appreciate comparative benefits and risks, given the repurposing focus for clinical use outside standardised trial protocols.

Side effects of SRL treatment

Both octreotide and lanreotide possess similar SST receptor pharmacological profiles (primarily SST2 agonists) (Supplementary Table 1) and are therefore expected to have a similar range of both therapeutic and adverse effects. The long acting depot preparations can persist in tissues for up to a month or longer. In young children this might lead to cumulative effects although the extent of accumulation of adverse effects is not known (45).

The utility of octreotide and other SST2 agonists are often complicated by loss of effect with increasing dose in the initial phase of treatment. This downregulation of the SRL dose-response curve is likely to be a consequence of receptor desensitization and internalization, although demonstration of this effect has not been shown in CHI pancreatic tissue. Octreotide and other SRLs have a number of adverse effects including the prolongation of gastrointestinal transit time, abdominal discomfort, and fat malabsorption (46), which could add to feeding problems or require treatment with pancreatic enzymes. Biliary sludging and accumulation into stones (47) are reported in adults (46) and children (48) although the need for cholecystectomy has not been described.

SRL therapy has been used for many years to reduce growth hormone excess, mainly in adults. As SRL treatment also reduces growth hormone secretion in children, regular auxology follow up in CHI patients is required. While the incidence of growth hormone deficiency following octreotide remains low (47), it is possible and perhaps likely, that this side effect is under-reported in the absence of long-term auxology datasets in CHI cohorts. As growth is an essential component of childhood, careful examination of stature and organ growth needs to be undertaken with the increasing use of long acting SRLs in CHI. Octreotide use in pregnant mothers with CHI also predisposes the fetus to growth restriction, but may represent the only therapeutic option (49) as alternatives such as diazoxide cause unacceptable reduction in placental blood flow.

In newborn babies, particularly those preterm, the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, possibly arising from reduced splanchnic vascular flow, is significant and can be life threatening (50, 51). Such risk persists beyond the neonatal period, thus necessitating careful review in follow-up of all patients. Although not life threatening, all forms of short and long acting SRLs have the propensity to cause hepatitis (45, 52), an adverse effect that precludes long-term use in the absence of data demonstrating normal hepatic outcomes in later life. Less commonly reported adverse effects include pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (53) and long QT syndrome with potential risk for cardiac arrythmias (54). Octreotide can also cause drug induced pancreatitis (55), an effect that needs to be heeded through stepped down withdrawal of treatment prior to pancreatectomy in CHI patients. Although not widely reported in CHI, octreotide can cause hair loss (56), an effect that might seem trivial but could have significant impact on the psychosocial well-being of older children.

Emerging somatostatin receptor ligands

Several SRLs have been utilised in the treatment of CHI, mainly in those are unresponsive and in those who experience adverse effects from diazoxide treatment. On the whole there is treatment benefit (45) although quantification is imprecise and probably unreliable. Further, loss of initial treatment effect often seen with octreotide is also likely to be present with long acting SRLs, causing later recurrence of hypoglycaemia.

It is likely that SRLs in development for other conditions such as acromegaly [e.g. paltusotine, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04837040] may also be repurposed for use in CHI patients. An example of such a SRL is pasireotide, currently FDA-approved for the treatment of Cushing’s disease in adults. In clinical trials in Cushing’s disease, treatment with pasireotide resulted in increases in glucose levels, suggesting collateral pancreatic effect (57). Pasireotide possesses a greater potency for stimulated cAMP inhibition of SST5 than octreotide or lanreotide while also possessing some potency for SST2 and SST3 (58) (Supplementary Table 1). Pasireotide has been observed to result in less inhibition of glucagon secretion than octreotide (57), an effect that may be beneficial in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia in CHI patients. Schwetz et al. (59) described the use of pasireotide effectively to control persistent hypoglycemia in an adult patient with CHI like features. Mooij et al. (60) reported on the use of both short-acting pasireotide injections and long-acting pasireotide in an infant with homozygous ABCC8 mutations; hypoglycaemia frequency improved but was not sufficient to prevent near-total pancreatectomy. Similar to the off-label use of other long acting SRLs, the long term treatment benefit of pasireotide remains to be clarified.

The use of off-label SRLs has prompted the development of new agonists targeting specific SST receptors, in particular SST5. A First in Human study to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of HTL0030310 compared to pasireotide has been registered in 2019 [https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03847207] but results are not yet available.

An orally-available selective nonpeptide SST5 agonist, CRN02481, has been shown to suppress insulin secretion and increase glucose levels in both oral glucose tolerance tests and a sulfonylurea model of hyperinsulinism (61, 62). CRN02481 prevented fasting hypoglycaemia and amino acid-stimulated insulin secretion in a Sur1-/- mouse model of CHI (63). Moreover, CRN02481 significantly decreased insulin secretion in human islets isolated from two patients with CHI and one patient with Beckwith-Weideman Syndrome (BWS) CHI, providing ex-vivo demonstration of efficacy in targeted hyperinsulinaemic patients (63).

Conclusions

The biology of SST receptors and ability of SRLs to activate specific receptor subtypes to reduce excess insulin is important in the understanding of the pathobiology and treatment perspectives in CHI. Pharmacological targeting of SST receptors reduces insulin release directly, bypassing K-ATP channel defect dysregulation, thereby providing treatment alternatives to diazoxide-unresponsive CHI patients. Both short and long acting SRLs have been used as second line treatments with similar therapeutic and adverse effect profiles. SRLs with specific β-cell action are currently being developed; these drugs may have improved efficacy and reduced adverse effect profiles, providing much needed therapeutic choice before considering irreversible sub-total pancreatectomy as a last resort for the treatment of severe and recurrent hypoglycaemia.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision. MA, KM, IB and SB read and approved the submitted version. To our sorrow, MD unexpectedly died during the drafting phase of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Author IB is associated with research grants in the development of somatostatin receptor ligands. He is also involved in novel drug development in Congenital Hyperinsulinism. Author SB is an employee of Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, which has an interest in the development of specific forms of somatostatin receptor ligands in Congenital Hyperinsulinism.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.921357/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, Ling N, Butcher M, Rivier J, et al. Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science (1973) 179:77–9. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.77

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Krulich L, Dhariwal AP, McCann SM. Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of purified hypothalamic extracts on growth hormone release from rat pituitary in vitro. Endocrinology (1968) 83:783–90. doi: 10.1210/endo-83-4-783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cabrera O, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Berggren P-O, Caicedo A. The unique cytoarchitecture of human pancreatic islets has implications for islet cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2006) 103:2334–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510790103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Brereton MF, Vergari E, Zhang Q, Clark A. Alpha-, delta- and PP-cells: Are they the architectural cornerstones of islet structure and Co-ordination? J Histochem Cytochem (2015) 63:575–91. doi: 10.1369/0022155415583535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Cives M, Strosberg J. The expanding role of somatostatin analogs in gastroenteropancreatic and lung neuroendocrine tumors. Drugs (2015) 75:847–58. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0397-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Strowski MZ, Blake AD. Function and expression of somatostatin receptors of the endocrine pancreas. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2008) 286:169–79. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bloom SR, Polak JM. Somatostatin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) (1987) 295:288–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6593.288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bauer W, Briner U, Doepfner W, Haller R, Huguenin R, Marbach P, et al. SMS 201-995: a very potent and selective octapeptide analogue of somatostatin with prolonged action. Life Sci (1982) 31:1133–40. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90087-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Molitch ME. Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas: A review. JAMA (2017) 317:516–24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19699

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Patel YC, Srikant CB. Somatostatin receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab (1997) 8:398–405. doi: 10.1016/S1043-2760(97)00168-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hipkin RW, Wang Y, Schonbrunn A. Protein kinase c activation stimulates the phosphorylation and internalization of the sst2A somatostatin receptor. J Biol Chem (2000) 275:5591–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Singh V, Brendel MD, Zacharias S, Mergler S, Jahr H, Wiedenmann B, et al. Characterization of somatostatin receptor subtype-specific regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion: an in vitro study on isolated human pancreatic islets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2007) 92:673–80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Tengholm A, Gylfe E. cAMP signalling in insulin and glucagon secretion. Diabetes Obes Metab (2017) 19(Suppl 1):42–53. doi: 10.1111/dom.12993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shi Y, Stevens A, Skae MS, Avatapalle B, Rigby L, Padidela R, et al. Islet somatostatin receptor expression is altered in children with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). In: Hormone research - espe abstract book FC11-182 51 (Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers) (2013).

Google Scholar

15. Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Gagniuc PA, Gubceac E, Mardare L, Popescu I, Dima S, et al. A 3D map of the islet routes throughout the healthy human pancreas. Sci Rep (2015) 5:14634. doi: 10.1038/srep14634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Arrojo E Drigo R, Jacob S, García-Prieto CF, Zheng X, Fukuda M, Tran Thi Nhu H, et al. Structural basis for delta cell paracrine regulation in pancreatic islets. Nat Commun (2019) 10:3700. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11517-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ramracheya R, Ward C, Shigeto M, Walker JN, Amisten S, Zhang Q, et al. Membrane potential-dependent inactivation of voltage-gated ion channels in alpha-cells inhibits glucagon secretion from human islets. Diabetes (2010) 59:2198–208. doi: 10.2337/db09-1505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ipp E, Dobbs RE, Arimura A, Vale W, Harris V, Unger RH. Release of immunoreactive somatostatin from the pancreas in response to glucose, amino acids, pancreozymin-cholecystokinin, and tolbutamide. J Clin Invest (1977) 60:760–5. doi: 10.1172/JCI108829

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rorsman P, Huising MO. The somatostatin-secreting pancreatic δ-cell in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2018) 14:404–14. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0020-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Braun M, Ramracheya R, Amisten S, Bengtsson M, Moritoh Y, Zhang Q, et al. Somatostatin release, electrical activity, membrane currents and exocytosis in human pancreatic delta cells. Diabetologia (2009) 52:1566–78. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1382-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Göpel S, Zhang Q, Eliasson L, Ma X-S, Galvanovskis J, Kanno T, et al. Capacitance measurements of exocytosis in mouse pancreatic alpha-, beta- and delta-cells within intact islets of langerhans. J Physiol (2004) 556:711–26. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lawlor N, George J, Bolisetty M, Kursawe R, Sun L, Sivakamasundari V, et al. Single-cell transcriptomes identify human islet cell signatures and reveal cell-type-specific expression changes in type 2 diabetes. Genome Res (2017) 27:208–22. doi: 10.1101/gr.212720.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huising MO, van der Meulen T, Huang JL, Pourhosseinzadeh MS, Noguchi GM. The difference δ-cells make in glucose control. Physiol (Bethesda) (2018) 33:403–11. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00029.2018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. DiGruccio MR, Mawla AM, Donaldson CJ, Noguchi GM, Vaughan J, Cowing-Zitron C, et al. Comprehensive alpha, beta and delta cell transcriptomes reveal that ghrelin selectively activates delta cells and promotes somatostatin release from pancreatic islets. Mol Metab (2016) 5:449–58. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Samols E, Marri G, Marks V. Promotion of insulin secretion by glucagon. Lancet (1965) 2:415–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(65)90761-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Huising MO. Paracrine regulation of insulin secretion. Diabetologia (2020) 63:2057–63. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05213-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kaczmarek P, Singh V, Cashen DE, Yang L, Berk S, Pasternak A, et al. Somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 mediate inhibition of egg yolk-induced gall bladder emptying in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil (2010) 22:204–9, e66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01407.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Strowski MZ, Cashen DE, Birzin ET, Yang L, Singh V, Jacks TM, et al. Antidiabetic activity of a highly potent and selective nonpeptide somatostatin receptor subtype-2 agonist. Endocrinology (2006) 147:4664–73. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mitrofanova LB, Perminova AA, Ryzhkova DV, Sukhotskaya AA, Bairov VG, Nikitina IL. Differential morphological diagnosis of various forms of congenital hyperinsulinism in children. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 12:710947. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.710947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Li N, Yang Z, Li Q, Yu Z, Chen X, Li JC, et al. Ablation of somatostatin cells leads to impaired pancreatic islet function and neonatal death in rodents. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9:682. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0741-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hirsch HJ, Loo S, Evans N, Crigler JF, Filler RM, Gabbay KH. Hypoglycemia of infancy and nesidioblastosis. studies with somatostatin. N Engl J Med (1977) 296:1323–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bougnères PF, Landier F, Garnier P, Job JC, Chaussain JL. Treatment of insulin excess by continuous subcutaneous infusion of somatostatin and glucagon in an infant. J Pediatr (1985) 106:792–4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80358-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hindmarsh P, Brook CG. Short-term management of nesidioblastosis using the somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995. N Engl J Med (1987) 316:221–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198701223160416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Veldkamp EJ, Schrander-Stumpel CT. Long-term treatment of an infant with nesidioblastosis using a somatostatin analogue. N Engl J Med (1987) 316:222–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198701223160417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Glaser B, Landaw H. Long-term treatment with the somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995: alternative to pancreatectomy in persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia of infancy. Digestion (1990) 45(Suppl 1):27–35. doi: 10.1159/000200258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Glaser B, Landau H, Smilovici A, Nesher R. Persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia of infancy: long-term treatment with the somatostatin analogue sandostatin. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (1989) 31:71–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb00455.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Glaser B, Hirsch HJ, Landau H. Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy: long-term octreotide treatment without pancreatectomy. J Pediatr (1993) 123:644–50. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80970-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Thornton PS, Alter CA, Katz LE, Baker L, Stanley CA. Short- and long-term use of octreotide in the treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism. J Pediatr (1993) 123:637–43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80969-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Banerjee I, Salomon-Estebanez M, Shah P, Nicholson J, Cosgrove KE, Dunne MJ. Therapies and outcomes of congenital hyperinsulinism-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabetes Med (2019) 36:9–21. doi: 10.1111/dme.13823

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Modan-Moses D, Koren I, Mazor-Aronovitch K, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Landau H. Treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism with lanreotide acetate (Somatuline autogel). J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96:2312–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kühnen P, Marquard J, Ernert A, Meissner T, Raile K, Wannenmacher G, et al. Long-term lanreotide treatment in six patients with congenital hyperinsulinism. Hormone Res paediatrics (2012) 78:106–12. doi: 10.1159/000341525

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Shah P, Rahman SA, McElroy S, Gilbert C, Morgan K, Hinchey L, et al. Use of long-acting somatostatin analogue (Lanreotide) in an adolescent with diazoxide-responsive congenital hyperinsulinism and its psychological impact. Hormone Res paediatrics (2015) 84:355–60. doi: 10.1159/000439131

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Boyd AE, DeFord LL, Mares JE, Leary CC, Garris JL, Dagohoy CG, et al. Improving the success rate of gluteal intramuscular injections. Pancreas (2013) 42:878–82. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318279d552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Le Quan Sang K-H, Arnoux J-B, Mamoune A, Saint-Martin C, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Valayannopoulos V, et al. Successful treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism with long-acting release octreotide. Eur J Endocrinol (2012) 166:333–9. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. van der Steen I, van Albada ME, Mohnike K, Christesen HT, Empting S, Salomon-Estebanez M, et al. A multicenter experience with long-acting somatostatin analogues in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism. Hormone Res paediatrics (2018) 89:82–9. doi: 10.1159/000485184

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Lamberts SW, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW, Hofland LJ. Octreotide. N Engl J Med (1996) 334:246–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601253340408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Yorifuji T, Kawakita R, Hosokawa Y, Fujimaru R, Matsubara K, Aizu K, et al. Efficacy and safety of long-term, continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion for patients with different subtypes of KATP-channel hyperinsulinism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2013) 78:891–7. doi: 10.1111/cen.12075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Abernethy LJ, Davidson DC, Lamont GL, Shepherd RM, Dunne MJ. Intra-arterial calcium stimulation test in the investigation of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. Arch Dis Child (1998) 78:359–63. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.4.359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Boulanger C, Vezzosi D, Bennet A, Lorenzini F, Fauvel J, Caron P. Normal pregnancy in a woman with nesidioblastosis treated with somatostatin analog octreotide. J Endocrinol Invest (2004) 27:465–70. doi: 10.1007/BF03345293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Laje P, Halaby L, Adzick NS, Stanley CA. Necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates receiving octreotide for the management of congenital hyperinsulinism. Pediatr Diabetes (2010) 11:142–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00547.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. McMahon AW, Wharton GT, Thornton P, de Leon DD. Octreotide use and safety in infants with hyperinsulinism. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf (2017) 26:26–31. doi: 10.1002/pds.4144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Avatapalle B, Padidela R, Randell T, Banerjee I. Drug-induced hepatitis following use of octreotide for long-term treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism. BMJ Case Rep (2012) 2012:1–3. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006271

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Ros-Pérez P, Golmayo L, Cilleruelo ML, Gutiérrez C, Celaya P, Lacámara N, et al. Octreotide-related exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in congenital hyperinsulinism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab (2020) 33:947–50. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2019-0565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Celik N, Cinaz P, Emeksiz HC, Hussain K, Çamurdan O, Bideci A, et al. Octreotide-induced long QT syndrome in a child with congenital hyperinsulinemia and a novel missense mutation (p.Met115Val) in the ABCC8 gene. Hormone Res paediatrics (2013) 80:299–303. doi: 10.1159/000354666

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wolfe D, Kanji S, Yazdi F, Barbeau P, Rice D, Beck A, et al. Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations. PloS One (2020) 15:e0231883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lami M-C, Hadjadj S, Guillet G. Hair loss in three patients with acromegaly treated with octreotide. Br J Dermatol (2003) 149:655–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05478.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. de Heide LJM, Laskewitz AJ, Apers JA. Treatment of severe postRYGB hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia with pasireotide: a comparison with octreotide on insulin, glucagon, and GLP-1. Surg Obes Relat Dis (2014) 10:e31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Hofland LJ, van der Hoek J, Feelders R, van Aken MO, van Koetsveld PM, Waaijers M, et al. The multi-ligand somatostatin analogue SOM230 inhibits ACTH secretion by cultured human corticotroph adenomas via somatostatin receptor type 5. Eur J Endocrinol (2005) 152:645–54. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.01876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Schwetz V, Horvath K, Kump P, Lackner C, Perren A, Forrer F, et al. Successful medical treatment of adult nesidioblastosis with pasireotide over 3 years: A case report. Medicine (2016) 95:e3272. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Mooij CF, Tacke CE, van Albada ME, Barthlen W, Bikker H, Mohnike K, et al. Pasireotide treatment for severe congenital hyperinsulinism due to a homozygous ABCC8 mutation. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab (2021) 26:278–83. doi: 10.6065/apem.2142010.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Sturchler E, Fowler M, Athanacio J, Kredel T, Johns M, Zhao J, et al. Selective nonpeptide somatostatin subtype 5 (sst5) agonists suppress glucose- and sulfonylurea-induced insulin secretion in rats. J Endocr Soc (2019) 3:SAT169. doi: 10.1210/js.2019-SAT-169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Fowler MA, Zhao J, Sturchler E, Rico E, de Necochea-Campion R, Athanacio J, et al. Discovery and identification of late stage selective nonpeptide somatostatin subtype 5 (sst5) agonists for the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. J Endocr Soc (2020) 4:MON089. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.701

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Juliana C, Chai J, Rico-Bautista EF, Betz S, de Leon DD. A selective nonpeptide somatostatin receptor 5 (sst5) agonist effectively decreases insulin secretion in the KATPHI mouse model. Diabetes (2019) 68(Supplement_1):1182–P. doi: 10.2337/db19-1182-P

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: congenital hyperinsulinemia, somatostatin, receptor expression, hypoglycemia, insulin, glucagon

Citation: van Albada ME, Mohnike K, Dunne MJ, Banerjee I and Betz SF (2022) Somatostatin receptors in congenital hyperinsulinism: Biology to bedside. Front. Endocrinol. 13:921357. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.921357

Received: 15 April 2022; Accepted: 29 August 2022;
Published: 27 September 2022.

Edited by:

Valentino Cherubini, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Italy

Reviewed by:

Dinesh Giri, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, United Kingdom
Maria Melikyan, Endocrinology Research Center, Russia

Copyright © 2022 van Albada, Mohnike, Dunne, Banerjee and Betz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mirjam E. van Albada, bS5lLnZhbi5hbGJhZGFAdW1jZy5ubA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.