AUTHOR=Mangili Federica , Esposito Emanuela , Treppiedi Donatella , Catalano Rosa , Marra Giusy , Di Muro Genesio , Barbieri Anna Maria , Locatelli Marco , Lania Andrea G. , Mangone Alessandra , Spada Anna , Arosio Maura , Peverelli Erika , Mantovani Giovanna TITLE=DRD2 Agonist Cabergoline Abolished the Escape Mechanism Induced by mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Tumoral Pituitary Cells JOURNAL=Frontiers in Endocrinology VOLUME=13 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.867822 DOI=10.3389/fendo.2022.867822 ISSN=1664-2392 ABSTRACT=

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus has been shown to display antiproliferative effects on a wide spectrum of tumors. In vitro studies demonstrated that everolimus inhibited pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) cell growth in a subset of patients. Sensitivity to everolimus is reduced by an escape mechanism that increases AKT phosphorylation (p-AKT), leading to pro-survival pathway activation. Dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2) mediates a reduction of p-AKT in a subgroup of non-functioning PitNETs (NF-PitNETs) and in prolactin-secreting tumor cells (MMQ cells) through a β-arrestin 2-dependent mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of everolimus combined with DRD2 agonist cabergoline in reducing NF-PitNET primary cells and MMQ cell proliferation and to evaluate AKT phosphorylation and a possible role of β-arrestin 2. We found that 9 out of 14 NF-PitNETs were resistant to everolimus, but the combined treatment with cabergoline inhibited cell proliferation in 7 out of 9 tumors (-31.4 ± 9.9%, p < 0.001 vs. basal) and reduced cyclin D3 expression. In the everolimus-unresponsive NF-PitNET group, everolimus determined a significant increase of p-AKT/total-AKT ratio (2.1-fold, p < 0.01, vs. basal) that was reverted by cabergoline cotreatment. To investigate the molecular mechanism involved, we used MMQ cells as a model of everolimus escape mechanism. Indeed everolimus did not affect MMQ cell proliferation and increased the p-AKT/total-AKT ratio (+1.53 ± 0.24-fold, p < 0.001 vs. basal), whereas cabergoline significantly reduced cell proliferation (-22.8 ± 6.8%, p < 0.001 vs. basal) and p-AKT. The combined treatment of everolimus and cabergoline induced a reduction of both cell proliferation (-34.8 ± 18%, p < 0.001 vs. basal and p < 0.05 vs. cabergoline alone) and p-AKT/total-AKT ratio (-34.5 ± 14%, p < 0.001 vs. basal and p < 0.05 vs. cabergoline alone). To test β-arrestin 2 involvement, silencing experiments were performed in MMQ cells. Our data showed that the lack of β-arrestin 2 prevented the everolimus and cabergoline cotreatment inhibitory effects on both p-AKT and cell proliferation. In conclusion, this study revealed that cabergoline might overcome the everolimus escape mechanism in NF-PitNETs and tumoral lactotrophs by inhibiting upstream AKT activation. The co-administration of cabergoline might improve mTOR inhibitor antitumoral activity, paving the way for a potential combined therapy in β-arrestin 2-expressing NF-PitNETs or other PitNETs resistant to conventional treatments.