AUTHOR=Liu Jin , Liao Jian-Wei , Li Wei , Chen Xiao-Jun , Feng Jia-Xin , Yao Lin , Huang Pan-Hui , Su Zhi-Hai , Lu Hai , Liao Yu-Ting , Li Shao-Lin , Ma Ya-Jun 

TITLE=Assessment of Osteoporosis in Lumbar Spine: In Vivo Quantitative MR Imaging of Collagen Bound Water in Trabecular Bone

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Endocrinology

VOLUME=13

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.801930

DOI=10.3389/fendo.2022.801930

ISSN=1664-2392

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Aim</title><p>Bone collagen matrix makes a crucial contribution to the mechanical properties of bone by imparting tensile strength and elasticity. The collagen content of bone is accessible <italic>via</italic> quantification of collagen bound water (CBW) indirectly. We prospectively study the performance of the CBW proton density (CBWPD) measured by a 3D short repetition time adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time (STAIR-UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in human lumbar spine.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>A total of 189 participants with a mean age of 56 (ranged from 50 to 86) years old were underwent MRI, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in lumbar spine. Major fracture risk was also evaluated for all participants using Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). Lumbar CBWPD, bone marrow fat fraction (BMFF), bone mineral density (BMD) and T score values were calculated in three vertebrae (L2–L4) for each subject. Both the CBWPD and BMFF were correlated with BMD, T score, and FRAX score for comparison. The abilities of the CBWPD and BMFF to discriminate between three different cohorts, which included normal subjects, patients with osteopenia, and patients with osteoporosis, were also evaluated and compared using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The CBWPD showed strong correlation with standard BMD (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75, P &lt; 0.001) and T score (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59, P &lt; 0.001), as well as a moderate correlation with FRAX score (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, P &lt; 0.001). High area under the curve (AUC) values (≥ 0.84 using QCT as reference; ≥ 0.76 using DXA as reference) obtained from ROC analysis demonstrated that the CBWPD was capable of well differentiating between the three different subject cohorts. Moreover, the CBWPD had better correlations with BMD, T score, and FRAX score than BMFF, and also performed better in cohort discrimination.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>The STAIR-UTE-measured CBWPD is a promising biomarker in the assessment of bone quality and fracture risk.</p></sec>