Oxidative stress-mediated beta cell death and dysfunction as a target for diabetes management

The biggest drawback of a current diabetes therapy is the treatment of the consequences not the cause of the disease. Regardless of the diabetes type, preservation and recovery of functional pancreatic beta cells stands as the biggest challenge in the treatment of diabetes. Free radicals and oxidative stress are among the major mediators of autoimmune destruction of beta cells in type 1 diabetes (T1D) or beta cell malfunction and death provoked by glucotoxicity and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Additionally, oxidative stress reduces functionality of beta cells in T2D by stimulating their de-/trans-differentiation through the loss of transcription factors critical for beta cell development, maturity and regeneration. This review summarizes up to date clarified redox-related mechanisms involved in regulating beta cell identity and death, underlining similarities and differences between T1D and T2D. The protective effects of natural antioxidants on the oxidative stress-induced beta cell failure were also discussed. Considering that oxidative stress affects epigenetic regulatory mechanisms involved in the regulation of pancreatic beta cell survival and insulin secretion, this review highlighted huge potential of epigenetic therapy. Special attention was paid on application of the state-of-the-art CRISPR/Cas9 technology, based on targeted epigenome editing with the purpose of changing the differentiation state of different cell types, making them insulin-producing with ability to attenuate diabetes. Clarification of the above-mentioned mechanisms could provide better insight into diabetes etiology and pathogenesis, which would allow development of novel, potentially more efficient therapeutic strategies for the prevention or reversion of beta cell loss.

Introduction

Human pancreas is a complex gland with dual exocrine and endocrine function. The endocrine part of the pancreas is represented by Langerhans islets scattered throughout the exocrine pancreas, making up only 1-5% of the mass of the gland (1). Islets poses mantle-core architecture so that the core is mainly made up of insulin-secreting beta cells (70-80%) surrounded by a discontinuous mantle of glucagon-secreting alpha/polypeptide-secreting PP cells (15-20%) and somatostatin-secreting delta cells (5%) (2). Insulin is involved in the regulation of various physiological processes and plays central role in glucose homeostasis. Rise in circulating glucose concentration after meal induces the secretion of insulin which enhances glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis in the liver and muscles, intensifies production of triglycerides which are stored in adipocytes and stimulates protein synthesis. Additionally, insulin inhibits secretion of glucagon and thereby reduces glucose output in the liver (3). Any deficit of insulin or a decreased tissue response to insulin action impairs glucose, lipid and protein metabolism and leads to chronic hyperglycemia and diabetes. Based on the pathophysiological processes that underlie the development of disease several basic categories of diabetes are distinguished. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) affects about 10% of diabetic patients most commonly children and adolescents and occurs as a consequence of selective autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells (4). At the time of diagnosis, reduction of 70-90% of beta cell mass as well as increase in the circulation of insulin autoantibodies (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA), insulinoma 2-associated autoantibodies (IA-2 and IA-2β) and islet-cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ICA) are detected in 60-80% of diabetic patients (5). Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common (85-90%) form of diabetes and usually occurs in patients over the age of forty, but it is increasingly being detected in a younger people and adolescents (6). T2D is characterized by insulin resistance, disturbances in the insulin secretion and progressive loss of 25-50% of pancreatic beta cells in the course of diabetes (7). Insulin deficiency and long-term hyperglycemia leads to severe diabetic complications such as nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, cardiovascular and liver disorders and consequently to premature death (8).

The high frequency and prevalence of the disease makes diabetes one of the four most common non-communicable diseases. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (4), in 2021 there were about 537 million adults (20-79 years) worldwide with diabetes, of which almost 50% were undiagnosed. More than 1.2 million children and adolescents (0-19 years) are living with T1D, while 541 million adults are at increased risk of developing T2D. It is estimated that by 2045, the number of people suffering from diabetes in the world will increase to 783 million, with the largest increase in the number of patients expected in developing countries. A large number of people with diabetes require significant costs for therapy, so that over 966 billion dollars are spent annually for diabetes treatment. Notwithstanding, diabetes therapy does not give desired results and nearly four million diabetic patients die each year worldwide. Pandemic scale of diabetes requires the improvement of current therapy, and it is a prerequisite to understand in detail pathogenesis of the disease.

Numerous studies dedicated to a clarification of the mechanisms involved in beta cell dysfunction revealed that excess of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS, respectively) and resulting non-physiological oxidative stress mediate various pathophysiological processes that underlie beta cell malfunction, dedifferentiation/transdifferentiation and death (9–14). ROS such as superoxide anion ($·{\text{O}}_2^{-}$), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), peroxyl radical (ROO^•), hydroxyl radical (HO^•) and RNS such as nitric oxide (NO^•), nitrogen dioxide ($·{\text{NO}}_2^{-}$, ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$, nitrite ion) and peroxynitrite anion (ONOO^-) are products of normal cellular metabolism and depending on their concentration can have beneficial or harmful effects (15). Under physiological conditions, ROS and RNS molecules are present in low concentrations and are involved in the regulation of signaling processes, differentiation, cell growth and migration, gene expression, posttranslational modifications and cellular defense against various infectious agents (16). New insights indicate that redox-related signaling requires continuous control of the steady-state redox set point by compartmentalized generation and removal of reactive species in order to preserve physiologically relevant oxidative stress denoted as oxidative eustress crucial for various biological processes and lifespan (17). However, in large quantities, either due to excessive production or due to disruption of the antioxidant system, reactive molecules initiate cell damage through lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation and DNA damage (18, 19). In addition, ROS and RNS indirectly cause oxidative tissue damage by activating numerous cell signaling pathways. The level of reactive species is regulated by a complex system of antioxidant protection including endogenous and exogenous antioxidants that prevent, delay or remove oxidative damage from target molecules (20). There is no universal “best” antioxidant and different antioxidants react with different free radicals with varying efficiency to protect target molecules. This review summarizes up to date clarified redox-related mechanisms involved in beta cell identity and death and discusses the potential of natural antioxidants in improving antioxidant capacity and function of beta cells in diabetes.

Growing body of evidence indicate that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, chromatin architectural modification and non-coding RNA determine identity of beta cells during embryogenesis and postnatal maturation and maintain their functioning in homeostasis (21). Diabetes progression and oxidative stress disarrange those epigenetic signatures causing dysfunction and loss of beta cells. Capacity of antioxidant compounds to improve viability of beta cells and reduce diabetic complications by modulating specific epigenetic markers (22–24) opens the avenue for defining specific epigenetic targets in the treatment of diabetes by antioxidants. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the studies supporting this point. In addition, by summarizing recent findings regarding the application of the state-of-the-art CRISPR/Cas9 technology in diabetes, this review emphasis a huge potential of targeted epigenome editing in changing the differentiation state of different cell types into insulin-producing cells with ability to attenuate diabetes. Complete understanding of the mechanisms underlying decreased tissue response to insulin action, as well as of the processes being crucially implicated in the preservation and recovery of beta cell mass would make diabetes no longer a chronic but a curable disease.

Redox-related mechanisms involved in beta cell death and dysfunction

Pancreatic beta cell failure occurs as the final step in T1D and T2D due to activation of various pathophysiological mechanisms such as autoimmune reaction, inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia/glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity and de-/trans-differentiation (25). Numerous clinical and experimental studies revealed that non-physiological oxidative stress represents underlying factor through which those mechanisms disrupt pancreatic beta cells structure and function and lead to development of diabetic complications (15, 26). The role of oxidative stress in mediating various types of beta cell death is summarized on Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Oxidative stress-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms cause various types of beta cell death in diabetic condition. Pathophysiological processes such as autoimmune reaction, inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia/glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity lead to pancreatic beta cell death in diabetic condition by inducing oxidative stress which is involved in apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis and autophagy.

In beta cells, oxidative stress is involved in the reduction of the activity of key regulators of insulin expression and other beta cell specific genes (11, 27). The adverse effects of oxidative stress on beta cells are pronounced in comparison to other cell types due to a low level of antioxidant capacity of beta cells. Comparative analysis of the gene expression of antioxidative enzymes in different cell types of islets prepared from human pancreatic sections showed lower expression of $·{\text{O}}_2^{-}$eliminating superoxide dismutases CuZn/Mn-SOD (1.4-fold) as well as of H₂O₂ eliminating glutathione peroxidase (GPx1) (3-fold) and catalase (CAT) (15-fold) in beta than in non-beta cells (28). Recent findings suggest that beta cells possess capacity to fight against micromolar levels of H₂O₂ through a thioredoxin/reductase-dependent mechanism thus not being as sensitive to oxidative damage as previously thought (29, 30). This presumption is based on demonstrated ability of human EndoC-βH1 beta cell line (similar to primary human beta cells) to detoxify continuously generated physiological level (50 µM) of H₂O₂ for 4 h through the peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin antioxidant system. However, in the same study, 100 µM H₂O₂ applied as a bolus to EndoC-βH1 beta cells reduced cell viability and induced DNA damage along with the depletion of cellular energy (29). Given these data, concerns remain as to whether peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin system would be effective in beta cell protection after the prolonged exposure to physiologically relevant H₂O₂ concentration (31). On the other hand, poor antioxidant capacity of beta cells make them susceptible to ROS mediated signaling involved in the regulation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in physiological conditions (32). Reactive species are mainly produced in mitochondrial respiratory chain that provides adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for GSIS under increased glycolytic and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) flux (27). ROS were shown to stimulate activation of ryanodine receptors (RyR) required for the increase of intracellular free Ca²⁺ in the course of GSIS in rat islet beta cells (33). However, continued increase in glycolytic flux due to impaired glucose clearance in diabetes pathogenesis results in ROS/RNS overproduction in beta cells with potential pathological consequences (27). Elevated levels of ROS reduce expression and secretion of insulin and lead to beta cell damage, suggesting critical role of redox balance and preservation of oxidative eustress (17) for a proper beta cell functioning (34).

Autoimmune destruction of beta cells and inflammation

Though it has long been thought that the autoimmune destruction of beta cells characterizes only T1D, the role of the autoimmune reaction as additional pathological mechanism of selective beta cells disruption in T2D is increasingly being recognized. In T1D the autoimmune reaction is triggered in genetically predisposed persons in response to not entirely clarified environmental factors, while in the case of T2D the trigger for autoimmune destruction of beta cells is chronic inflammation due to obesity and metabolic disorders (35). Prolonged hyperglycemia is associated with sustained oxidative stress which triggers the expression of different pathogenic proinflammatory pathways and activates inflammation-regulated genes (36). The autoimmune process in pancreatic beta cells is characterized by infiltration of macrophages, dendritic and T cells in the islets of Langerhans. Proinflammatory cytokines such as interferon-gamma (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β) and reactive molecules such as nitric oxide (NO) and various related free-radical and oxidant species produced by infiltrated immune cells are major mediators of the induction of apoptosis, the main form of cell death observed through biopsies of islets of rats and humans with T1D (37). Oxidative stress activates mitochondrial or intrinsic pathway of apoptotic beta cell death mediated by family of Bcl-2 proteins (38, 39), while interaction of apoptosis stimulating fragment ligand (FasL) and TNF-α with corresponding receptors on beta cell surface initiate the extrinsic pathway of apoptotic cell death (40). Resulting death signals recruit procaspases and promote their activation into caspases (cysteine-aspartic proteases) leading to disruption of beta cells (41). Activated IL-1β has a crucial role in the amplification and support of FasL and NO effects in beta cell dysfunction and death (42). Through defined chain of events, interaction of IL-1β with IL-1R1 receptor on the surface of beta cells results with an activation of nuclear factor kappa B protein (NF-κB) which reduces activity of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox factor-1 (Pdx1) transcription factor crucial for beta cell functioning and induces inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and consequently NO generation (43). In accordance, activated iNOS and ${\text{ONO}}_2^{-}$ were detected in pancreas of non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice, whereas iNOS-deficient mice are protected from streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetes (44). Formation of ${\text{ONO}}_2^{-}$ promotes the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial membrane which mediates activation of executioner caspase leading to apoptosis (45). NO also provokes fragmentation of DNA, reacts with prosthetic groups of transcription factors required for their biological function and inhibits enzymatic activity required for synthesis of ATP and insulin (46).

Secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α in macrophage and dendritic cells is further stimulated by IFN-γ. Interaction of TNF-α with its TNFR-1 receptor expressed on beta cells triggers signaling that leads to the activation of caspases 3, 6 and 7 (37). Besides inducing apoptotic cell death, activation of TNF-α/TNFR-1 signaling promotes beta cell death by programmed necrosis i.e. necroptosis, executed through excessive ROS production and fragmentation of DNA (47). ROS are produced through Fenton reaction due to TNF-α-stimulated degradation of ferritin and accumulation of iron ions Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺, as well as through increased influx of α-ketoglutarate to Krebs cycle and stimulated reduction-oxidation reactions in the respiratory chain (37). While exposure of RINm5f cells to IL-1β promoted iNOS-mediated NO^• production, combination of IL-1 β, TNF-α and INF- γ induced accumulation of H₂O₂ and production of highly toxic HO^• (48). Excessive level of HO^• induces lipid peroxidation of cell membranes and stimulates apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) translocation from mitochondria to nucleus where it induces large-scaled DNA fragmentation and necroptosis (49).

Insulin resistance and glucotoxic induced beta cell death

Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and high insulin requirements in T2D cause compensatory hyperinsulinemia and expansion of beta cells which gradually leads to a loss of beta cell mass (50). Under normoglycemic conditions, glucose metabolites are mostly subjected to oxidative phosphorylation, while hyperglycemia promotes additional biosynthetic pathways including glucose autooxidation as the main source of ROS production in diabetic condition (51). In combination with transition metals, glucose oxidation generates ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ and subsequently H₂O₂ leading to a production of extremely reactive HO^-. In addition, hyperglycemia activates NF-κB and increases the expression of NAD(P)H oxidase (NOX) and iNOS, resulting with $·{\text{O}}_2^{-}$ and NO^• production and ${\text{ONO}}_2^{-}$ formation (52). Peroxynitrite induces damage of DNA by introducing single-strand breaks which is a stimulus for the activation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) (53). PARP-1 binds to damaged DNA and catalyzes cleavage of NAD⁺ to nicotinamide and ADP-ribose which is further used for poly(ADP-ribose) polymers formation and their covalent binding to proteins (44). PolyADPribosylation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) reduces its activity (54). Accumulation of GAPDH upstream glycolytic intermediates such as glucose, glucose-6-phosphate, fructose-6-phosphate, fructose-1,6- diphosphate, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate causes enhanced activity of sorbitol and hexosamine metabolism, protein kinase C activation, enediol formation, polyol pathway and glycation, all leading to ROS overproduction (55). In addition, activation of polyol pathway and aldose reductase enzyme activity reduces concentration of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) leading to reduction of antioxidant mechanisms in beta cells (37). Hyperglycemia-associated ROS overproduction promotes an increase of IL-1β expression in beta cells which mediates programmed cell death known as pyroptosis, managed through activation of caspase 1 and formation of inflammasome complex (56, 57). Prolonged hyperglycemia also stimulates inflammatory processes and proapoptotic mechanisms mediated by generation of NO and NO-related species. IL-1β-stimulated iNOS expression and NF-κB activation in turn induces iNOS and IL-1β autostimulation, thus promoting beta cell dysfunction (58).

Cell models for insulin resistance such as dexamethasone- and TNF-α-treated adipocytes revealed that ROS overproduction may be a key trait of insulin resistance (59). The oxidation rate of the redox-sensitive dye dichlorofluorescein (DCF) was higher by 65% in dexamethasone-treated and by 50% in TNF-α-treated insulin resistant cells. Elevated level of protein carbonylation in dexamethasone-treated (by 110%) and in TNF-α-treated (by 50%) adipocytes reflected cumulative oxidative stress in insulin-resistant cells and pointed that the increase in ROS level precedes and triggers the onset of detectable insulin resistance. It must be emphasized that insulin resistance exhausts beta cells through high insulin demand and compensatory hyperinsulinemia eventually affecting their survival (55). Insulin resistance in T2D is often accompanied by pathogenic effects of elevated levels of plasma fatty acids. Since a persistently raised glucose concentration precedes diabetes-related lipotoxicity, the term glucolipotoxicity is used for describing deleterious action of lipids on beta cells (55). Oleate-treated MIN6 cells exhibited increased level of H₂O₂, while exposure of INS-1E cells to palmitate promoted $·{\text{O}}_2^{-}$ formation in mitochondria (60, 61). Treatment of isolated islets and beta cells with elevated levels of fatty acids results with oxidative stress-related impaired insulin expression, inhibition of GSIS and induction of apoptotic cell death (62–65). Experimental and clinical studies indicate increased levels of oxidative stress parameters in circulation, oxidative tissue damage and a positive correlation between oxidative markers and impaired GSIS in islets in diabetic condition (66). Increased levels of oxidative stress markers such as hydroperoxides, 8-hydroxy-guanine, 8-epi-PGF2α and DNA base oxidation were detected in circulation of diabetic patients (67, 68). Exposure of human islets to high glucose concentration or rat islets to excess levels of glucose metabolite D-glyceraldehyde was accompanied by ROS overproduction and the decrease of insulin content and GSIS (69, 70). Concentrations of nitrotyrosine and 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) oxidative stress markers were significantly increased in pancreatic islets isolated from T2D cadaveric organ donors and they were correlated with impairment of insulin expression and GSIS (71).

High glucose level is accompanied by iron overload which leads to insulin resistance and beta cell injury by iron-related programmed cell death termed ferroptosis (72, 73). Mainly characterized by the shrinkage of mitochondria and by lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis is mediated by glutathione (GSH)/glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4) pathway (74). Therefore, GSH deficiency and inhibition of GSH synthesis could provoke ferroptosis, while lipophilic-/iron-chelating agents and antioxidants can prevent this type of cell death (75). Recently, Stančić and coworkers (76) analyzed the ability of diabetogenic agents such as high glucose (HG), proinflammatory cytokines, H₂O₂ and STZ to induce ferroptosis in Rin-5F beta cell line in vitro, and have analyzed the share of ferroptosis in beta cell damage in vivo using STZ-diabetic mice. All tested in vitro treatments decreased viability of Rin-5F cells which was associated with elevated levels of iron, ROS, lipid peroxides, inactivation of NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) along with decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and expression of Gpx4. Those effects were diminished in HG, H₂O₂ and STZ treatments of beta cells by ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin 1 (Fer-1) which failed to improve MMP and cell viability in cytokines-treated Rin-5F cells. Moreover, Fer-1 increased the number of insulin-positive cells in islets of STZ-diabetic mice by decreasing macrophage infiltration and accumulation of lipid peroxides. Those findings strongly suggest that high glucose level and ROS overproduction, but not proinflammatory cytokines, induce loss of beta cells by ferroptosis under diabetic condition (76).

Growing body of evidence indicate association of defects in autophagy with insulin resistance, obesity and beta cell dysfunction in diabetes (77, 78). This lysosomal degradation machinery includes macroautophagy, crinophagy and microautophagy which regulate cellular homeostasis by recycling damaged macromolecules and organelles for new protein synthesis and energy production (78). Dysfunctional autophagy in beta cells under oxidative stress conditions could result with accumulation of excess proteins and their toxic effects (71). Hence, rise of autophagy in islets of diabetic db/db and high-fat diet (HFD) fed C57BL/6 mice suggest its role in adaptive response of beta cells to fight against insulin resistance and insulin deficiency (79). Autophagy may also protect cells from H₂O₂-induced single- or double-strand DNA breaks and deleterious effects of increased activity of PARP-1 (80). Activation of PARP-1 and subsequent intracellular NAD⁺ and ATP depletion leads to inhibition of proinsulin synthesis and increases AIF translocation from mitochondria to the nucleus, resulting with chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation and programmed necrotic cell death independent of the caspase cascade (44, 81). On the other hand, Huang et al. (80) showed that PARP-1 could stimulate autophagy by promoting serine/threonine protein kinase LKB1-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)–mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, suggesting that beta cell survival depends on the balance between necrosis and autophagy mediated by two particular PARP-1-pathways. Oxidative stress and DNA damage are among multiple cellular stressors that stimulate autophagy of beta cells (82). ROS promotes autophagy by several mechanisms including activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) which inhibits insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) (83). Hydrogen peroxide may stimulate PKR-like eIF2α kinase (PERK) which, by phosphorylation of general autophagy regulator initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), stimulates expression of LC3 necessary for sustained autophagy (84). By reducing IkBα translation, PERK also activates autophagy contributing factor NF-kB (85). Hydrogen peroxide directly oxidizes Atg4 proteases and enhances their activity toward accelerated formation of proteolytically mature LC3 (86) Figure 1.

Beta cell identity and de-/trans-differentiation

Generally accepted view that diabetes-associated beta cell loss is primarily caused by beta cell death was recently challenged. It is increasingly being recognized that loss of beta cell identity through de- and trans-differentiation processes contribute to failure of beta cells (50). Rodent based in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that preservation of beta cell identity is regulated by several transcription factors identified as critical for development, maturity, regeneration and functioning of beta cells. Dedifferentiation is characterized by decreased expression of key beta cell markers such as Pdx-1, musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog A (MafA), homeobox protein (Nkx6.1), neurogenic differentiation factor 1 (NeuroD1) and forkhead box protein O1 (Foxo1) along with increased expression of beta cell “disallowed” genes such as progenitor Neurogenin3, SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) or monocarboxylate transporter MCT1 and lactate dehydrogenase genes (87). On the other hand, transdifferentiation implies transition of beta cells into other types of hormone producing islet cells. Mice lacking Foxo1 transcription factor in beta cells exhibited reduction of beta cell mass due to dedifferentiation of beta cells into Neurogenin3-, Nanog-, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4-) and cell cycle regulator L-Myc-expressing progenitor-like cells and alpha-like cells, resulting with hyperglycemia and hyperglucagonemia (88). Likewise, independent studies provided evidence that dedifferentiation may also occur in human beta cells through loss of transcription factors necessary for maintaining mature beta cell identity. Namely, selective loss of Pdx1, MafA and Nkx6.1 markers was detected in pancreatic islets from T2D cadaveric organ donors which was associated with a marked insulin reduction (89, 90). It can be assumed that dedifferentiation represents a defense mechanism by which beta cells avoid the autoimmune reaction (10). This is supported by data showing that loss of beta cell maturity genes and acceptance of stemness-like proprerties of beta cells repress the autoimmune attack and development of diabetes in NOD mice (91).

Deletion of beta cell specific Pdx-1 or overexpression of alpha cell specific aristaless-related homeobox gene (Arx) transcription factor leads to decreased number of beta cells and increased number of alpha cells in rodents (92). Similar change in beta cell-fate was detected in diabetic db/db mice characterized by loss of insulin as well as of Pdx-1 and MafA factors (88). Pdx-1 plays an important role in pancreas development and differentiation, as well as in maintaining normal beta cell function, while MafA transcription factor primarily regulates insulin gene expression but is also involved in development and proliferation of beta cells (11, 27). Targeted removal of Pdx1 from beta cells led to severe hyperglycemia in PKO mice associated with reprogramming of majority of Pdx1-deleted beta cells into alpha-like cells including de-repression of MafB transcription factor specific for alpha cells (12). These data suggest that Pdx1 plays an essential role in regulating beta cell identity by concurrently activating beta cell genes and repressing genes associated with alpha cell fate. The lack of NKX6.1 in beta cells promotes gaining of delta-cell phenotype (93), while deficiency of PAX6 or NKX2.2 establishes epsilon-like or polyhormonal-cells, respectively (13, 14).

Numerous data indicate that oxidative stress and redox-related mechanisms stimulate de- or trans-differentiation processes in beta cells by interrupting the expression of beta cell maturity transcription factors (94), which has been illustrated in Figure 2. Initial studies demonstrated that prolonged culturing of insulin secreting HIT-T15 cells in high glucose concentration (11.1 mM) compromised insulin gene expression and GSIS resulting from loss of Pdx-1 and MafA binding to insulin promoter (95, 96). Those glucotoxicity effects were related to oxidative stress-induced posttranscriptional loss of Pdx-1 mRNA and posttranslational loss of MafA protein, which was further supported by findings showing that antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or aminoguanidine improved insulin gene expression by preserving Pdx1 and MafA binding to insulin promoter in high glucose cultured HIT-T1 cells (97). Later on, it has been shown that H₂O₂ reduces insulin gene expression in rat islets by repressing binding of Pdx-1 to insulin promoter (98). Negative effects of ROS on Pdx-1 activity are probably mediated by JNK pathway and Foxo1 transcription factor (99). Namely, inhibition of JNK protects beta cells from ROS-mediated reduction of insulin expression, whereas activation of JNK induces nuclear translocation of Foxo1. In accordance, siRNA-inhibited expression of Foxo1 in H₂O₂-treated HIT-T15 beta cells keeps cytoplasmic localization of Foxo1 and nuclear localization of Pdx-1 along with insulin expression (100). Likewise, H₂O₂ provokes cytoplasmic localization of MafA and prevents its stimulating effect on insulin gene expression (101). Therefore, hyperglycemia-induced cytoplasmic translocation of MafA is considered to be an early indicator of beta cell dysfunction. Presented data strongly suggest that redox status affects subcellular localization of key insulin transcription factors as well as their regulators (11).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Oxidative stress compromises beta cell identity by altering expression of beta cell maturity genes and beta cell disallowed genes. Loss of beta cell identity through de-/trans-differentiation processes contributes to beta cell failure in diabetic condition. Oxidative stress-reduced expression of beta cell-fate markers such as duodenal homeobox factor-1 (Pdx-1), musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog A (MafA), paired box 4 (Pax4) and homeobox protein Nkx6.1, decreases the expression of insulin (Ins) and glucose transporter GLUT1 and promotes the expression of progenitor markers such as SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) and hairy and enhancer of split-1 (HES1), suggesting occurrence of dedifferentiation process. By reducing expression of Pdx-1, oxidative stress may also lead to overexpression of alpha cell specific aristaless-related homeobox gene factor (Arx) and consequently to transdifferentiation of beta cells into alpha cells.

Leenders and coworkers (10) used human islets and human EndoC-βH1 cell line to investigate the effects of H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress on identity and function of human beta cells in diabetic conditions. They found that treatment with H₂O₂ promoted cell stress response and reduced expression of insulin and glucose transporter GLUT1 in human EndoC-βH1 cells associated with decreased expression of beta cell fate markers MafA, Pdx-1, paired box 4 (Pax4), Nkx6.1, as well as of beta cell-related genes Pax6, Nkx2.2, NeuroD1, Kir6.2, MafB and Foxa2. Simultaneously increased expression of progenitor cell-specific SOX9 and hairy and enhancer of split-1 (HES1) genes in H₂O₂-treated EndoC-βH1 cells suggests occurrence of dedifferentiation mechanisms (10). In accordance, usage of primary human islets and human islets transplanted into HFD fed mice revealed that widely used immunosuppressant in organ transplantation therapies, tacrolimus, accelerates development of diabetes by inducing loss of beta cell maturity features through metabolic stress-activated Foxo1 and reduced expression of MafA (102). Oxidative stress-related loss of beta cell identity is supported by findings showing that overexpression of Gpx1 or treatment with Gpx mimetic agents could restore expression of Pdx-1 and/or MafA in islets of diabetic mice (103, 104). At the same time, those findings strongly indicate that targeting of antioxidant mechanisms could play a significant role in preserving beta cell identity and function in diabetic condition.

Natural antioxidants against beta cell failure

Current diabetes therapy includes the use of insulin and hypoglycemic drugs, as well as dietary correction. Various drugs exert their antidiabetogenic effect by stimulating insulin secretion, reducing the process of gluconeogenesis in the liver, increasing peripheral glucose absorption or delaying intestinal glucose absorption (105). Nevertheless, glycemic control is established in less than 50% of diabetic patients and results of up-to-date therapy are far from expected (106). Over time, patients become resistant to treatments, some drugs display side or even toxic effects, while insulin therapy carries the risk of life-threatening hypoglycemia (107). Such limitations in diabetes management have stimulated efforts to improve therapeutic approaches. One of the biggest challenges in this direction is certainly the recovery and preservation of functional beta cells. For that cause, several potential strategies emerged such as stimulation of existing beta cells to proliferate, islet transplantation from cadaveric donors, transplantation of beta cells generated in vitro from stem cells or cellular reprogramming of other types of pancreatic cells (50, 108). However, it turned out that stimulation of proliferation and transplantation are not quite effective or available, while potential of cellular reprogramming will be discussed in chapter 5. A major obstacle in using stimulated proliferation of beta cells in diabetes therapy is diminishment of the proliferative capacity of beta cells over time due to lower replication potential of human beta cells in comparison to rodents (109, 110). On the other hand, even when exceeding immune-mediated rejection, islet transplantation carries a great risk of progressive islet decline due to increased secretory demand, hyperglycemia, inflammation and oxidative stress (111). Besides, successful preservation and function of islet grafts is counteracted by oxidative stress in isolated islets which initiated the development of strategies, such as ROS reduction or induction of antioxidant enzymes, to reduce oxidative stress in islets before transplantation (112, 113).

Given the indisputable role of non-physiological oxidative stress in structural and functional disruption of beta cells, the use of antioxidants could have significant therapeutic effects. However, antioxidant supplementation with vitamins (A, C, E), coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), enzymatic antioxidants-like mimics (CAT/GPx/SOD/mimetics), flavonoids, β-carotene, NAC, selenium and zinc in human clinical trials revealed limited beneficial effects probably due to their poor stability, solubility, permeability and specificity (114–116). For example, results from clinical trials regarding the beneficial effects of vitamins C and E in reducing various oxidative stress-related diseases are inconsistent due to almost an equal number of studies showing positive or no significant effect (116). This has stimulated efforts in finding efficient delivery systems to enhance the effects of antioxidant supplements in diabetes treatment as well as the examination of antidiabetogenic properties of plant-based preparations. Namely, herbal preparations contain complex combination of polyphenolic compounds that can act synergistically, antagonistically and additively against oxidative stress and different pathogenic mechanisms in diabetes (117). Coexistence of various antioxidant compounds in plants enables the maintenance of the so-called antioxidant chain - after the neutralization of free radicals, the antioxidant is recycled thanks to the next antioxidant in the chain (118). Therefore, usage of synthetic antioxidants cannot replace the consumption of food rich in antioxidants. Clinical trials such as phase II clinical trial (NCT02801448) with broccoli sprout extract in T2D patients (119), phase II/III clinical trial (NCT03262363) evaluating the effect of curcumin on antioxidant capacity and renal function in diabetic nephropathy (120), or phase II trial (NCT00811889) determining the effects of Nrf-2 activator bardoxolone methyl in T2D patients with chronic kidney disease (121) displayed promising results for the treatment of diabetic complications. These studies encourage further investigation of the beneficial effects of natural compounds in diabetic condition.

Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) is the most consumed among the twelve world chestnut species and is known for its antioxidant properties (122). Extracts prepared from three different parts of sweet chestnut (catkins, leaves and spiny burs) displayed high phenolic and flavonoid content and protected Rin-5F beta cells from STZ-induced oxidative stress and death by lowering DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and increasing GSH level (123). Positive effect of chestnut extract on beta cell viability against STZ toxicity was more pronounced in cooperation with extract prepared from edible mushroom Lactarius deterrimus (117). Combination of C. Sativa (spiny burs) and L. deterrimus extracts (MIX Ld/Cs) displayed high in vitro ROS-scavenging activity originating from chestnut extract and good NO-scavenging activity exhibited by mushroom extract. Moreover, MIX Ld/Cs acquired high ferrous (Fe²⁺) chelating effect despite the very low chelating activities of individual extracts. Analysis of underlying mechanisms revealed that MIX Ld/Cs exerted protective effect against STZ-induced beta cell death and improved their function by lowering GSH oxidation, NO-output and activity of NF-kB-p65 (117). When applied to STZ-diabetic rats at dose of 60 mg/kg (daily/4 weeks), L. deterrimus extract alleviated diabetes induced hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia, lowered the level of glycated serum proteins and adjusted the diabetes-induced redox imbalance in the circulation (124). Increased activities of CAT and SOD enzymes in the circulation were accompanied by increased levels of glutathionylated proteins and free intracellular thiols. This systemic antioxidant effect was accompanied by restrained islet destruction and partially restored number of insulin-positive cells in diabetic animals through decreased level of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and elevated expression of chemokine CXCL12 that mediated prosurvival pathway. Namely, analysis of the pro-survival protein kinase B (Akt) kinase and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) indicated that mushroom extract shifted the balance from beta cell death in favor to survival and proliferation. Considering the presence of quiescent pancreatic cells with proliferative potential, described protective mechanisms of mushroom extract could be beneficial in initial stages of diabetes through regeneration of existing beta cell mass, supporting a therapeutic potential of L. deterrimus extract in diabetes treatment (124).

Traditional use of common centaury (Centaurium erythraea Rafn) for diabetes treatment in numerous Mediterranean countries stimulated in vitro and in vivo examination of its protective effects on pancreatic beta cells. Application of C. erythraea extract (200 mg/kg/day; 30 days) to STZ-diabetic rats recovered pancreatic islet morphology along with reduction of blood glucose level (125). Such beneficial effects of C. erythraea extract were attributed to its antioxidant properties and decreased oxidative damage of beta cells owing to increased level of GSH and stimulated activities of SOD, GPx and CAT enzymes in pancreas. Composition characterization of C. erythraea methanol extract by Đorđević et al. (8) revealed dominant presence of secoiridoids and abundant content of polyphenols such as phenolic acids, flavonoids and xanthones, while in vitro biochemical assays unveiled its strong reducing power, H₂O₂- and NO-scavenging activities. This is in line with data showing that C. erythraea extract reduced cell death by alleviating lipid peroxidation, protein S-glutathionylation, DNA damage and by correcting the expression and the activity of MnSOD, CuZnSOD, CAT, GPx and GR enzymes in STZ-treated Rin-5F beta cells (66). In parallel, C. erythraea extract modulated redox sensitive pathways mediated by NF-kB-p65, Nrf-2, forkhead box O3 (FOXO3A) and specificity protein 1 (Sp1) and promoted the activity of Pdx-1 and MafA proteins after STZ-trigered oxidative stress in Rin-5F cells. In addition, when applied to STZ-induced diabetic rats at a dose of 100 mg/kg, for 4 weeks, C. erythraea extract contributed to protection of beta cells in islets and improved the levels of activated pro-survival protein kinase B (p-Akt), insulin and its GLUT-2 receptor in pancreatic sections (66). C. erythraea extract also provided increased viability and insulin expression/secretion in Rin-5F cells after sodium nitroprusside (SNP)- or H₂O₂-induced redox imbalance (126). Unlike to H₂O₂ which directly causes oxidative damage and provides ^•OH formation, SNP releases NO^• and induces cytotoxicity by nitrosative stress. SNP- and H₂O₂-promoted lowering of GSH/GSSG ratio, alterations in the activities of GPx, GR, CAT, MnSOD and CuZnSOD enzymes and the increase in DNA damage, protein S-glutathionylation and lipid peroxidation in Rin-5F beta cells was ameliorated by C. erythraea extract probably through its NO- and H₂O₂-scavenging activities (8, 126). This is especially important considering that NO^• and/or H₂O₂ overproduction negatively affects proliferation of beta cells as well as their ability to produce and secrete insulin (127). Underlying mechanisms of such detrimental NO^• and H₂O₂ effects are based on the post-translational modifications of Pdx1 and MafA factors crucial for insulin gene expression (11). It can be assumed that C. erythraea extract increased expression of insulin in SNP- and H₂O₂-treated beta cells by protecting Pdx1 and MafA from oxidative damage which is in correlation with C. erythraea extract-stimulated Pdx1 and MafA activity and expression of insulin in STZ-treated beta cells (66). Those findings are further supported with data showing that targeting of redox-induced modifications of regulatory factors such as kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), protein kinase C (PKC), inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta (IKKβ), NF-kB, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ), p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinases or Mn-/CuZn-SOD and CAT enzymes are potential therapeutic strategies in treatment of diabetes pathogenesis (8, 105, 114, 128).

As not being initial factor in diabetes development and progression but rather being induced by immune reaction, inflammation and glucolipotoxicity, targeting of oxidative stress at present is seen as ancillary treatment in diabetes therapy (27). However, numerous studies dedicated to illumination of the mechanisms involved in beta cell failure strongly suggest that control of oxidative stress has a great potential in the treatment of diabetes. The main disadvantage of effective use of antioxidants such as polyphenolic compounds in diabetes therapy seems to be their insufficient stability, permeability and aqueous solubility in conventional application. Phenolic compounds cannot be absorbed in their native form and are subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis in the small intestine (around 48% of all polyphenols) and large intestine (about 42%) remaining only 10% in undigested and intact form (129). Thus, the effective concentration that reaches target tissue and displays biological effect is far less from the applied dose of phytoconstituents (130). For that cause it is demanding to develop antioxidant delivery approaches with consistent delivery and smart dissolution that could precisely target ROS production, redox modifications as well as ROS-induced injury and death of beta cells (115, 131). Since normal functioning of beta cells requires balanced ROS production, novel antioxidant delivery systems also have to provide adequate modulation of antioxidant defense to elicit beneficial not adverse effects. Advantages and weaknesses of beta cell protection by natural antioxidants are presented in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 Effects of natural antioxidants (polyphenolic compounds) on oxidative stress-related targets: ROS production, redox modifications and ROS-induced injury of beta cells. Oxidative stress reduces the functioning and survival of beta cells through oxidative damage and modifications of macromolecules, disruption of the antioxidant defense system and reduction of beta cell maturity genes. Thus control of oxidative stress by plant-derived preparations has a great potential in the treatment of diabetes. However, the protective effect of natural antioxidants on beta cells can be enhanced by the improvement of a current antioxidant delivery approaches. ROS/ROS, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species; Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺, ferrous ions; LP, lipid peroxidation; PG, protein glycosylation; DNA D, DNA damage; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; NF-kB, nuclear factor kappa B; Akt, protein kinase B; Pdx1, duodenal homeobox factor-1; MafA, musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog A; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; Sp1, specificity protein 1; Sirt1, Silent information regulator 1.

Oxidative stress-related epigenetic regulatory mechanisms as a therapeutic target for diabetes

Developmental studies have provided evidence that pancreas maintains a certain level of cellular plasticity under pathological conditions (132). This implies that under given environmental conditions beta cells can undergo dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation, with ability of re-differentiation depending on severity and duration of stressors (50). By avoiding prolonged exposure to those insults it would be possible to recover mature identity of pre-existing beta cells and their normal functioning. In accordance, advances in experimental and clinical studies have illuminated the substantial role of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in the development and function of beta cells in physiological conditions, as well as in triggering islet autoimmunity and/or beta cell dysfunction and decline in both T1D and T2D (21, 133).

Epigenetic mechanisms regulate complex interplay between environmental or other external factors and gene expression (134). Epigenetic modifications are highly dynamic and include DNA methylation/demethylation, histone posttranslational modifications and non-coding microRNA (miRNA) expression that all influence chromatin organization and gene regulation without changing DNA sequence. A load of scientific publications supports a fundamental principle that the specific combination of epigenetic modifications is necessary for the identity of each pancreatic cell lineage. Any dysregulation of pancreatic cell’ epigenetic signatures are a key event in the pathogenesis of diabetes and therefore the molecular machinery that defines these epigenetic signatures can be potential targets in the therapeutic development of diabetic epidrugs (21).

Oxidative stress and epigenetic modifications in diabetes

Elevated glucose level in diabetic condition affects biochemical and metabolic pathways which is also reflected on epigenetic modifications (134). Reduced level of a methyl group donor SAM in diabetes may interrupt methyltransferase activity and inhibit methylation of DNA and histone proteins (135, 136). The evaluation of the histone modification role in T1D cohort revealed association between levels of glycohemoglobin and H3K9 acetylation in the monocytes, as well as altered DNA methylation of 3′ UTR of thioredoxin-interacting protein, suggesting its potential use as a biomarker for oxidative stress (137, 138). In study of elderly T2D patients, reduced level of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in leucocytes was recorded (139). T2D pathogenesis is considered to be associated with alterations in DNA methylation due to rise in level of short-chain fatty acids, which lead to hypomethylation and dysregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes (140). In accordance, decreased levels of Suv39H1 methytransferase and trimethylated lysine 9 residue of histone 3 (H3K9me3) at interleukin-6 promoter were detected in vascular smooth muscle cells of T2D mice (141). Diabetes pathogenesis is also associated with alterations in miRNA levels, for example miR-21 and miR-210 are taken as T1D biomarkers, while lowering of miR-126 is connected with T2D development (142, 143).

Oxidative stress significantly contributes to the control of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms (144). Oxidative stress-induced DNA strand breaks and damage can alter DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, thus leading to abnormal DNA methylation pattern (145). Oxidation of guanine within CpG islands produces 8-OHdG which stimulates DNA methylation of adjacent cytosine and reduces affinity of methyl-domain binding proteins. DNA methylation can be also stimulated by reactive molecules through cytosine deprotonation and accelerated interaction between DNA and SAM donor (146). Oxidative stress promotes DNMT1 and histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 association and inhibits activity of HDACs such of Silent information regulator 1 (Sirt1) (147). In addition, multiple lysine residues on histone domains are also susceptible to harmful effects of oxidative stress (148). These changes in epigenetic modifications certainly lead to disturbances in the regulation of expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes and their regulators, which in turn promotes oxidative stress conditions. SOD gene expression is suppressed by increased DNA methylation, H4K20 methylation and H3K9 acetylation in diabetic conditions (149, 150). Nrf2, a central regulator of antioxidant defense genes and its regulator Keap1 are both epigenetically regulated by miRNAs and histone modifications (134).

Epigenetic modifications and beta cell function

Epigenetic modulatory mechanisms are involved in the regulation of beta cell differentiation, proliferation, homeostasis and pathogenesis (21, 144, 151). Dhawan et al. (152) have demonstrated that beta cell identity relays on DNA methylation-mediated repression of Arx. Namely, lack of DNMT1 gene in transgenic mice led to trans-differentiation of beta cells into alpha cells, which was in correlation with Arx1 gene hypomethylation. DNMT1 deletion did not display large-scale alterations in gene methylation suggesting not just localized effect of DNMT1 activity, but also the crucial effect of epigenetic mechanisms in beta cell differentiation. Besides DNA methylation, histone acetylation has been demonstrated to be involved in the regulation of islet development and functioning and T2D pathogenesis (153). Application of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) during rat embryonic development increased Neurogenin3 positive endocrine progenitor cells revealing a key role of histone acetylation in lineage specification of pancreatic alpha, beta, delta and PP cells (154, 155). In line with those data, HDACs were shown to be essential in diabetes pathogenesis since specific HDACi augmented beta cell mass and insulin secretion (156, 157). It has been shown that insulin expression is inversely correlated with CpG methylation level, i.e. insulin promoter is hypomethylated in beta cells and hypermethylated in other cell types (158). Accordingly, specific methylation profile of the proximal promoter of insulin gene was found to be associated with T1D (159). Therefore, differential methylation of DNA from insulin gene in circulation could be used as a biomarker of beta cell loss in T1D (160). Similarly, DNA methylation profiling of human islets from control and T2D donors revealed differential DNA methylation of 853 genes which can influence insulin secretion (161). These findings indicate important role of DNA methylation in insulin secretion and beta cell dysfunction in T2D. Moreover, in cooperation with histone acetyltransferase p300, Pdx1 enhances insulin expression under high glucose concentration by stimulation of chromatin opening near insulin promoter, while at low glucose levels Pdx1 inhibits insulin expression by recruitment of HDAC1 and HDAC2 (162, 163). Consistently, it was found that proteasomal degradation of p300 contributes to beta cell apoptosis in diabetes condition (164), while removal of Set7/9 methyltransferase and disturbance of active H3K4 histone mark in beta cells reduces Pdx1 expression and insulin secretion (165, 166). Numerous studies revealed the impact of miRNA regulation in beta cell failure. Among great number of miRNA, specific miR-375 was detected exclusively in pancreatic islets where it regulates beta cell programming, proliferation and glucose homeostasis (167). Targeted inhibition of miR-375 in mice disturbed islet morphology with the reduction in alpha and beta cell mass and impaired insulin secretion (168, 169). IL-1β/TNF-α-induced damage of MIN6 cells, islets of NOD mice and human islets, was mediated by miR-21, miR-34a and miR-146a overexpression (170), while increased expression of miRNA-29a/b/c in islets of pre-diabetic NOD mice was associated with impaired GSIS and induction of apoptosis (171). In newly diagnosed T1D children, miR-25 was found to be associated with glycemic control and function of residual beta cells (172).

It is evident that epigenetic regulation plays an essential role of in the development, viability and function of beta cells, as well as, that diabetic environment and oxidative stress interfere with those epigenetic marks causing dysfunction and loss of beta cells. On the other hand, plasticity of epigenetic mechanisms strongly encourages the development of a novel diabetic therapeutic strategies based on reversing epigenetic modifications in order to enable the recovery of beta cells.

Epigenetic targets in diabetes therapy and potential use of natural antioxidants

Association between epigenetic mechanisms and diabetes pathogenesis has stimulated development of new therapeutic strategies with ability to reverse epigenetic modifications, such as epidrugs and epigenome editing (133, 173). In accordance, synthetic compounds have been intensively studied as potential epigenetic modifiers primarily in cancer, but also in other pathological states, including diabetes. DNMTs inhibitors such as 5-azacytidine (Aza, Vidaza) and its derivative 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC, Decitabine) are currently approved drugs for the treatment of hematological malignancies in elderly patients, but were also shown to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory diseases (174–176). Treatment of non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice with DAC prevented diabetes development by cyclophosphamide, while application of DAC to HFD fed ob/ob mice improved insulin sensitivity (177, 178). HDAC inhibitors valproic acid and trichostatin A reduced apoptosis and improved proliferation and function of beta cells in T1D animals (179, 180). Acting as agonists of HDAC enzyme Sirt1, medications such as metformin and fenofibrate stimulated insulin secretion and improved glucose metabolism in T1D mice (181, 182).

Considering the role of oxidative stress in diabetes development via affecting epigenetic mechanisms, the use of antioxidants becomes powerful alternative approach in epigenetic therapy. In addition to the confirmed anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of polyphenolic compounds, their effect on epigenetic regulation is increasingly being recognized (Figure 4). It has been shown that polyphenolic compounds have the ability to modulate epigenetic related mechanisms including DNA methylation, histone modification and miRNA level (183). Despite evident involvement of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in a number of diseases, the majority of studies investigated the effects of natural polyphenols in the treatment of cancer, and these data are certainly valuable guidelines for research in other fields. So far, only limited number of studies has reported causative relationship between dietary polyphenolic compounds and epigenetic modifications in diabetes pathogenesis. However, it is undeniable that dietary deficiency or excesses in methyl donors could affect global changes in DNA and/or histone methylation patterns (144). The regeneration of primary methyl donor SAM from S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH) also depends upon the presence of certain nutrients such as zinc, folate, choline, betaine or vitamins B2, B6 and B12 that serve as cofactors or intermediates (135, 184). Given that SAH has a negative regulatory effect on methyltransferase activity, its cellular accumulation could inhibit methylation of DNA or histone proteins (144). Polyphenols may directly inhibit DNMTs by reducing their expression and activity or indirectly by lowering SAM levels. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and curcumin inhibit DNMT1 through a direct interaction with enzyme (184, 185), while catechol-containing polyphenols such as quercetin, catechin, epicatechin, rutin, luteolin and caffeic acid act as a non-competitive DNMTs inhibitors by causing SAH overproduction due to usage of SAM as a methyl donor for their own methylation (183). Regarding the histone mark modifications by polyphenols, it has been found that resveratrol-stimulated histone deacetylation through activation of Sirt1 resulted with improved glucose level and increased insulin secretion in experimental animals (186). Natural compounds such as quercetin, genistein, curcumin and EGCG were identified as HDACi (187). EGCG corrects gene expression of tumor suppressor genes by inhibition of HDAC activity and stimulation of H3K9/H3K14 and H4K5/H4K12/H4K16 histone acetylation in cancer cells (188). Genistein also can act as histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activator and Sirt1 inhibitor, while EGCG and curcumin display HAT inhibitory activity (189, 190). EGCG decreases the level of miR-30b, miR-453, miR-520e, miR-629, and miR-608 in human hepg2 cells (191), and resveratrol regulates the activity of inflammation-related miRNAs (miR-21, miR-30c2, miR-34a, miR-155, miR-181b and miR-663) in T2D patients (192).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Role of natural antioxidants in the regulation of epigenetic mechanisms involved in diabetes pathogenesis. Antioxidants are becoming powerful alternative approach in epigenetic therapy. Besides synthetic compounds as a potential epigenetic modifiers (Aza, Vidaza, Decitabine (DAC), valproic acid and trichostatin A), it has been shown that polyphenolic compounds have the ability to modulate epigenetic related mechanisms including DNA methylation, histone modification and regulation of miRNA expression. SAM, S-Adenosyl methionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; DNMTs, DNA methyltransferases; HATs, Histone acetyltransferases; HDACs, Histone deacetylases; HMTs, Histone methyltransferases; RISC, RNA-induced silencing complex; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; W, writers of histone marks; R, readers of histone marks; E, erasers of histone marks.

Phenolic phytochemicals may also regulate gene expression of antioxidant enzymes through alteration of epigenetic modifications (51). This could be achieved by epigenetic activation of Nrf-2 transactivator of antioxidant genes, as it was reported for curcumin, sulforaphane, quercetin and reserpine (193). Curcumin and sulforaphane were identified to increase expression of Nrf2 by demethylating its promoter and decreasing DNMT1 enzyme (194, 195). Luteolin was also reported to activate Nrf-2 gen in heme oxygenase-1 induction and to enhance HDACs and repress HATs in high glucose-treated THP-1 cells (196, 197). Besides, combination of luteolin with fisetin reduces ROS formation and promotes Sirt1expression (198). Sirt-1 plays a multiple roles in beta cells because it is considered to be a strong stimulator of GSIS process and important regulator of physiological level of autophagy (199, 200). It has been shown that a polyphenolic flavonoid silibinin reduced apoptosis of beta cells in STZ-diabetic mice by inducing Sirt-1 expression and by recovering physiological autophagy (200). Despite growing body of evidence, many pieces of diabetes-oxidative stress-epigenetic puzzle are still missing and require further investigation. A number of issues in targeting epigenetic mechanisms by drugs or natural epigenetic modifiers have to be clarified including their adequate dosage, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicity and safety (134). This is especially important considering the multi-factorial nature of diabetes which requires multitargeted approach for its prevention and treatment.

CRISPR/Cas9 epigenome editing in attenuation of diabetes

Prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas systems were repurposed to be used as a tool for modulation of gene expression by the spatial positioning of genomic loci, genome and epigenome editing (201). The most attractive gene editing tool is the class 2 CRISPR/Cas9 system, in which a single Cas9 protein from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) targets specific DNA sequences (202). This system is composed of a single-stranded guide RNA (sgRNA) usually 20 bp long and Cas9 endonuclease. The designed unique sgRNA, by recognizing complementary bases of the target site, directs Cas9 to the targeted DNA containing upstream 2-5 bp DNA sequence known as protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) (usually 5’-NGG-3’; N - any nucleotide base), compatible to Cas9 protein (203). Positioning of Cas9 to a target DNA site initiates the formation of an RNA-DNA hybrid and Cas9 mediated DNA cutting into double strand breaks (204). Thus, by inducing repair machinery (non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology directed repair (HDR)), CRISPR/Cas9 system provides targeted genome modifications of DNA, including insertions and deletions (205).

The CRISPR/Cas9 platform has a multiple advantages in genome and epigenome editing in comparison to the other editing technologies such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) or zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) (206). Concisely, TALEN or ZFN platforms imply de novo nuclease synthesis for each target sequence and are more demanding in terms of time and costs. On the other hand, Cas9 enzyme does not require reengineering because its DNA sequence targeting relies on sgRNA alterations (207). Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 system enables simultaneous editing of multiple target loci, making this technology more comfortable and powerful therapeutic approach for the treatment of diseases.

Several gene editing attempts that relay on CRISPR/Cas9 targeted gene activation tools have been developed in order to modify expression of certain genes in primary human pancreatic islet cells (208). Bevacqua and colleagues (208), using CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of PDX1 in primary human islets showed loss-of-function phenotypes, as well as using dCas9 fused to the activation domains VP64-p65-Rta23, manage to activate gene expression for endogenous genomic sequences of human islet cells, underlining an essential function of PDX1 in primary mature human islet beta cells. Previously, CRISPR-based targeting has been reported in human stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells (209) and in immortalized beta cell lines, EndoCβH3 (210) which unfortunately represent surrogate cell types that are genetically and biologically far from genuine pancreatic islet cells. To overcome these problems, researchers in the field of diabetes decided to use CRIPSR/Cas9 gene editing of diabetic patient-derived iPSCs and to induce their differentiation to autologous pancreatic beta cells. These cells reversed pre-existing STZ-induced diabetes when transplanted into mice (211). In addition, similar discovery, so called VCTX210, resulted in the Phase 1 clinical trial. The VCTX210, is an allogeneic, gene-edited, stem cell-derived therapy designed as a best-in-class treatment for T1D and insulin-dependent T2D. The therapy is designed to replace the pancreatic beta cells that are lost in diabetes, and is developed using a CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing approach on CyT49 human pluripotent stem cells engineered to avoid destruction by patient’s autoimmune attack (212).

The epigenome editing emerged as another promising research option for deciphering the pathology of diabetes and for offering a potential cure (Figure 5). Epigenome editing may have certain advantages over genome editing given that it affects reversible epigenetic mechanisms of genome regulation. Besides, epidrug-based epigenetic therapies could have more pronounced off-target effects than methods for targeted epigenome editing such as CRISPR/dCas9 methodology. Since creation of DNA double-strand breaks in genome-editing systems limits their clinical use due to potential creation of unwanted mutations with harmful effects, the CRISPR/Cas9 system had to be redesigned in order to drive a targeted regulation of endogenous gene expression without creating DNA double strand breaks. To repurpose the CRISPR/Cas9 for genome regulation instead of genome editing, a catalytically inactive version of Cas9 (dCas9) has been created as a platform for RNA-guided transcription regulation (CRISPRi). In this scenario, CRISPR/dCas9 was targeted to the protein-coding region of targeted genes and by forming RNA-DNA adducts, it blocks RNA polymerase and transcript elongation (213). Despite the objective difficulties accompanying the in vivo implementation of this editing system, Liao and coworkers (173) succeeded to activate endogenous target genes in mice using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated target gene activation (TGA) tool. Overexpression of Pdx1 in liver cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TGA system (used with dgRNA that deactivates Cas9) led to their transdifferentiation into insulin-secreting cells in a mouse STZ-induced T1D model of diabetes (173). This effect was followed up by a partially reduced STZ-induced hyperglycemia along with increased serum levels of insulin in STZ-diabetic mice. The specificity of this robust system is that it provides the trans-epigenetic remodeling of histone marks through dgRNAs-mediated recruitment of Cas9 and transcriptional machinery to target sites. Those findings strongly suggest that CRISPR/Cas9/dCas9 TGA tool may provide engineering of cell fate in order to produce cell types necessary to restore particular physiological functions in vivo.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5 Improvement of diabetic conditions by epigenome editing using CRISPR/dCas9 synthetic tools. The epigenome editing is cutting edge research tool for deciphering the pathology of diabetes and for offering a potential cure. The existing epigenetic editing tools are consisting of target DNA sequence recognition part (TALEN or dCas9) and linked to different effector domains (ED). ED could be any of epigenetic modifiers of DNA (DNMTs and TETs) or histones (histone modifying enzymes). In regard of diabetes treatment, several in vitro and in vivo studies based on usage of these tools have been recently released and are listed in the inset tables. gRNA-guide RNA.

The blooming in the field of epigenetic editing started with several constructs design to allow targeted editing of specific epigenetic marks to alter the expression of specific genes (214–216) (Figure 5). The epigenetic editing is based on tools that consists of target DNA sequence recognition part (TALEN, ZNF or dCas9) linked to different epigenetic modifiers of DNA (DNMTs and TETs) or histones (histone modifying enzymes). Recently, few studies based on usage of these tools in diabetes treatment have been released. Ou et al. (217) used the TALE-TET1 system for demethylation of the imprinted control region 2 (ICR2) which resulted in decreased expression of CDKN1C and increased replication of pancreatic beta cells. Also, targeted demethylation of the distal MyoD enhancer by dCas9-Tet1 and fibroblasts reprogramming to myoblasts has been shown (218). Moreover, using this approach, Kameswaran et al. (219) identified an intronic enhancer that seems to regulate allele-specific expression at the imprinted DLK1-MEG3 locus which is dysregulated in islets from T2D patients (219). Furthermore, the utility of CRISPR tools and multiplexing (targeting multiple genes in the same time) for epigenetic editing and directed cellular differentiation of pancreatic beta cells have been recently shown (220). In this paper, authors used the CRISPR/dCas9-VP160, CRISPR/dCas9-TET1 and CRISPR/dCas9-P300 systems for multiplex epigenetic editing and activation of human pancreatic beta cell genes (PDX1, NEUROG3, PAX4 and INS) essential for maintaining beta cell identity (Figure 5).

Conclusion

The loss of pancreatic beta cell mass and function represents a central event in T1D and T2D pathogenesis despite differences in their development and progression. In order to emphasize the significance of targeting the redox-related mechanisms in diabetes management, this review has evaluated different aspects of the involvement of oxidative stress in the structural and functional disruption of pancreatic beta cells. Both, experimental and clinical research unambiguously highlights the adverse effects of oxidative stress on beta cell identity and viability through intermediation in various pathological mechanisms involved in beta cell malfunction, de-/trans-differentiation and death. Detrimental effects of oxidative stress on beta cells can be to accomplish either directly through oxidative damage of macromolecules, or indirectly by disturbances of numerous regulatory pathways including epigenetic mechanisms. Among other regulatory processes, identity of beta cell relays on DNA methylation-mediated repression of Arx, while insulin expression inversely correlates with DNA methylation level of insulin promoter. Accordingly, clinical studies provided evidence that T1D and T2D are associated with altered methylation profile of the insulin gene promoter indicating a key role of DNA methylation in insulin secretion and beta cell dysfunction. Oxidative stress-induced damage of DNA and proteins in diabetes can lead to abnormal DNA methylation pattern and histone modifications, which opens the avenue for the development of a new therapeutic approach based on reversing epigenetic modifications by targeting oxidative stress. This is supported by the experimental data showing that the correction of ROS production and modulation of redox-related signaling and modifications by plant derived antioxidants (such as polyphenolic compounds) can stimulate pro-survival pathways in beta cells under diabetic condition. Moreover, the ability of polyphenolic compounds to modulate epigenetic related mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications and miRNA level further encourages the use of antioxidants in epigenetic therapy. At least, this approach may provide the preservation of beta cells in early phases of diabetes or renewal of beta cell mass in the later stages of the disease.

To conclude, possibly there are several avenues where epigenetics may help in improving the diabetic conditions. Since differentially methylated insulin gene is recently detected as biomarker of progressive beta cell loss, the discovery of novel blood-based epigenetic biomarkers may be used to predict risk for diabetes development and development of its related complications. Furthermore, discovery of new epidrugs to serve as activators or repressors of different epigenetic enzymes relevant for DNA or histone modifications and regulation of miRNA expression may be potential future therapy for diabetes. Lastly, epigenetic editing and valuable advantages of CRISPR/dCas9 methodology, pave the way for the development of targeted epigenetic therapies against wide range of injuries and human diseases, not just diabetes (173). In addition, challenges in its implementation cannot be ignored. Choosing of unique Cas9 target sequences without homology to other genome regions and the improvement of structure and composition of gRNA will reduce off-target effects (221, 222). Finally, editing of DNA with irreversible permanent change of genome information carries unavoidable security risks and ethical problems (207). Likewise, a number of issues in targeting epigenetic mechanisms by natural and synthetic epigenetic modifiers have to be clarified including their adequate dosage, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicity and safety. This is especially important considering the multi-factorial nature of diabetes which requires multitargeted approach for its prevention and treatment.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: systematic literature search and writing, SD and MV. Review and editing: JAJ, AU, MM, NG, AT, JR, and MĐ. Supervision: MV. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia supported this work (Grant No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200007).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Kim SK, Hebrok M. Intercellular signals regulating pancreas development and function. Genes Dev (2001) 15(2):111–27. doi: 10.1101/gad.859401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bonner-Weir S, Sullivan B, Weir G. Human islet morphology revisited: Human and rodent islets are not so different after all. J Histochem Cytochem (2015) 63(8):604–12. doi: 10.1369/0022155415570969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Demir S, Nawroth PP, Herzig S, Üstünel BE. Emerging targets in type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications. Adv Sci (2021) 8:2100275. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100275

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 10th ed. Brussels (2021). Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org.

Google Scholar

5. Winter WE, Schatz DA. Autoimmune markers in diabetes. Clin Chem (2011) 57(2):168–75. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.148205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet (2011) 378(9785):31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chu C, Li D, Zhang S, Ikejima T, Jia Y, Wang D, et al. Role of silibinin in the management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Arch Pharm Res (2018) 41(8):785–96. doi: 10.1007/s12272-018-1047-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Đorđević M, Mihailović M, Arambašić Jovanović J, Grdović N, Uskoković A, Tolić A, et al. Centaurium erythraea methanol extract protects red blood cells from oxidative damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol (2017) 202:172–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.03.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Watson D, Loweth AC. Oxidative and nitrosative stress in b-cell apoptosis: Their contribution to b-cell loss in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Br J BioMed Sci (2009) 66(4):208–15. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2009.11730278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Leenders F, Groen N, de Graaf N, Engelse MA, Rabelink TJ, de Koning EJP, et al. Oxidative stress leads to b-cell dysfunction through loss of b-cell identity. Front Immunol (2021) 12:690379. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.690379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Newsholme P, Keane KN, Carlessi R, Cruzat V. Oxidative stress pathways in pancreatic β-cells and insulin-sensitive cells and tissues: Importance to cell metabolism, function, and dysfunction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2019) 317(3):C420–33. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00141.2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gao T, McKenna B, Li C, Reichert M, Nguyen J, Singh T, et al. Pdx1 maintains b cell identity and function by repressing an alpha cell program. Cell Metab (2014) 19(2):259–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Swisa A, Avrahami D, Eden N, Zhang J, Feleke E, Dahan T, et al. PAX6 maintains b cell identity by repressing genes of alternative islet cell types. J Clin Invest (2017) 127:230–43. doi: 10.1172/JCI88015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gutieírrez GD, Bender AS, Cirulli V, Mastracci TL, Kelly SM, Tsirigos A, et al. Pancreatic b cell identity requires continual repression of non-b cell programs. J Clin Invest (2017) 127:244–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI88017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol (2007) 39(1):44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Veal EA, Day AM, Morgan BA. Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling. Mol Cell (2007) 26:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sies H. Oxidative eustress: On constant alert for redox homeostasis. Redox Biol (2021) 41:101867. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Acharya JD, Ghaskadbi SS. Islets and their antioxidant defense. Islets (2010) 2(4):225–35. doi: 10.4161/isl.2.4.12219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kim JW, Yoon KH. Glucolipotoxicity in pancreatic β-cells. Diabetes Metab J (2011) 35(5):444–50. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.5.444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press (2015). doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717478.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sun X, Wang L, Obayomi SMB, Wei Z. Epigenetic regulation of β cell identity and dysfunction. Front Endocrinol (2021) 12:725131. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.725131

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang Q, Liu M, Liu WW, Hao WB, Tashiro S, Onodera S, et al. In vivo recovery effect of silibinin treatment on streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice is associated with the modulations of sirt-1 expression and autophagy in pancreatic β-cell. J Asian Nat Prod Res (2015) 14(5):413–23. doi: 10.1080/10286020.2012.657180

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Barbagallo I, Vanella L, Cambria MT, Tibullo D, Godos J, Guarnaccia L, et al. Silibinin regulates lipid metabolism and differentiation in functional human adipocytes. Front Pharmacol (2016) 6:309. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kheiripour N, Karimi J, Khodadadi I, Tavilani H, Goodarzi MT, Hashemnia M. Silymarin prevents lipid accumulation in the liver of rats with type 2 diabetes via sirtuin1 and SREBP-1c. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol (2018) 29(3):301–8. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2017-0122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wajchenberg BL. β-cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment. Endocr Rev (2007) 28(2):187–218. doi: 10.1210/10.1210/er.2006-0038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Robertson RP. Chronic oxidative stress as a central mechanism for glucose toxicity in pancreatic islet beta cells in diabetes. J Biol Chem (2004) 279(41):42351–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R400019200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gerber PA, Rutter GA. The role of oxidative stress and hypoxia in pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Antioxid Redox Signaling (2017) 26(10):501–18. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6755

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gurgul-Convey E, Mehmeti I, Plotz T, Jorns A, Lenzen S. Sensitivity profile of the human EndoC-betaH1 beta cell line to proinflammatory cytokines. Diabetologia (2016) 59:2125–33. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4060-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Stancill JS, Broniowska KA, Oleson BJ, Naatz A, Corbett JA. Pancreatic beta-cells detoxify H2O2 through the peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin antioxidant system. J Biol Chem (2019) 294:4843–53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Stancill JS, Happ JT, Broniowska KA, Hogg N, Corbett JA. Peroxiredoxin 1 plays a primary role in protecting pancreatic beta-cells from hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2020) 318:R1004–13. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00011.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Eguchi N, Vaziri ND, Dafoe DC, Ichii H. The role of oxidative stress in pancreatic β cell dysfunction in diabetes. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22:1509. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pi J, Zhang Q, Fu J, Woods CG, Hou Y, Corkey BE, et al. ROS signaling, oxidative stress and Nrf2 in pancreatic beta-cell function. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2010) 244:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.05.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Llanos P, Contreras-Ferrat A, Barrientos G, Valencia M, Mears D, Hidalgo C. Glucose-dependent insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cell islets from Male rats requires Ca2+ release via ROS-stimulated ryanodine receptors. PloS One (2015) 10:e0129238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Dinić S, Grdović N, Uskoković A, Đorđević M, Mihailović M, Jovanović Arambašić J, et al. CXCL12 protects pancreatic beta-cells from oxidative stress by a Nrf2-induced increase in catalase expression and activity. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci (2016) 92(9):436–54. doi: 10.2183/pjab.92.436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brooks-Worrell B, Palmer JP. Immunology in the clinic review series; focus on metabolic diseases: development of islet autoimmune disease in type 2 diabetes patients: potential sequelae of chronic inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol (2012) 167(1):40–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04501.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Uskoković A, Mihailović M, Dinić S, Arambašić-Jovanović J, Grdović N, Marković J, et al. Administration of a beta-glucan-enriched extract activates beneficial hepatic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Funct Foods (2013) 5:1966–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.09.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Rojas J, Bermudez V, Palmar J, Martínez MS, Olivar LC, Nava M, et al. Pancreatic beta cell death: Novel potential mechanisms in diabetes therapy. J Diabetes Res (2018) 19:9601801. doi: 10.1155/2018/9601801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gurzov EN, Eizirik DL. Bcl-2 proteins in diabetes: Mitochondrial pathways of β-cell death and dysfunction. Trends Cell Biol (2011) 21(7):424–31. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhou F, Yang Y, Xing D. Bcl-2 and bcl-xL play important roles in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. FEBS J (2011) 278(3):403–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07965.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Eisenberg-Lerner A, Bialik S, Simon HU, Kimchi A. Life and death partners: apoptosis, autophagy and the cross-talk between them. Cell Death Differ (2009) 16(7):966–75. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Hui H, Dotta F, Di Mario U, Perfetti R. Role of caspases in the regulation of apoptotic pancreatic islet beta cells death. J Cell Physiol (2004) 200(2):177–200. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Pirot P, Cardozo AK, Eizirik DL. Mediators and mechanisms of pancreatic beta-cell death in type 1 diabetes. Arquivos Brasileiros Endocrinol Metabologia (2008) 52(2):156–65. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302008000200003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lawrence T. The nuclear factor NF-κB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol (2009) 1(6):a001651. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001651

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Virag L, Szabo C. The therapeutic potential of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev (2002) 54(3):375–429. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.3.375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wang C, Guan Y, Yang J. Cytokines in the progression of pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. Int J Endocrinol (2010) 2010(515136). doi: 10.1155/2010/515136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. King AJF, Guo Y, Cai D, Hollister-Lock J, Morris B, Salvatori A, et al. Sustained NF-κB activation and inhibition in β-cells have minimal effects on function and islet transplant outcomes. PloS One (2013) 8(10):e77452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Christofferson DE, Yuan J. Necroptosis as an alternative form of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol (2010) 22(2):263–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Gurgul-Convey E, Mehmeti I, Lortz S, Lenzen S. Cytokine toxicity in insulin-producing cells is mediated by nitro-oxidative stress-induced hydroxyl radical formation in mitochondria. J Mol Med (Berl) (2011) 89:785–98. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0747-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Necroptosis: A specialized pathway of programmed necrosis. Cell (2008) 135(7):1161–3. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Remedi MS, Emfinger C. Pancreatic beta-cell identity in diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab (2016) 18(Suppl 1):110–6. doi: 10.1111/dom.12727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Mihailović M, Dinić S, Arambašić Jovanović J, Uskoković A, Grdović N, Vidaković M. The influence of plant extracts and phytoconstituents on antioxidant enzymes activity and gene expression in the prevention and treatment of impaired glucose homeostasis and diabetes complications antioxidants. Antioxidants (2021) 10:480. doi: 10.3390/antiox10030480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Radi R. Oxygen radicals, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrite: Redox pathways in molecular medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2018) 115:5839–48. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804932115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Garcia Soriano F, Virag L, Jagtap P, Szabo E, Mabley JG, Liaudet L, et al. Diabetic endothelial dysfunction: The role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation. Nat Med (2001) 7(1):108–13. doi: 10.1038/83241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Du XL, Edelstein D, Rossetti L, Fantus IG, Goldberg H, Ziyadeh F, et al. Hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide overproduction activates the hexosamine pathway and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression by increasing Sp1 glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2000) 97(22):12222–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Poitout V, Robertson RP. Glucolipotoxicity: Fuel excess and beta-cell dysfunction. Endoc Rev (2008) 29(3):351–66. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Bergsbaken T, Fink SL, Cookson BT. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Microbiol (2009) 7(2):99–109. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, Jha S, Zhang L, Huang MT, et al. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nat Immunol (2011) 12(5):408–15. doi: 10.1038/ni.2022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Arafat HA, Katakam AK, Chipitsyna G, Gong Q, Vancha AR, Gabbeta J, et al. Osteopontin protects the islets and β-cells from interleukin-1 β-mediated cytotoxicity through negative feedback regulation of nitric oxide. Endocrinology (2007) 148(2):575–84. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0970

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature (2006) 440:944–8. doi: 10.1038/nature04634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Koshkin V, Wang X, Scherer PE, Chan CB, Wheeler MB. Mitochondrial functional state in clonal pancreatic b-cells exposed to free fatty acids. J Biol Chem (2003) 278:19709–15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209709200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Lin N, Chen H, Zhang H, Wan X, Su Q. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibition ameliorates palmitate-induced INS-1 b-cell death. Endocrine (2012) 42:107–17. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9633-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Hagman DK, Hays LB, Parazzoli SD, Poitout V. Palmitate inhibits insulin gene expression by altering PDX-1 nuclear localization and reducing MafA expression in isolated rat islets of langerhans. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:32413–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506000200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Wrede CE, Dickson LM, Lingohr MK, Briaud I, Rhodes CJ. Protein kinase B/Akt prevents fatty acid-induced apoptosis in pancreatic b-cells (INS-1). J Biol Chem (2002) 277:49676–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208756200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Piro S, Anello M, Di Pietro C, Lizzio MN, Patane G, Rabuazzo AM, et al. Chronic exposure to free fatty acids or high glucose induces apoptosis in rat pancreatic islets: possible role of oxidative stress. Metabolism (2002) 51:1340–7. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.35200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Maestre I, Jordan J, Calvo S, Reig JA, Cena V, Soria B, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal and fatty acids in the b-cell line INS-1. Endocrinology (2003) 144:335–45. doi: 10.1210/en.2001-211282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Đorđević M, Grdović N, Mihailović M, Arambašić Jovanović J, Uskoković A, Rajić J, et al. Centaurium erythraea extract improves survival and functionality of pancreatic beta-cells in diabetes through multiple routes of action. J Ethnopharmacol (2019) 242:112043. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Rehman A, Nourooz-Zadeh J, Moller W, Tritschler H, Pereira P, Halliwell B. Increased oxidative damage to all DNA bases in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. FEBS Lett (1999) 448:120–2. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00339-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Shin CS, Moon BS, Park KS, Kim SY, Park SJ, Chung MH, et al. Serum 8-hydroxy-guanine levels are increased in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care (2001) 24:733–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Tanaka Y, Tran PO, Harmon J, Robertson RP. A role for glutathione peroxidase in protecting pancreatic cells against oxidative stress in a model of glucose toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99:12363–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.192445199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Takahashi H, Tran PO, LeRoy E, Harmon JS, Tanaka Y, Robertson RP. D-glyceraldehyde causes production of intracellular peroxide in pancreatic islets, oxidative stress, and defective beta cell function via non-mitochondrial pathways. J Biol Chem (2004) 279:37316–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403070200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Del Guerra S, Lupi R, Marselli L, Masini M, Bugliani M, Sbrana S, et al. Functional and molecular defects of pancreatic islets in human type 2 diabetes. Diabetes (2005) 54:727–35. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.3.727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Jahng JWS, Alsaadi RM, Palanivel R, Song E, Hipolito VEB, Sung HK, et al. Iron overload inhibits late stage autophagic flux leading to insulin resistance. EMBO Rep (2019) 20(10):e47911. doi: 10.15252/embr.201947911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Zhou Y. The protective effects of cryptochlorogenic acid on β-cells function in diabetes in vivo and vitro via inhibition of ferroptosis. diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity. Targets Ther (2020) 13:1921–31. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S249382

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Yang XD, Yang YY. Ferroptosis as a novel therapeutic target for diabetes and its complications. Front Endocrinol (2022) 2022:853822. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.853822

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: A regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell (2017) 171:273–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Stančić A, Saksida T, Markelić M, Vučetić M, Grigorov I, Martinović V, et al. Ferroptosis as a novel determinant of β-cell death in diabetic conditions. Redox Biol Diabetes (2022) 2022:3873420. doi: 10.1155/2022/3873420

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Rocchi A, He C. Emerging roles of autophagy in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Front Biol (2015) 10(2):154–64. doi: 10.1007/s11515-015-1354-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Muralidharan C, Linnemann AK. β-cell autophagy in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2021) 321:E410–6. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00151.2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Ebato C, Uchida T, Arakawa M, Komatsu M, Ueno T, Komiya K, et al. Autophagy is important in islet homeostasis and compensatory increase of beta cell mass in response to high-fat diet. Cell Metab (2008) 8(4):325–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Huang Q, Wu YT, Tan HL, Ong CN, Shen HM. A novel function of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in modulation of autophagy and necrosis under oxidative stress. Cell Death Differ (2009) 16:264–77. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Yu SW, Andrabi SA, Wang H, Kim NS, Poirier GG, Dawson TM, et al. Apoptosis-inducing factor mediates poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer-induced cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2006) 103:18314–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606528103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Kroemer G, Mariño G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol Cell (2010) 40(2):280–93. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Wong CH, Iskandar KB, Yadav SK, Hirpara JL, Loh T, Pervaiz S. Simultaneous induction of non-canonical autophagy and apoptosis in cancer cells by ROS-dependent ERK and JNK activation. PloS One (2010) 5:e9996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Milani M, Rzymski T, Mellor HR, Pike L, Bottini A, Generali D, et al. The role of ATF4 stabilization and autophagy in resistance of breast cancer cells treated with bortezomib. Cancer Res (2009) 69:4415–23. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Deng J, Lu PD, Zhang Y, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Sonenberg N, et al. Translational repression mediates activation of nuclear factor kappa b by phosphorylated translation initiation factor 2. Mol Cell Biol (2004) 24:10161–8. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.23.10161-10168.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Scherz-Shouval R, Shvets E, Fass E, Shorer H, Gil L, Elazar Z. Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J (2007) 26:1749–60. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Moin AS, Butler AE. Alterations in beta cell identity in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep (2019) 19:83. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1194-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Talchai C, Xuan S, Lin HV, Sussel L, Accili D. Pancreatic β cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic β cell failure. Cell (2012) 150:1223–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Guo S, Dai C, Guo M, Taylor B, Harmon JS, Sander M, et al. Inactivation of specific beta cell transcription factors in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest (2013) 123:3305–16. doi: 10.1172/JCI65390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Cinti F, Bouchi R, Kim-Muller JY, Ohmura Y, Sandoval PR, Masini M, et al. Evidence of beta-cell dedifferentiation in human type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 101:1044–54. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Rui J, Deng S, Arazi A, Perdigoto AL, Liu Z, Herold KC. β cells that resist immunological attack develop during progression of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Cell Metab (2017) 25(3):727–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Courtney M, Gjernes E, Druelle N, Ravaud C, Vieira A, Ben-Othman N, et al. The inactivation of arx in pancreatic α-cells triggers their neogenesis and conversion into functional β-like cells. PloS Genet (2013) 9(10):e1003934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Taylor BL, Liu FF, Sander M. Nkx6.1 is essential for maintaining the functional state of pancreatic beta cells. Cell Rep (2013) 4(6):1262–75. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Cnop M, Abdulkarim B, Bottu G, Cunha DA, Igoillo-Esteve M, Masini M, et al. RNA Sequencing identifies dysregulation of the human pancreatic islet transcriptome by the saturated fatty acid palmitate. Diabetes (2014) 63:1978–93. doi: 10.2337/db13-1383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Olson LK, Redmon JB, Towle HC, Robertson RP. Chronic exposure of HIT cells to high glucose concentrations paradoxically decreases insulin gene transcription and alters binding of insulin gene regulatory protein. J Clin Invest (1993) 92:514–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI116596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Sharma A, Olson LK, Robertson RP, Stein R. The reduction of insulin gene transcription in HIT-T15 beta-cells chronically exposed to high glucose concentration is associated with the loss of RIPE3b1 and STF-1 transcription factor expression. Mol Endocrinol (1995) 9:1127–34. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.9.7491105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Tanaka Y, Gleason CE, Tran POT, Harmon JS, Robertson RP. Prevention of glucose toxicity in HIT-T15 cells and zucker diabetic fatty rats by antioxidants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1999) 96:10857–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Kaneto H, Xu G, Fujii N, Kim S, Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC. Involvement of c-jun n-terminal kinase in oxidative stress-mediated suppression of insulin gene expression. J Biol Chem (2002) 277:30010–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202066200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Kaneto H, Katakami N, Matsuhisa M, Matsuoka TA. Role of reactive oxygen species in the progression of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. Mediators Inflammation (2010) 2010:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2010/453892

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Kawamori D, Kaneto H, Nakatani Y, Matsuoka TA, Matsuhisa M, Hori M, et al. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 bridges the JNK pathway and the transcription factor PDX-1 through its intracellular translocation. J Biol Chem (2006) 281:1091–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508510200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Wang J, Wang H. Oxidative stress in pancreatic -cell regeneration. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2017) 2017:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2017/7478523

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Triñanes J, Ten Dijke P, Groen N, Hanegraaf M, Porrini E, Rodriguez-Rodriguez AE, et al. Tacrolimus-induced BMP/SMAD signaling associates with metabolic stress-activated FOXO1 to trigger b-cell failure. Diabetes (2020) 69(2):193–204. doi: 10.2337/db19-0828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Harmon JS, Bogdani M, Parazzoli SD, Mak SSM, Oseid EA, Berghmans M, et al. B-Cell-Specific overexpression of glutathione peroxidase preserves intranuclear MafA and reverses diabetes in Db/Db mice. Endocrinology (2009) 150(11):4855–62. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Mahadevan J, Parazzoli S, Oseid E, Hertzel AV, Bernlohr DA, Vallerie SN, et al. Ebselen treatment prevents islet apoptosis, maintains intranuclear pdx-1 and MafA levels, and preserves β-cell mass and function in ZDF rats. Diabetes (2013) 62(10):3582–8. doi: 10.2337/db13-0357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Đorđević MM, Tolić A, Rajić J, Mihailović M, Arambašić Jovanović J, Uskoković A, et al. Centaurium erythraea methanol extract improves the functionality of diabetic liver and kidney by mitigating hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress. J Funct Foods (2022) 90:104975. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.104975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: The elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care (2017) 40(11):1425. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care (2019) 42(Suppl. 1):S90–S102. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Burke GW, Vendrame F, Virdi SK, Ciancio G, Chen L, Ruiz P, et al. Lessons from pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes: Recurrence of islet autoimmunity. Curr Diabetes Rep (2015) 15:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0691-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Rankin MM, Kushner JA. Adaptive beta-cell proliferation is severely restricted with advanced age. Diabetes (2009) 58:1365–72. doi: 10.2337/db08-1198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Wang P, Fiaschi-Taesch NM, Vasavada RC, Scott DK, Garcia-Ocana A, Stewart AF, et al. Diabetes mellitus advances and challenges in human β-cell proliferation. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2015) 11:201–12. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Potter KJ, Westwell-Roper CY, Klimek-Abercrombie AM, Warnock GL, Verchere CB. Death and dysfunction of transplanted β-cells: Lessons learned from type 2 diabetes? Diabetes (2014) 63:12–9. doi: 10.2337/db12-0364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Bottino R, Balamurugan AN, Tse H, Thirunavukkarasu C, Ge X, Profozich J, et al. Response of human islets to isolation stress and the effect of antioxidant treatment. Diabetes (2004) 53:2559–68. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.10.2559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Padmasekar M, Lingwal N, Samikannu B, Chen C, Sauer H, Linn T. Exendin-4 protects hypoxic islets from oxidative stress and improves islet transplantation outcome. Endocrinology (2013) 154:1424–33. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Dinić S, Uskoković A, Mihailović M, Grdović N, Arambašić Jovanović J, Marković J, et al. Ameliorating effects of antioxidative compounds from four plant extracts in experimental models of diabetes. J Serb Chem Soc (2013) 78(3):365–80. doi: 10.2298/JSC121026136D

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Zhang P, Li T, Wu X, Nice EC, Huang C, Zhang Y. Oxidative stress and diabetes: antioxidative strategies. Front Med (2020) 14(5):583–600. doi: 10.1007/s11684-019-0729-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Forman HJ, Zhang H. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: Promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2021) 20(9):689–709. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00233-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Grdović N, Dinić S, Arambašić J, Mihailović M, Uskoković A, Marković J, et al. The protective effect of a mix of lactarius deterrimus and castanea sativa extracts on streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress and pancreatic β-cell death. Br J Nutr (2012) 108:1163–76. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511006702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Rafieian-Kopaei M, Baradaran A, Rafieian M. Oxidative stress and the paradoxical effects of antioxidants. J Res Med Sci (2013) 18(7):629.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

119. Axelsson AS, Tubbs E, Mecham B, Chacko S, Nenonen HA, Tang Y, et al. Sulforaphane reduces hepatic glucose production and improves glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Transl Med (2017) 9(394):eaah4477. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Balogun E, Hoque M, Gong P, Killeen E, Green CJ, Foresti R, et al. Curcumin activates the haem oxygenase-1 gene via regulation of Nrf2 and the antioxidant-responsive element. Biochem J (2003) 371(Pt 3):887–95. doi: 10.1042/bj20021619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Pergola PE, Raskin P, Toto RD, Meyer CJ, Huff JW, Grossman EB, et al. Bardoxolone methyl and kidney function in CKD with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2011) 365(4):327–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Barreira JCM, Ferreira ICFR, Beatriz M, Oliveira PP, Pereira J-A. Antioxidant activities of the extracts from chestnut flower, leaf, skins and fruit. Food Chem (2008) 107:1106–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Mujić A, Grdović N, Mujić I, Mihailović M, Živković J, Poznanović G, et al. Antioxidative effects of phenolic extracts from chestnut leaves, catkins and spiny burs in streptozotocin-treated rat pancreatic β-cells. Food Chem (2011) 125:841–9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Mihailović M, Arambašić Jovanović J, Uskoković A, Grdović N, Dinić S, Vidović S, et al. Protective effects of the mushroom lactarius deterrimus extract on systemic oxidative stress and pancreatic islets in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Diabetes Res (2015) 2015:576726. doi: 10.1155/2015/576726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Sefi M, Fetoui H, Lachkar N, Tahraoui A, Lyoussi B, Boudawara T, et al. Centaurium erythrea (Gentianaceae) leaf extract alleviates streptozotocininduced oxidative stress and beta-cell damage in rat pancreas. J Ethnopharmacol (2011) 135(2):243–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.02.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Đorđević M, Grdović N, Mihailović M, Jovanović Arambašić J, Uskoković A, Rajić J, et al. Centaurium erythraea extract reduces redox imbalance and improves insulin expression and secretion in pancreatic β-cells exposed to oxidative and nitrosative stress. Arch Biol Sci (2020) 72:117–28. doi: 10.2298/ABS200127005D

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Quintana-Lopez L, Blandino-Rosano M, Perez-Arana G, Cebada-Aleu A, Lechuga-Sancho A, Aguilar-Diosdado M, et al. Nitric oxide is a mediator of antiproliferative effects induced by proinflammatory cytokines on pancreatic beta cells. Mediators Inflammation (2013) 2013:10. doi: 10.1155/2013/905175

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Mihailović M, Arambašić J, Uskoković A, Dinić S, Grdović N, Marković J, et al. Beta-glucan administration to diabetic rats alleviates oxidative stress by lowering hyperglycaemia, decreasing non-enzymatic glycation and protein O-GlcNAcylation. J Funct Foods (2013) 5:1226–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.04.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Wojtunik-Kulesza K, Oniszczuk A, Oniszczuk T, Combrzyński M, Nowakowska D, Matwijczuk A. Influence of In vitro digestion on composition, bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity of food polyphenols-a non-systematic review. Nutrients (2020) 12(5):1401. doi: 10.3390/nu12051401

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Proença S, Escher BI, Fischer FC, Fisher C, Grégoire S, Hewitt NJ, et al. Effective exposure of chemicals in in vitro cell systems: A review of chemical distribution models. Toxicol In Vitro (2021) 73:105133. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Das S, Roy P, Pal R, Auddy RG, Chakraborti AS, Mukherjee A, et al. Engineered silybin nanoparticles educe efficient control in experimental diabetes. PloS One (2014) 39(7):e101818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Puri S, Hebrok M. Cellular plasticity within the pancreas-lessons learned from. Dev Cell (2010) 18:342–56. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Esposito S, Toni G, Tascini G, Santi E, Berioli MG. And principi n environmental factors associated with type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (2019) 10:592. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00592

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Kowluru RA, Mishra M. Epigenetic regulation of redox signaling in diabetic retinopathy: Role of Nrf2. Free Radic Biol Med (2017) 103:155–64. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Davis CD, Uthus EO. DNA Methylation, cancer susceptibility, and nutrient interactions. Exp Biol Med (2004) 229:988–95. doi: 10.1177/153537020422901002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Olsen AS, Sarras MP, Leontovich A, Intine RV. Heritable transmission of diabetic metabolic memory in zebrafish correlates with DNA hypomethylation and aberrant gene expression. Diabetes (2012) 61:485–91. doi: 10.2337/db11-0588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Miao F, Chen Z, Genuth S, Paterson A, Zhang L, Wu X, et al. Evaluating the role of epigenetic histone modifications in the metabolic memory of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes (2014) 63:1748–62. doi: 10.2337/db13-1251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Chen Z, Miao F, Paterson AD, Lachin JM, Zhang L, Schones DE, et al. Epigenomic profiling reveals an association between persistence of DNA methylation and metabolic memory in the DCCT/EDIC type 1 diabetes cohort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2016) 113:E3002–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603712113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Florath I, Butterbach K, Heiss J, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Zhang Y, Schottker B, et al. Type 2 diabetes and leucocyte DNA methylation: Sn epigenome-wide association study in over 1,500 older adults. Diabetologia (2016) 59:130–8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3773-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Wren JD, Garner HR. Data-mining analysis suggests an epigenetic pathogenesis for type 2 diabetes. J BioMed Biotechnol (2005) 2005(2), 104–12. doi: 10.1155/JBB.2005.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Villeneuve LM, Reddy MA, Lanting LL, Wang M, Meng L, Natarajan R. Epigenetic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in metabolic memory and inflammatory phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells in diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2008) 105:9047–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803623105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Zhang T, Lv C, Li L, Chen S, Liu S, Wang C, et al. Plasma miR-126 is a potential biomarker for early prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in susceptible individuals. BioMed Res Int (2013) 2013:761617. doi: 10.1155/2013/761617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Osipova J, Fischer DC, Dangwal S, Volkmann I, Widera C, Schwarz K, et al. Diabetes-associated microRNAs in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99:E1661–5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Gilbert ER, Liu D. Epigenetics. the missing link to understanding β-cell dysfunction in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Epigenetics (2012) 7(8):841–52. doi: 10.4161/epi.21238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Franco R, Schoneveld O, Georgakilas AG, Panayiotidis MI. Oxidative stress, DNA methylation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett (2008) 266:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Afanasev I. New nucleophilic mechanisms of ros-dependent epigenetic modifications: Comparison of aging and cancer. Aging Dis (2014) 5:52–62. doi: 10.14336/ad.2014.050052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Zhang R, Kang KA, Kim KC, Na SY, Chang WY, Kim GY, et al. Oxidative stress causes epigenetic alteration of CDX1 expression in colorectal cancer cells. Gene (2013) 524:214–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Simmons RA. Role of metabolic programming in the pathogenesis of beta-cell failure in postnatal life. Rev Endocr Metab Disord (2007) 8:95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11154-007-9045-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Hurt EM, Thomas SB, Peng B, Farrar WL. Molecular consequences of SOD2 expression in epigenetically silenced pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Br J Cancer (2007) 97:1116–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Zhong Q, Kowluru RA. Epigenetic changes in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase in the retina and the development of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes (2011) 60:1304–13. doi: 10.2337/db10-0133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res (2009) 19:92–105. doi: 10.1101/gr.082701.108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Dhawan S, Georgia S, Tschen SI, Fan G, Bhushan A. Pancreatic β cell identity is maintained by DNA methylation-mediated repression of arx. Dev Cell (2011) 20:419–29. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Lien YC, Wang PZ, Lu XM, Simmons RA. Altered transcription factor binding and gene bivalency in islets of intrauterine growth retarded rats. Cells (2020) 9:1435. doi: 10.3390/cells9061435

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Haumaitre C, Lenoir O, Scharfmann R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors modify pancreatic cell fate determination and amplify endocrine progenitors. Mol Cell Biol (2008) 28:6373–83. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00413-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Haumaitre C, Lenoir O, Scharfmann R. Directing cell differentiation with small-molecule histone deacetylase inhibitors: The example of promoting pancreatic endocrine cells. Cell Cycle (Georgetown Tex) (2009) 8:536–44. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.4.7610

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Rafehi H, Kaspi A, Ziemann M, Okabe J, Karagiannis TC, El-Osta A. Systems approach to the pharmacological actions of HDAC inhibitors reveals EP300 activities and convergent mechanisms of regulation in diabetes. Epigenetics (2017) 12:991–1003. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1371892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Lundh M, Galbo T, Poulsen SS, Mandrup-Poulsen T. Histone deacetylase 3 inhibition improves glycaemia and insulin secretion in obese diabetic rats. Diabetes Obes Metab (2015) 17:703–7. doi: 10.1111/dom.12470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Kuroda A, Rauch TA, Todorov I, Ku HT, Al-Abdullah IH, Kandeel F, et al. Insulin gene expression is regulated by DNA methylation. PloS One (2009) 4:e6953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Fradin D, Le Fur S, Mille C, Naoui N, Groves C, Zelenika D, et al. Association of the CpG methylation pattern of the proximal insulin gene promoter with type 1 diabetes. PloS One (2012) 7:e36278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Olsen JA, Kenna LA, Spelios MG, Hessner MJ, Akirav EM. Circulating differentially methylated amylin DNA as a biomarker of b-cell loss in type 1 diabetes. PloS One (2016) 11:e0152662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Dayeh T, Volkov P, Salö S, Hall E, Nilsson E, Olsson AH, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of human pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic donors identifies candidate genes that influence insulin secretion. PloS Genet (2014) 10:e1004160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Reddy MA, Natarajan R. Epigenetic mechanisms in diabetic vascular complications. Cardiovasc Res (2011) 90:421–9. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Spaeth JM, Walker EM, Stein R. Impact of Pdx1-associated chromatin modifiers on islet b-cells. Diabetes Obes Metab (2016) 18 Suppl.) 1:123–7. doi: 10.1111/dom.12730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Ruiz L, Gurlo T, Ravier MA, Wojtusciszyn A, Mathieu J, Brown MR, et al. Proteasomal degradation of the histone acetyl transferase P300 contributes to beta-cell injury in a diabetes environment. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9:600. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0603-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Deering TG, Ogihara T, Trace AP, Maier B, Mirmira RG. Methyltransferase Set7/9 maintains transcription and euchromatin structure at islet-enriched genes. Diabetes (2009) 58:185–93. doi: 10.2337/db08-1150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Javeed N, Brown MR, Rakshit K, Her T, Sen SK, Matveyenko AV. Proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 1beta disrupts beta-cell circadian clock function and regulation of insulin secretion. Endocrinology (2021) 162:bqaa084. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Poy MN, Eliasson L, Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Ma X, Macdonald PE, et al. A pancreatic islet specific microRNA regulates insulin secretion. Nature (2004) 432:226–30. doi: 10.1038/nature03076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Kloosterman WP, Lagendijk AK, Ketting RF, Moulton JD, Plasterk RH. Targeted inhibition of miRNA maturation with morpholinos reveals a role for miR-375 in pancreatic islet development. PloS Biol (2007) 5:e203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Poy MN, Hausser J, Trajkovski M, Braun M, Collins S, Rorsman P, et al. miR-375 maintains normal pancreatic alpha- and beta-cell mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2009) 106:5813–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810550106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Roggli E, Britan A, Gattesco S, Lin-Marq N, Abderrahmani A, Meda P, et al. Involvement of microRNAs in the cytotoxic effects exerted by proinflammatory cytokines on pancreatic β-cells. Diabetes (2010) 59:978–86. doi: 10.2337/db09-0881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Roggli E, Gattesco S, Caille D, Briet C, Boitard C, Meda P, et al. Changes in microRNA expression contribute to pancreatic b-cell dysfunction in prediabetic NOD mice. Diabetes (2012) 61:1742–51. doi: 10.2337/db11-1086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Nielsen LB, Wang C, Sørensen K, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Hansen L, Andersen ML, et al. Circulating levels of microRNA from children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and healthy controls: evidence that miR-25 associates to residual beta-cell function and glycaemic control during disease progression. Exp Diabetes Res (2012) 2012:896362. doi: 10.1155/2012/896362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Liao H-K, Hatanaka F, Araoka T, Reddy P, Wu M-Z, Sui Y, et al. In vivo target gene activation via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated trans-epigenetic modulation. Cell (2017) 171(7):1495–1507.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Sadashiv SK, Hilton C, Khan C, Rossetti JM, Benjamin HL, Fazal S, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with azacitidine for 5 days in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Med (2014) 3(6):1570–8. doi: 10.1002/cam4.321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Tendas A, Cupelli L, Siniscalchi A, Scaramucci L, Giovannini M, Dentamaro T, et al. Azacitidine in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: An effective and manageable approach. Mediter J Hematol Infect Dis (2014) 6(1):e2014020. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2014.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Landman S, van der Horst C, van Erp PEJ, Joosten I, de Vries R, Koenen HJPM. Immune responses to azacytidine in animal models of inflammatory disorders: A systematic review. J Transl Med (2021) 19:11. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02615-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Zheng Q, Xu Y, Liu Y, Zhang B, Li X, Guo F, et al. Induction of Foxp3 demethylation increases regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells and prevents the occurrence of diabetes in mice. J Mol Med (Berlin Germany) (2009) 87(12):1191–205. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0530-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

178. Wang X, Cao Q, Yu L, Shi H, Xue B, Shi H. Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization and inflammation by DNA methylation in obesity. JCI Insight (2016) 19:e87748. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87748

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Jayaraman S, Patel A, Jayaraman A, Patel V, Holterman M, Prabhakar B. Transcriptome analysis of epigenetically modulated genome indicates signature genes in manifestation of type 1 diabetes and its prevention in NOD mice. PloS One (2013) 8:e55074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Khan S, Jena G. Valproic acid improves glucose homeostasis by increasing beta-cell proliferation, function, and reducing its apoptosis through HDAC inhibition in juvenile diabetic rat. J Biochem Mol Toxicol (2016) 30:438–46. doi: 10.1002/jbt.21807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Cuyàs E, Verdura S, Llorach-Parés L, Fernández-Arroyo S, Joven J, Martin-Castillo B, et al. Metformin is a direct SIRT1-activating compound: Computational modeling and experimental validation. Front Endocrinol (2018) 9:657. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00657

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

182. Zhang J, Cheng Y, Gu J. Fenofibrate increases cardiac autophagy via FGF21/SIRT1 and prevents fibrosis and inflammation in the hearts of type 1 diabetic mice. Clin Sci (2016) 130:625–41. doi: 10.1042/CS20150623

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

183. Cuevas A, Saavedra N, Salazar LA, Abdalla DS. Modulation of immune function by polyphenols: Possible contribution of epigenetic factors. Nutrients (2013) 5(7):2314–32. doi: 10.3390/nu5072314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

184. Lee WJ, Shim JY, Zhu BT. Mechanisms for the inhibition of DNA methyltransferases by tea catechins and bioflavonoids. Mol Pharmacol (2005) 68:1018–30. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.008367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

185. Liu Z, Xie Z, Jones W, Pavlovicz RE, Liu S, Yu J, et al. Curcumin is a potent DNA hypomethylation agent. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2009) 19:706–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

186. Szkudelski T, Szkudelska K. Resveratrol and diabetes: From animal to human studies. Biochim Biophys Acta (2015) 1852:1145–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

187. Rajendran P, Ho E, Williams DE, Dashwood RH. Dietary phytochemicals, hdac inhibition, and DNA damage/repair defects in cancer cells. Clin Epigenet (2011) 3:4. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-3-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

188. Nandakumar V, Vaid M, Katiyar SK. (–)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate reactivates silenced tumor suppressor genes, cip1/p21 and p16ink4a, by reducing DNA methylation and increasing histones acetylation in human skin cancer cells. Carcinogenesis (2011) 32:537–44. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

189. Kikuno N, Shiina H, Urakami S, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, Tanaka Y, et al. Genistein mediated histone acetylation and demethylation activates tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer (2008) 123:552–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

190. Chen Y, Shu W, Chen W, Wu Q, Liu H, Cui G. Curcumin, both histone deacetylase and p300/cbp-specific inhibitor, represses the activity of nuclear factor kappa b and notch 1 in raji cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol (2007) 101:427–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00142.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

191. Arola-Arnal A, Blade C. Proanthocyanidins modulate microrna expression in human hepg2 cells. PloS One (2011) 6:e25982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

192. Tomé-Carneiro J, Larrosa M, Yáñez-Gascón MJ, Dávalos A, Gil-Zamorano J, Gonzálvez M, et al. One-year supplementation with a grape extract containing resveratrol modulates inflammatory-related microRNAs and cytokines expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 2 diabetes and hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. Pharmacol Res (2013) 72:69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

193. Ooi BK, Yap WH, Chan K-G, Goh BH. The role of natural products in targeting cardiovascular diseases via Nrf2 pathway: Novel molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Front Pharmacol (2018) 9:1308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

194. Khor TO, Huang Y, Wu TY, Shu L, Lee J, Kong AN. Pharmacodynamics of curcumin as DNA hypomethylation agent in restoring the expression of Nrf2 via promoter CpGs demethylation. Biochem Pharmacol (2011) 82:1073–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

195. Zhang C, Su ZY, Khor TO, Shu L, Kong AN. Sulforaphane enhances Nrf2 expression in prostate cancer TRAMP C1 cells through epigenetic regulation. Biochem Pharmacol (2013) 85:1398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

196. Reichard JF, Motz GT, Puga A. Heme oxygenase-1 induction by NRF2 requires inactivation of the transcriptional repressor BACH1. Nucleic Acids Res (2007) 35:7074–86. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

197. Rangarajan P, Karthikeyan A, Dheen ST. Role of dietary phenols in mitigating microglia-mediated neuroinflammation. Neuromolecular Med (2016) 18:453–64. doi: 10.1007/s12017-016-8430-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

198. Kim A, Yun JM. Combination treatments with luteolin and fisetin enhance anti-inflammatory effects in high glucose-treated THP-1 cells through histone Acetyltransferase/Histone deacetylase regulation. J Med Food (2017) 20:782–9. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2017.3968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

199. Moynihan KA, Grimm AA, Plueger MM, Bernal-Mizrachi E, Ford E, Cras-Me´neur C, et al. Increased dosage of mammalian Sir2 in pancreatic β cells enhances glucosestimulated insulin secretion in mice. Cell Metab (2005) 2:105–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

200. Wang Q, Liu M, Liu WW, Hao WB, Tashiro S, Onodera S, et al. In vivo recovery effect of silibinin treatment on streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice is associated with the modulations of sirt-1 expression and autophagy in pancreatic beta-cell. J Asian Nat Prod Res (2012) 14:413–23. doi: 10.1080/10286020.2012.657180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

201. Wang H, Xu X, Nguyen CM, Liu Y, Gao Y, Lin X, et al. CRISPR-mediated programmable 3D genome positioning and nuclear organization. Cell (2018) 175(5):1405–1417.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

202. Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. RNA-Guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-cas systems. Nat Biotechnol (2013) 31:233–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2508

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

203. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA. DNA Interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature (2014) 50:62–7. doi: 10.1038/nature13011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

204. Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109:E2579–86. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208507109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

205. Ran F, Hsu P, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc (2013) 8:2281–308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

206. Cox DB, Platt RJ, Zhang F. Therapeutic genome editing: Prospects and challenges. Nat Med (2015) 21:121–31. doi: 10.1038/nm.3793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

207. Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, Huang M, Wu M, Zhao X. Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: Mechanisms, advances and prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5:1. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0089-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

208. Bevacqua RJ, Dai X, Lam JY, Gu X, Friedlander MSH, Tellez K, et al. CRISPR-based genome editing in primary human pancreatic islet cells. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):2397. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22651-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

209. Tiyaboonchai A, Cardenas-Diaz FL, Ying L, Maguire JA, Sim X, Jobaliya C, et al. GATA6 plays an important role in the induction of human definitive endoderm, development of the pancreas, and functionality of pancreatic β cells. Stem Cell Rep (2017) 8:589–604. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

210. Miguel-Escalada I, Bonàs-Guarch S, Cebola I, Ponsa-Cobas J, Mendieta-Esteban J, Atla G, et al. Human pancreatic islet three-dimensional chromatin architecture provides insights into the genetics of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet (2019) 51(7):1137–48. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0457-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

211. Maxwell KG, Augsornworawat P, Velazco-Cruz L, Kim MH, Asada R, Hogrebe NJ, et al. Gene-edited human stem cell-derived β cells from a patient with monogenic diabetes reverse preexisting diabetes in mice. Sci Transl Med (2020) 12(540):eaax9106. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax9106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

212. Philippidis A. First Patient Dosed with VCTX210, a Cell Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes. Genetic engineering & biotechnology (2022) 42:10–1. doi: 10.1089/gen.42.05.02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

213. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell (2013) 152:1173–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

214. de Groote ML, Verschure PJ, Rots MG. Epigenetic editing: targeted rewriting of epigenetic marks to modulate expression of selected target genes. Nucleic Acids Res (2012) 40:10596–613. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

215. Jurkowski TP, Ravichandran M, Stepper P. Synthetic epigenetics-towards intelligent control of epigenetic states and cell identity. Clin Epigenet (2015) 7:18. doi: 10.1186/s13148-015-0044-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

216. Takahashi Y, Wu J, Suzuki K, Martinez-Redondo P, Li M, Liao HK, et al. Integration of CpG-free DNA induces de novo methylation of CpG islands in pluripotent stem cells. Science (2017) 356:503–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aag3260

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

217. Ou K, Yu M, Moss NG, Wang YJ, Wang AW, Nguyen SC, et al. Targeted demethylation at the CDKN1C/p57 locus induces human β cell replication. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(1):209–14. doi: 10.1172/JCI99170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

218. Liu XS, Wu H, Ji X, Stelzer Y, Wu X, Czauderna S, et al. Editing DNA methylation in the mammalian genome. Cell (2016) 167(1):233–47:e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

219. Kameswaran V, Golson ML, Ramos-Rodríguez M, Ou K, Wang YJ, Zhang J, et al. The dysregulation of the DLK1-MEG3 locus in islets from patients with type 2 diabetes is mimicked by targeted epimutation of its promoter with TALE-DNMT constructs. Diabetes (2018) 67(9):1807–15. doi: 10.2337/db17-0682

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

220. Gimenez CA, Curti L, Hyon SH, Grosembacher L, Ross PJ, Pereyra-Bonnet F. Activation of pancreatic β-cell genes by multiplex epigenetic CRISPR-editing. bioRxiv (2020) 07:214544. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.24.214544

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

221. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y, Kweon J, Kim HS, Bae S, et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res (2014) 24(1):132–41. doi: 10.1101/gr.162339.113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

222. Moon SB, Kim DY, Ko JH, Kim JS, Kim YS. Improving CRISPR genome editing by engineering guide RNAs. Trends Biotechnol (2019) 37:870–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar