Fu-Xing-Zi Li1
Xiao Lin2
Feng Xu1
Su-Kang Shan1
Bei Guo1
Li-Min Lei1
Ming-Hui Zheng1
Yi Wang1
Qiu-Shuang Xu1
Ling-Qing Yuan1*- 1National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Disease, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 2Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are applied in regenerative medicine of several tissues and organs nowadays by virtue of their self-renewal capabilities, multiple differentiation capacity, potent immunomodulatory properties, and their ability to be favourably cultured and manipulated. With the continuous development of “cell-free therapy” research, MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEVs) have increasingly become a research hotspot in the treatment of various diseases. Small extracellular vesicles (SEVs) are membrane vesicles with diameters of 30 to 150 nm that mediate signal transduction between adjacent or distal cells or organs by delivering non-coding RNA, protein, and DNA. The contents and effects of sEVs vary depending on the properties of the originating cell. In recent years, MSC-sEVs have been found to play an important role in the occurrence and development of diabetes mellitus as a new way of communication between cells. Diabetes mellitus is a common metabolic disease in clinic. Its complications of the heart, brain, kidney, eyes, and peripheral nerves are a serious threat to human health and has been a hot issue for clinicians. MSC-sEVs could be applied to repair or prevent damage from the complications of diabetes mellitus through anti-inflammatory effects, reduction of endoplasmic reticulum-related protein stress, polarization of M2 macrophages, and increasing autophagy. Therefore, we highly recommend that MSC-sEVs-based therapies to treat diabetes mellitus and its chronic complication be further explored. The analysis of the role and molecular mechanisms of MSC-sEVs in diabetes and its related complications will provide new idea and insights for the prevention and treatment of diabetes.
Introduction
Diabetes is a group of metabolic diseases characterized by chronic hyperglycemia caused by multiple causes. It is caused by defects in insulin secretion and/or function. By 2045, the number of diabetic patients is predicted to rise to 693 million (1). Diabetes is mainly manifested by absolute or relative deficiency of insulin and decreased sensitivity of target cells to insulin (2). Persistent high blood sugar can cause extensive vascular damage to the cardiovascular system, retina, kidneys, and nerves, which can lead to various complications (3–5). At present, the application of therapeutic insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents is one of the methods to effectively control the blood glucose level of diabetic patients (6, 7). However, the long-term use of insulin and hypoglycemic drugs causes side effects of varying degrees, and exogenous insulin is still not enough to mimic the natural activity of endogenous insulin. There is also a risk of hypoglycaemia (8). In addition, transplantation of pancreatic or islet cells has been widely restricted in clinical applications due to the lack of pancreatic donors, the number and activity of pancreatic cells, allogeneic immune rejection, surgery and post-operation and many other complex factors (9).
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been established as promising candidate sources for cell therapy due to their contributions to tissue and organ homeostasis, repair and support by self-renewal and multi-differentiation, as well as by their anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, immunomodulatory, trophic and pro-angiogenic properties (10). Various diseases have been successfully treated by MSCs in animal models and hundreds of clinical trials related to the potential benefits of MSCs are in progress or have concluded satisfactorily (11). MSCs are commonly used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, repair of tissue injuries (bone, cartilage, joint, heart, liver, spinal cord, and nervous system diseases), autoimmune diseases, and as vectors for gene therapy (12). MSCs can promote the regeneration of pancreatic β-cells, protect endogenous pancreatic β-cells from apoptosis, and improve the insulin resistance (IR) of peripheral tissues by providing a supportive microenvironment driven by the secretion of paracrine factors or the deposition of extracellular matrix (13, 14). Numerous studies have shown that the therapeutic effects of MSCs are mediated in a paracrine manner, mainly through extracellular vesicles such as small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) (15). Therefore, cell-free therapy technology based on MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEVs) has gradually become a research direction. Existing studies have shown that MSC-sEVs have a therapeutic effect on diabetes (16, 17). MSC-sEVs also show great potential in the tissue repair of diabetes complications. Therefore, the regenerative and immunomodulatory properties of MSC-sEVs have the potential to treat diabetes and related complications, such as diabetic nephropathy (DN) (18) and central nervous system damage (19). Information has emerged regarding the roles of specific miRNAs and other MSC-sEVs components as mediators of the protective effects of MSCs administration in preclinical diabetes disease models but many remains unknown. Currently, the role of MSC-sEVs in the treatment of diabetes diseases is an area of active preclinical study. This review mainly introduces the research progress of MSC-sEVs in the treatment and pathogenesis of diabetic central and peripheral neuropathy, diabetic vascular disease, diabetic skin disease, and DN in recent years.
Diabetes
Diabetes describes a group of conditions in which blood glucose is not properly regulated. Diabetes mellitus occurs when β-cells fail to secrete the insulin necessary to maintain the homeostasis of glucose in the blood. The most common forms of diabetes are type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T1DM results from a cell-mediated autoimmune destruction of β-cells, whereas in T2DM, IR from peripheral organs is coupled with insulin deficiency resulting from an insufficient β-cell mass or function. Other forms of diabetes include gestational diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA), and neonatal diabetes mellitus (NMD) and maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) in which mutations in key pancreatic genes are found (e.g. Glucokinase, Pdx1, etc.). Over time, diabetes can lead to the development of different long-term complications such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, critical ischemia of the limbs and so on. The pathogenesis of related diabetes complications was shown in Table 1. Currently, diabetes cannot be cured, and the treatment of diabetes consists of handling hyperglycemia by providing an exogenous insulin and medications supply or by islet cell transplantation. However, the inability to achieve tight control of glucose regulation has motivated more efforts to develop other approaches to address diabetes and reduce the burden of existing diabetes complications. Moreover, the diabetes-based existence of a chronic inflammatory state, impaired immune response, impaired coagulation and other related complications could be among the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to the increased morbidity and mortality of people with diabetes.
Table 1 Application of MSC-sEVs in diabete diseases.
Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) refer to vesicle-like bodies with a double-layer membrane structure that fall off the cell membrane or are secreted by cells. They are widely present in various body fluids and cell supernatants, and stably carry some important signal molecules (46). According to MISEV 2018, they can be divided into 3 subgroups: small EVs (< 100 nm or < 200 nm), medium/large EVs (> 200 nm) (47). EVs are involved in cell communication, cell migration, angiogenesis, tumor cell growth and other processes. They act as new mediators of long-distance cell-to-cell communication and can transfer various biologically active molecules (such as encapsulated cytokines and genetic information) from their parental cells to distant target cells (47).
Exosomes, the smallest EVs with the size range of 30 - 150 nm in diameter,have a bilayer structure and saucer-like morphology (48). In the full text of this article, we all use the exosomes command as sEVs. After fusion with the cell membrane, the contents of the sEVs are released into the extracellular matrix (49) as depicted in Figure 1. Almost all types of cells can secrete sEVs, mainly from body fluids, such as blood (19), urine (39), cerebrospinal fluid (52), saliva (53), and breast milk (54). sEVs apply their effects through targeting their cargos, such as nucleic acids (DNA, mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA and so on), lipids and proteins at the host cells, which leads to a shift in the behaviour of the recipient cells (55, 56). sEVs play an important role in various physiological and pathological processes, such as adipose metabolism, angiogenesis, inflammatory response, tissue regeneration, tumorigenesis, nerve regeneration, islet resistance, and immune regulation (57, 58). The current gold standard for isolating sEVs is ultracentrifugation (59, 60). The main molecular markers of exosomes include tetraspanin (CD9, CD63, CD81) and ESCRT proteins (TSG101, ALIX) (61–64). The methods for identifying sEVs mainly include the use of protein immunoassays. Western blot (WB) is used to detect molecular markers (65). Ultrastructure and particle size are measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (66). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) or nanometer particle tracking analysis (NTA) detects particle size distribution (67).
Figure 1 Biogenesis of small extracellular vesicles. The formation of sEVs originates from a series of regulation processes of “endocytosis-fusion-efflux”; that is, early endosomes formed after the plasma membrane of the cell is recessed. The envelope of early endosomes keeps invading and selectively accepts biologically active components, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids in the cells, and eventually forms late endosomes. Late endosomes produce multiple intraluminal vesicles in the form of internal budding, which selectively receive cytosolic proteins, nucleic acids, or lipids to form multivesicular bodies (MVB). MVB are divided into exocytic-MVB and degradative-MVB. Exocytic-MVB release the vesicles in the MVB to the outside of the cell in the form of exocytosis through the plasma membrane fusion mediated by Rab27, and the released membranous vesicles are the sEVs. Degradative-MVB are degraded by fusion with lysosomes (50, 51).
MSCs can be isolated from various adult tissues such as bone marrow, umbilical cord, adipose, peripheral blood, liver, and gums (68). It is also favored for its advantages, such as easy collection, low immune rejection, and less ethical controversy (69). It has been used in the repair and regeneration treatment of various tissues and organs. Previous studies have shown that by MSCs being transplanted into damaged tissues and differentiated to replace damaged cells, systemic administration of MSCs can prevent the occurrence of T1DM. However, the proportion of transplanted MSCs reaching the damaged tissue was less than 1%, and most of them were trapped in organs such as liver and lung (70). Even if the transplanted MSCs had tissue repair effects, the transplantation and differentiation of MSCs in the damaged parts was low and short-lived (71), suggesting that MSCs exert the greatest effect through the secretion media. Simple MSCs transplantation may also have the risk of embolism, abnormal differentiation and tumor formation, these factors limit the use of MSCs (72). MSCs are recruited to the damaged tissue and secretes cytokines through paracrine action to change the microenvironment and induce the repair of the tissue structure and function of the damaged organ. In addition to several common modes (endocrine, paracrine, chemical synapse communication between neuron and target cell, autocrine, contact dependent communication between cells), there are other modes of information communication between cells through exosomes. Due to the vesicle structure of sEVs, the way of information exchange between cells is different from the typical mode mentioned above. There are three main ways for sEVs to participate in information exchange between cells, including the direct action of signal molecules on the membrane surface, intracellular regulation of content during membrane fusion and regulation of release of bioactive components. The discovery of sEVs makes the information exchange between cells more precise and comprehensive. The discovery of sEVs reveals the RNA intercellular transfer pathway existing in the body itself, which is expected to become an ideal gene therapy vector in the field of gene therapy due to its safe and effective targeted transport capacity. (73). MSCs are prolific sEVs secretors that shed a higher dose of sEVs compared to other cell types (74, 75). Indeed, most in vitro studies have directed their focus on sEVs derived from MSC subtypes, including adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and others. The amount of sEVs released from MSCs is strongly associated with their proliferation rate (75). MSC-sEVs seem to be particularly beneficial in enhancing the recovery of various disease models. A recent study found that MSC-sEVs have tissue repair and reconstruction functions similar to MSCs. MSC-sEVs act on target cells such as β-cells, adipose cells, liver cells, macrophages, and skeletal muscle cells, by carrying specific miRNAs, proteins and other substances, thereby participating in the occurrence and development of IR and diabetes. As a new research hotspot, compared with MSCs, MSC-sEVs have the following advantages (76–78): (1) MSC-sEVs do not have the same issues as human cell transplantation, so the risk of immune rejection and aneuploidy is lower, and the safety is higher. There are also no ethical issues. (2) MSC-sEVs is stable in nature, can be stored for a long time at -20 °C, are easy to manage and control, and the type and quantity of its contents can be changed artificially. Also, its contents are not easily degraded (79, 80). (3) MSC-sEVs are small in size and will not block capillaries as easily as MSCs. The dosage of MSC-sEVs can be adjusted as needed. Many of the proteins found in MSC-sEVs are enzymes, which are milder than drugs and may reduce the risk of overdose or under-dose (81, 82). (4) MSC-sEVs have a more direct effect and can target specific organs and damaged parts. MSC-sEVs can cross the blood-brain barrier due to its own structural characteristics and have higher histocompatibility. (5) The production cost of MSC-sEVs is controllable, and MSC-sEVs can be conveniently transported and stored.
Study on the Application of Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Diagnosis of Diabetes
Small Extracellular Vesicles -Related miRNAs
Increasing blood glucose is the main criterion for diagnosing diabetes. Although the detection method is simple and cost-effective, it cannot provide relevant information about the patient’s pathogenesis or disease progression. During the onset and development of diabetes, the morphology and number of circulating sEVs change with the individual’s physiological or pathological conditions, suggesting that it may be used as a new marker (83). Studies have shown that sEVs can be used as carriers to transport miRNAs or other RNAs to neighbouring cells through the binding of receptors and ligands, and as biomarkers to indicate physiological or pathological changes in tissues or organs. miRNA is a type of small single-stranded RNA with a length of 18-25 nucleotides. It can mediate post-transcriptional gene silencing by binding to the 3’-untranslated region or open reading frame region of the target mRNA (84). It plays an important regulatory role in the process of differentiation, migration, and disease occurrence and development. Exosomal miRNA is protected from RNase degradation by the phosphatidic acid molecular layer, which is conducive to the isolation, extraction and storage of exosomal miRNA (85). Garcia-Contreras et al. (86) performed exosomal miRNA chip detection on plasma samples of 12 patients in the T1DM group and 12 healthy person in the control group, and the results demonstrated that there were significant differences between the two groups of 7 miRNAs, and the up-regulated miR-16- 5p, miR-302d-3p, miR-378e, miR-570-3p, miR-574-5p, and miR-579; miR-25-3p were down-regulated. It was verified by RT-qPCR that miR-16-5p and miR-574-5p in the control group were significantly higher than in the T1DM group. This study revealed for the first time that miRNA isolated from patient plasma sEVs was expected to be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of T1DM. Glutamate decarboxylase-65 antibody, insulin antigen-512 and insulin antibody are the main autoantibodies in patients with T1DM. The sEVs containing autoantibody-positive miRNAs or proteins secreted by pancreatic β-cells can be used for the diagnosis of T1DM potential markers (86, 87). In addition, circulating sEVs in the body fluids of diabetic patients show higher procoagulant activity (88). Compared with the normal healthy group, whether they have microvascular complications or uncomplicated, all patients with T1DM have a significantly higher sEVs level. It can be used as one of the diagnostic basis (89). Meanwhile, Katayama et al. found that exosome-derived extracellular miR-20b-5p, a highly abundant exoRNA in patients with T2DM, is a circulating biomarker associated with T2DM that plays an intracellular role in modulating insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism via AKT signalling (90). Moreover, in peripheral blood microvesicles, among 104 miRNAs in EVs, miR-320-3p is highly expressed in microvesicles of plasma (2.637-fold more than in blood cells), as well as, miR-320-3p has also been associated with the regulation of Glucose-Induced Gene expression in T2DM (91). During the occurrence and development of diabetes, the content or number of sEVs will change abnormally, which suggests the possibility for using sEVs as new markers. In addition, quantitative and stoichiometric analyses of miRNAs content in sEVs highlight the lack of reliable natural sources for miRNA-loaded particles, which necessitates the need for custom sEVs or nanoparticles to efficiently deliver miRNAs closely related to immunity, metabolism, and epigenetics in target cells. However, loading extracellular mature miRNAs into recipient cells comes at a cost, as it at least blocks the dynamic localization of miRNAs in the nucleoli, or leads to inefficient miRNAs delivery due to rapid exonuclease recovery. All of this work requires the design of new bionic vectors and in vivo assessment of miRNA function when delivered by natural or bionic nanoparticles to control metabolic diseases from infancy to adulthood.
Small Extracellular Vesicles-Related Protein
The latest research shows that C-megalin in urinary sEVs is positively correlated with the severity of DN (92). With the increase in urinary albumin, the level of C-megalin in urinary sEVs also increases, which is expected to become a diagnostic marker for DN. Aquaporins (AQPs) are a class of transmembrane proteins that are highly selective to water and have important physiological functions in regulating water metabolism. Polyuria is an early clinical symptom of diabetes. The levels of AQP2 and AQP5 in the urinary sEVs of DN patients are positively correlated with the histological grade of DN (93), indicating that AQPs of sEVs may become biomarkers for early diagnosis and monitoring of DN.
The Role of MSC-sEVs in Diabetes
The Improvement of Pancreatic β-Cell Function
MSC-sEVs improve the function of pancreatic β-cells, which may be one of its mechanisms of treatment of diabetes. After transplantation, MSC-sEVs can specifically chemoattract and migrate to the damaged islets to promote the proliferation of β-cells in the damaged islets, so as to repair and regenerate β-cells and inhibit β-cell apoptosis. Sabry et al. (94) found that injecting MSC-sEVs into streptozotocin (STZ) -induced diabetic rats had a better hypoglycaemic effect and faster effect than MSCs themselves. In the MSC-sEVs group, blood glucose levels decreased, plasma insulin levels increased, islet cell regeneration was enhanced, the number and size of islets increased, fibrosis and inflammation decreased, and the islet regeneration genes insulin, Pdx1, Smad2, Smad3, and Tgf-b were all significantly up-regulated. Another study found that sEVs isolation from menstrual blood-derived-MSCs through homing to the pancreas and pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 pathway enhanced the STZ-induced wistar rat β-cell quality and insulin production (95). Chen et al. (96) used the mouse β-cell line βTC-6 and found that the expression of apoptosis-related proteins cleaved caspase 3 and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) were up-regulated under hypoxia. MSC-sEVs with miRNA-21 reduced endoplasmic reticulum stress-related protein (GRP78, GRP94, p-eIF2α and CHOP) expression and inhibited of p38/MAPK phosphorylation, thereby protecting β-cells from hypoxia-induced apoptosis. MSC-sEVs are as effective as parental MSCs in improving the survival rate and function of islet cells (97). This cytoprotective effect may be mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in MSC-sEVs (97). Another study by Kordelas et al. (98) demonstrated that MSC-sEVs can also help the angiogenesis and survival of transplanted pancreatic islets, improving the efficiency and success rate of the treatment. Overall, MSC-sEVs can improve the survival and function of the coated islets and benefit diabetic patients.
Amelioration of Insulin Resistance in Peripheral Target Tissues
Regulation of Autophagy
Autophagy is an important regulatory pathway for maintaining cell homeostasis, and maintains normal cell function by affecting the degradation of intracellular substances. The dysregulation of autophagy-related mechanisms after diabetes can lead to a decrease in the number of pancreatic β-cells and dysfunction, resulting in a decrease in insulin secretion (99). The latest study found that MSC-sEVs can promote liver glycolysis, glycogen storage and lipolysis of 0.25mM palmitic acid (PA)-treated LO2 cells and reduce gluconeogenesis (100). They found that the AMPK signaling pathway was activated and induced autophagy in T2DM rats and PA-treated LO2 cells. The formation of autophagosomes in the MSC-sEVs group increased, and the autophagy marker proteins BECN1 and MAP 1LC3B increased. Furthermore, the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine significantly reduced the effect of MSC-sEVs on glucose and lipid metabolism in T2DM rats.
Mechanism of Insulin Resistance in Peripheral Target Tissues
Sun et al. (101) established a T2DM rat model with high-fat diet (HFD) and STZ induction. Through the results of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), peritoneal insulin tolerance tests (IPITTs), IR index (HOMA-IR) and serum insulin tests, they found that intravenous injection of sEVs from MSCs (hucMSC-sEVs) can effectively alleviate hyperglycemia in T2DM rats. In T2DM rats, hucMSC-sEVs restored the phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and protein kinase B (Akt), and promoted the expression and membrane translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) in muscles. The expression level of glycogen synthesis related protein p-GSK3β and glycogen synthase rises, increasing the storage of liver glycogen to maintain glucose homeostasis. At the same time, hucMSC-sEVs inhibited STZ-induced β-cell apoptosis and restored the insulin secretion function of T2DM. The study of Su et al. (102) effectively explained a clinical phenomenon, which is “Why do the elderly often develop IR?” They extracted the sEVs released by BM-MSCs from young and aged mice. They found that the highly enriched miR-29b-3p sEVs released by BM-MSCs can be absorbed by adipocytes, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes, thereby producing IR in vivo and in vitro. Their research further found that miR-29b-3p could directly target SIRT1. Interestingly, they utilized an aptamer-mediated nanocomplex delivery system, which can specifically target BM-MSCs. Down-regulating/up-regulating the level of miR-29b-3p in BM-MSCs-derived sEVs could significantly ameliorate/increase IR in elderly mice.
Anti-Inflammatory and Immune Regulation Mechanism
Immunity imbalance is one of the key factors in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Generally, inflammatory cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (lL-6) (101, 103), which are the main causes of IR in chronic inflammatory tissues. Therefore, timely and effective ameliorate the body’s microenvironment and regulation of immune response through MSC-sEVs is one of the important directions and strategies for diabetes treatment. As we all know, T1DM is an autoimmune disease characterized by permanent destruction of pancreatic β-cells mediated by T cells (104). Recent studies found that the autoimmune response or immune imbalance was closely related to IR and the progressive decline of pancreatic β-cell function during the pathogenesis of T2DM (105). In addition, the incidence of diabetes-related complications is also affected by autoimmune reactions (106). Sun et al. (101) found that, in the STZ-induced rat diabetes model, hucMSC-sEVs injected via the tail vein inhibited the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α to reverse T2DM IR and indirectly increased the insulin/AKT signaling pathway activation. Zhao et al. (107) introduced ADSCsEVs into mice fed with HFD-Fed, which can significantly reduce systemic IR caused by obesity, attenuation of dsylipiemia, inhibit fat cell hypertrophy. By measuring the area under the glucose tolerance test curve, it was observed that ADSCsEVs can increase the effect of insulin by 27.8%. The transfer of ADSC-sEVs carrying active STAT3 to activate arginase-1 from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to macrophages induces polarization of M2 macrophages and attenuation of WAT inflammation in HFD-Fed Mice. M2 macrophages induced by ADSC–sEVs can express high levels of tyrosine hydroxylase. Also ADSC–sEVs can drive the expression of Arg-1 by transporting STAT3 to promote ADSCs proliferation and lactate production. The Fas/FasL pathway plays an important role in β-cell apoptosis in T1DM, especially under high glucose conditions (108). Human BM-MSCs and their sEVs can deliver siFas and anti-miR-375 together to inhibit the early apoptosis of transplanted human islets (109). Under inflammatory cytokine treatment, after simultaneously silencing Fas and miR-375, pancreatic islet cell apoptosis was markedly inhibited, and insulin release was enhanced. In the humanized NOD scid gamma mouse model, intravenous injection of BM-MSCs and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) co-cultured sEVs can further suppress the immune response by inhibiting the proliferation of PBMC and enhancing the function of regulatory T cells (Treg). BM-MSCs and derived sEVs may be an effective method to improve islet function under inflammation as showed in Figure 2.
Figure 2 The approach of MSC-sEVs to treat diabetes. MSC-sEVs down regulate blood glucose through reverse insulin resistance in insulin target tissues (liver, muscle, adipose tissue) and relieve islet β cells destruction.
The Role of MSC-sEVs in the Complications of Diabetes
Microvascular Disease
Microvessels refer to capillaries and microvessels between tiny arteries and tiny veins with a lumen diameter of less than 100 µm. Microangiopathy is a specific complication of diabetes. Its typical changes are microcirculation disorder and thickening of the microvascular basement membrane. The main risk factors include long duration of diabetes, poor blood sugar control, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, smoking, and IR. Microvascular disease mainly manifests in the retina, kidney, nerve, and myocardial tissue, among which DN and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are particularly important. Fortunately, MSC-sEVs has been found to have a positive therapeutic effect in these microvascular diseases.
Repair Function of MSC-sEVs in Diabetic Nephropathy
DN occurs in 20% to 40% of diabetic patients (110). DN has become one of the main causes of end-stage renal disease. Diabetes with long-term hyperglycemia infiltration and micro-inflammatory environment can cause substantial kidney damage. Its clinical feature is proteinuria, and its final pathological manifestation is renal fibrosis. Studies have pointed out that sEVs not only participate in the early diagnosis of DN, but also have the ability to repair kidney tissue. Ebrahim et al. (11) found that STZ-induced diabetes rat after tail vein injection of MSC-sEVs can ameliorate kidney injury. A kidney biopsy showed that glomerular and tubular collagen fibre deposition was reduced, glomerular basement membrane thickened and foot process fusion was reduced. Many autophagosomes can be seen in the cytoplasm. RT-qPCR and WB showed that the expression of mTOR was reduced, and the expression of autophagy-related proteins LC3II and Beclin-1 increased. It may be possible to up-regulate the expression of LC3II and Beclin-1 by inhibiting the mTOR signalling pathway to enhance autophagy. In turn, it reduced podocyte apoptosis and collagen fibre deposition and exerted renal protection. In addition, ADSC-sEVs also have a renal protective effect (27). After the tail vein injection of ADSC-sEVs in mice, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and urine protein decreased, and podocyte apoptosis decreased. The addition of ADSC-sEVs co-cultivation can effectively alleviate the limitation of high glucose culture on the proliferation rate of MPC5 cells. The exosomal miR-486 reduced the expression of Smad1, inhibited the activation of p62/mTOR signalling pathway and caspase3, up-regulated the expression of LC3 and Beclin-1, enhanced autophagy, and reduced podocyte apoptosis to improve kidney injury in db/db mice. Exosomal miR-486 may be a key factor for stem cells to improve DN. MSC-sEVs protect the kidney by regulating autophagy-related factors, providing a new direction for the treatment of DN. Nagaishi et al. (28) found that the treatment of MSCs and MSCs sEVs can inhibit the abnormal infiltration and interstitial fibrosis of BMSCs in the kidney and inhibited inflammatory signals by inhibiting the p38-MAPK pathway and the overexpression of TGF-β. It reversed the severe damage to renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) caused by high glucose stimulation, inhibited epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and reduced the damage caused by DN. In addition, in the diabetic rat model induced by STZ, the tail vein injection of human urine stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles (USC-sEVs) can promote angiogenesis and cell survival by inhibiting the overexpression of caspase-3 protease and reduce podocyte apoptosis (29). Another study by Jiang et al. (18) demonstrated that USCs-sEVs could potentially reduce the urine volume and urinary microalbumin excretion, prevent podocyte and tubular epithelial cell apoptosis, suppress the caspase-3 overexpression, and increase glomerular endothelial cell proliferation in diabetic rats. Other related studies have also found that MSCs and its sEVs also delay the EMT of podocytes and renal tubular interstitial cells induced by high glucose and have anti-fibrotic effects on DN (31, 32). Overall, these findings provide the basis for the future application of MSC-sEVs as a new biological treatment of DN. However, its therapeutic value is currently limited to animal models. If MSC-sEVs treatment is to be applied into the clinic, further clinical trials are needed.
Repair Function of MSC-sEVs in Diabetic Retinopathy
Hyperglycemia can damage the basement membrane, endothelial cells and retinal perivascular cells of the retinal vascular system (111). Early treatment is to strictly control blood sugar and blood pressure to control disease risk factors, and later can be treated by laser photocoagulation, intraocular anti-VEGF, or glucocorticoid drugs (112). However, these treatments have certain complications and related problems, such as unstable efficacy. Therefore, the treatment of MSC-sEVs has become an alternative solution. At present, scholars generally believe that the occurrence of DR is related to retinal cell degeneration (including retinal cell apoptosis, glial cell dysfunction) and retinal microvascular dysfunction (retina no perfusion, changes in vascular permeability, and retinal neovascularization) (113). The results of Zhang et al. (25) showed that MSC-sEVs injection can alleviate the inflammatory response of diabetic rats or human retinal endothelial cells exposed to high glucose by down-regulating the levels of caspase-1, IL-1b, and IL-18. Compared with control MSC-sEVs, overexpression of miR-126 in MSC-sEVs significantly inhibited the HMGB1 signalling pathway in diabetic rats and inhibited inflammation. In vitro, miR-126 overexpression in MSC-sEVs significantly reduced HMGB1 expression and NLRP3 inflammasome activity induced by high glucose. Safwat et al. (24) showed that ADSC-sEVs reduce STZ-induced DR degeneration in rabbits by delivering micRNA-222 to retinal cells. Mathew et al. (23) explained that in the rat model, MSC-sEVs injected into the vitreous humor 24 h after retinal ischemia can significantly enhance functional recovery and reduce neuroinflammation and cell apoptosis. Generally speaking, MSC-sEVs have great potential as a biomaterial for neuroprotection and regeneration therapy of retinal diseases.
Macrovascular Disease
The predisposing factors of atherosclerosis such as obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia, often occur in people with diabetes (mainly T2DM) (114). The prevalence of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients is higher, and the onset is earlier. The progress is faster. Atherosclerosis mainly invades the aorta, coronary arteries, cerebral arteries, renal arteries and limb arteries, causing coronary heart disease, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, renal arteriosclerosis, and other diseases. Studies have pointed out that sEVs derived from BM-MSCs can treat brain cognitive dysfunction caused by diabetes. Diabetic vascular calcification (VC) is a common pathological basis in diabetic vascular disease, which is characterized by the deposition of calcium phosphate in the cardiovascular structure (115–118). Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are the main cause of diabetes-related vascular complications, including diabetic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) calcification, which can cause VSMCs to calcify (119). The thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) is a member of the α-arrestin family of inhibitory proteins. In a high glucose state, TXNIP can bind to thioredoxin (Trx) and cause its inactivation and activity. The increase in oxygen species and the production of vascular inflammation are closely related to the production of AGEs (120). Wang et al. (26) found that MSC-sEVs contained high levels of miR-146a. When it was co-cultured with VSMCs pretreated AGE modified bovine serum albumin (AGE-BSA), it could be transferred into cells, by targeting to inhibit the production of TXNIP to protect Trx activity, and inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS) to prevent AGE-BSA-induced calcification. Therefore, MSC-sEVs may be a potential therapeutic target for VC and play an important role in diabetic vascular disease.
Repair Function of MSC-sEVs in Diabetic Central Nervous System Damage
Diabetic neuropathy is divided into central nervous system disease and peripheral nervous system disease. Central nervous system diseases include brain diseases and spinal cord diseases (121). The abnormal glucose metabolism caused by hyperglycemia damages nerve cells and slows down the conduction speed of brain cells, which can be measured by neuroelectrophysiological equipment. Many people with diabetes have worse memory, reaction speed, and thinking and cognitive abilities than people without diabetes (122). The conduction velocity of the spinal nerve is slowed down, and the patient has symmetry deep paresthesias in the lower limbs, such as loss of position sense, unstable walking, and dysuria. The main cause of cognitive impairment in diabetic patients may be damage to hippocampal neurons and astrocytes. In a study published by Nakano et al. (43) intravenous injection of MSC-sEVs easily spreads from blood vessels to the brain parenchyma. It was internalized by astrocytes and neurons, enhancing the ability of astrocytes to resist oxidative stress. At the same time, MSC-sEVs enhanced the ability of astrocytes to remove glutamate from the brain and maintain K+ balance, thereby promoting neuronal function, brain balance and synapse formation and improving cognitive impairment caused by diabetes. Local injection of BM-MSC-sEVs may be an effective drug for the treatment of cognitive impairment caused by diabetes. Xin et al. (44) found that MiR-133b in sEVs released after stroke by MSCs can transfer to astrocytes and regulate the gene expression of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) rats. miR-133b regulates the expression of Ras homolog gene family member A (RhoA) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), thereby promoting neurite remodelling and growth, and promoting the functional recovery of nerve cells. Venkat et al. (19) found that MSC-sEVs treatment of T2DM stroke can increase the expression of tight junction protein ZO-1, reduce blood-brain barrier leakage and bleeding, reduce body weight and reduce the expression of inflammatory factors (MMP-9 and MCP-1). At the same time, it promotes the remodelling of white matter marked by the increase in axon and myelin density to produce the therapeutic effect of nerve function recovery. The therapeutic effect induced by MSC-sEVs may be partly mediated by reducing the expression of miR-9 and up-regulating the ABCA1-IGFR1 pathway. Kubota et al. (45) further found that an enriched environment promoted the up-regulation of miR-146a secreted by endogenous BM-MSC-sEVs and down-regulation of IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) expression, thereby inhibiting the NF-κB pathway and reducing the production of TNF-α, thereby exerting an anti-inflammatory effect on damaged astrocytes and preventing diabetes-induced cognitive impairment. In addition, some scholars have extracted sEVs derived from BM-MSCs of TIDM rats and BM-MSCs of normal rats and injected them into the brains of TIDM stroke rats (123). They found that the former has the ability to remodel the cerebral blood vessels and white matter. The test results showed that the former serum miR-145 expression decreased, while the miR-145 target gene adenosine triphosphate binding cassette transporter 1 and insulin-like long factor 1 receptor expression increased. Studies have further confirmed that the sEVs transfected and knocked out miR-145 affect the degree of nerve growth, indicating that miR-145 plays an important regulatory role in neuroprotection. MSC-sEVs carry a large number of proteins and nucleic acids that protect nerves and nutrient nerves, can regulate related molecular pathways, protect myelin sheath, reshape synapses, repair damaged neurons, and so on to promote neuron growth and functional recovery. The above research results proved that MSC-sEVs treatment was a powerful tool for central nervous system damage in diabetic patients.
The Role of MSC-sEVs in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Autonomic Neuropathy
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the main complications of diabetes and one of the important causes of the incidence and death of diabetes (124, 125). There is currently no effective treatment for this disease. Fan et al. (42) applied BM-MSC-sEVs to a DPN mouse model. The results showed that, after treatment with sEVs, the expression of TNF-α in nerve tissues was reduced, and the levels of TGF-β, IL-10, and Arg1 increased, indicating that exosome treatment reversed the increase in M1 type macrophages and the decrease in M2 type macrophages caused by diabetes, which is achieved by the polarization of macrophages M2 to reduce inflammation and improve neurovascular function. From these results we know that MSC-sEVs can reduce neurovascular dysfunction and improve the functional recovery of DPN mice by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory genes.
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common comorbidity of male diabetes, and its pathogenesis may be caused by dysregulation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells (CCSMCs). According to epidemiological data, about 50% of diabetic male patients develop erectile dysfunction within 10 years after diagnosis (126). Considering the low efficacy of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in these patients (127, 128), MSC-sEVs therapy is an attractive tool for the treatment of diabetic ED (DED). Zhu et al. (21) showed that ADSC-sEVs contains some pro-angiogenic microRNA (miR-126, miR-130a, and miR-132) and an anti-fibrotic microRNA family (miR-let7b and miR-let7c). ADSC-sEVs have pro-angiogenic properties in vitro. In vivo ADSC-SEVs can induce endothelial cell proliferation, reduce cavernous fibrosis, and restore erectile function. Wang et al. (20) also found that ADSC-sEVs promoted neurovascular function by delivering corin and inhibited the expression of inflammatory factors to restore erectile function in diabetic rats. Huo et al. (22) explained that miR-21-5p delivered by MSC-sEVs can inhibit the expression of PDCD4 in T1DM rats, thereby stimulating the proliferation of corpus caverno-sum smooth muscle cells (CCSMCs), inhibiting CCSMCs apoptosis, and improving DED. These findings may provide new insights into the role of MSC-sEVs in the innovative treatment of DED.
The Role of MSC-sEVs in Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Diabetic Skin Damage
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes. Although people are increasingly aware of its pathophysiology and cellular and molecular responses, the reason for this pessimistic situation is the lack of effective treatments. DFU is mainly caused by ischemic, neurological, or combined neuroischemic abnormalities (129). It is a slow-healing deep chronic wound and microvascular obstruction. In recent years, multiple studies have reported the potential of MSC-sEVs to treat lower extremity ischemia and ulcers caused by diabetes. MSC-sEVs show stupendous therapeutic potential in the immune regulation and angiogenesis stage of DFU. In the immune regulation stage, MSC-sEVs could secrete miR124a/125b (130) to reduce inflammation, produce leb-7b (36) to regulates macrophage polarization, and secrete miR21 (38, 131, 132) to modulate dendritic cell differentiation. In the angiogenesis stage, MSC-sEVs have the ability to produce NRF2 (37), mmu_circ_0000250 (40), DMBT1 (39), lncRNA H19 (133), OxOband (41), miR126 (134, 135), miR23 (136), and miR21 (38, 131, 132) to promote the process of angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation, and re-epithelialization. The detailed summary of this part can be found in the review by An et al. (137). The exosome-derived miRNA and protein can be better protected by the exosomal membrane structure to avoid degradation, which not only helps to open up new targets for the early treatment of DFU, but also delays or even reverses the disease caused by the DFU process.
Poor healing of diabetic wounds can increase the risk of gangrene, amputation and even death. The main reasons for this complication include hypoxia, impaired angiogenesis, reactive oxygen species injury, and neuropathy (37, 138). At present, the main methods for treating diabetic chronic skin damage are debridement and dressing, but these treatment methods do not bring satisfactory results (139). Studies have shown that MSC-sEVs can carry a variety of anti-inflammatory factors and growth factors, which can regulate the immune response and inflammation (140, 141), promote wound angiogenesis (142, 143), accelerate the proliferation and regeneration of skin cells (142), and activate the collagen secretion of fibroblasts (144), eventually promoting the re-epithelialization of the skin wound. ADSC-sEVs exert an immunosuppressive effect by reducing the secretion of IFN-α, thereby inhibiting the activation of T cells (145). Li et al. (37) found that ADSC-sEVs inhibited the production of ROS and inflammatory factors through the overexpression of Nrf2 in a high glucose environment and prevented the senescence of endothelial cells. In addition, a new method to promote the healing of diabetic wounds has emerged: Shi et al.’s study in diabetic rat skin defect models showed that the combination of sEVs derived from gingival MSCs and chitosan/silk hydrogel can promote the regeneration of extracellular matrix (35). Epithelialization, deposition and remodelling promote angiogenesis and inward growth of neurons, thereby effectively promoting the healing of ulcer wounds in diabetic rats. ADSC-sEVs riched in miRNA-125a and miRNA-31, which can be transferred to vascular endothelial cells to stimulate proliferation, and promote angiogenesis (142, 143). At the same time, ADSC-sEVs can inhibit the expression of angiogenesis inhibitor (DLL4) and the anti-angiogenesis gene HIF1 in vascular endothelial cells, thereby promoting the migration of vascular endothelial cells and enhancing angiogenesis. In the early stage, ADSC-sEVs promote collagen remodelling by synthesizing type I and III collagen and, in the late stage reduce scar formation by inhibiting collagen formation (144). In addition, ADSC-sEVs stimulate the reconstruction of the extracellular matrix by regulating the differentiation and gene expression of fibroblasts, thereby promoting wound healing. Wang et al. (146) found that ADSC-sEVs increased the ratio of transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) to TGF-β1 in vivo. ADSC-sEVs also increased the expression of MMP3 in skin dermal fibroblasts, which was beneficial to the remodelling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) to reduce scar formation. These evidences prove that MSC-sEVs or its combination with new materials have strong therapeutic potential as depicted in Figure 3.
Figure 3 The mechanisms of MSC-sEVs in the treatment of complex diabetic complications.
Pharmaceutical Development of MSC-sEVs-Based Therapeutics for Diabetes Diseases
With such promising preclinical findings in various types of disease models, investigators are now tasked with developing safe, feasible and reproducible MSC-sEVs-based therapies. Currently, 93 clinical trials involving exosomes are listed in www.clinicaltrials.gov. The majority of these trials focus on the use of sEVs from several body fluids as early diagnostic tools to predict the outcome of various treatments. MSC-sEVs have been shown in preclinical studies to be safe and scalable to large, clinically relevant doses (147).To date, several clinical applications of MSC-sEVs have been reported (148). A published study demonstrated that increasing dosages of MSC-sEVs in a patient with severe therapy-refractory acute graft versus-host disease (GVHD), was well tolerated and led to a significant and sustainable improvement of symptoms, which remained stable for five months (98). Globally, at least one clinical trial of MSC-derived sEVs for the improvement of β-cell mass in T1DM patients has been reported (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02138331?term=MSC+exosomes&draw=1&rank=1). The first phase I clinical trial was initiated in 2014 with the aim of evaluating the safety of UC-MSC-sEVs in 20 patients with type 1 diabetes. Patients received a systemic injection of sEVs (ranging between 40-180 nm, in a dose of the supernatant produced from (1.22-1.51) × 106/kg/IV) at day 0 and of microvesicles (ranging between 180-1000 nm, in a dose of the supernatant produced from (1.22-1.51) × 106/kg/IV) at day 7. At the end of study (3 months) the following parameters are being evaluated: liver functions tests, kidney functions tests, HbA1c, glucose tolerance test, fasting and 2 h postprandial blood glucose levels, C-peptide chain level, and calculated total daily insulin dose. However, the status of the trial is unknown. More studies of MSC-sEVs-based therapeutics will be initiated in the near future (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT02138331, NCT03437759, NCT03384433) (98, 149). However, there remain significant challenges to translating this therapy into the clinic.
New Strategy for MSC-sEVs Treatment
The treatment of diabetes and its related complications is a huge economic burden for all countries in the world. At present, the most common way to diagnose diabetes is to measure blood glucose levels. However, before the blood sugar rises, there are potential vascular damage and decreased insulin sensitivity, so it is particularly important to find new alternative treatments. Numerous studies have shown that MSC-sEVs can mimic the biological functions of MSCs. But, MSCs mostly reside in the liver, spleen, and lungs, reaching less than 1% of the injured site. Most of the MSCs that reach the target tissue disappear after a few days, and the fate of most MSCs is anoikis or phagocytosis. Only a small amount of MSCs stayed at the injury site for a long time. In recent years, with the deepening of sEVs research, scholars have proposed sEVs as a new biomarker for early diagnosis of diabetes. Studies have confirmed that injection of therapeutic sEVs can maintain a lasting biological effect within 6 weeks, suggesting that sEVs can transmit lasting signal information between cells (150). Whether or not it is advisable to develop MSC-sEVs therapy since it seems that the miRNAs on their own have a therapeutic effect rather than the MSC-sEVs? Our answer is that it is necessary to develop the treatment of MSC-sEVs. Although current studies on the mechanism of MSC-sEVs have reported that miRNAs play a major role (151), miRNAs will eventually need a vector for gene therapy involving miRNAs (152). Loading of extracellular mature miRNA into recipient cells comes with a cost by at least impeding dynamic localization of miRNAs in nucleoli or inefficient miRNA delivery due to rapid recycling by exonucleases. All these works are calling for the design of new biomimetic vehicles. There have been some reports of genetic drugs/carrier, but they can be eaten up by the immune system and they’re not very stable, they have some immunogenicity (153). SEVs have a transport function and can increase the potency of miRNAs or drugs by modifying aptamer to specifically target tissues (67) and in vivo assessment of miRNA functionality when delivered by natural or biomimetic nanoparticles in order to control metabolic diseases. MSC-sEVs have great potential in cell-free therapy. This therapy is safer and easier to operate than cell therapy. It can circumvent potential tumorigenicity (154–156), untargeted tissue differentiation, undesired immune response in stem cell transplantation (157), low survival rate of transplanted cells (158), heterogeneity of clinical donors, in vitro expansion, cryopreservation methods, poor safety. Moreover, small-size EV preparations that are isolated using protocols including a filtration step through 0.22 µm membranes can be considered as sterile and do not require an additional sterilization step. These advantages make sEVs a safer and more effective alternative to traditional viral vectors (159), and sEVs can be designed as carriers for targeted delivery of molecular therapy (160). Because sEVs can transmit bioactive molecules between cells to affect the insulin sensitivity of target cells, using sEVs as therapeutic agents and carriers to enhance β-cell proliferation and repair also provides a new direction for the treatment of diabetes. With the development of targeted therapy technology, MSC-sEVs have shown great potential as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes and related complications (77). MSC-sEVs mediate a variety of signaling pathways in diabetes and its complications, transmit different messages between cells, and regulate pathological activities and physiological functions. Due to different physiological or pathological conditions, sEVs and their contents will undergo corresponding differential changes. If biomarkers are found in them, the detection of body fluid sEVs may become an effective early diagnosis and treatment method for diabetes and its complications. SEVs contain a variety of proteins and biological genetic materials, and sEVs can travel throughout the whole body and even penetrate the blood-brain barrier, so proteins and macromolecular genetic materials can be loaded in the sEVs. If the corresponding drugs are wrapped into the sEVs, and then targeted and absorbed by cells, they will become an effective means of precision treatment. MSC-sEVs will become an ideal solution for cell-free therapy in the field of regenerative medicine. Proteins and miRNAs that help tissue regeneration can be packaged into specially designed MSC-sEVs. The ligands expressed by these packaged MSC-sEVs help to attach to therapeutic targets. Theoretically, injection of these sEVs will allow the drug to be delivered directly to specific target cells. This therapy can be used in patients with diabetic nephropathy or central nervous system damage to stimulate cell regeneration. What’s more, it can also be used as a supportive treatment for islet transplant recipients, prolonging insulin independence and reducing patients’ dependence on immunosuppressive drugs. All the advantages for MSC-sEVs treatment by comparison to MSCs donor cells as showed in Table 2. But the long-term effectiveness and safety of this treatment must first be evaluated. Research on sEVs is still in its early stages. There is no comprehensive clinical trial using MSC-sEVs-based regenerative therapy. Research progress depends on a deeper understanding of sEVs formation and signal transduction mechanisms.
Table 2 The advantages for MSC-sEVs treatment by comparison to MSCs donor cells.
Challenges
Unfortunately, few experimental studies have compared the efficacy of MSCs and MSC-sEVs in diabetes and its chronic complications. MSC-sEVs therapy prevents abnormal renal function in HFD- and STZ-diabetic mice, similar to MSCs therapy (28). However, MSC-sEVs in HFD-diabetic mice conferred anti-inflammatory and renoprotective effects exceeding those of their parent MSCs (28). The combination of MSCs and MSC-sEVs was more effective to either one alone inhibit further immune response of transplanted islets, suggesting additive effects (109). Both strategies supported the notion that MSC-sEVs recapitulate the salutary effects of MSCs.
Although MSC-sEVs are a good natural carrier, uncertainty remains regarding sEVs fate, safety, isolation, characterization and long-term effects, which might impose important limitations on their path to clinical translation. In translational clinical studies, people have not yet reached a consensus on the dose of sEVs, the quantification of MSC-sEVs is essential to understanding the basic biological relationship between MSC-sEVs and its parent cells and the underlying interpretation of MSC-sEVs signals. Currently, researchers use several different methods to quantify the dose of sEVs, protein concentration and NTA, tunable resistance pulse sensing (TRPS) and flow cytometry, which make it difficult to compare studies with each other (161). Therefore, to help inter-study comparison, we need multiple quantifications using various quantification tools. Next, the route of administration still requires further clarification. Therefore, it is necessary to further research and establish a uniform administration procedure for sEVs.
The storability of MSC-sEVs is an important aspect, both for basic research and for clinical applications. Currently, there is no standardized procedure for the storage of MSC-sEVs. Whether MSC-sEVs is suitable for storage at 4°C, -80°C, -196°C or other temperatures is no standardized procedure (162). It’s still impractical to always use fresh MSC-sEVs preparations. In addition, storage vials can also affect the quality of MSC-sEVs, because MSC-sEVs may accidentally and irreversibly combine with certain materials (163). Due to the lack of data to address the impact of storage time and drugs on the stability and effectiveness of MSC-sEVs, it is necessary to develop a customized agreement for MSC-sEVs.
At present, there are still a series of problems, such as complicated sEVs extraction processes, low purity, expensive reagent supplies and so on (77). It is essential to expand the production of MSC-sEVs to meet the needs of clinical research (164, 165). A standardized sEVs detection platform should be established as soon as possible to accelerate the clinical transformation of large sEVs and big data, and provide a new direction for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Based on the complexity of the biological substances contained in sEVs, the specific mechanisms and signaling pathways of sEVs involved in diabetes coupling still need to be further explored. Therefore, it is necessary to further research and establish a uniform administration procedure for sEVs.
Conclusion and Future Perspective
With a more complete understanding of the mechanisms driving sEVs formation, sEVs could be engineered as vectors for the targeted delivery of molecular therapies injection of these sEVs would, in theory, allow for the discriminate delivery of medicine directly into specific target cells. It could also be of benefit as a supportive treatment for pancreatic islet transplant recipients, lengthening insulin independence and reducing the patients’ dependence on immunosuppressive medication. With great perspective, MSC-sEVs therapy brings a bright future for diabetes treatment. Besides, sEVs from MSCs as well as pre-treatment of MSC-sEVs can be regarded as a key breakthrough to improve therapeutic efficiency.
In conclusion, MSC-sEVs is a therapeutic option for diabetes and its chronic complications in the future. However, long term studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sEVs therapy to find new and novel strategies for the treatment of diabetes; and further studies in humans are necessary to investigate the results on animal models. In the future, one can hope that sEVs therapy can be used in reduce the blood glucose, restore insulin sensitivity along with other complications treatments and promises a new therapeutic approach in clinical applications. In addition, with rapid advances in bioengineering and cell modification technologies, the next step in the field of sEVs will be the engineering or modification of exosome surfaces and contents, which may be more specific, extending its application to more complex medical fields.
Author Contributions
L-QY: manuscript writing and approving final version of manuscript. F-X-ZL: study conduct, data analysis, and manuscript writing. XL, FX, S-KS, BG, L-ML, M-HZ, YW and Q-SX: data analysis. All authors: reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81770881 and 82070910). Key R &; D plan of Hunan Province (2020SK2078).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, Da, Rocha Fernandez ,JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence for 2017 and Projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2018) 138:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023
2. Saeedi Borujeni MJ, Esfandiary E, Taheripak G, Codoñer-Franch P, Alonso-Iglesias E, Mirzaei H. Molecular Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus: Resistin, microRNA, and Exosome. J Cell Biochem (2018) 119:1257–72. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26271
3. Yazdanpanah L, Nasiri M, Adarvishi S. Literature Review on the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. World J Diabetes (2015) 6:37–53. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.37
4. Wu T, Qiao S, Shi C, Wang S, Ji G. Metabolomics Window Into Diabetic Complications. J Diabetes Investig (2018) 9:244–55. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12723
5. Wang C, Zhang W, Wang Y, Wan H, Chen Y, Xia F, et al. Novel Associations Between Sex Hormones and Diabetic Vascular Complications in Men and Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol (2019) 18:97. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0901-6
6. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 Diabetes. Lancet (2014) 383:69–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7
7. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Dubose SN, Dimeglio LA, et al. Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Diabetes Care (2015) 38:971–8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0078
8. Lilly MA, Davis MF, Fabie JE, Terhune EB, Gallicano GI. Current Stem Cell Based Therapies in Diabetes. Am J Stem Cells (2016) 5:87–98.
9. Pokrywczynska M, Lanzoni G, Ricordi C. From Adult Pancreatic Islets to Stem Cells. Principles Regenerative Med (2019), 335–49. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809880-6.00021-7
10. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal Criteria for Defining Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement. Cytotherapy (2006) 8:315–7. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905
11. Ebrahim N, Ahmed IA, Hussien NI, Dessouky AA, Farid AS. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorated Diabetic Nephropathy by Autophagy Induction Through the mTOR Signaling Pathway. Cells (2018) 7:226. doi: 10.3390/cells7120226
12. Peng BY, Dubey NK, Mishra VK, Tsai FC, Dubey R, Deng WP. Addressing Stem Cell Therapeutic Approaches in Pathobiology of Diabetes and Its Complications. J Diabetes Res (2018) 2018:7806435. doi: 10.1155/2018/7806435
13. Labusca L, Herea DD, Mashayekhi K. Stem Cells as Delivery Vehicles for Regenerative Medicine-Challenges and Perspectives. World J Stem Cells (2018) 10:43–56. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v10.i5.43
14. Lei LM, Lin X, Xu F, Shan SK, Guo B, Li FX, et al. Exosomes and Obesity-Related Insulin Resistance. Front Cell Dev Biol (2021) 9:651996. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.651996
15. Squillaro T, Peluso G, Galderisi U. Clinical Trials With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Update. Cell Transplant (2016) 25:829–48. doi: 10.3727/096368915X689622
16. Cantaluppi V, Biancone L, Figliolini F, Beltramo S, Medica D, Deregibus MC, et al. Microvesicles Derived From Endothelial Progenitor Cells Enhance Neoangiogenesis of Human Pancreatic Islets. Cell Transplant (2012) 21:1305–20. doi: 10.3727/096368911X627534
17. Zhang S, Chuah SJ, Lai RC, Hui JHP, Lim SK, Toh WS. MSC Exosomes Mediate Cartilage Repair by Enhancing Proliferation, Attenuating Apoptosis and Modulating Immune Reactivity. Biomaterials (2018) 156:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.028
18. Jiang ZZ, Liu YM, Niu X, Yin JY, Hu B, Guo SC, et al. Exosomes Secreted by Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Could Prevent Kidney Complications From Type I Diabetes in Rats. Stem Cell Res Ther (2016) 7:24. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0287-2
19. Venkat P, Zacharek A, Landschoot-Ward J, Wang F, Culmone L, Chen Z, et al. Exosomes Derived From Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Harvested From Type Two Diabetes Rats Promotes Neurorestorative Effects After Stroke in Type Two Diabetes Rats. Exp Neurol (2020) 334:113456. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113456
20. Wang J, Mi Y, Wu S, You X, Huang Y, Zhu J, et al. Exosomes From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Protect Against High Glucose-Induced Erectile Dysfunction by Delivery of Corin in a Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rat Model. Regener Ther (2020) 14:227–33. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2020.03.002
21. Zhu LL, Huang X, Yu W, Chen H, Chen Y, Dai YT. Transplantation of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorates Erectile Function in Diabetic Rats. Andrologia (2018) 50. doi: 10.1111/and.12871
22. Huo W, Li Y, Zhang Y, Li H. Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomal microRNA-21-5p Downregulates PDCD4 and Ameliorates Erectile Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Diabetes Mellitus. FASEB J (2020) 34:13345–60. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000102RR
23. Mathew B, Ravindran S, Liu X, Torres L, Chennakesavalu M, Huang CC, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Retinal Ischemia-Reperfusion. Biomaterials (2019) 197:146–60. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.016
24. Safwat A, Sabry D, Ragiae A, Amer E, Mahmoud RH, Shamardan RM. Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes Attenuate Retina Degeneration of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in Rabbits. J Circ Biomark (2018) 7:1849454418807827. doi: 10.1177/1849454418807827
25. Zhang W, Wang Y, Kong Y. Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulate miR-126 to Ameliorate Hyperglycemia-Induced Retinal Inflammation Via Targeting Hmgb1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2019) 60:294–303. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25617
26. Wang Y, Ma WQ, Zhu Y, Han XQ, Liu N. Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Pretreated With Advanced Glycation End Product-Bovine Serum Albumin Inhibit Calcification of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2018) 9:524. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00524
27. Jin J, Shi Y, Gong J, Zhao L, Li Y, He Q. Exosome Secreted From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Attenuates Diabetic Nephropathy by Promoting Autophagy Flux and Inhibiting Apoptosis in Podocyte. Stem Cell Res Ther (2019) 10:95. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1177-1
28. Nagaishi K, Mizue Y, Chikenji T, Otani M, Nakano M, Konari N, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy Ameliorates Diabetic Nephropathy via the Paracrine Effect of Renal Trophic Factors Including Exosomes. Sci Rep (2016) 6:34842. doi: 10.1038/srep34842
29. Barutta F, Tricarico M, Corbelli A, Annaratone L, Pinach S, Grimaldi S, et al. Urinary Exosomal microRNAs in Incipient Diabetic Nephropathy. PloS One (2013) 8:e73798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073798
30. Duan YR, Chen BP, Chen F, Yang SX, Zhu CY, Ma YL, et al. Exosomal microRNA-16-5p From Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Ameliorates Diabetic Nephropathy Through Protection of Podocyte. J Cell Mol Med (2019) 25:10798–813. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14558
31. Jin J, Wang Y. Exosomal miRNA-215-5p Derived From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Attenuates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Podocytes by Inhibiting Zeb2. BioMed Res Int (2020) 2020:2685305. doi: 10.1155/2020/2685305
32. Xiang E, Han B, Zhang Q, Rao W, Wang Z, Chang C, et al. Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prevent the Progression of Early Diabetic Nephropathy Through Inhibiting Inflammation and Fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) 11:336. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01852-y
33. Liu W, Yu M, Xie D, Wang L, Ye C, Zhu Q, et al. Melatonin-Stimulated MSC-Derived Exosomes Improve Diabetic Wound Healing Through Regulating Macrophage M1 and M2 Polarization by Targeting the PTEN/AKT Pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) 11:259. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01756-x
34. Dalirfardouei R, Jamialahmadi K, Jafarian AH, Mahdipour E. Promising Effects of Exosomes Isolated From Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Wound-Healing Process in Diabetic Mouse Model. J Tissue Eng Regener Med (2019) 13:555–68. doi: 10.1002/term.2799
35. Shi Q, Qian Z, Liu D, Sun J, Wang X, Liu H, et al. GMSC-Derived Exosomes Combined With a Chitosan/Silk Hydrogel Sponge Accelerates Wound Healing in a Diabetic Rat Skin Defect Model. Front Physiol (2017) 8:904. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00904
36. Ti D, Hao H, Tong C, Liu J, Dong L, Zheng J, et al. LPS-Preconditioned Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Modify Macrophage Polarization for Resolution of Chronic Inflammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b. J Transl Med (2015) 13:308. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0642-6
37. Li X, Xie X, Lian W, Shi R, Han S, Zhang H, et al. Exosomes From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Overexpressing Nrf2 Accelerate Cutaneous Wound Healing by Promoting Vascularization in a Diabetic Foot Ulcer Rat Model. Exp Mol Med (2018) 50:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0058-5
38. Hu Y, Rao SS, Wang ZX, Cao J, Tan YJ, Luo J, et al. Exosomes From Human Umbilical Cord Blood Accelerate Cutaneous Wound Healing Through miR-21-3p-Mediated Promotion of Angiogenesis and Fibroblast Function. Theranostics (2018) 8:169–84. doi: 10.7150/thno.21234
39. Chen CY, Rao SS, Ren L, Hu XK, Tan YJ, Hu Y, et al. Exosomal DMBT1 From Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Facilitates Diabetic Wound Repair by Promoting Angiogenesis. Theranostics (2018) 8:1607–23. doi: 10.7150/thno.22958
40. Shi R, Jin Y, Hu W, Lian W, Cao C, Han S, et al. Exosomes Derived From Mmu_Circ_0000250-Modified Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice by Inducing miR-128-3p/SIRT1-Mediated Autophagy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2020) 318:C848–c856. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00041.2020
41. Shiekh PA, Singh A, Kumar A. Exosome Laden Oxygen Releasing Antioxidant and Antibacterial Cryogel Wound Dressing OxOBand Alleviate Diabetic and Infectious Wound Healing. Biomaterials (2020) 249:120020. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120020
42. Fan B, Li C, Szalad A, Wang L, Pan W, Zhang R, et al. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Peripheral Neuropathy in a Mouse Model of Diabetes. Diabetologia (2020) 63:431–43. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05043-0
43. Nakano M, Nagaishi K, Konari N, Saito Y, Chikenji T, Mizue Y, et al. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Diabetes-Induced Cognitive Impairment by Exosome Transfer Into Damaged Neurons and Astrocytes. Sci Rep (2016) 6:24805. doi: 10.1038/srep24805
44. Xin H, Li Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Shang X, Cui Y, et al. MiR-133b Promotes Neural Plasticity and Functional Recovery After Treatment of Stroke With Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Rats via Transfer of Exosome-Enriched Extracellular Particles. Stem Cells (2013) 31:2737–46. doi: 10.1002/stem.1409
45. Kubota K, Nakano M, Kobayashi E, Mizue Y, Chikenji T, Otani M, et al. An Enriched Environment Prevents Diabetes-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Rats by Enhancing Exosomal miR-146a Secretion From Endogenous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PloS One (2018) 13:e0204252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204252
46. Shaihov-Teper O, Ram E, Ballan N, Brzezinski RY, Naftali-Shani N, Masoud R, et al. Extracellular Vesicles From Epicardial Fat Facilitate Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation (2021) 143:2475–93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052009
47. Théry C, Witwer KW. Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A Position Statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and Update of the MISEV2014 Guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles (2018) 7:1535750. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750
48. Ahmadi M, Rezaie J. Tumor Cells Derived-Exosomes as Angiogenenic Agents: Possible Therapeutic Implications. J Transl Med (2020) 18:249. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02426-5
49. He C, Zheng S, Luo Y, Wang B. Exosome Theranostics: Biology and Translational Medicine. Theranostics (2018) 8:237–55. doi: 10.7150/thno.21945
50. Pegtel DM, Gould SJ. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem (2019) 88:487–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111902
51. Zhang D, Lee H, Wang X, Groot M, Sharma L, Dela Cruz CS, et al. A Potential Role of Microvesicle-Containing miR-223/142 in Lung Inflammation. Thorax (2019) 74:865–74. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212994
52. Spaull R, Mcpherson B, Gialeli A, Clayton A, Uney J, Heep A, et al. Exosomes Populate the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Preterm Infants With Post-Haemorrhagic Hydrocephalus. Int J Dev Neurosci (2019) 73:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.01.004
53. Nawaz M, Malik MI, Zhang H, Hassan IA, Cao J, Zhou Y, et al. Proteomic Analysis of Exosome-Like Vesicles Isolated From Saliva of the Tick Haemaphysalis Longicornis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2020) 10:542319. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.542319
54. Grossen P, Portmann M, Koller E, Duschmalé M, Minz T, Sewing S, et al. Evaluation of Bovine Milk Extracellular Vesicles for the Delivery of Locked Nucleic Acid Antisense Oligonucleotides. Eur J Pharm Biopharm (2021) 158:198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.11.012
55. Li FX, Liu JJ, Xu F, Lin X, Zhong JY, Wu F, et al. Role of Tumor-Derived Exosomes in Bone Metastasis. Oncol Lett (2019) 18:3935–45. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10776
56. Rezaie J, Aslan C, Ahmadi M, Zolbanin NM, Kashanchi F, Jafari R. The Versatile Role of Exosomes in Human Retroviral Infections: From Immunopathogenesis to Clinical Application. Cell Biosci (2021) 11:19. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00537-0
57. Shan SK, Lin X, Li F, Xu F, Zhong JY, Guo B, et al. Exosomes and Bone Disease. Curr Pharm Des (2019) 25:4536–49. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666191127114054
58. Wu F, Li F, Lin X, Xu F, Cui RR, Zhong JY, et al. Exosomes Increased Angiogenesis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Microenvironment. Endocr Relat Cancer (2019) 26:525–38. doi: 10.1530/ERC-19-0008
59. Li P, Kaslan M, Lee SH, Yao J, Gao Z. Progress in Exosome Isolation Techniques. Theranostics (2017) 7:789–804. doi: 10.7150/thno.18133
60. Nikfarjam S, Rezaie J, Zolbanin NM, Jafari R. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived-Exosomes: A Modern Approach in Translational Medicine. J Trans Med (2020) 18:449. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02622-3
61. Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular[interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol (2014) 30:255–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326
62. Rezaie J, Nejati V, Khaksar M, Oryan A, Aghamohamadzadeh N, Shariatzadeh MA, et al. Diabetic Sera Disrupted the Normal Exosome Signaling Pathway in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Vitro Cell Tissue Res (2018) 374:555–65. doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-2895-x
63. Lin X, Zhu T, Xu F, Zhong JY, Li F, Shan SK, et al. Plasma Exosomes Derived From Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Renal Transplant Recipients Have Different Effects on Vascular Calcification. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020) 8:618228. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.618228
64. Nikfarjam S, Rezaie J, Kashanchi F, Jafari R. Dexosomes as a Cell-Free Vaccine for Cancer Immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2020) 39:258. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01781-x
65. Arima Y, Liu W, Takahashi Y. Effects of Localization of Antigen Proteins in Antigen-Loaded Exosomes on Efficiency of Antigen Presentation. Mol Pharm (2019) 16:2309–14. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01093
66. Hardin H, Helein H, Meyer K, Robertson S, Zhang R, Zhong W, et al. Thyroid Cancer Stem-Like Cell Exosomes: Regulation of EMT via Transfer of lncRNAs. Lab Invest (2018) 98:1133–42. doi: 10.1038/s41374-018-0065-0
67. Luo ZW, Li FX, Liu YW, Rao SS, Yin H, Huang J, et al. Aptamer-Functionalized Exosomes From Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Target Bone to Promote Bone Regeneration. Nanoscale (2019) 11:20884–92. doi: 10.1039/C9NR02791B
68. Yu B, Zhang X, Li X. Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci (2014) 15:4142–57. doi: 10.3390/ijms15034142
69. Torre P, Flores AI. Current Status and Future Prospects of Perinatal Stem Cells. Genes (Basel) (2020) 12:6. doi: 10.3390/genes12010006
70. Phinney DG, Prockop DJ. Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem/Multipotent Stromal Cells: The State of Transdifferentiation and Modes of Tissue Repair–Current Views. Stem Cells (2007) 25:2896–902. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0637
71. Katsha AM, Ohkouchi S, Xin H, Kanehira M, Sun R, Nukiwa T, et al. Paracrine Factors of Multipotent Stromal Cells Ameliorate Lung Injury in an Elastase-Induced Emphysema Model. Mol Ther (2011) 19:196–203. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.192
72. Lai RC, Chen TS, Lim SK. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome: A Novel Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease. Regener Med (2011) 6:481–92. doi: 10.2217/rme.11.35
73. Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, et al. Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell (2019) 177:428–445.e418. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029
74. Yoo KH, Jang IK, Lee MW, Kim HE, Yang MS, Eom Y, et al. Comparison of Immunomodulatory Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Adult Human Tissues. Cell Immunol (2009) 259:150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.06.010
75. Yeo RW, Lai RC, Zhang B, Tan SS, Yin Y, Teh BJ, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell: An Efficient Mass Producer of Exosomes for Drug Delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2013) 65:336–41. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001
76. Altaner C, Altanerova U. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome-Mediated Prodrug Gene Therapy for Cancer. Methods Mol Biol (2019) 1895:75–85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8922-5_6
77. Castaño C, Novials A. Exosomes and Diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2019) 35:e3107. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3107
78. Zheng M, Huang M, Ma X, Chen H, Gao X. Harnessing Exosomes for the Development of Brain Drug Delivery Systems. Bioconjug Chem (2019) 30:994–1005. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00085
79. Munoz JL, Bliss SA, Greco SJ, Ramkissoon SH, Ligon KL, Rameshwar P. Delivery of Functional Anti-miR-9 by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes to Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells Conferred Chemosensitivity. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2013) 2:e126. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2013.60
80. Yu B, Gong M, Wang Y, Millard RW, Pasha Z, Yang Y, et al. Cardiomyocyte Protection by GATA-4 Gene Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Is Partially Mediated by Translocation of miR-221 in Microvesicles. PLoS One (2013) 8:e73304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073304
81. Furlani D, Ugurlucan M, Ong L, Bieback K, Pittermann E, Westien I, et al. Is the Intravascular Administration of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Safe? Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Intravital Microscopy. Microvasc Res (2009) 77:370–6. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2009.02.001
82. Lou G, Chen Z, Zheng M, Liu Y. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as a New Therapeutic Strategy for Liver Diseases. Exp Mol Med (2017) 49:e346. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.63
83. Guay C, Regazzi R. Exosomes as New Players in Metabolic Organ Cross-Talk. Diabetes Obes Metab (2017) 19(Suppl 1):137–46. doi: 10.1111/dom.13027
84. Lin X, Li F, Xu F, Cui RR, Xiong D, Zhong JY, et al. Aberration Methylation of miR-34b was Involved in Regulating Vascular Calcification by Targeting Notch1. Aging (Albany NY) (2019) 11:3182–97. doi: 10.18632/aging.101973
85. Montecalvo A, Larregina AT, Shufesky WJ, Stolz DB, Sullivan ML, Karlsson JM, et al. Mechanism of Transfer of Functional microRNAs Between Mouse Dendritic Cells via Exosomes. Blood (2012) 119:756–66. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338004
86. Garcia-Contreras M, Brooks RW, Boccuzzi L, Robbins PD, Ricordi C. Exosomes as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Tools for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2017) 21:2940–56.
87. Cianciaruso C, Phelps EA, Pasquier M, Hamelin R, Demurtas D, Alibashe Ahmed M, et al. Primary Human and Rat β-Cells Release the Intracellular Autoantigens GAD65, IA-2, and Proinsulin in Exosomes Together With Cytokine-Induced Enhancers of Immunity. Diabetes (2017) 66:460–73. doi: 10.2337/db16-0671
88. La Marca V, Fierabracci A. Insights Into the Diagnostic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles and Their miRNA Signature From Liquid Biopsy as Early Biomarkers of Diabetic Micro/Macrovascular Complications. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18:1974. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091974
89. Salem MA, Adly AA, Ismail EA, Darwish YW, Kamel HA. Platelets Microparticles as a Link Between Micro- and Macro-Angiopathy in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. Platelets (2015) 26:682–8. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2015.1018880
90. Katayama M, Wiklander OPB, Fritz T, Caidahl K, El-Andaloussi S, Zierath JR. Circulating Exosomal miR-20b-5p Is Elevated in Type 2 Diabetes and Could Impair Insulin Action in Human Skeletal Muscle. Diabetes (2019) 3:515–26. doi: 10.2337/db18-0470
91. Feng B, Chakrabarti S. miR-320 Regulates Glucose-Induced Gene Expression in Diabetes. ISRN Endocrinol (2012) 2012:549875. doi: 10.5402/2012/549875
92. De S, Kuwahara S, Hosojima M, Ishikawa T, Kaseda R, Sarkar P, et al. Exocytosis-Mediated Urinary Full-Length Megalin Excretion Is Linked With the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes (2017) 66:1391–404. doi: 10.2337/db16-1031
93. Rossi L, Nicoletti MC, Carmosino M. Urinary Excretion of Kidney Aquaporins as Possible Diagnostic Biomarker of Diabetic Nephropathy. J Diabetes Res (2017) 2017:4360357. doi: 10.1155/2017/4360357
94. Sabry D, Marzouk S, Zakaria R, Ibrahim HA, Samir M. The Effect of Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Rats. Biotechnol Lett (2020) 42:1597–610. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-02908-y
95. Mahdipour E, Salmasi Z, Sabeti N. Potential of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes to Regenerate β Islets Through Pdx-1 Dependent Mechanism in a Rat Model of Type 1 Diabetes. J Cell Physiol (2019) 234:20310–21. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28631
96. Chen J, Chen J, Cheng Y, Fu Y, Zhao H, Tang M, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Protect Beta Cells Against Hypoxia-Induced Apoptosis via miR-21 by Alleviating ER Stress and Inhibiting P38 MAPK Phosphorylation. Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) 11:97. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01610-0
97. Keshtkar S, Kaviani M, Sarvestani FS, Ghahremani MH, Aghdaei MH, Al-Abdullah IH, et al. Exosomes Derived From Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Preserve Mouse Islet Survival and Insulin Secretion Function. Excli J (2020) 19:1064–80. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-2451
98. Kordelas L, Rebmann V, Ludwig AK, Radtke S, Ruesing J, Doeppner TR, et al. MSC-Derived Exosomes: A Novel Tool to Treat Therapy-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Leukemia (2014) 28:970–3. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.41
99. Lee YH, Kim J, Park K, Lee MS. β-Cell Autophagy: Mechanism and Role in β-Cell Dysfunction. Mol Metab (2019) 27s:S92–s103. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.06.014
100. He Q, Wang L, Zhao R, Yan F, Sha S, Cui C, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Exert Ameliorative Effects in Type 2 Diabetes by Improving Hepatic Glucose and Lipid Metabolism via Enhancing Autophagy. Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) 11:223. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01731-6
101. Sun Y, Shi H, Yin S, Ji C, Zhang X, Zhang B, et al. Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Exosomes Alleviate Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Reversing Peripheral Insulin Resistance and Relieving β-Cell Destruction. ACS Nano (2018) 12:7613–28. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07643
102. Su T, Xiao Y, Xiao Y, Guo Q, Li C, Huang Y, et al. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomal MiR-29b-3p Regulates Aging-Associated Insulin Resistance. ACS Nano (2019) 13:2450–62. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09375
103. Kawano Y, Nakae J, Watanabe N, Kikuchi T, Tateya S, Tamori Y, et al. Colonic Pro-Inflammatory Macrophages Cause Insulin Resistance in an Intestinal Ccl2/Ccr2-Dependent Manner. Cell Metab (2016) 24:295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.07.009
104. Zaccardi F, Webb DR, Yates T, Davies MJ. Pathophysiology of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 90-Year Perspective. Postgrad Med J (2016) 92:63–9. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133281
105. Xie Z, Hao H, Tong C, Cheng Y, Liu J, Pang Y, et al. Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Elicit Macrophages Into an Anti-Inflammatory Phenotype to Alleviate Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Stem Cells (2016) 34:627–39. doi: 10.1002/stem.2238
106. Esser N, Legrand-Poels S, Piette J, Scheen AJ, Paquot N. Inflammation as a Link Between Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2014) 105:141–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.006
107. Zhao H, Shang Q, Pan Z, Bai Y, Li Z, Zhang H, et al. Exosomes From Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Attenuate Adipose Inflammation and Obesity Through Polarizing M2 Macrophages and Beiging in White Adipose Tissue. Diabetes (2018) 67:235–47. doi: 10.2337/db17-0356
108. Silva DG, Petrovsky N, Socha L, Slattery R, Gatenby P, Charlton B. Mechanisms of Accelerated Immune-Mediated Diabetes Resulting From Islet Beta Cell Expression of a Fas Ligand Transgene. J Immunol (2003) 170:4996–5002. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.10.4996
109. Wen D, Peng Y, Liu D, Weizmann Y, Mahato RI. Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Derived Exosome as Small RNA Carrier and Immunomodulator to Improve Islet Transplantation. J Control Release (2016) 238:166–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.044
110. Kim SS, Kim JH, Kim IJ. Current Challenges in Diabetic Nephropathy: Early Diagnosis and Ways to Improve Outcomes. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) (2016) 31:245–53. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.2.245
111. Abcouwer SF, Gardner TW. Diabetic Retinopathy: Loss of Neuroretinal Adaptation to the Diabetic Metabolic Environment. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2014) 1311:174–90. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12412
112. Fiori A, Terlizzi V, Kremer H, Gebauer J, Hammes HP, Harmsen MC, et al. Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells as Potential Therapy in Diabetic Retinopathy. Immunobiology (2018) 223:729–43. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2018.01.001
113. Harvey HB, Wu CC, Gilman MD, Vartanians V, Halpern EF, Pandharipande PV, et al. Correlation of the Strength of Recommendations for Additional Imaging to Adherence Rate and Diagnostic Yield. J Am Coll Radiol (2015) 12:1016–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.038
114. Khaksar M, Sayyari M, Rezaie J, Pouyafar A, Montazersaheb S, Rahbarghazi R. High Glucose Condition Limited the Angiogenic/Cardiogenic Capacity of Murine Cardiac Progenitor Cells in In Vitro and In Vivo Milieu. Cell Biochem Funct (2018) 36:346–56. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3354
115. Liao XB, Zhang ZY, Yuan K, Liu Y, Feng X, Cui RR, et al. MiR-133a Modulates Osteogenic Differentiation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Endocrinology (2013) 154:3344–52. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2236
116. Peng YQ, Xiong D, Lin X, Cui RR, Xu F, Zhong JY, et al. Oestrogen Inhibits Arterial Calcification by Promoting Autophagy. Sci Rep (2017) 7:3549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03801-x
117. Lin X, Xu F, Cui RR, Xiong D, Zhong JY, Zhu T, et al. Arterial Calcification Is Regulated Via an miR-204/DNMT3a Regulatory Circuit Both In Vitro and in Female Mice. Endocrinology (2018) 159:2905–16. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00320
118. Xu F, Zhong JY, Lin X, Shan SK, Guo B, Zheng MH, et al. Melatonin Alleviates Vascular Calcification and Ageing Through Exosomal miR-204/miR-211 Cluster in a Paracrine Manner. J Pineal Res (2020) 68:e12631. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12631
119. Bodiga VL, Eda SR, Bodiga S. Advanced Glycation End Products: Role in Pathology of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail Rev (2014) 19:49–63. doi: 10.1007/s10741-013-9374-y
120. Devi TS, Lee I, Hüttemann M, Kumar A, Nantwi KD, Singh LP. TXNIP Links Innate Host Defense Mechanisms to Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Retinal Muller Glia Under Chronic Hyperglycemia: Implications for Diabetic Retinopathy. Exp Diabetes Res (2012) 2012:438238. doi: 10.1155/2012/438238
121. Newton WC, Kim JW, Luo JZQ, Luo L. Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Novel Vector for Tissue Repair and Diabetic Therapy. J Mol Endocrinol (2017) 59:R155–r165. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0080
122. Wrighten SA, Piroli GG, Grillo CA, Reagan LP. A Look Inside the Diabetic Brain: Contributors to Diabetes-Induced Brain Aging. Biochim Biophys Acta (2009) 1792:444–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.10.013
123. Cui C, Ye X, Chopp M, Venkat P, Zacharek A, Yan T, et al. miR-145 Regulates Diabetes-Bone Marrow Stromal Cell-Induced Neurorestorative Effects in Diabetes Stroke Rats. Stem Cells Transl Med (2016) 5:1656–67. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0349
124. Brownlee M. Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology of Diabetic Complications. Nature (2001) 414:813–20. doi: 10.1038/414813a
125. Said G. Diabetic Neuropathy–A Review. Nat Clin Pract Neurol (2007) 3:331–40. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0504
126. Thorve VS, Kshirsagar AD, Vyawahare NS, Joshi VS, Ingale KG, Mohite RJ. Diabetes-Induced Erectile Dysfunction: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management. J Diabetes Complications (2011) 25:129–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2010.03.003
127. Fandel TM, Albersen M, Lin G, Qiu X, Ning H, Banie L, et al. Recruitment of Intracavernously Injected Adipose-Derived Stem Cells to the Major Pelvic Ganglion Improves Erectile Function in a Rat Model of Cavernous Nerve Injury. Eur Urol (2012) 61:201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.061
128. Matz EL, Terlecki R, Zhang Y, Jackson J, Atala A. Stem Cell Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev (2019) 7:321–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.12.008
129. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The Global Burden of Diabetic Foot Disease. Lancet (2005) 366:1719–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67698-2
130. Geiger A, Walker A, Nissen E. Human Fibrocyte-Derived Exosomes Accelerate Wound Healing in Genetically Diabetic Mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2015) 467:303–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.166
131. Zhou Q, Gallagher R, Ufret-Vincenty R, Li X, Olson EN, Wang S. Regulation of Angiogenesis and Choroidal Neovascularization by Members of microRNA-23~27~24 Clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2011) 108:8287–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105254108
132. Madhyastha R, Madhyastha H, Pengjam Y, Nakajima Y, Omura S, Maruyama M. NFkappaB Activation Is Essential for miR-21 Induction by Tgfβ1 in High Glucose Conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2014) 451:615–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.035
133. Zhang N, Geng T, Wang Z, Zhang R, Cao T, Camporez JP, et al. Elevated Hepatic Expression of H19 Long Noncoding RNA Contributes to Diabetic Hyperglycemia. JCI Insight (2018) 3:e120304. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.120304
134. Chen JJ, Zhou SH. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Overexpressing MiR-126 Enhance Ischemic Angiogenesis via the AKT/ERK-Related Pathway. Cardiol J (2011) 18:675–81. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2011.0032
135. Hu J, Zeng L, Huang J, Wang G, Lu H. miR-126 Promotes Angiogenesis and Attenuates Inflammation After Contusion Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. Brain Res (2015) 1608:191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.036
136. Amin KN, Umapathy D, Anandharaj A, Ravichandran J, Sasikumar CS, Chandra SKR, et al. miR-23c Regulates Wound Healing by Targeting Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1α (SDF-1α/CXCL12) Among Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Microvasc Res (2020) 127:103924. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103924
137. An T, Chen Y. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Application and Challenges. Stem Cell Rev Rep (2020) 17:369–78. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10014-9
138. Wang C, Wang M, Xu T, Zhang X, Lin C, Gao W, et al. Engineering Bioactive Self-Healing Antibacterial Exosomes Hydrogel for Promoting Chronic Diabetic Wound Healing and Complete Skin Regeneration. Theranostics (2019) 9:65–76. doi: 10.7150/thno.29766
139. Guo SC, Tao SC, Yin WJ, Qi X, Yuan T, Zhang CQ. Exosomes Derived From Platelet-Rich Plasma Promote the Re-Epithelization of Chronic Cutaneous Wounds via Activation of YAP in a Diabetic Rat Model. Theranostics (2017) 7:81–96. doi: 10.7150/thno.16803
140. Kranendonk ME, Visseren FL, Van Balkom BW, Nolte-'T Hoen EN, Van Herwaarden JA, De Jager W, et al. Human Adipocyte Extracellular Vesicles in Reciprocal Signaling Between Adipocytes and Macrophages. Obes (Silver Spring) (2014) 22:1296–308. doi: 10.1002/oby.20679
141. Zhang Y, Mei H, Chang X, Chen F, Zhu Y, Han X. Adipocyte-Derived Microvesicles From Obese Mice Induce M1 Macrophage Phenotype Through Secreted miR-155. J Mol Cell Biol (2016) 8:505–17. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjw040
142. Kang T, Jones TM, Naddell C, Bacanamwo M, Calvert JW, Thompson WE, et al. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Induce Angiogenesis via Microvesicle Transport of miRNA-31. Stem Cells Transl Med (2016) 5:440–50. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0177
143. Liang X, Zhang L, Wang S, Han Q, Zhao RC. Exosomes Secreted by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Endothelial Cell Angiogenesis by Transferring miR-125a. J Cell Sci (2016) 129:2182–9. doi: 10.1242/jcs.170373
144. Hu L, Wang J, Zhou X, Xiong Z, Zhao J, Yu R, et al. Exosomes Derived From Human Adipose Mensenchymal Stem Cells Accelerates Cutaneous Wound Healing via Optimizing the Characteristics of Fibroblasts. Sci Rep (2016) 6:32993. doi: 10.1038/srep32993
145. Blazquez R, Sanchez-Margallo FM, de la Rosa O, Dalemans W, Alvarez V, Tarazona R, et al. Immunomodulatory Potential of Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived Exosomes on In Vitro Stimulated T Cells. Front Immunol (2014) 5:556. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00556
146. Wang L, Hu L, Zhou X, Xiong Z, Zhang C, Shehada HMA, et al. Exosomes Secreted by Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Scarless Cutaneous Repair by Regulating Extracellular Matrix Remodelling. Sci Rep (2017) 7:13321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12919-x
147. Bagno L, Hatzistergos KE, Balkan W, Hare JM. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: Progress and Challenges. Mol Ther (2018) 7:1610–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.009
148. Basu J, Ludlow JW. Exosomes for Repair, Regeneration and Rejuvenation. Expert Opin Biol Ther (2016) 16:489–506. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1131976
149. Nassar W, El-Ansary M, Sabry D, Mostafa MA, Fayad T, Kotb E, et al. Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived Extracellular Vesicles Can Safely Ameliorate the Progression of Chronic Kidney Diseases. Biomater Res (2016) 20:21. doi: 10.1186/s40824-016-0068-0
150. Wang X, Gu H, Huang W, Peng J, Li Y, Yang L, et al. Hsp20-Mediated Activation of Exosome Biogenesis in Cardiomyocytes Improves Cardiac Function and Angiogenesis in Diabetic Mice. Diabetes (2016) 65:3111–28. doi: 10.2337/db15-1563
151. Tomasoni S, Longaretti L, Rota C, Morigi M, Conti S, Gotti E, et al. Transfer of Growth Factor Receptor mRNA via Exosomes Unravels the Regenerative Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev (2013) 22:772–80. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0266
152. Xie J, Ameres SL, Friedline R, Hung JH, Zhang Y, Xie Q, et al. Long-Term, Efficient Inhibition of microRNA Function in Mice Using rAAV Vectors. Nat Methods (2012) 9:403–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1903
153. Beuzelin D, Kaeffer B. Exosomes and miRNA-Loaded Biomimetic Nanovehicles, a Focus on Their Potentials Preventing Type-2 Diabetes Linked to Metabolic Syndrome. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2711. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02711
154. Prockop DJ, Brenner M, Fibbe WE, Horwitz E, Le Blanc K, Phinney DG, et al. Defining the Risks of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy. Cytotherapy (2010) 12:576–8. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.507330
155. Klopp AH, Gupta A, Spaeth E, Andreeff M, Marini F 3rd. Concise Review: Dissecting a Discrepancy in the Literature: Do Mesenchymal Stem Cells Support or Suppress Tumor Growth? Stem Cells (2011) 29:11–9. doi: 10.1002/stem.559
156. Pham PV. Concise Review: Extracellular Vesicles From Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Cellular Therapy. Biomed Res Ther (2017) 4. doi: 10.15419/bmrat.v4i08.287
157. Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Immune Evasive, Not Immune Privileged. Nat Biotechnol (2014) 32:252–60. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2816
158. Wu Y, Huang S, Enhe J, Ma K, Yang S, Sun T, et al. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Attenuates Skin Fibrosis Development in Mice. Int Wound J (2014) 11:701–10. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12034
159. Lee Y, El Andaloussi S, Wood MJ. Exosomes and Microvesicles: Extracellular Vesicles for Genetic Information Transfer and Gene Therapy. Hum Mol Genet (2012) 21:R125–134. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds317
160. Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the Mouse Brain by Systemic Injection of Targeted Exosomes. Nat Biotechnol (2011) 29:341–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1807
161. Koritzinsky EH, Street JM, Star RA, Yuen PS. Quantification of Exosomes. J Cell Physiol (2017) 232:1587–90. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25387
162. Lőrincz M, Timár CI, Marosvári KA, Veres DS, Otrokocsi L, Kittel, et al. Effect of Storage on Physical and Functional Properties of Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Neutrophilic Granulocytes. J Extracell Vesicles (2014) 3:25465. doi: 10.3402/jev.v3.25465
163. Lener T, Gimona M, Aigner L, Börger V, Buzas E, Camussi G, et al. Applying Extracellular Vesicles Based Therapeutics in Clinical Trials - an ISEV Position Paper. J Extracell Vesicles (2015) 4:30087. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.30087
164. Watson DC, Bayik D, Srivatsan A, Bergamaschi C, Valentin A, Niu G, et al. Efficient Production and Enhanced Tumor Delivery of Engineered Extracellular Vesicles. Biomaterials (2016) 105:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.003
Keywords: diabetic complication, extracellular vesicles, insulin resistance, mesenchymal stromal cells, microRNAs
Citation: Li F-X-Z, Lin X, Xu F, Shan S-K, Guo B, Lei L-M, Zheng M-H, Wang Y, Xu Q-S and Yuan L-Q (2021) The Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Diabetes and Its Chronic Complications. Front. Endocrinol. 12:780974. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.780974
Received: 22 September 2021; Accepted: 29 November 2021;
Published: 20 December 2021.
Edited by:
Jean-François Tanti, U1065 Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire (INSERM), FranceReviewed by:
Babak Arjmand, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, IranSoazig Le Lay, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France
Copyright © 2021 Li, Lin, Xu, Shan, Guo, Lei, Zheng, Wang, Xu and Yuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ling-Qing Yuan, YWxsZW55bHFAY3N1LmVkdS5jbg==