Marilda Mormando1
Giulia Puliani1,2
Agnese Barnabei1
Rosa Lauretta1
Marta Bianchini1Alfonsina Chiefari1Michelangelo Russillo3Francesco Cognetti3Luisa Romano4
Marialuisa Appetecchia1*- 1Oncological Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- 2Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- 3Division of Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- 4Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
Introduction: Pituitary metastases (PM) are rare events and to date only very few cases of melanoma PM have been described in literature up to now.
Case Presentation: We describe the clinical history of a 33-year-old male patient who underwent surgical excision of an inter-scapular melanoma in 2008. The subsequent follow-up was negative for ~10 years. In September 2018, due to the onset of a severe headache, the patient underwent a brain magnetic resonance imaging, which showed an expansive mass in the saddle and suprasellar region with a maximum diameter of 17 mm. Pituitary function tests and visual field were normal. Worsening of the headache and the appearance of a left eye ptosis led the patient to surgical removal of the lesion in October 2018. The histological examination unexpectedly showed metastasis of the melanoma. Post-operative hormonal assessment showed secondary hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism, which were both promptly treated, and a mild hypogonadism. Three months after surgery, a sellar MRI showed a persistent, increased pituitary mass (3 cm of diameter); fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) detected an increased radiopharmaceutical uptake in the sellar region. Due to the persistence of the disease and the evidence of a BRAF V600E mutation, in February 2019, the patient underwent a combined treatment with dabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulate kinase inhibitor). Sellar MRI performed 6 months later showed no evidence of mass in the sellar region. The patient was in a good clinical condition and did not complain of headaches or other symptoms; there were no significant side-effects from the anticancer therapy. After 13 months of treatment, the patient showed no recurrence of the disease on morphological imaging. Anticancer therapy was confirmed, replacement therapies with hydrocortisone and levothyroxine continued and the pituitary-gonadal axis was restored.
Conclusion: This is a very interesting case, both for the rarity of the pituitary melanoma metastasis and for the singular therapeutic course carried out by the patient. This is the first case of a pituitary melanoma metastasis with BRAF mutation, successfully treated with the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib after incomplete surgical removal.
Introduction
Pituitary metastases (PM) are a rare event; lung cancer is the most common cause among men (46%) while breast cancer accounts for half of the cases in women (1, 2), followed by renal, prostate and colon cancer (3–5% respectively), however, any type of tumor can metastasize in the pituitary region, including solid tumors and hematological malignancies (3). In the surgical series, PM represents <1% of patients undergoing transsphenoidal sellar mass surgery (1, 4). Melanoma metastases in the pituitary gland are extremely rare, with only a few reported cases. In 1857 L. Benjamin described, for the first time, a case of metastasis in the pituitary gland found during the autopsy of a patient with disseminated melanoma. Since then, only ten similar cases have been reported in the literature (5).
Case Report
We report the case of a 33-year-old Caucasian man with a pituitary mass and a previous history of melanoma. In January 2008 the patient underwent surgical removal of a pigmented skin lesion of the interscapular region at our Institute. Histological examination showed a melanoma (IV Clark level, Breslow thickness 1.5 mm). In February 2008, the patient underwent an enlargement of the surgical wound and removal of bilateral sentinel lymph nodes, which were free from neoplastic infiltrations.
Thereafter the patient underwent clinical examination every 6 months for the first 5 years, and every 12 months after the first 5 years, without evidence of disease recurrence or new cutaneous lesions.
Ultrasound of the lymph node stations and of the peritumoral scar area were performed every 6 months and the abdominal ultrasound every 12 months in the following 10 years.
In August 2018, the patient presented with several severe headaches, not sensitive to common analgesic drugs. In September 2018 he performed a contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which documented an expansive lesion in the left and suprasellar region, with a maximum diameter of 17 mm, hyperintense in T2-weighted sequences with an inhomogeneous contrast distribution due to the presence of internal colliquative areas (Figure 1). The left side of the mass was in contact with the optic chiasm. The initial radiological diagnosis was of pituitary macroadenoma. No visual field alterations were detected, and the pituitary hormone function tests were within the normal range. The patient was therefore candidate for elective surgery; however, after a few days he complained of a worsening of the headache and the appearance of a ptosis of the left eye. Brain computed tomography (CT) which was performed urgently 2 weeks after the MRI, documented two hyperdense areas, referred to as intralesional hemorrhages, in the pituitary mass.
Figure 1. T2-weighted basal sagittal pituitary MRI performed at diagnosis. The red arrow indicates the sellar mass.
In October 2018, the patient underwent surgical removal of the lesion using a trans-sphenoidal endoscopic approach. Post-operative hormonal tests performed few days later showed mild hypothyroidism and secondary hypoadrenalism for which hydrocortisone (20 mg daily) and levothyroxine (75 μg daily) oral therapy were promptly initiated, and a mild hypogonadism.
At histology, metastasis of the melanoma (maximum diameter 26 mm) was unexpectedly found. Neoplasm expressed vimentin, S100, MITF, HMB45, and melan-A; the specimen showed areas of necrosis, mitosis and focal brownish pigment.
Due to a persistent headache, a sellar MRI was performed 3 months after surgery (January 2019), Imaging showed a persistent pituitary mass, characterized by increased size (maximum diameter of 3 cm), hypointense in T1-weighted and inhomogeneous in T2-weighted sequences, with a necrotic component (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Imaging performed 3 months after surgery. (A,B) Pituitary MRI, T2-weighted basal sagittal and coronal sequences. (C,D) Pituitary MRI, T1- weighted post-gadolinium sagittal and coronal sequences. (E) Whole body fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) showing pathological uptake in sellar region. Red arrows indicate the sellar lesion.
In January 2019, a fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) was performed for restaging. An increased radiopharmaceutical uptake, associated with a necrotic area in the context, was documented in the sellar region. No other areas of increased uptake were identified (Figure 2).
Given the histological diagnosis and in order to decide the subsequent treatment, analysis of the BRAF gene mutation was carried out on the surgical specimen. After evidence of the BRAF V600E mutation and the persistence of disease, a schedule of a combined treatment was started in February 2019 with dabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor, [BRAFi]) and trametinib (a mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, [MEK inhibitor]).
After 6 months of therapy, a pituitary MRI showed complete remission (CR) of the disease with no evidence of the mass in the sellar region (Figure 3). During therapy, the patient did not complain of headaches or other symptoms. He had no significant side-effects from the anti-cancer therapy. The pituitary-gonadal axis was restored while the recovery of pituitary-thyroid and pituitary-adrenal axes did not occur. FT4 levels were in normal range on levothyroxine therapy and morning ACTH and cortisol plasmatic levels were below the range after 24 h from last hydrocortisone administration. At the last follow-up visit, 13 months after the start of antineoplastic therapy, no evidence of persistence/recurrence of the disease was found at whole-body computerized axial tomography. Replacement therapy with hydrocortisone and levothyroxine was confirmed and antineoplastic therapy was continued.
Figure 3. Pituitary MRI performed after combined therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib, showing the complete remission of the pituitary mass. (A,B) T2-weighted basal sagittal and coronal sequences. (C,D) T1- weighted post-gadolinium sagittal and coronal sequences MRI.
Discussion
Melanoma accounts for ~1% of all skin cancers; nevertheless, it is responsible for most skin cancer-related deaths. The worldwide incidence of melanoma has increased rapidly over the past 50 years (6). Its incidence is higher among fair-skinned populations and in low-latitude regions. Europe, North America, and Oceania are the most affected; about 85% of the world's annual cutaneous melanomas occur in populations from these regions. The incidence is higher among geriatric populations, reaching a peak at the seventh and eighth decades of life (7). This trend is found among most high-risk populations, including people in Australia, New Zealand and northern Europe (6). The incidence in the USA, however, peaks at the sixth decade of life. Although melanoma incidence is lower among people under the age of 40 years, melanoma is one of the most common cancer among teenagers and young adults. Overall, men are more susceptible to melanoma. This difference in incidence by sex is exemplified in the USA with an annual incidence of 29.2:100,000 cases in men compared with 17.3:100,000 cases in women (8, 9).
Although melanoma incidence has increased significantly over time, the 5-years survival rate has also increased. Survival rates largely depend on the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis; the 5-year survival rate ranged from about 98% for localized disease to only about 23% for metastatic disease with previous traditional chemotherapy regimens (10). In early-stage cutaneous melanoma, although two-thirds of the relapses occurred within the first 2 years of diagnosis and nearly half of the first recurrences were locoregional metastasis, distant metastases can occur in the following 10 years from diagnosis. Furthermore, distant metastases alone and particularly brain metastases, although uncommon, are more frequent in men than women (11). Pituitary involvement is rare. To date, 10 cases of pituitary melanoma metastasis are described in literature, but only five of these are described in detail and have been confirmed by a histological examination (12–15). Table 1 summarizes the clinical features, onset symptoms, MRI, treatment, and outcomes of all patients with melanoma pituitary metastasis reported in literature to date. Cases of primary melanoma of the sellar region (16) and metastasis on preexisting pituitary mass (adenoma or oncocytoma) (17, 18) have been excluded from our analysis.
Three different metastatic modalities can be hypothesized for the metastatic spread of melanoma in the pituitary: (1) melanoma cells metastasize in the posterior pituitary through the inferior pituitary artery and therefore invade the anterior pituitary; (2) melanoma cells cross the blood-brain barrier of the adenohypophysis and invade the pituitary; and (3) melanoma cells spread through lymphatic microvessels and settle in the pituitary gland (14, 19).
Diabetes insipidus is present in about 50% of patients with PMs of all sites, in 25–45% of cases an anterior pituitary functional deficiency was reported, visual damage in 30%, ophthalmoplegia in 25%, and headache/retroorbital pain in 20% of cases was reported (3, 20, 21). In pituitary melanoma metastases, the clinical presentation is the same as that observed in the case of PMs due to other neoplasms: the onset symptoms are diabetes insipidus, headache, visual problems while pituitary dysfunctions include hypothyroidism, hypocortisolism, and hypogonadism (Table 1).
Pituitary MRI in all PMs usually reveals a non-homogeneous invasive sellar mass and loss of posterior bright spot. Sometimes it is difficult to differentiate PMs radiologically from adenomas or other sellar lesions; the presence of sellar bone erosion without sellar enlargement may suggest diagnosis of PM (3). At MRI, melanoma metastasis, due to melanin storage, appears with a typical hyperintensity on basal T1-weighted sequences and hypointensity on basal T2-weightedsequences; in our case pituitary imaging was in conflict: the mass was hyperintense in T2 sequences, suggesting pituitary adenoma, but the heterogeneity due to the intralesional bleeding suggested a PM.
All patients with PMs at all sites have an unfavorable prognosis, and usually most of them die within 12 months after diagnosis, more often owing to the progression of the primary malignancy (20). In recent years, a series of patients with PM showed an improved prognosis with a an extended median survival, probably due to the use of a multimodal treatment approach, including pituitary surgery, sellar radiotherapy, hormonal replacement and chemotherapy (22). The few cases, in literature, describing melanoma PM had an unsatisfactory prognosis or short disease-free survival (12–14). In our case, however, we observed a disease-free survival of 13 months thanks to the combined treatment with dabrafenib-trametinib and an overall survival (OS) of 17 months.
Monoclonal antibodies that block programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, are the first therapeutic option in advanced/metastatic melanoma (23, 24). These drugs could cause swelling and inflammatory reaction in the tumor area potentially leading to compressive symptoms and pituitary deficiencies. Furthermore, the PD-1 inhibitors could cause hypophysitis (much more rarely than monoclonal antibody against the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4] as ipilimumab) with a maximum incidence of 1.2% for pembrolizumab and 0.9% for nivolumab (25, 26). The compressive effect due to the mass swelling and the possible pituitary deficiencies could be managed, respectively, by high dose corticosteroids and hormonal replacement therapies.
Considering that 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma have mutations in BRAF, located in BRAF exon 15 at V600 in 95% of cases (27), an additional therapeutic option is BRAFi. The approval of BRAFi vemurafenib in 2011 and dabrafenib in 2012 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) led to substantial improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared with therapies available at that time (28, 29). BRAF is a member of the RAF kinase family, with a role in the ERK/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, a signaling cascade that regulates cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. The clinical response observed with BRAFi is, however, limited by acquired resistance to these agents through the reactivation of the MAPK pathway via transactivation of RAF and subsequent MEK/ERK phosphorylation in cells with wild-type BRAF (30).
The addition of a MEKi, such as trametinib or cobimetinib, to BRAFi mitigates a pathway of resistance, increasing response rates with an improved OS, without significant cumulative toxicity. Dual inhibition of the MAPK pathway with the addition of MEKi therapy to BRAFi therapy has been demonstrated in subsequent clinical studies aimed at further improving efficacy results and reducing the toxicities associated with reactivation of the MAPK pathway, including the incidence of secondary malignancies (31). A scheduled treatment with both BRAFi and MEKi showed a better efficacy overall compared to BRAFi monotherapy (32). Three BRAFi- MEKi combination treatments (dabrafenib-trametinib, vemurafenib-cobimetinib, and encorafenib-binimetinib) are currently considered the standard treatments for patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma (33–35).
In a recent landmark analysis, the 5-year OS in patients with BRAF V600 mutant metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib-trametinib was 28% with a 76% response rate and CR observed in 17% of patients. In patients with CR, the 3-year PFS rate was 67, 40% at 5 years and the median PFS was 39.6 months (36). Furthermore, a case of long-term complete response 18 months after treatment discontinuation, has been reported (37).
We report the first case, in literature, of a histologically proven melanoma PM successfully treated with the combination of dabrafenib-trametinib. Considering the uncommon site of melanoma metastasis and the long timeframe between the primary disease and the recurrence, a multidisciplinary team reassessed the case. The histological evaluation revealed focal brownish pigments in the removed sellar mass suggestive of melanoma metastasis. A careful clinical and dermatological examination was conducted to rule out the presence of new cutaneous lesions suspected for melanoma. No further immunohistochemical analysis were available to ensure the relationship between primary and metastatic tumor. At the time of disease recurrence after surgical intervention, the presence of the BRAF mutation in our patients has allowed the use of dabrafenib-trametinib, an effective anticancer therapy not burdened by side-effects on the pituitary gland, already compromised by the disease.
It would be very interesting to understand the mechanisms behind the rapid and complete response to the combination therapy with dabrafenib-trametinib. Some studies reported that, in metastatic melanomas, the mechanisms involved in the response to dabrafenib therapy may involve the pituitary tumor-transforming gene-1 (PTTG1), an oncogene overexpressed in a variety of cancer cell lines as well as in a wide range of primary and metastatic tumors. PTTG1 is also overexpressed in a variety of endocrine-related tumors, in particular, pituitary, thyroid, breast, ovary, and uterus tumors (38). In a recent study, the authors demonstrated that in dabrafenib-sensitive cells, inhibition of cell growth and extra cellular matrix invasion, occur, at least in part, through the down regulation of PTTG1 expression (39). In our case, we could assume a downregulation of the PTTG1 oncogene, mediated by the BRAFi, which could be strongly expressed by the tumor; it has also been observed in animal models of pituitary tumors (40).
Conclusions
PMs often represent the manifestation of systemic malignancies and had an unfavorable prognosis. Literature confirmed that pituitary melanoma metastases represent a very rare event burdened by therapeutic failure. Our case report suggests that in metastatic melanomas, the new antineoplastic drugs acting on the BRAF system could represent an effective therapy and a real chance of cure with prolonged disease-free survival, without affecting quality of life, an important issue especially in young patients.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
A written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author Contributions
MM wrote the manuscript. GP contributed to the manuscript preparation. RL, MB, and AC contributed to the concept and design for the study. MR and FC conducted the oncological management and follow up. LR contributed to the performing and interpretation of nuclear imaging. AB and MA supervised this work. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Komninos J, Vlassopoulou V, Protopapa D, Korfias S, Kontogeorgos G, Sakas DE, et al. Tumors metastatic to the pituitary gland: case report and literature review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2004) 89:574–80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030395
2. Marsh JC, Garg S, Wendt JA, Gielda BT, Turian JV, Herskovic AM. Intracranial metastatic disease rarely involves the pituitary: retrospective analysis of 935 metastases in 155 patients and review of the literature. Pituitary. (2010) 13:260–5. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0229-4
3. Shimon I. Metastatic spread to the pituitary. Neuroendocrinology. (2020). doi: 10.1159/000506810. [Epub ahead of print].
4. Nelson PB, Robinson AG, Martinez AJ. Metastatic tumor of the pituitary gland. Neurosurgery. (1987) 21:941–4. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198712000-00030
5. Javanbakht A, D'Apuzzo M, Badie B, Salehian B. Pituitary metastasis: a rare condition. Endocr Connect. (2018) 7:1049–57. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0338
6. MacKie RM, Hauschild A, Eggermont AM. Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol. (2009) 20(Suppl. 6):vi1–7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp252
7. Garbe C, Leiter U. Melanoma epidemiology and trends. Clin Dermatol. (2009) 27:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2008.09.001
8. Matthews N, Li W, Qureschi A, Weinstock M, Cho E. Epidemiology of melanoma. In: Ward WH, Farma JM, editors. Cutaneous Melanoma, Etiology and Therapy. Brisbane, QLD: Codon Publications (2017). p. 3–22.
9. Rastrelli M, Tropea S, Rossi CR, Alaibac M. Melanoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification. In Vivo. (2014) 28:1005–11.
10. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551
11. Tas F, Erturk K. Early and late relapses of cutaneous melanoma patients. Postgrad Med. (2019) 131:207–11. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1569354
12. Leung GK, Chow WS, Tan KC, Fan YW, Lam KS. Metastatic melanoma of the pituitary gland. Case report. J Neurosurg. (2003) 99:913–5. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0913
13. McCutcheon IE, Waguespack SG, Fuller GN, Couldwell WT. Metastatic melanoma to the pituitary gland. Can J Neurol Sci. (2007) 34:322–7. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100006752
14. Masui K, Yonezawa T, Shinji Y, Nakano R, Miyamae S. Pituitary apoplexy caused by hemorrhage from pituitary metastatic melanoma: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). (2013) 53:695–8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.cr2012-0068
15. Guzel A, Maciaczyk J, Dohmen-Scheufler H, Senturk S, Volk B, Ostertag CB, et al. Multiple intracranial melanoma metastases: case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol. (2009) 93:413–20. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9785-0
16. Wang YY, Norris A, du Plessis D, Gnanalingham KK. Melanoma of the sellar region. J Clin Neurosci. (2011) 18:154–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.111
17. Yang C, Liu L, Lan X, Zhang S, Li X, Zhang B. Progressive visual disturbance and enlarging prolactinoma caused by melanoma metastasis: a case report and literature review. Medicine. (2017) 96:e6483. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006483
18. Jung SM, Hsu YY, Chuang CC, Chang CN, Hsueh C, Kuo TT. A man in his mid-70s with a sellar mass. Brain Pathol. (2007) 17:115–6, 121. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00044_1.x
19. Louveau A, Smirnov I, Keyes TJ, Eccles JD, Rouhani SJ, Peske JD, et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. (2015) 523:337–41. doi: 10.1038/nature14432
20. Habu M, Tokimura H, Hirano H, Yasuda S, Nagatomo Y, Iwai Y, et al. Pituitary metastases: current practice in Japan. J Neurosurg. (2015) 123:998–1007. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14870
21. He W, Chen F, Dalm B, Kirby PA, Greenlee JD. Metastatic involvement of the pituitary gland: a systematic review with pooled individual patient data analysis. Pituitary. (2015) 18:159–68. doi: 10.1007/s11102-014-0552-2
22. Patel KR, Zheng J, Tabar V, Cohen MA, Girotra M. Extended survival after surgical resection for pituitary metastases: clinical features, management, and outcomes of metastatic disease to the sella. Oncologist. (2019) 25:e789–97. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0520
23. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:23–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030
24. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:2521–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093
25. Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, Hamid O, Kefford R, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. (2014) 384:1109–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60958-2
26. Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, Kluger HM, Carvajal RD, Sharfman WH, et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. (2014) 32:1020–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.0105
27. Colombino M, Capone M, Lissia A, Cossu A, Rubino C, De Giorgi V, et al. BRAF/NRAS mutation frequencies among primary tumors and metastases in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:2522–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2452
28. Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, Millward M, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2012) 380:358–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60868-X
29. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:2507–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103782
30. Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. (2010) 464:427–30. doi: 10.1038/nature08902
31. Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, Stroiakovski D, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:30–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412690
32. Greco A, Safi D, Swami U, Ginader T, Milhem M, Zakharia Y. Efficacy and adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients treated with combination BRAF plus MEK inhibitors versus BRAF inhibitors: a systematic review. Cancers. (2019) 11:1950. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121950
33. Dummer R, Hauschild A, Lindenblatt N, Pentheroudakis G, Keilholz U, Committee EG. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. (2015) 26(Suppl. 5):v126–32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv297
34. Network NCC. NCCN clinical practice guideline in oncology, cutaneous melanoma. Version 2.2020. Plymouth Meeting, PA (2020).
35. Hamid O, Cowey CL, Offner M, Faries M, Carvajal RD. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of approved combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor regimens for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Cancers. (2019) 11:1642. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111642
36. Long GV, Eroglu Z, Infante J, Patel S, Daud A, Johnson DB, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma who received dabrafenib combined with trametinib. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:667–73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1025
37. Brugnara S, Sicher M, Bonandini EM, Donner D, Chierichetti F, Barbareschi M, et al. Treatment with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF(V600E)-mutated metastatic malignant melanoma: a case of long-term complete response after treatment cessation. Drugs Context. (2018) 7:212515. doi: 10.7573/dic.212515
38. Vlotides G, Eigler T, Melmed S. Pituitary tumor-transforming gene: physiology and implications for tumorigenesis. Endocr Rev. (2007) 28:165–86. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0042
39. Caporali S, Alvino E, Lacal PM, Ruffini F, Levati L, Bonmassar L, et al. Targeting the PTTG1 oncogene impairs proliferation and invasiveness of melanoma cells sensitive or with acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:113472–93. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23052
Keywords: melanoma, pituitary melanoma metastasis, pituitary, dabrafenib, trametinib, therapy
Citation: Mormando M, Puliani G, Barnabei A, Lauretta R, Bianchini M, Chiefari A, Russillo M, Cognetti F, Romano L and Appetecchia M (2020) A Rare Case of Pituitary Melanoma Metastasis: A Dramatic and Prolonged Response to Dabrafenib-Trametinib Therapy. Front. Endocrinol. 11:471. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00471
Received: 14 May 2020; Accepted: 15 June 2020;
Published: 23 July 2020.
Edited by:
Veronica Vella, University of Catania, ItalyReviewed by:
Sapna Patel, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United StatesRodabe N. Amaria, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Copyright © 2020 Mormando, Puliani, Barnabei, Lauretta, Bianchini, Chiefari, Russillo, Cognetti, Romano and Appetecchia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marialuisa Appetecchia, bWFyaWFsdWlzYS5hcHBldGVjY2hpYSYjeDAwMDQwO2lmby5nb3YuaXQ=