Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 07 February 2018
Sec. Experimental Endocrinology

The Steroid Hormone 20-Hydroxyecdysone Regulates the Conjugation of Autophagy-Related Proteins 12 and 5 in a Concentration and Time-Dependent Manner to Promote Insect Midgut Programmed Cell Death

\r\nYong-Bo LiYong-Bo LiTing YangTing YangJin-Xing WangJin-Xing WangXiao-Fan Zhao*\r\nXiao-Fan Zhao*
  • Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Autophagy requires the conjugation of autophagy-related protein 12 (ATG12) to autophagy-related protein 5 (ATG5) through covalent attachment. However, the signals regulating ATG12–ATG5 conjugation are unclear. The larval midgut of lepidopteran insects performs autophagy and apoptosis sequentially during the transition of larvae to pupae under regulation by the steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), thus representing a model to study steroid hormone regulation of ATG12–ATG5 conjugation. In the present study, using the lepidopteran insect Helicoverpa armigera as a model, we report that 20E regulates the conjugation of ATG12–ATG5 in a concentration and time-dependent manner. The ATG12–ATG5 conjugate was abundant in the epidermis, midgut, and fat body during metamorphosis from the larvae to the pupae; however, the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate level decreased at the time of pupation. At low concentrations (2–5 µM) over a short time course (1–48 h), 20E promoted the conjugation of ATG12–ATG5; however, at 10 µM and 72 h, 20E repressed the conjugation of ATG12–ATG5. ATG12 was localized in the larval midgut during metamorphosis. Knockdown of ATG12 in larvae caused death with delayed pupation, postponed the process of midgut programmed cell death (PCD), and repressed ATG8 (also called LC3-I) transformation to LC3-II and the cleavage of caspase-3; therefore, knockdown of ATG12 in larvae blocked both autophagy and apoptosis. Knockdown of ATG12 in H. armigera epidermis cell line cells also repressed 20E-induced autophagosome formation and caspase-3 activation. The results suggested that 20E plays key role in the regulation of ATG12–ATG5 conjugation in a concentration and time-dependent manner for autophagy or apoptosis, and that ATG12 is necessary by both autophagy and apoptosis during insect midgut PCD.

Introduction

Programed cell death (PCD) includes apoptosis (type I PCD) with features of nuclear condensation and fragmentation, formation of apoptotic bodies, and caspase activation; autophagic cell death (type II PCD), with the accumulation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, along with cell death; necrotic cell death (type III PCD), which involves cell swelling and membrane rupture (1); and ferroptosis, a non-apoptotic forms of cell death induced by the small molecule erastin (2). Autophagy is a self-protective phenomenon that plays a critical role in cell survival (3). A series of autophagy-related proteins (ATGs) participate in autophagy. Among them, ATG12 is an ubiquitin-like protein that conjugates with ATG5 to play vital roles during autophagy (4). ATG12 forms an isopeptide bond with ATG5 through activation of ATG7 and under the mediation of ATG10, finally forming the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate (5), which then associates with ATG16 to form a larger ATG12–ATG5–ATG16 complex (6). The complex functions as an ubiquitin–protein ligase (E3)-like enzyme to transfer microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3 in mammals, also known as ATG8 in yeast) from ATG3 to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) by stimulating the E2 activity of ATG3 (7). The ATG12–ATG5–ATG16 complex and ATG8/LC3 drive autophagosome membrane expansion and fusion (8). However, it is unclear how upstream factors, especially steroid hormones, regulate ATG12–ATG5 conjugation.

The insect midgut undergoes remodeling during insect metamorphosis from larvae to pupae to adults, which includes larval midgut PCD and the pupal and adult imaginal midgut formation (9). The larval midgut changes color from pale yellow to red, condenses toward the midgut lumen, and separates from the newly formed imaginal midgut, which are characteristics of midgut PCD (10). The steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) promotes insect pupation, decreases the pupation time, and promotes larval midgut PCD by upregulating the expression of a set of genes (11). The titer of 20E changes constantly during development from larvae to pupae. The 20E titer is 1 µM during feeding, reaching a maximum of approximately 8.6 µM at the molt stage in the lepidopteran Manduca sexta (12). The change in 20E titer results in up- or downregulation of downstream genes (e.g., HR3 and E75), which regulates the growth and metamorphosis of insects (13).

Autophagy plays a critical role in insect larval midgut PCD. A series of ATGs participate in autophagy in the insect midgut (14). In lepidopteran insects, cells exhibit both autophagic and apoptotic characteristics in many organs during metamorphosis from larvae to pupae (15). Autophagy precedes apoptosis during PCD in the silkworm larval midgut, and apoptosis is actually responsible for cell death and for the disappearance of larval midgut cells, whereas autophagy is a protective mechanism or an initial condition of apoptosis (16). 20E upregulates autophagic or apoptosis genes to promote autophagy or apoptosis in the Bombyx fat body (17, 18). A recent study demonstrated that 20E promotes the switch from autophagy to apoptosis during midgut PCD in Helicoverpa armigera by increasing intracellular calcium levels (19).

Therefore, the midgut of lepidopteran insects represents a suitable model to study the regulation of autophagy by steroid hormones and the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis. In this study, we report that low concentrations, a short period of 20E promote ATG12–ATG5 conjugation and high concentrations, a long period repress ATG12–ATG5 conjugation during midgut PCD in the lepidopteran insect H. armigera. ATG12 is necessary for both autophagy and apoptosis. The study provides new insights into the steroid hormone regulation of autophagy and apoptosis in the insect midgut during metamorphosis.

Materials and Methods

Cloning and Sequence Analysis of ATG12 cDNA

The full sequence of the ATG12 cDNA open reading frame (ORF) was cloned from a cDNA library of H. armigera larvae using PCR with two specific primers, ATG12F and ATG12R (Table 1). Protein translation and prediction was performed using the ExPASy software.1 The ORF contains 381 nucleotides and encodes a protein of 126 amino acids, giving the calculated molecular mass of 14.2 kDa. Multiple sequence alignment revealed that H. armigera ATG12 exhibited a high degree of identity with ATG12 proteins from other species: 83% to the ATG12-like proteins of B. mori and Biston betularia; 78% to the ATG12-like protein of Danaus plexippus; and 63% identity to ATG12-like protein of Camponotus floridanus.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Primers used in the experiments.

Recombinant Expression of ATG12 in Escherichia coli and Preparation of Antiserum

Specific primers ATG12EXPF and ATG12EXPR (Table 1) were designed to amplify the ATG12 ORF. The DNA sequence was digested with BamH I and Xho I and ligated into the expression vector pGEX-4T-1, which has a glutathione S-transferase (GST) tag (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The recombinant plasmid, designated pGEX-ATG12, was screened in DH5α competent cells. Plasmid pGEX-ATG12 was then transformed into competent E. coli strain Rosseta. A single-colony transformant was inoculated into Luria–Bertani broth and the culture was shaken at 37°C overnight. The overnight culture was diluted 100-fold and inoculated in 200 mL of a fresh LB medium containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin. When the optical density (OD600) reached approximately 0.6, isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM to induce the expression of the fusion protein for 4 h at 37°C. Harvested cell pellets were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and sonicated for 20 min in an ice bath, with a 10 s on/off cycle to prevent overheating. The total cellular proteins were then partitioned into soluble and insoluble fractions by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. SDS-PAGE was then performed to determine the molecular mass and solubility of the fusion protein GST-ATG12. The GST-ATG12 protein was expressed with a molecular mass of 41 kDa (GST 27 kDa + ATG12 14 kDa = 41 kDa) and existed primarily in the pellet, which was then purified by washing the inclusion bodies. The purified recombinant GST-ATG12 protein was then used to prepare rabbit polyclonal antibodies.

Quantitative Real-time Reverse Transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from H. armigera using the Unizol Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biostar, Shanghai, China). After determining the RNA quality by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, 5 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA. The resulting cDNAs were then used as the templates in PCR reactions. qRT-PCR was performed using SsoFast™ EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and in a real-time thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). β-actin was amplified for internal standardization. The experiments were repeated three times, and the experimental data were analyzed statistically using Student’s t-test. The relative expression data from the qRT-PCR experiments were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method (20).

Immunoblotting (Western Blotting)

Total proteins from various tissues were extracted using Tris buffer saline (TBS, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl with 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride) from three larvae to eliminate individual differences. The protein concentration was measured according to the Bradford method (21). Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) for each sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred electrophoretically onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated with blocking buffer (2% skim milk powder dissolved in TBS) for 1 h at room temperature. The antiserum against Helicoverpa ATG12 was diluted to 1:100 in blocking buffer in TBS and incubated with the membrane for 2 h at room temperature (21–25°C). After washing, the membrane was incubated with the secondary antibody (alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:10,000 in the blocking buffer) for 2.5 h at room temperature. The protein signal was visualized using 45 µL of nitroblue tetrazolium (75 mg/mL) and 35 µL of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (50 mg/mL) (Sigma) in 10 mL of TBS in the dark at room temperature. The SDS-PAGE gel concentration was 12.5% unless otherwise stated. The protein bands on the membrane were analyzed using Quantity One software.2

20E Treatment of the H. armigera Epidermis Cell Line (HaEpi)

Helicoverpa armigera epidermis cell line cells were cultured with 5 µM 20E for 1, 6, 24, 48, or 72 h in Grace’s medium at 27°C. The same volume of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added as a 20E solvent control. The total proteins were extracted from cells using 40 mM Tris-HCl for western blot assays.

Immunohistochemistry

The larvae midgut was separated and treated with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight and then gradient-dehydrated. The prepared midgut tissues were embedded in paraffin. They were then cut into 7-µm sections and adhered to gelatin-coated glass slides, before being dried at 37°C overnight. Subsequently, the slides were dewaxed, gradient-dehydrated, and digested with 20 µM proteinase K at 37°C for 10 min. The slides were then blocked in 2% BSA at 37°C for 30 min before the addition of rabbit anti-ATG12 antibodies at 4°C overnight. The slides were washed with PBS three times and then 1 µL of secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 488 antibody in 10 mL blocking buffer) was added and incubation continued at 37°C for 1 h. The nuclei were stained by 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (AnaSpec Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature. An Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope (Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the fluorescence on the sections.

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining

The histological sections were dewaxed, gradient-dehydrated, stained with hematoxylin for 10 min, washed with running water for 1 min, washed with Scott TapWater/Bluing (0.35 g NaHCO3 and 2 g MgSO4 dissolved for 1 min) for 1 min, washed with hydrochloric acid ethanol differentiation medium (concentrated hydrochloric acid mixture of 70% ethanol 1:100) for 20 s, washed with Scott TapWater/Bluing for 1 min, and washed with 1% ammonia water for 30 s. The sections were then stained with 0.5% eosin for 30 s and washed for 1 min with 1% ammonia water. The morphology of the cells in the sections was then observed under an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope.

RNA Interference (RNAi) in Larvae

The primers ATG12-RNAiF and ATG12-RNAiR (Table 1) were designed to amplify the ATG12 gene fragment to synthesize double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) according to the method of the MEGAscri RNAi Kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA). One hundred and twenty larvae were divided into two groups of 60 larvae. One group was injected with ATG12 dsRNA (dsATG12) (1 μg/larva), whereas the other was injected with dsGFP (1 μg/larva). The dsRNA was injected into the hemocoel of the sixth instar 6 h larva. A second injection was administered 24 h later. After 48 h, the RNA of each treatment group was extracted from three larvae for further detection. Independent experiments were conducted three times for statistical analysis.

RNAi in the HaEpi Cell Line

The primers ATG12F and ATG12R, and GFPF and GFPR (Table 1) were used for PCR amplification of the ATG12 and green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene fragments, respectively. The PCR products were purified using a PCR purification kit (Shenggong, Shanghai, China). dsRNA was synthesized using the MEGAscript™ RNAi kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA). HaEpi cell line culturing and transfection were performed according to the methods described by Shao et al. (22). dsGFP was used as the control.

Autophagosome Detection in HaEpi Cells

Preparation of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against H. armigera ATG8/LC3. H. armigera ATG8/LC3 was expressed in E. coli from the pET-30a plasmid. Two hundred micrograms of purified ATG8/LC3 in 1 mL TBS was mixed with 1 mL complete Freund’s adjuvant and injected subcutaneously into a rabbit to induce antibodies, according to a previously published method (23). ATG12 antiserum was prepared by the same method. To indicate autophagosomes in HaEpi cells directly, a DNA sequence, TATGGCAGGAAGAAGCGGAGACAGCGACGAAGA, encoding the cell-penetrating peptide TAT (24) was cloned into RFP (red fluorescence protein)-LC3 plasmid (His-TAT-RFP-LC3-His). The His-TAT-RFP-LC3-His protein was expressed in E. coli as a soluble protein and was purified by His tag affinity resin. His-TAT-RFP-LC3-His was able to penetrate into cells to detect LC3 puncta in HaEpi cells. TAT has no cell toxicity (25).

Apoptosis Detection in HaEpi Cells

Helicoverpa armigera epidermis cell line cells were incubated with 5 µM 20E for 48 h. Anti-human, mouse, and rat caspase-3 polyclonal antibodies were used to detect the active caspase-3 band in western blots (WL01589, Wanleibio, Shen Yang, China). These antibodies recognize cleaved-caspase-3 (16, 26). The NucView™ Caspase-3 assay kit (NO. 30029 Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) was used to detect the caspase-3 activity in HaEpi cells by immunocytochemistry, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The principle of the staining is that the caspase-3 substrate peptide DEVD is attached to a DNA-binding dye. When the substrate is cleaved by caspase-3 in the cells, the fluorogenic DNA dye stains the nucleus. Therefore, the substrate not only detects caspase-3 but also visualizes the apoptotic nuclear morphology.3

Statistical Analysis

Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. For statistical analyses, significance was determined using two-tailed paired Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

Results

The ATG12–ATG5 Conjugate Level Increases during Metamorphic Molting (MM)

A previous study indicated that ATG12 forms the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate in yeast (5). Therefore, we tested whether ATG12 and ATG5 formed a conjugate in an HaEpi and midgut. The anti-ATG12 antibodies recognized two bands from the lysate of HaEpi after DMSO and 20E treatments, with the 14 kDa band corresponding to the calculated molecular mass of free ATG12 (14.2 kDa) and the 45 kDa band corresponding to ATG12 (14.2 kDa) plus ATG5 (31 kDa), indicating that the anti-ATG12 antibody could recognize ATG12 and the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate. The anti-ATG12 antibodies also recognized these two bands in the larval midgut from sixth instar 24 h feeding larvae and 96 h MM larvae. There were lower levels of free ATG12 in both the sixth instar 24 h feeding larvae and 96 h MM larvae, and an increased level of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate at the sixth instar 96 h larvae (Figure 1A), suggesting that ATG12 forms conjugate with ATG5 once it is expressed in the MM larval midgut.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Analysis of ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels in larval development by western blot. (A) Detection of ATG12 and the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate using an antibody against Helicoverpa armigera ATG12 in H. armigera epidermis cell line (HaEpi) cells and in the midgut at the indicated times of the sixth larval instar (6th-24 h, 6th-96 h). 20-Hydroxyecdysone (20E) treatment was 5 µM final concentration for 24 h. (B) Detection of ATG5 and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate using an antibody against H. armigera ATG5 in HaEpi cells and the midgut as in (A). Both antibodies were prepared by our laboratory. (C) Developmental profile of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate in H. armigera tissues; detected by anti-ATG12 antibody; an antibody against H. armigera β-actin was used as a loading control. 5th-F, 5th instar 12 h feeding larvae; 5th-M, 5th instar 36 h molting larvae; 6th-6 h through 6th-120 h, hours of the sixthth instar larvae; 5F, 5th instar feeding larvae; 5M, 5th instar molting larvae; 6F, sixth instar feeding larvae; MM, metamorphic molt; 6th-F, sixth instar feeding larvae; P0, pupae at day 1. (c) Relative quantification of the data in (C) using the Image Pro-Plus software. Bars indicate mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of ATG12 mRNA in the midgut after 20E induction (500 ng applied per 6th-6 h larva). (E) qRT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of ATG12 in HaEpi cells after 20E treatment (5 µM) at the corresponding time points. Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. The data in (D,E) were subjected to Student’s t-test to indicate significant differences relative to the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) controls at the corresponding time points. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

To confirm that the 45-kDa band was indeed the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate, we used antibodies recognizing H. armigera ATG5 prepared in our previous work (19). The anti-ATG5 antibodies also detected the 45-kDa band (ATG12–ATG5 conjugate) in both HaEpi and midgut samples. In addition, full length ATG5 (31 kDa) and a very weak cleaved N-terminal ATG5 fragment (NtATG5, 25 kDa) were also detected by the anti-ATG5 antibodies (Figure 1B). These results confirmed that ATG5 forms a conjugate with ATG12, and that the anti-ATG5 antibodies specifically recognize ATG5 and the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate.

We next examined the variation in ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels in greater detail in selected H. armigera tissues starting from the fifth instar feeding larval stage until pupation. The apparent abundance of the 45-kDa ATG12–ATG5 conjugate increased during the MM period at 72, 96, and 120 h of the sixth instar in the epidermis, midgut, and fat body, and decreased at pupation time (Figures 1C,c). This suggested that ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels in these tissues are possibly regulated by 20E during metamorphosis, because the 20E titer can reach 4.87 µg/mL (about 10 µM) from 0.02 µg/ml in lepidopteran insect Antheraea mylitta at the molting and spinning stages (27). The highest titer in the hemolymph of H. armigera increased from 100 to 800 ng/mL, as assessed by radioimmunoassay (28). To examine whether ATG12 expression might be regulated by 20E at the mRNA level, we injected 20E into the hemocoel of 6th-6 h larvae. The qRT-PCR results showed that ATG12 mRNA in the midgut was upregulated significantly at 12 h after 20E injection compared with larvae injected with the DMSO solvent. The upregulation lasted for at least 24 h post-injection (Figure 1D). Similarly, 20E-induced ATG12 expression after 12 h and the effect lasted for at least 48 h in the HaEpi, compared with a control treated with the equivalent amount of DMSO solvent (Figure 1E). These results suggested that ATG12 expression is stimulated by 20E.

The Abundance of the ATG12–ATG5 Conjugate Is Increased by a Low Concentration and a Short Period of Treatment of 20E, and Repressed by a High Concentration and a Long Period of Treatment of 20E

To examine whether 20E regulates the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels, we determined the variation in the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels under 20E induction at various concentration in HaEpi cells. The anti-ATG5 antibody detected a marked increase in both ATG5 (31 kDa) and the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate (45 kDa) after induction by 2–5 µM 20E. However, ATG5 (31 kDa) and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate (45 kDa) levels decreased, but NtATG5 (25 kDa) increased significantly, under a high concentration of 20E induction (10 µM) compared with the control (DMSO) (Figures 2A,B). In turn, the anti-ATG12 antibody also detected the increase of ATG12 (14 kDa) and the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate (45 kDa) levels after induction using low concentrations of 20E (2–5 µM). However, the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate level decreased significantly under a higher concentration of 20E (10 µM) induction, but ATG12 level was not decreased simultaneously (Figures 2C,D). These data confirmed that a lower concentration of 20E promotes ATG12 expression and ATG12–ATG5 conjugation, but a higher concentration of 20E represses ATG12–ATG5 conjugation.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Regulation of 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) on ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels by western blot analysis. (A) Anti-ATG5 antibody detecting the levels of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate in Helicoverpa armigera epidermis cell line (HaEpi) cells under 20E treatment (24 h) at the indicated concentration. (B) Statistical analysis of (A). (C) Anti-ATG12 antibody detecting the levels of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate in HaEpi cells as the condition as (A). (D) Statistical analysis of (C). (E) Anti-ATG5 antibody detecting the levels of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate in HaEpi cells under 20E treatment (5 µM) at the indicated time. (F) Statistical analysis of (E). Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences determined by Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 in all of the statistical analysis.

Different periods of 20E treatment were examined to analyze the effect of 20E on ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels. Both ATG5 (31 kDa) and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate (45 kDa) levels increased from 1 to 48 h under 5 µM 20E induction. However, ATG5 and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels decreased, but NtATG5 (25 kDa) increased significantly, after a longer period of 20E induction (72 h) (Figures 2E,F). These data suggested that a shorter period of 20E treatment induces ATG5 expression and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation, but a longer period of 20E treatment decreases ATG5 and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels by causing the cleavage of ATG5 to NtATG5.

To prove the key role of ATG5 in maintaining the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate, ATG5 was knocked down in HaEpi cells. Immunoblotting showed that, as expected, ATG5 depletion reduced the amount of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate, while the relative amount of unconjugated ATG12 increased (Figures 3A,B). Meanwhile, ATG5 knockdown had no effect on ATG12 expression at the mRNA level (Figure 3C). These data confirmed that the ATG5 level determines ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The effect of ATG5 knockdown to ATG12–ATG5 conjugate. (A) ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels and free ATG12 protein after knockdown of ATG5 and 20E treatment for 24 h. (B) Statistical analysis of (A). (C) Expression levels of the ATG12 mRNA after ATG5 knockdown and 20E treatment for 24 h. β-actin served as an internal reference for all the experiments. Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences determined by Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 in all of the statistical analysis.

ATG12 Was Located in the Larval Midgut during Metamorphosis

The location of ATG12 was examined by immunohistochemistry using anti-ATG12 antibodies to address its role in midgut PCD during metamorphosis. The results showed that anti-ATG12 antibodies detected an intense signal in the larval midgut cells from the 6th-96 h and 6th-120 h wandering larvae. In contrast, a less intense signal was detected from the 6th-24 h feeding larval midgut or the imaginal midgut cells (Figure 4), suggesting ATG12 was localized in the larval midgut.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Localization of ATG12 in the midgut. The tissues dissected from the sixth instar larvae at the indicated time points. Stained with 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and with the anti-ATG12 antibody followed by an Alexa 488-labeled secondary antibody, or with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). LM, larval midgut; IM, imaginal midgut. Scale bars = 50 µm.

ATG12 Knockdown Delays Pupation and Blocks Midgut PCD

To investigate the function of ATG12 in insect pupation, ATG12 was knocked down by injecting the larvae with dsRNA. qRT-PCR and immunoblotting showed that ATG12 was knocked down systemically in the larval midgut (Figures 5A,B). ATG12 knockdown resulted abnormal pupation (Figure 5C). Compared with dsGFP injection, 33% of the larvae formed abnormal pupae and many of the abnormal pupae died (Figure 5D). Although 50% of the larvae survived and pupated after dsATG12 injection, the pupation time was delayed to 145 h, which was 12 h longer, compared with the dsGFP-injected larvae (133 h). In addition, 20E injection caused larval pupation at 118 h, which was 20 h earlier compared with that in the DMSO-injected larvae (138 h). However, after dsATG12 injection, 20E could not promote earlier pupation, but delayed this 20E-stimulated pupation by 16 h, increasing the pupation time from 120 to 136 h, compared with dsGFP plus 20E (Figure 5E). These results suggested that ATG12 is critical for the 20E-dependent promotion of pupation.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. ATG12 knockdown delayed 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E)-induced pupation. One µg of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and 500 ng 20E were injected into sixth instar 6 h larvae; 3 groups and 30 larvae in each group. After 24 h, 1 µg of dsRNA was injected again. (A,B) qRT-PCR and immunoblotting indicate the efficiency of ATG12 RNA interference at the mRNA and protein levels, respectively. (C) The phenotype of insects after ATG12 knockdown. (D) Statistical analysis of the phenotype shown in (C). (E) Statistical analysis of pupation time of 50% larvae (P50) after injection of dsRNA. Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences determined by Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

To examine the role of ATG12 in midgut PCD, we observed midgut structures after dsATG12 injection in 6th-6 h larvae. The midgut developed a red color, also known as the yellow body (29), which is a typical characteristic of midgut PCD (30), at 72 h after dsGFP injection. However, the midgut remained milky white, which is typical of a feeding midgut, after dsATG12 injection (Figure 6A). During midgut PCD, the larval midgut is separated from imaginal midgut and larval midgut undergoes PCD (29). Immunohistochemical analysis showed that after dsATG12 injection, the larval midgut did not separate from the imaginal midgut at 96 h. In contrast, the larval midgut separated from the imaginal midgut at 96 h after dsGFP injection (Figure 6B). These results suggested that ATG12 is required for larval midgut PCD.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Knockdown of ATG12 delayed midgut programed cell death. (A) The phenotype of the midgut 72 h after dsATG12 (1 µg) injection to sixth instar 6 h larvae. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining shows the midgut structure 72 and 96 h after dsGFP and dsATG12 injection, respectively. (C) Levels of the indicated proteins in the midgut after ATG12 knockdown using antibodies against H. armigera LC3 and β-actin; cleaved Caspase-3 was detected with the “anti-mammalian” Caspase-3 antibody. (c) Statistical analysis of the data in (C). Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments; significance of differences determined by Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. (D,E) The specificity of the antibodies and molecular weight of LC3 and Caspase-3. The standard molecular masses of the proteins are same as in Figure 1A.

To address the mechanism whereby ATG12 knockdown represses midgut PCD, we examined the ATG levels of LC3-II (ATG8–PE), and cleavage of apoptosis-associated protein caspase-3, with LC3-II indicating autophagy and caspase-3 cleavage indicating apoptosis. The results showed that at 72 h after dsATG12 injection, the level of LC3-II, the autophagic indicator, was significantly lower relative to that in dsGFP-injected animals. The level of cleaved caspase-3, the apoptosis indicator, was also reduced significantly (Figures 6C,c). The specificity of the antibodies against LC3-II and caspase-3 were confirmed by western blotting (Figures 6D,E). These results suggested that ATG12 is involved in both autophagy and apoptosis during midgut PCD.

ATG12 Knockdown Represses Autophagosome Formation and Caspase-3 Activity

To confirm the role of ATG12 in autophagy and apoptosis, we examined the involvement of ATG12 in autophagy and apoptosis in HaEpi cells. We constructed a red fluorescence protein-marked LC3 protein by fusing it with the cell-penetrating peptide TAT (TAT-RFP-LC3), with the red fluorescence protein indicating LC3, and the TAT penetrating peptide allows the protein to enter into cells. The TAT-RFP-LC3 protein accumulated as puncta in dsGFP-treated cells, indicating autophagosome formation; however, the TAT-RFP-LC3 protein did not accumulated as puncta, but existed uniformly in dsATG12-treated cells, indicating no autophagosome formation in dsATG12-treated cells. Meanwhile, caspase-3 activity was detected in dsGFP-treated cells, but not in dsATG12-treated cells (Figure 7A). Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in the number of autophagosome puncta and caspase-3 activity between the dsGFP and dsATG12-treated cells (Figure 7B). qRT-PCR confirmed the successful knockdown of ATG12 in HaEpi cells (Figure 7C). These data suggested that ATG12 is involved in both autophagy and apoptosis.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Knockdown of ATG12 repressed autophagy and apoptosis in Helicoverpa armigera epidermis cell line cells. (A) ATG12 RNA interference (RNAi) repressed autophagosome formation and Caspase-3 activity. Cells were exposed to 5 µM 20E and either GFP (control) or ATG12 double-stranded RNA for 48 h. Red fluorescence indicates the TAT-RFP-LC3 protein, a cell-penetrating peptide (TAT) fused to the LC3 protein; green fluorescence indicates Caspase-3 activity detected by the Nuclear View Caspase-3 assay kit. Scale bars = 50 µm. (B) Statistical analysis of the effects of ATG12 RNAi on autophagosome formation and Caspase-3 in (A). (C) qRT-PCR analysis of the knockdown efficiency of ATG12. Bars represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments; significance of differences determined by Student’s t-test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 in all the statistics.

Discussion

The ATG12–ATG5 conjugate is required for LC3 lipidation for final autophagy (4). However, whether steroid hormones regulate ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation was unknown until now. In the present study, we present evidence that the steroid hormone 20E promotes ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation under low concentrations and for a short period, but inhibits ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation at a high concentration and for a long period. In addition, ATG12 is necessary by autophagy and apoptosis.

20E Regulates ATG12–ATG5 Conjugate Levels in a Concentration and Time-Dependent Manner

As one of the core ATG proteins, ATG12 plays an important role in autophagy by forming a complex with ATG5 and ATG16 to accelerate the formation of ATG8–PE (LC3-II) and autophagy precursors, with a double membrane structure (31). The human ATG12–ATG5 conjugate appears as a single band with a molecular mass of about 52 kDa (4). Our study revealed that the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate is abundant in the midgut during the wandering stages from sixth instar 72–120 h, but decreases at the pupation stage, indicating the occurrence of autophagy at an earlier metamorphic stage, which had stopped by the pupation stage. This finding correlated with the observation that autophagy occurs at an earlier stage of MM, and apoptosis occurs at the later stage of MM in lepidopteran insects (16). The 20E titer is higher at the wandering stages in lepidopteran insects (13); therefore, we hypothesized that the level of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate is increased via 20E induction. However, an interesting finding from our study is that 20E induction increases ATG12–ATG5 conjugate only at low concentration (2–5 µM) and for a short period (1–48 h), but inhibits ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation at a high concentration (10 µM) and for a longer period (72 h). We observed that higher 20E concentration (10 µM) and longer time (72 h) treatment induced cleavage of the full length ATG5 to NtATG5, and inhibited the formation of the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate.

ATG5 cleavage to NtATG5 is part of the mechanism of autophagy switching to apoptosis. ATG5 is cleaved by calcium-dependent cysteine proteases (calpains) to NtATG5, which binds to mitochondria to release cytochrome C, triggering the activation of caspases and apoptosis (32). Higher 20E concentrations induce higher calcium levels and the transformation of ATG5 to NtATG5 to switch autophagy to apoptosis in the midgut PCD (19). Therefore, 20E triggers autophagy at lower concentration and transform autophagy to apoptosis at higher concentration by the cleavage of ATG5 to NtATG5.

20E Regulates Autophagy and Apoptosis Dependent on Concentration

20-Hydroxyecdysone promotes both autophagic and apoptotic genes expression, such as in the fat body of B. mori (17, 18). In the Drosophila and Bombyx fat body, overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of the 20E receptor EcR suppressed 20E-induced autophagy (18, 33). The promoter of ATG1 contains an EcR response element (EcRE) and deletion of the EcRE inhibited 20E-induced autophagy in the Bombyx fat body (18).

20-Hydroxyecdysone plays a critical role in insect development, particularly in PCD during the developmental transition from larvae to adults (34). The 20E titer increases during the molting and metamorphic stages in Drosophila (35) and in Lepidoptera (13), reaching 900 ng/mL in the Bombyx wing disk during metamorphosis (36). The highest 20E titer was recorded as 4.87 µg/mL in the hemolymph (about 10 µM) in A. mylitta (lepidoptera: Saturniidae) at the molting stage (27). The 20E titer increased to 800 ng/mL from a much lower titer in the hemolymph in H. armigera (28). We observed that 20E promotes ATG12 and ATG5 expression and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation; however, a higher concentration and longer time of 20E treatment induced the cleavage of ATG5 to NtATG5 and decreased the ATG12–ATG5 conjugate levels. These results confirmed that 20E promotes autophagy at a lower concentration and shorter time, but switches autophagy to apoptosis by inducing ATG5 cleavage to NtATG5 at a higher concentration and longer exposure.

Autophagy Is Essential for Apoptosis in the Midgut of H. armigera

Both autophagy and apoptosis are observed during Drosophila midgut PCD (37). Apoptosis involves nuclear condensation, membrane blebbing, DNA fragmentation, and activation of caspases; whereas autophagy is accompanied by the formation of acidic autophagic puncta in the cytoplasm (38). One study suggested that autophagy is essential for midgut cell death in Drosophila (39); however, autophagy and apoptosis occur sequentially during midgut PCD of B. mori (40). In the human liver, autophagy also precedes apoptosis, and is required for the occurrence of apoptosis (41). In H. armigera, apoptotic midgut PCD has been observed (11). Our previous study showed that an inhibitor of autophagy, 3-MA, or knockdown of ATG12 repressed autophagy and apoptosis. In addition, after knockdown of ATG5, autophagy and apoptosis are inhibited in the midgut, and 20E promoted ATG5 cleavage to NtATG5, which mediates the transformation of autophagy to apoptosis (19). In the present study, our data showed that knockdown of ATG12 in larvae also delayed pupation and midgut PCD. Meanwhile, LC3-II levels and activated caspase-3 were also decreased by ATG12 knockdown. This suggested that both autophagy and apoptosis are involved in midgut PCD in H. armigera, and that autophagy is essential for the occurrence of apoptosis. ATG12 knockdown in the HaEpi cells not only repressed autophagosome formation, but also repressed caspase-3 activity. Therefore, our data showed that during PCD of the midgut in H. armigera, autophagy is essential for apoptosis, and that ATG12 plays a role in both processes.

Conclusion

Based on the above data, we conceived a model to explain the role of ATG12 in autophagy and apoptosis under 20E regulation (Figure 8). A low concentration and short period of treatment by 20E promote the expression of ATG12 and ATG5 and the conjugation ATG12 and ATG5, which subsequently promotes autophagy. A high concentration and a long period of treatment by 20E inhibit ATG12–ATG5 conjugation because ATG5 is cleaved to NtATG5 for apoptosis. ATG12 is necessary for autophagy and apoptosis in the insect midgut PCD.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. A model for 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) regulation on ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation and midgut programed cell death (PCD). 20E promotes ATG12 and ATG5 expression and ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation at a lower concentration, shorter period, thus results in autophagy. Whereas, 20E inhibits ATG12–ATG5 conjugate formation by inducing the cleavage of ATG5 to NtATG5 at a higher concentration, longer period, thus causes apoptosis during midgut PCD.

Author Contributions

Y-BL prepared the antibodies against H. armigera ATG5 and performed most of the experiments. TY prepared the antibodies against H. armigera ATG12 and performed some of the experiments. J-XW and X-FZ conceived and coordinated the study and edited the paper. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. All co-authors have checked and confirmed their contribution statement.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31730083 and 31572328).

Accession Number

GenBank accession number of ATG12: KY217730 (X-FZ).

Footnotes

References

1. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams J, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Differ (2009) 16:3–11. doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell (2012) 149:1060–72. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kanayama M, Shinohara ML. Roles of autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in antifungal immunity. Front Immunol (2016) 7:47. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Otomo C, Metlagel Z, Takaesu G, Otomo T. Structure of the human ATG12~ATG5 conjugate required for LC3 lipidation in autophagy. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2013) 20:59–66. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mizushima N, Noda T, Yoshimori T, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, George MD, et al. A protein conjugation system essential for autophagy. Nature (1998) 395:395–8. doi:10.1038/26506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mizushima N, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Apg16p is required for the function of the Apg12p-Apg5p conjugate in the yeast autophagy pathway. EMBO J (1999) 18:3888–96. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.14.3888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hanada T, Noda NN, Satomi Y, Ichimura Y, Fujioka Y, Takao T, et al. The Atg12-Atg5 conjugate has a novel E3-like activity for protein lipidation in autophagy. J Biol Chem (2007) 282:37298–302. doi:10.1074/jbc.C700195200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ohsumi Y. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res (2014) 24:9–23. doi:10.1038/cr.2013.169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Parthasarathy R, Palli SR. Developmental and hormonal regulation of midgut remodeling in a lepidopteran insect, Heliothis virescens. Mech Dev (2007) 124:23–34. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2006.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang JL, Jiang XJ, Wang Q, Hou LJ, Xu DW, Wang JX, et al. Identification and expression profile of a putative basement membrane protein gene in the midgut of Helicoverpa armigera. BMC Dev Biol (2007) 7:76. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-7-76

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Liu CY, Liu W, Zhao WL, Wang JX, Zhao XF. Upregulation of the expression of prodeath serine/threonine protein kinase for programmed cell death by steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone. Apoptosis (2013) 18:171–87. doi:10.1007/s10495-012-0784-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Langelan RE, Fisher JE, Hiruma K, Palli SR, Riddiford LM. Patterns of MHR3 expression in the epidermis during a larval molt of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Dev Biol (2000) 227:481–94. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Riddiford LM, Hiruma K, Zhou X, Nelson CA. Insights into the molecular basis of the hormonal control of molting and metamorphosis from Manduca sexta and Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem Mol Biol (2003) 33:1327–38. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2003.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Xie Y, Kang R, Sun X, Zhong M, Huang J, Klionsky DJ, et al. Posttranslational modification of autophagy-related proteins in macroautophagy. Autophagy (2015) 11:28–45. doi:10.4161/15548627.2014.984267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Romanelli D, Casati B. A molecular view of autophagy in Lepidoptera. Biomed Res Int (2014) 2014:902315. doi:10.1155/2014/902315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Franzetti E, Huang ZJ, Shi YX, Xie K, Deng XJ, Li JP, et al. Autophagy precedes apoptosis during the remodeling of silkworm larval midgut. Apoptosis (2012) 17:305–24. doi:10.1007/s10495-011-0675-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Tian L, Liu S, Liu H, Li S. 20-hydroxyecdysone upregulates apoptotic genes and induces apoptosis in the Bombyx fat body. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol (2012) 79:207–19. doi:10.1002/arch.20457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tian L, Ma L, Guo EE, Deng XJ, Ma SY, Xia QY, et al. 20-hydroxyecdysone upregulates Atg genes to induce autophagy in the Bombyx fat body. Autophagy (2013) 9:1172–87. doi:10.4161/auto.24731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Li YB, Li XR, Yang T, Wang JX, Zhao XF. The steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone promotes switching from autophagy to apoptosis by increasing intracellular calcium levels. Insect Biochem Mol Biol (2016) 79:73–86. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Fleige S, Walf V, Huch S, Prgomet C, Sehm J, Pfaffl MW. Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol Lett (2006) 28:1601–13. doi:10.1007/s10529-006-9127-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem (1976) 72:248–54. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Shao HL, Zheng WW, Liu PC, Wang Q, Wang JX, Zhao XF. Establishment of a new cell line from lepidopteran epidermis and hormonal regulation on the genes. PLoS One (2008) 3:e3127. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sui YP, Wang JX, Zhao XF. The impacts of classical insect hormones on the expression profiles of a new digestive trypsin-like protease (TLP) from the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Mol Biol (2009) 18:443–52. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00884.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhou Z, Li Y, Yuan C, Zhang Y, Qu L. Oral administration of TAT-PTD-diapause hormone fusion protein interferes with Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) development. J Insect Sci (2015) 15:123. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iev102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Meloni BP, Craig AJ, Milech N, Hopkins RM, Watt PM, Knuckey NW. The neuroprotective efficacy of cell-penetrating peptides TAT, penetratin, Arg-9, and Pep-1 in glutamic acid, kainic acid, and in vitro ischemia injury models using primary cortical neuronal cultures. Cell Mol Neurobiol (2014) 34:173–81. doi:10.1007/s10571-013-9999-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Fogarty CE, Bergmann A. Detecting caspase activity in Drosophila larval imaginal discs. Methods Mol Biol (2014) 1133:109–17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0357-3_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kumar D, Subrahmanyam B, Sharan SK, Mishra PK, Singh BMK, Suryanarayana N. Endogenous 20-hydroxyecdysone levels in the haemolymph of non-diapause-destined and diapause-destined generations of tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and associated developmental changes. Eur J Entomol (2008) 105:591–8. doi:10.14411/eje.2008.079

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Liu J, Shi GP, Zhang WQ, Zhang GR, Xu WH. Cathepsin L function in insect moulting: molecular cloning and functional analysis in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Mol Biol (2006) 15:823–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00686.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hakim RS, Baldwin K, Smagghe G. Regulation of midgut growth, development, and metamorphosis. Annu Rev Entomol (2010) 55:593–608. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Vilaplana L, Pascual N, Perera N, Belles X. Molecular characterization of an inhibitor of apoptosis in the Egyptian armyworm, Spodoptera littoralis, and midgut cell death during metamorphosis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol (2007) 37:1241–8. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Geng J, Klionsky DJ. The Atg8 and Atg12 ubiquitin-like conjugation systems in macroautophagy. ’Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects’ review series. EMBO Rep (2008) 9:859–64. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Gordy C, He YW. The crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis: where does this lead? Protein Cell (2012) 3:17–27. doi:10.1007/s13238-011-1127-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Cherbas L, Hu X, Zhimulev I, Belyaeva E, Cherbas P. EcR isoforms in Drosophila: testing tissue-specific requirements by targeted blockade and rescue. Development (2003) 130:271–84. doi:10.1242/dev.00205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Yamanaka N, Rewitz KF, O’connor MB. Ecdysone control of developmental transitions: lessons from Drosophila research. Annu Rev Entomol (2013) 58:497–516. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Dubrovsky EB. Hormonal cross talk in insect development. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2005) 16:6–11. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2004.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Moriyama M, Osanai K, Ohyoshi T, Wang HB, Iwanaga M, Kawasaki H. Ecdysteroid promotes cell cycle progression in the Bombyx wing disc through activation of c-Myc. Insect Biochem Mol Biol (2016) 70:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yin VP, Thummel CS. Mechanisms of steroid-triggered programmed cell death in Drosophila. Semin Cell Dev Biol (2005) 16:237–43. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Kroemer G, El-Deiry WS, Golstein P, Peter ME, Vaux D, Vandenabeele P, et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death. Cell Death Differ (2005) 12(Suppl 2):1463–7. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401724

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Denton D, Shravage B, Simin R, Mills K, Berry DL, Baehrecke EH, et al. Autophagy, not apoptosis, is essential for midgut cell death in Drosophila. Curr Biol (2009) 19:1741–6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Xie K, Tian L, Guo X, Li K, Li J, Deng X, et al. BmATG5 and BmATG6 mediate apoptosis following autophagy induced by 20-hydroxyecdysone or starvation. Autophagy (2016) 12:381–96. doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1134079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Rocchi A, He C. Emerging roles of autophagy in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Front Biol (2015) 10:154–64. doi:10.1007/s11515-015-1354-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: steroid hormone, ATG12–ATG5 conjugation, autophagy, apoptosis, programmed cell death

Citation: Li Y-B, Yang T, Wang J-X and Zhao X-F (2018) The Steroid Hormone 20-Hydroxyecdysone Regulates the Conjugation of Autophagy-Related Proteins 12 and 5 in a Concentration and Time-Dependent Manner to Promote Insect Midgut Programmed Cell Death. Front. Endocrinol. 9:28. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00028

Received: 17 November 2017; Accepted: 22 January 2018;
Published: 07 February 2018

Edited by:

Honoo Satake, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Japan

Reviewed by:

Ryusuke Niwa, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Andreas Heyland, University of Guelph, Canada

Copyright: © 2018 Li, Yang, Wang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiao-Fan Zhao, eGZ6aGFvJiN4MDAwNDA7c2R1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.