data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1526584
This article is part of the Research Topic Diagnostic Tools and Research Applications to Combat Wildlife Trade Issues View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study was undertaken to explore the applicability of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) technology in combating the illegal wildlife trade, specifically focusing on Australia's Tiliqua species. The research aimed to develop models that could effectively identify species, distinguish between captive-bred and wild individuals, and predict geographic provenance. The hypothesis was that pXRF could achieve high accuracy in species identification and classifications, thereby providing a useful tool for wildlife enforcement efforts.The study was conducted using pXRF technology to analyse a range of Tiliqua specimens, including shingleback (T. rugosa) and common blue-tongue (T. scinoides) lizards. Specimens were collected and analysed in various states-live, dead, and as animal parts. Species specific XGBoost models were developed and tested for accuracy in identifying species and distinguishing between captive and wild individuals. Geographic provenance models were also created, utilizing predictor variables such as soil nutrient groups and hydrological basins to evaluate model performance.The study found that species specific models could identify shingleback and common bluetongue lizards with an accuracy of 70%. Additionally, the models distinguished captive-bred from wild individuals with up to 81% accuracy for blue-tongue lizards and 83% for shinglebacks. Geographic provenance models demonstrated variable performance, achieving up to 83% accuracy but indicating the need for further refinement and more intensive sampling to improve model resolution.The results imply that pXRF technology has significant potential as a tool for wildlife enforcement, providing valuable information for species identification and the classification of individuals as captive or wild. This finding is consistent with prior research highlighting the utility of elemental profiling in wildlife conservation. The study also identifies a critical knowledge gap regarding the impact of captivity duration on elemental profiles, suggesting that future research should focus on refining geographic models and understanding the dynamics of elemental changes over time in captive versus wild specimens. Overall, the integration of pXRF into wildlife enforcement protocols represents a cost-effective and rapid approach to combatting illegal wildlife trade.
Keywords: Australia, shingleback, blue-tongue, pXRF, captive, wild, poaching
Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Brandis, Zawada, Meagher, Ramp and Francis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kate Brandis, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.