HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Sec. Chemical Ecology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1505145

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Ecological StoichiometryView all 5 articles

Exploring the multi-scale ecological consequences of stoichiometric imbalance using an Agent-Based Modeling approach

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Emory University, Atlanta, United States
  • 2Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, United States
  • 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
  • 4Department of Ecology, Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Prague, Czechia
  • 5Institute of Soil Biology (ASCR), České Budějovice, South Bohemia, Czechia
  • 6University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, United States
  • 7Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Despite living in a nutritionally heterogeneous world, consumers maintain a relatively strict elemental homeostasis. As a result, consumers often face an elemental imbalance between what they ingest and what is required for their growth, maintenance, and reproduction. Here, we attempt to unite concepts from three complementary frameworks used to study these imbalances—Ecological Stoichiometry Theory (EST), Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory, and Nutritional Geometry (NG)—within an agent-based modelling (ABM) approach. Specifically, we developed a two-reserve DEB model within the ABM that tracks elemental intake, storage, and release in individual consumers across space and time, all while integrating energetic trade-offs and simulating behavioral responses to stoichiometric mismatch. This approach provides a platform to study the effects of stoichiometric imbalances on populations with individuals that have heterogeneous traits, and on feedbacks between consumer populations and environmental nutrient cycling. We demonstrate the utility of this approach through a case study of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) balancing carbon and nitrogen intake in a nitrogen-limited landscape. Our case study demonstrates how heterogeneity in resource stoichiometry, and the ability for consumers to respond to such heterogeneity under nutrient limitation, can have variable effects on population dynamics and consumer nutrient cycling. Ultimately, our ABM is able to capture how stoichiometric mismatches faced at the individual level can drive emergent ecological outcomes through the collective impacts on the population. While the intricacy of our model ensures ample room for further improvements and expansions, we hope this user-friendly tool will enable practitioners of EST, DEB, and NG to test new hypotheses, guide experimental and field research, and advance theoretical development.

Keywords: Elemental homeostasis, Stoichiometric imbalance, Ecological stoichiometry, Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB), Agent-based model (ABM), theoretical ecology

Received: 02 Oct 2024; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bradley, Akinnifesi, Duvall, Novotna Jaromerska, Junker and Wong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: LM Bradley, Emory University, Atlanta, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more