Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1535001
This article is part of the Research Topic Opportunities and Challenges for Wild Bee Conservation View all 13 articles

Discovering, understanding, and saving wild bees in a changing world

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Georgia, Athens, United States
  • 2 USFS Athens, Georgia, Athens, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    It is a tragic irony that the advancements in agriculture, technology, and industrialization that have afforded us the opportunity to study the diversity and ecology of wild bees are also driving the destruction of the habitats crucial to sustaining these species. The excitement of discovering previously unknown species or ecological interactions is tempered by an urgent need for research focused on developing effective conservation and restoration strategies. Without such efforts, many bee species and the vital services they provide could be lost from managed landscapes. Although human activities are driving a biodiversity crisis of historic proportions (Cowie et al., 2022), we are thankfully not helpless in this moment. The same spirit of innovation and discovery that fueled our dramatic successes in shaping landscapes and ecosystems around the world offers our best hope for achieving a sustainable and biodiverse future. The articles assembled in this issue on "Opportunities and Challenges for Wild Bee Conservation" represent important steps in that direction.Of key importance to wild bee conservation in mixed-use landscapes is the protection of seminatural habitats. For example, Heuel et al. (2024) found higher bee richness and increased seed set near natural grasslands than near perennial wildflower strips in Germany. Other papers in this issue underscore the value of forests to bee diversity. For example, Edelkind-Vealey et al. ( 2024) report on the diversity of bees associated with urban forest fragments in the southeastern United States and compare community composition between the forest edge and interior. Similarly, Ulyshen et al. (2024) characterize the diverse native bee community associated with firemaintained pine savanna. Two papers highlight the unique bee fauna associated with forest canopies. Dorey et al. (2024) document eight new Hylaeus species from Fiji, all from the rainforest canopy. Similarly, Cunningham-Minnick et al. (2024) demonstrate that the canopies of North American temperate deciduous forests, historically dismissed as suboptimal pollinator habitat, support distinct assemblages of bees compared to those captured nearer to the forest floor.Despite the immense importance of protecting and properly managing semi-natural habitats, such efforts alone may be insufficient to conserve bees in many degraded landscapes. As noted by Tetlie and Harmon-Threatt (2024), neonicotinoids, which persist in ecosystems long after their application, represent a potential long-term threat to bees. Kueneman et al. (2024) similarly stress the negative impacts of land-use changes on solitary ground-nesting bees, which are often overlooked in conservation efforts. Efforts to restore habitats, as discussed by Payne et al. (2024), are key to addressing habitat loss and fragmentation. These efforts must include both floral and nesting resources to support diverse bee communities. Similarly, Kline and Joshi (2024) argue that urban and agricultural landscapes, often seen as threats to biodiversity, may offer untapped potential for pollinator conservation if managed with bee-friendly strategies.Improved monitoring techniques are essential to properly assess bee populations and understand how they respond to different habitat conditions. Studies like those by Mathis et al. (2024) andMacLeod et al. (2024) underscore the importance of non-lethal sampling methods, such as visual distance surveys, which provide more accurate data without introducing biases. Citizen science initiatives, like those described by Kueneman et al. (2024) andMacLeod et al. (2024), can also play an important role in increasing data availability and filling gaps in our understanding of bee distributions. Finally, Rousseau et al. (2024) report on how deficiencies in data quality and quantity are impeding efforts to assess population trends and prioritize conservation actions.It is clear from these articles that much about wild bees remains to be discovered and that the survival of these species is increasingly threatened by anthropogenic changes. Effective conservation strategies will require the protection and restoration of habitats, the improvement of monitoring techniques, and the sustained dedication of landowners, policy makers, and the general public.

    Keywords: Wild bees, Sampling, conservation, Urban, Forest, restoration, Community science

    Received: 26 Nov 2024; Accepted: 04 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Braman and Ulyshen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Kris Braman, University of Georgia, Athens, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.