Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Ecol. Evol., 12 August 2024
Sec. Evolutionary Developmental Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in Evolutionary Developmental Biology 2023 View all 9 articles

Editorial: Women in evolutionary developmental biology 2023

  • 1Department of Marine Biology, Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
  • 2Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy

Women pursuing a career in science face many barriers, including gender bias and discrimination, challenges in balancing work and family life, and a lack of female mentors and role models. Yet, these barriers have not stopped women researchers in the field of evolutionary developmental biology, who have lead and generated groundbreaking discoveries for decades: from Hilde Mangold, who discovered during her PhD, the Spemann-Mangold organizer in 1924, to current prominent leaders, such as Marianne Bronner, Ruth Lehmann, Cori Bargmann, Trudy Schupbach and many more. The Research Topic Women in evolutionary developmental biology 2023 celebrates the remarkable achievements and discoveries of female scientists in the field of evolutionary developmental biology.

1 Development and evolution of Drosophila and other insects

The first female developmental biologist to be awarded the Nobel Prize was Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard in 1995, for her discoveries of the genes that drive early development in the fly, Drosophila melanogaster (Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus, 1980). Three papers in this Research Topic use comparative studies of Drosophila and other insects, to study different aspects of development and evolution. Urum et al., investigate the development and evolution of the male terminalia (genitalia and analia) by dissecting and comparing these morphological structures in the pupas across 12 species of Drosophila. They discovered a substantial heterochrony in the development of pupal terminalia in different species, but were nevertheless able to align the developmental stages across species. Their detailed analyses illuminate the evolutionary origin of different substructures, identify new morphologies and suggest a possible homology of other substructures. A molecular and functional comparative study by Babišová et al. demonstrates the evolutionary conservation of the apocrine secretion across 30 species of Drosophila and two other dipterans from diverse habitats. Apocrine secretion is a secretory mechanism that is evolutionarily conserved in all metazoans, including the human salivary and sweat glands. Babišová et al. show that while apocrine secretion is universally used for exuvial fluid in the 32 species they studied, not all species use exocytosis for secretion, highlighting a conserved role for apocrine secretion in providing microbial defense during pupal metamorphosis.

A mini review by Casasa discusses the regulation of phenotypic plasticity, which is the ability of organisms to change in response to their environment. This paper focuses on how insects adapt to changes in nutrition, reviewing our current understanding of the mechanisms behind this adaptability, how these mechanisms have evolved, and how multiple traits work together in response to nutrition. These studies collectively illuminate developmental processes and evolutionary adaptations in insects, demonstrating the strength of comparative analyses in understanding the mechanisms underlying these phenomena.

2 Development and evolution of sea urchins and other echinoderms

The experimental advantages of the sea urchin embryo enabled major discoveries in developmental biology, from the fundamental principles of embryology to the detailed models of the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive cell fate specification (Davidson, 2010; Paganos et al., 2021). In 1983, Lynn M. Angerer revolutionized the field by using in-situ hybridization of RNA antisense probes to study the spatial gene expression in the sea urchin embryo (Cox et al., 1984); a method that is now widely adopted, with this paper attracting close to 2,000 citations. In this Research Topic, Lynne’s former students Yaguchi and Yaguchi continue her path, and investigate the regulation of the development of the cholinergic neurons in the apical organ of the sea urchin. The sea urchin apical organ is a sensory structure located at the anterior neuroectoderm of the larva that includes serotonergic and cholinergic neurons. This study demonstrates that the transcription factor, Rx, is essential for the development of cholinergic neurons, and that the RNA-binding protein Musashi1 acts downstream of Rx and regulates the level of choline acetyltransferase. Important regulators of mRNA are microRNAs that fine-tune many developmental processes, and their dysregulation is related to a range of diseases and developmental abnormalities (Shang et al., 2023). Arnott et al. study the transcriptional regulation of miR1, miR31, miR71, miR92, miR124 and miR2012, by developmental signaling pathways and transcription factors in sea urchin embryos. Using pharmacological and genetic perturbations, the authors discovered that these microRNAs are regulated by Wnt, Nodal and Sonic Hedgehog signaling pathways and the transcription factors, Alx1, Tbr and Ets.

As more echinoderm models are developed, comparative studies illuminate the evolution of novel body plans through changes in gene regulatory networks (Gildor et al., 2019). Perrilo et al. present a new echinoderm model for comparative studies, the Mediterranean sea cucumber, Holothuria tubulosa. They describe a reliable method for obtaining gametes and creating embryonic cultures, as well as characterize unique larval tissues using immunohistochemistry and high-resolution microscopy. Together, these three papers exemplify how research of the development in echinoderms uncovers the regulation of key developmental processes and provides novel insights into evolutionary developmental biology.

3 Genetic basis of phenotypic variation and adaptation in mammals

The evolution of novel traits that lead to phenotypic variation was thought to be mainly driven by changes in cis-regulatory elements that control gene expression (Wray, 2007). The groundbreaking work of Hopi Hoekstra revealed that a single amino-acid mutation in the coding sequence of melanocortin-1 receptor determines the coat-color of mice and allow them to thrive in different backgrounds (Hoekstra et al., 2006). Her works, and others since, have proven that phenotypic variation can be due to mutations that alter protein function (Hoekstra and Coyne, 2007). In this Research Topic, Agata et al. investigate the role of a single amino acid mutation in the transactivating domain of the transcription factor GLI3 that occurs in Neanderthals and Denisovans. They show that this mutation affects the expression of downstream genes and when introduced to mice, leads to alteration in mice skeletal morphology, implying that this mutation might have provided beneficial traits for extinct hominins.

4 Computational model of the minimal GRN that explains leaf polarity

The complexity of GRNs makes it difficult to evaluate their explanatory capacity, and various mathematical models have been used to simulate GRN function (Chaves et al., 2005; Ben-Tabou de-Leon and Davidson, 2009; Peter et al., 2012). Here, Yuste et al. used Boolean network modeling to study an experimentally based model of the GRN that controls the abaxial-adaxial polarity in Arabidopsis thaliana leaf primordium. They found 1,905 Boolean networks that could produce the abaxial-adaxial polarity, and among these, identified two networks that best matched perturbation data and predicted missing connections. This work highlights the ability of Boolean networks to test experimentally based GRN models and identify missing regulatory connections that need to be tested experimentally.

5 Conclusions

In conclusion, this Research Topic highlights the outstanding contributions of female scientists to evolutionary developmental biology. More broadly, the Research Topic emphasizes the importance of comparative studies and computational modeling in deciphering the regulation of fundamental biological mechanisms and gaining evolutionary insights. We commend the exceptional skill and determination of women scientists in evolutionary developmental biology who have paved the way for future discoveries and insights, and created greater inclusivity in scientific research.

Author contributions

SB-T: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MA: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ben-Tabou de-Leon S., Davidson E. H. (2009). Modeling the dynamics of transcriptional gene regulatory networks for animal development. Dev. Biol. 325, 317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaves M., Albert R., Sontag E. D. (2005). Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 235, 431–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cox K. H., DeLeon D. V., Angerer L. M., Angerer R. C. (1984). Detection of mrnas in sea urchin embryos by in situ hybridization using asymmetric RNA probes. Dev. Biol. 101, 485–502. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90162-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson E. H. (2010). Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks. Nature 468, 911–920. doi: 10.1038/nature09645

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gildor T., Cary G. A., Lalzar M., Hinman V. F., Ben-Tabou de-Leon S. (2019). Developmental transcriptomes of the sea star, Patiria miniata, illuminate how gene expression changes with evolutionary distance. Sci. Rep. 9, 16201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52577-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoekstra H. E., Coyne J. A. (2007). The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61, 995–1016. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00105.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoekstra H. E., Hirschmann R. J., Bundey R. A., Insel P. A., Crossland J. P. (2006). A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313, 101–104. doi: 10.1126/science.1126121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nusslein-Volhard C., Wieschaus E. (1980). Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795–801. doi: 10.1038/287795a0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paganos P., Voronov D., Musser J. M., Arendt D., Arnone M. I. (2021). Single-cell RNA sequencing of the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus larva reveals the blueprint of major cell types and nervous system of a non-chordate deuterostome. eLife 10, 1-29. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70416.sa2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peter I. S., Faure E., Davidson E. H. (2012). Feature Article: Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 16434–16442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207852109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shang R., Lee S., Senavirathne G., Lai E. C. (2023). microRNAs in action: biogenesis, function and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 816–833. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00611-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wray G. A. (2007). The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 206–216. doi: 10.1038/nrg2063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: embryo development, evolution, adaptation, Drosophila, echinoderm, Boolean models

Citation: Ben-Tabou de-Leon S and Arnone MI (2024) Editorial: Women in evolutionary developmental biology 2023. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12:1464506. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1464506

Received: 14 July 2024; Accepted: 31 July 2024;
Published: 12 August 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Mark A. Elgar, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2024 Ben-Tabou de-Leon and Arnone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon, sben-tab@univ.haifa.ac.il; Maria Ina Arnone, miarnone@szn.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.