Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1459468
This article is part of the Research Topic Water and Ecological System: Response, Management, and Restoration-Volume II View all 8 articles

Characteristics of the Macroinvertebrate Community Structure and Their Habitat Suitability Conditions in the Chishui River

Provisionally accepted
Xinyu Li Xinyu Li 1Long Yan Long Yan 1*Peng Hu Peng Hu 1*Chongju Shang Chongju Shang 2*Baolong Zhao Baolong Zhao 1*Zhi Xu Zhi Xu 3
  • 1 China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 2 Guizhou Institute of Water Conservancy Science, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
  • 3 China Three Gorges Corporation, Wuhan, Hebei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    As an important tributary of the upper Yangtze River without dams, the study of the macroinvertebrate community structure and habitat suitability conditions in the Chishui River holds significant implications for water ecological conservation and restoration. In order to explore the species composition, community characteristics and their ecological needs of macroinvertebrates in the Chishui River, 26 sampling sites were deployed in the Chishui River in this study in March (dry season) , July (wet season) , and November (normal season) of 2023. A total of 153 macroinvertebrate taxa were identified, with 62 taxa recorded in the dry season, 46 in the wet season and 115 in the normal season. The assemblage was predominantly composed of aquatic insects from the EPT group (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera). The results of ANOSIM analysis indicate that the species composition of macroinvertebrates varies significantly across different water periods. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Margalef index were significantly higher during the normal season compared to the dry and wet seasons. In contrast, the Pielou index and Simpson index remained relatively stable, suggesting a higher level of evenness in community structure across the different water periods. Based on the habitat suitability curves, Corbicula fluminea and Heptagenia prefer environments with high flow velocities and substrate particle sizes (D50) smaller than 300 mm. Hydropsyche sp.1 and Baetis thrive in environments with medium to low water depths, high flow velocities, and D50 ranging from 100 to 300 mm. Caridina favor deeper waters, low flow velocities, and larger substrate particles. The GAM fitting results revealed that the number of macroinvertebrate taxa increased with rising pondus hydrogenii (pH) and electrical conductivity (EC) levels. Species richness initially declined and then rose within certain thresholds of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations. The optimal conditions for macroinvertebrate communities in the Chishui River were determined to be a DO concentration of 9.8 mg/L and an NH3-N concentration of 0.12 mg/L. Overall, the macroinvertebrate community structure in the Chishui River is significantly influenced by factors such as water quality, flow velocity, and substrate particle size, and it demonstrates strong adaptability to seasonal variations.

    Keywords: Undamed River, Chishui River, macroinvertebrates, community structure, habitat suitability

    Received: 04 Jul 2024; Accepted: 23 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Yan, Hu, Shang, Zhao and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Long Yan, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, Beijing Municipality, China
    Peng Hu, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, Beijing Municipality, China
    Chongju Shang, Guizhou Institute of Water Conservancy Science, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
    Baolong Zhao, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, Beijing Municipality, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.