Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Urban Ecology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1457049
This article is part of the Research Topic Urban Biodiversity in the Global South View all 6 articles

Structural and acoustic properties of urbanized landscapes adversely affect bird communities in a tropical environment

Provisionally accepted
Dickson Anoibi A. Matthew Dickson Anoibi A. Matthew 1*Samuel T. Osinubi Samuel T. Osinubi 2Samuel T. Ivande Samuel T. Ivande 3Soladoye B. Iwajomo Soladoye B. Iwajomo 4Ulf Ottosson Ulf Ottosson 1
  • 1 A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, Jos, Nigeria
  • 2 Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, Faculty of Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
  • 3 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau, Nigeria
  • 4 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The rural-urban gradient serves as a valuable context for investigating the impact of urbanization on biodiversity. While previous studies have demonstrated shifts in bird communities along this gradient, our understanding of the specific impacts of individual urban components such as man-made physical structures and anthropogenic noise, remains limited, and more so, in Afro-tropical environments. Employing the point count method, we recorded birds and also determined the levels of anthropogenic noise and physical structures, across fifteen sites along the rural-urban gradient in the Jos Plateau, Nigeria. We then investigated variations in bird communities along the urbanization gradient and assessed the influence of the two urban components -anthropogenic noise and physical structures, on bird populations. Our findings revealed a decline in bird abundance and species richness along the urbanization gradient. Similarly, species common to all the urbanization categories (species present at least at one point in rural, suburban, and urban) also exhibited a decrease in abundance. The suburban area showed a greater similarity in bird community composition to the urban area than the rural area. Notably, as the level of urban development increased, numerous bird species associated with undisturbed sites gradually vanished. Both anthropogenic noise and physical structures exhibited significant negative effects on bird abundance and species richness. Interestingly, there was no evidence of interdependence between these urban components, suggesting that their impacts on bird communities were not contingent on each other. Anthropogenic noise had a significant negative effect on bird abundance and richness at all levels of physical structures. Overall, our research underscores the detrimental consequences of anthropogenic habitat modification, particularly the alteration of structural and acoustic properties, and emphasizes the importance of preserving undisturbed habitats and implementing ecologically mindful urban planning strategies to safeguard bird communities in the Afro-tropics.

    Keywords: Bird community, Urbanization, anthropogenic noise, physical structure, Rural-urban

    Received: 30 Jun 2024; Accepted: 21 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Matthew, Osinubi, Ivande, Iwajomo and Ottosson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Dickson Anoibi A. Matthew, A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, Jos, Nigeria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.