The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1411388
Navigating Diversity: Primer Impact on Arthropod Recovery in Molecular Environmental Monitoring in tropical Amazon
Provisionally accepted- 1 Vale Technological Institute (ITV), Belém, Brazil
- 2 GLOBE Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
The urgent need for effective environmental monitoring amid the escalating biodiversity crisis has prompted the adoption of molecular techniques like DNA metabarcoding. Through sequencing of taxonomically informative mitochondrial markers in bulk arthropod samples, metabarcoding allows assessment of arthropod diversity, which is crucial for ecosystem health evaluations, especially in threatened regions like the Amazon. However, challenges such as primer biases and reference database limitations persist. Here we assess the performance of four metabarcoding primer sets, two COI markers (ZBJ-ArtF1c/ZBJ-ArtR2c [Zeale]: 157bp targeting arthropods, and mlCOIintF/jgHCO2198 [Leray]: 313bp targeting metazoans) and two 16S markers (Ins16S_1shortF/Ins16S_1shortR [Ins16S]: 150bp targeting insects, and Coleop_16Sc/Coleop_16Sd [Epp]: 105bp targeting arthropods, mainly Coleoptera) in amplifying the taxonomic constituents of bulk arthropod samples collected across different natural and anthropogenic habitats from the Brazilian Amazon biome. To evaluate primer performance, we used the indicators (i) amplification efficiency, (ii) primer specificity, i.e., the amount of non-target sequences, (iii) detected OTU richness, (iv) group coverage, and (v) taxonomic resolution. Finally, we (vi) estimated the refinement in taxa recovery by additional amplifications. Despite lower specificity and contrasting results regarding OTU richness, the primer pairs returning larger fragments showed higher taxonomic resolution (Ins16S) and broader taxonomic coverage (Leray) than Zeale and Epp did. Furthermore, results demonstrated the complementarity of the Leray and the Ins16S primer sets fro taxon-dependent studies. Despite limitations, combining these primers could enhance biodiversity monitoring in the region. Considering incomplete reference gene banks, primers maximizing OUT richness (EPP and Leray) may be the best choice for taxon-independent surveys. These findings underscore the importance of primer selection and highlight the ongoing efforts to refine DNA metabarcoding for robust environmental assessments.
Keywords: Primer selection, DNA in bulk samples, taxonomic coverage, Malaise traps, DNA metabarcoding
Received: 02 Apr 2024; Accepted: 30 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Valente Penner, Lynggaard, Argolo, Kelly, Oliveira, Bohmann and Gastauer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Markus Gastauer, Vale Technological Institute (ITV), Belém, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.