AUTHOR=Wikston Madison , Breton Brie-Anne A. , Vilaça Sibelle Torres , Bennett Amanda M. , Kyle Christopher J. , Beresford David V. , Lesbarrères David , Wilson Chris C. , Green David M. , Fortin Marie-Josée , Murray Dennis L. TITLE=Comparative efficacy of eDNA and conventional methods for monitoring wetland anuran communities JOURNAL=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1179158 DOI=10.3389/fevo.2023.1179158 ISSN=2296-701X ABSTRACT=
Documenting biodiversity, species occurrence, and species status require reliable monitoring techniques, but the complex life history and cryptic behavior of many anurans create challenges for conventional monitoring approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys are a promising alternative (or complement) to conventional anuran monitoring, but their relative success has not been fully tested. We assessed the comparative efficacy of targeted eDNA detection via quantitative PCR (qPCR) and three conventional amphibian survey methods (visual encounter, breeding call, and larval dipnet surveys) for detecting nine anuran species in natural wetlands in southern Ontario, Canada. Our analyses revealed that all assessment methods yielded imperfect detection, with visual encounter and eDNA surveys detecting the greatest species richness and eDNA surveys requiring the fewest sampling events. Amphibian community composition results differed among survey methods and sampling events, and detection efficacy was markedly variable, with some species requiring two to three methods to maximize detection success. Notably, two relatively terrestrial species (