AUTHOR=Zhu Kai , Liu Qicheng , Xiong Xiao , Zhang Yuan , Wang Min , Liu Hai TITLE=Carbon footprint and embodied carbon emission transfer network obtained using the multi–regional input–output model and social network analysis method: A case of the Hanjiang River basin, China JOURNAL=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution VOLUME=10 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.941520 DOI=10.3389/fevo.2022.941520 ISSN=2296-701X ABSTRACT=

China is the largest carbon emitter in the world; thus, reducing carbon emissions while maintaining economic growth has become an important issue. Within the context of carbon neutrality strategies, calculation of the carbon footprint and embodied carbon transfer can help policymakers formulate reasonable carbon reduction plans. The multi–regional input–output (MRIO) model can clarify carbon flow pathways between regions, and social network analysis (SNA) can comprehensively evaluate the different positions of individual sectors. Combining these two approaches, the specific characteristics of carbon emissions in complex production and trade relationships can be analyzed. China has become the world’s top total carbon emitter, and the Hanjiang River basin (HJRB) constitutes an important economic link between the developed and less developed regions of China. Studying carbon emissions in the HJRB can provide a reference for other, similar regions and is vital for the realization of China’s carbon emission reduction targets. This paper examines the carbon footprint and embodied carbon emission transfer among three provinces and 12 sectors in the HJRB during different periods and identifies the key industries in the carbon transfer process. The results indicate that (1) the total carbon footprint in the HJRB exhibits an increasing trend. Energy-based Shaanxi Province exhibits the highest growth rate of the carbon footprint, agriculture-based Henan Province shows a decreasing trend, and consumption-based Hubei Province displays the lowest carbon footprint intensity. (2) There are differences in the carbon emission coefficient and final consumption rate among various sectors; construction, metal processing and metal and non-metallic products, processing and manufacturing of petroleum, coking, nuclear fuel, chemical products, and other services are the sectors accounting for a high proportion of emissions. (3) The more obvious the supply relationship is, the higher the flow of embodied carbon emission transfer between sectors. (4) Energy-based regions transfer large amounts of fossil energy, electricity, steel and coal resources to developed regions and simultaneously assume more of the carbon reduction pressure imposed on developed regions. (5) The key industries within the embodied carbon emission transfer network notably control the carbon emissions of other industries and can provide breakthroughs to achieve challenging carbon emission reduction targets.