ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Geohazards and Georisks

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1564744

This article is part of the Research TopicNatural Disaster Prediction Based on Experimental and Numerical MethodsView all 10 articles

Coseismic landslides caused by the 2022 Luding earthquake in China: Insights from remote sensing interpretations and machine learning models

Provisionally accepted
Zhiwen  DingZhiwen Ding1,2Chun  WangChun Wang3*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 3Sichuan Institute of Nuclear Geological Survey, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

On September 5, 2022, an Ms 6.8 earthquake occurred in Luding County, Sichuan Province, China, triggering numerous landslides and causing extensive damage to buildings and casualties. A comprehensive study of the characteristics of coseismic landslide distribution in this area is highly important for postearthquake emergency response. In this paper, coseismic landslides in highintensity areas were interpreted through remote sensing images, and 5,386 landslides with a total area of 22.2 km 2 were identified. The spatial distribution of coseismic landslides was analyzed in relation to seismic, topographic, and geological factors to assess their susceptibility at the regional scale. The results revealed that the majority of coseismic landslides occurred on both sides of the Xianshuihe fault, which is the causative fault, and the landslides exhibited a linear distribution. These landslides were concentrated mainly at elevations between 1,000 and 1,800 m, with slopes of 30-50°, and they occurred in areas with hard intrusive rock masses. The spatial distribution of coseismic landslides in the study area was predicted using three models: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) theory was used to conduct a quantitative analysis of the main geomorphological factors controlling the landslides. This paper revealed that different topographic factors had varying degrees of nonlinear impacts on landslide formation and that the combined effects of multiple factors, such as the peak ground acceleration (PGA), slope, and lithology, controlled the formation of landslides. This paper highlights the significant advantages of machine learning-based intelligent identification and analytical techniques in landslide disaster emergency surveys and analysis of formation conditions. Rapid prediction of the spatial location and distribution pattern of coseismic landslides provides effective support and guidance for emergency response, risk mitigation, and reconstruction planning.

Keywords: coseismic landslides, 2022 Luding earthquake, spatial distribution, machine learning, SHAP analysis

Received: 22 Jan 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ding and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chun Wang, Sichuan Institute of Nuclear Geological Survey, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more