
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Geohazards and Georisks
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1557860
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Landslides represent a significant geohazard in the northern Ethiopian highlands, causing extensive damage to farmland, infrastructure, and settlements, with severe socio-economic repercussions. Addressing the critical need for improved natural hazard management, this study investigates landslide susceptibility in Debek, South Wollo, Ethiopia, using advanced geospatial modeling techniques. The primary objectives are to identify and integrate key causative factors of landslides, evaluate the efficacy of Frequency Ratio (FR) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) models, and provide actionable insights for georisk mitigation. Field surveys and satellite imagery identified 328 landslide events, partitioned into training (75%) and validation (25%) datasets. Eight critical landslide-influencing factors-slope gradient, aspect, elevation, proximity to streams and springs, slope material, distance to lineaments, and land use/land cover (LULC) were systematically analyzed. Among these, slope material and distance to springs were identified as the most significant contributors to landslide susceptibility. Landslide susceptibility map's were developed using FR and AHP models, with validation conducted through landslide density indices (R-index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results demonstrated a high degree of concordance between highly susceptible areas and observed landslide events. The FR model exhibited marginally superior performance, achieving an ROC success rate of 0.828 and a prediction rate of 0.835, compared to the AHP model's ROC success rate of 0.826 and prediction rate of 0.832. The novelty of the study lays in the comparative analysis of Frequency Ratio (FR) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) models for landslide susceptibility mapping in a data-scarce region. These findings underscore the utility of GIS-based geomatics approaches in delineating landslide-prone zones, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of each model. This study provides critical resources for policymakers and stakeholders, supporting informed land-use planning, targeted geohazard mitigation, and comprehensive disaster prevention initiatives. By advancing the understanding of landslide dynamics in the Ethiopian highlands, this research reinforces the pivotal role of geospatial modeling in enhancing natural hazard management and susceptibility reduction frameworks.
Keywords: Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR) Model, Geohazards and Georisks, Geospatial modeling, landslide susceptibility mapping, Natural hazard mitigation
Received: 09 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Teku, Ali, Sisay and Mihret. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Degfie Teku, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mekdela Amba University, Tulu Awuliya, Ethiopia
Alemnew Ali, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mekdela Amba University, Tulu Awuliya, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.