
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1542536
This article is part of the Research Topic Impacts of Climate Change (CC) on territory and environment: materials and methods for evaluating the various CC-induced hazards and actions for reducing the consequences on the communities. View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As anthropogenic climate signals have intensified, precipitation patterns have changed over the contiguous United States (CONUS) and may continue to change in the future. Comparing historical climate model simulations to ground-based observations can help us quantify uncertainties in climate models when simulating precipitation and its changes. This work evaluates precipitation simulated by the Community Earth System Model Version 2 large ensemble (CESM2-LE) against observations from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Prediction Center Unified CONUS (CPC) during 1948-2022. Next, past precipitation patterns from CPC are compared to future projections (2023-2100) of CESM2-LE for a medium-to-high emission scenario (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, SSP3-7.0) from a 70-member ensemble. A pixel-by-pixel bias correction is then conducted to remove systemic errors between the model and observations. Results indicate that precipitation variability is drastically reduced in the ensemble mean and suggest caution when using it to draw conclusions regarding precipitation changes. CESM2-LE is shown to underestimate (overestimate) ground observations over CONUS in summer (winter) during 1948-2022. Climate model simulations struggle particularly to capture high-magnitude precipitation (i.e., annual averages larger than 10 mm/day), especially in the Northwestern US. Historical precipitation data show slightly upward patterns in annual, spring, fall, and winter averages, patterns that are projected to continue in the future. Future annual precipitation will increase with respect to historical observations by as much as 11% and 15% in the Northeast and Southeast US (which are already wet regions), respectively, whereas the arid Northern Great Plains region will experience a 15% decrease. Overall results indicate drier summers and wetter winters in the future with respect to the past. Furthermore, the 75th and 95th percentiles of seasonal precipitation will become more extreme during winter by as much as 100% but will decrease during summer by as much as 80%. This study places a strong emphasis on understanding reliable future climate projections, which can be useful when designing community-driven adaptation and mitigation plans for climate change.
Keywords: precipitation patterns1, trends2, climate model projections3, CESM24, CPC observations5
Received: 10 Dec 2024; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sharif, Maggioni and DOLLAN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ridwana Binte Sharif, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.