Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Geoscience and Society
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1520159
This article is part of the Research Topic Gross Ecosystem Product: Valuation of Nature’s Contribution to Human Well-Being View all 3 articles

From 2000 to 2022 evaluate of Land Ecological Security and reveal Obstacle Factors in Heilongjiang Province

Provisionally accepted
Yujia Wang Yujia Wang 1*Jing Gan Jing Gan 1*Fuyou Guo Fuyou Guo 2Erwei Dong Erwei Dong 3*Jiafu Liu Jiafu Liu 1*Wenqi Zhao Wenqi Zhao 1*
  • 1 Jilin Normal University, Siping, China
  • 2 Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study evaluated the land ecological security of Heilongjiang Province from 2000 to 2022, found out the main factors affecting the land ecological security, provided the basis for scientific formulation of corresponding measures, provided the guarantee for the sustainable development of regional social economy and agriculture, and maintained the long-term coordinated development of the land natural, social and economic complex. Based on the PSR model, this study constructs an index system for evaluating land ecological security. It employs a comprehensive index model to assess and utilizes the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method to determine the weights of various indicators. It calculated the comprehensive index of Heilongjiang Province from 2000 to 2022. Drawing upon relevant literature, this research establishes the land ecological security level of the region. The obstacle factor diagnosis model is used to analyze the main obstacle factors at each level, and corresponding countermeasures are proposed based on the results. The main results are as follows : (1) From 2000 to 2022, the level of land ecological security in Heilongjiang Province has generally shown a fluctuating upward trend, with the safety level changing from dangerous to relatively safe and moving towards a favorable direction. However, it remained mostly in an unsafe state for the past 20 years; (2) The main threats at the criterion layer have changed significantly, with obstacle degrees rising to 59% for pressure systems and 36% for status systems while decreasing to 5% for response systems. Currently, the main threat comes from pressure systems; (3) The main obstacle factors at the indicator layer have evolved from the proportion of tertiary industry output value and effective irrigation area of arable land to pure amount of chemical fertilizer applied in agriculture and proportion of forest area. In 2022, major factors affecting land ecological security in Heilongjiang Province are pure amount of chemical fertilizer applied in agriculture, proportion of forest area, industrial solid waste generation volume , pesticide use volume, and per capita water resources.

    Keywords: Land ecological security, Heilongjiang Province, PSR model, Obstacle factors, Entropy weight method

    Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 30 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Gan, Guo, Dong, Liu and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yujia Wang, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China
    Jing Gan, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China
    Erwei Dong, Arizona State University, Tempe, 85281, Arizona, United States
    Jiafu Liu, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China
    Wenqi Zhao, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.