
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Cryospheric Sciences
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1517081
This article is part of the Research Topic The State and Fate of the Cryosphere in the South American Andes View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Glaciers are of paramount importance in diverse environments, and due to the accelerated retreat experienced in recent decades, efforts have intensified to achieve a comprehensive understanding of key variables such as mass balance and glacial melting. However, the scarcity of data in regions that are difficult to access, such as the Andes Cordillera, hinders reliable glaciological studies of the historical period. This research examines the mass balance and melting dynamics of the Universidad Glacier, the largest in the semiarid Andes, from 1955 to 2020, using the physically based Cold Regions Hydrological Model (CRHM). The model was calibrated with geodetic mass balance estimates available between 1955 to 2020 and evaluated against on-site observations available between 2012 to 2014. Change point analysis revealed three contrasting periods of mass balance evolution: significant mass loss for the periods 1955-1971 and 2006-2020, and near equilibrium mass balance from 1971-2006. These loss and gain periods align with negative phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and positive ENSO (El Niño) events, respectively. Simulated runoff from glacier melt showed a positive trend of 8% per decade since 1971. Calibrated and uncalibrated versions of the model showed similar temporal variability, but cumulative mass balance differed significantly. The model calibrated from 1955 to 2020 had a minimal overestimation of 0.1% in mass loss and slightly improved the representation of annual albedo. Relative to this best-performing model, the model calibrated with geodetic mass balance estimates from 2000 to 2020 overestimated mass loss by 25%, while the uncalibrated model overestimated mass balance by 62%. Physically based modeling with parameters adjusted based on field observations is adequate to reproduce the most salient features of MB interannual variability. However, long-term projections may diverge significantly, and albedo parameterizations, including its special and temporal evolution throughout a glacier surface, are an avenue for future research.
Keywords: Glacier mass balance, Extratropical Andes Cordillera, hydrological modeling, Energy balance modeling, Geodetic surface change, Albedo calibration
Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mejías, McPhee, Mahmoud, Farías-Barahona, Kinnard, MacDonell, Montserrat, Somos-Valenzuela and Fernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
James McPhee, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.