Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Geoscience and Society

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1512780

This article is part of the Research Topic Gross Ecosystem Product: Valuation of Nature’s Contribution to Human Well-Being View all 6 articles

Distinguishing the contributions of natural ecosystems and water infrastructures to water provisioning services at watershed scale

Provisionally accepted
Jian Zhang Jian Zhang 1,2Shidong Zhang Shidong Zhang 1,3Yuan Huang Yuan Huang 1Feifei Fan Feifei Fan 1Jinfeng Ma Jinfeng Ma 1Hua Zheng Hua Zheng 1,4*
  • 1 Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 2 School of Management, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, China
  • 3 Minzu University of China, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 4 College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Natural ecosystems and water infrastructure (such as reservoirs) jointly exert an influence water flow by means of retaining, regulating, storing, and releasing water, thereby enhancing the availability of water resources to satisfy human demands. Previous research has predominantly concentrated on the role of natural ecosystems in water provision services; however, studies that integrate the contributions of both natural ecosystems and infrastructure to quantify their respective impacts on water provisioning services remain scarce. Here we utilize the SWAT hydrological model to simulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of water provisioning services in the Qinling-Danjiang watershed-an area prone to seasonal water shortages. The study delineates the supply and beneficiary areas, quantifying the relative contributions of natural ecosystems and infrastructure to watershed water provisioning services and their ecosystem service values were respectively evaluated by delineating the supply and beneficiary areas of water provisioning services and using scenario analyses. The annual water provision in the Danjiang watershed was 2.394×10 3 million m 3 , with significant variation across watershed and months. The total water demand from stakeholders was 1.122×10 3 million m 3 , with agricultural irrigation being the largest consumer, and 52.81% of the area experiencing a supply deficit. Under the baseline scenario, the value of water provisioning services was 14.602 billion CNY. In a scenario without reservoir infrastructure, water provision of natural ecosystems increased by approximately 27% to 3.039×10 3 million m 3 (about 18.538 billion CNY), but exacerbated seasonal imbalances. Conversely, in a scenario without natural ecosystems, the water provision of reservoir infrastructure dropped by over 90% to 193 million m 3 (about 1.179 billion CNY), which was insufficient to meet regional demands. This study provides a novel perspective for understanding the interactions between natural ecosystems and infrastructure in water provisioning services and offers a new approach to distinguish their relative contribution in water provisioning services, which is of great significance for accounting nature's contribution to people.

    Keywords: Natural ecosystems, Water infrastructures, Supply and demand relationship, Ecosystem service values (ESVs), Qinling-Danjiang watershed

    Received: 17 Oct 2024; Accepted: 19 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhang, Huang, Fan, Ma and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hua Zheng, Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, 100085, Beijing Municipality, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more