Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Solid Earth Geophysics
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2024.1483285
This article is part of the Research Topic Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Rock Physics View all 5 articles

A theoretical analysis for the logging-while-drilling dipole acoustic reflection measurement

Provisionally accepted
Yanghu Li Yanghu Li 1,2Zhenlin Wang Zhenlin Wang 1,3Yuanda Su Yuanda Su 2Xiaoming Tang Xiaoming Tang 2*
  • 1 Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company of PetroChina, Karamay, China
  • 2 School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The post-drilling wireline acoustic single-well imaging technology can now detect geological structures tens of meters away from borehole. Further development of this single-well imaging technology in the logging while drilling (LWD) environment has significant values in real time applications such as geosteering and reservoir navigation, etc. Based on the wireline imaging application, we propose a new method for the LWD application. In wireline imaging, the four-component (4C) dipole acoustic data are azimuthally rotated to scan the reflectors around borehole. In LWD, the azimuthal scanning is achieved by the drilling rotation, such that the 4C dipole system in the wireline is replaced by a one-dipole-source and two-receiver LWD system, where the two receivers are mounted on the opposite sides of the drill collar. For the LWD application, we first develop the theory for the LWD dipole shear-wave reflection imaging and validate the theory using finite-difference waveform modeling. Using the analytical solution, we analyze far-field radiation directivity of an acoustic LWD dipole source, and the effect of drilling rotation on the shear-wave reflection imaging using the LWD acoustic system. The LWD analysis results show that, for fast formations, the SH wave is the dominant component for the imaging, while for slow formations, the P wave becomes important and can be used for the imaging. Our results also indicate that the reflection data acquired by the system are affected by the drilling rotation speed. The take-off azimuth at the wave radiation may be different from the incident azimuth at the wave reception. Knowing the rotation speed, this azimuth difference can be corrected. A further advantage of using the oppositely mounted receivers is that the reflected wave arrives earlier (later) at the front (back) side receiver, thus the arrival time difference between the receivers can be used to eliminate the 180°-azimuth ambiguity of the dipole acoustic imaging.For reflection imaging using the proposed LWD system configuration, we have tested its azimuth sensitivity and validated its 180°-ambiguity solution using synthetic LWD and field wireline dipole data. The results of this work, therefore, provide a theoretical foundation for the development of the LWD acoustic reflection imaging system.

    Keywords: borehole dipole reflection imaging, Logging while drilling, azimuthal reception response, azimuth ambiguity, Geosteering

    Received: 19 Aug 2024; Accepted: 07 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Wang, Su and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaoming Tang, School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.