Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Geoscience and Society
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2024.1470577
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Climate Action: Insights from COP28 View all articles

Addressing the Anthropocene from the Global South: Integrating Paleoecology, Archaeology and Traditional Knowledge for COP Engagement

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany
  • 2 isoTROPIC Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
  • 3 Department of Structural Changes in the Technosphere, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany
  • 4 School of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, National Capital Region, Philippines
  • 5 Institute of Archaeological Science, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
  • 6 Department of Earth Systems Science, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany
  • 7 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany
  • 8 Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
  • 9 Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss necessitates more holistic, comprehensive, and integrated public policy approaches. Within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, this crisis highlights significant conflicts over forms of knowledge and conceptualization, affecting how international policies are formed. Indigenous knowledge systems have become increasingly acknowledged for their vital role in addressing the challenges of the Anthropocene. Conferences of the Parties institutions like the International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change emphasize the critical, although not always recognized, importance of Indigenous territories, which contain eighty percent of the world's biodiversity. Here, we show that research in paleoecology, archaeology and history demonstrates the long-term significance of traditional knowledge and Indigenous land management practices for contemporary ecosystem dynamics. Drawing from these varied studies and perspectives also reveal the socio-economic inequalities resulting from centuries of European colonialism. We showcase three case studies on; (i) pastoralism in eastern Africa, (ii) natural resource management in southeast Asia and (iii) adaptation to sea level rise in the Caribbean, which touch upon highly diverse human resilience strategies across space and time. Despite efforts at the COP28 to accelerate climate action and incorporate diverse knowledge systems, significant challenges remain. The need for a pluralistic knowledge, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, blending scientific language with artistic and narrative forms, is proposed as critical for fostering effective communication and developing more effective and equitable solutions for global environmental governance.

    Keywords: Anthropocene1, Global South2, Traditional Knowledge3, Climate Change4, COP Agenda5

    Received: 25 Jul 2024; Accepted: 18 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zuccarelli Freire, Ziegler, Caetano-Andrade, Iminjili, Lellau, Rudd, Stokes, Viegas, Antonosyan, Jha, Jha, Maezumi, Winkelmann, Roberts and Furquim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Veronica N. Zuccarelli Freire, Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.