Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Geochemistry
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2024.1448035
This article is part of the Research Topic Faults and Earthquakes Viewed by Networks, Monitoring Systems and by Numerical Modelling Techniques View all articles

Multiple geochemical parameters of well Wuliying of Beijing Seismic Monitoring Networks probably responding to the small earthquake of Chaoyang Beijing in 2022

Provisionally accepted
Yuxuan Chen Yuxuan Chen 1*Guiping Liu Guiping Liu 1*Fuqiong HUANG Fuqiong HUANG 2*Zhiguo Wang Zhiguo Wang 1*Leying Hu Leying Hu 1*Mingbo Yang Mingbo Yang 1*Xiaoru Sun Xiaoru Sun 1*Peixue Hua Peixue Hua 1*Shijun Zhu Shijun Zhu 1*Yanan Zhang Yanan Zhang 1*Xiaodong Wu Xiaodong Wu 1*Zhihui Wang Zhihui Wang 1*Lvqing Xu Lvqing Xu 1*Kongyan Han Kongyan Han 1*Bowen Cui Bowen Cui 1*Hongyan Dong Hongyan Dong 1*Yonggang Zhou Yonggang Zhou 3*
  • 1 Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
  • 2 China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing, China
  • 3 The Bureau of seismology of Yanqing District of Beijing, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Hydrological changes in groundwater coupled to earthquakes had been documented in the previous studies, while few reports investigate multiple geochemical parameters respond to earthquakes, particularly in trace elements received less attention, whereas they were suggested to be more sensitive to small earthquakes. Beijing is located in the Zhangjiakou-Bohai (Zhang-Bo) Seismic Belt of North China, to find effective precursors is the significant for Operational Earthquake Forcasting of Beijing area, we carried out one-year test research project through weekly collecting groundwater samples during June 2021 to June 2022 from seismic monitoring well of Wuliying in northwest of Beijing. The 41 trace chemical composition were analyzed for each sample. During the project ongoing period, the biggest earthquake with a magnitude of ML3.3 occurred in Chaoyang district of Beijing on February 3th, 2022. The content changes of these trace elements were systematically monitored before and after the earthquake. Through retrospective research, it was found that a few sensitive trace elements are were anomalous to be coupled to the earthquake, including Li, Sc, Rb, Mo, Cs, Ba, W, U, Sr, Mn, Ni, Zn. Besides trace elements, we examined stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen and existing hydrological data of groundwater level, temperature, major ions and gases to assess the validity of geochemistry as a monitoring and predictive tool. We only found that F-(fluorine) ions and He (helium) gas had apparent shifts to the earthquakes, while no shifts of groundwater level. Such characteristics of multiple geochemical parameters indicate that trace elements are likely to be more sensitive to crustal strain than groundwater level and major ions. We supposed a most likely mechanism of combination result of mixing and water-rock interactions to explain the phenomenon. The probably scenario was that minor stresses caused by the earthquakes might create micro-cracks in bedrocks, thereby leading to small volume of chemically distinct water mixing with the original water of aquifer, finally, the earthquake-induced rock fractures enhanced the water-rock interactions, resulting in post-seismic recovery of trace elements and δ 18 O value migration to the GWML. More testing works to find other sensitive sites to investigate multiple geochemical characteristics is continuing.

    Keywords: Zhang-Bo (Zhangjiakou-Bohai) Seismic Belt, Earthquake precursor, Trace Elements, hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes, Gases

    Received: 12 Jun 2024; Accepted: 12 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chen, Liu, HUANG, Wang, Hu, Yang, Sun, Hua, Zhu, Zhang, Wu, Wang, Xu, Han, Cui, Dong and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yuxuan Chen, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Guiping Liu, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Fuqiong HUANG, China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing, China
    Zhiguo Wang, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Leying Hu, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Mingbo Yang, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Xiaoru Sun, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Peixue Hua, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Shijun Zhu, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Yanan Zhang, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Xiaodong Wu, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Zhihui Wang, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Lvqing Xu, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Kongyan Han, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Bowen Cui, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Hongyan Dong, Beijing earthquake agency, Beijing, China
    Yonggang Zhou, The Bureau of seismology of Yanqing District of Beijing, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.