Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.
Sec. Volcanology
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2024.1392098
This article is part of the Research Topic Women in Science: Volcanology 2022 View all 13 articles

Tephra fall impacts to buildings: The 2017-2018 Manaro Voui eruption, Vanuatu

Provisionally accepted
Susanna F. Jenkins Susanna F. Jenkins 1,2*Ame McSporran Ame McSporran 3Thomas Wilson Thomas Wilson 3Carol Stewart Carol Stewart 4Graham S. Leonard Graham S. Leonard 5Sandrine Cevuard Sandrine Cevuard 6Esline Garaebiti Esline Garaebiti 6
  • 1 Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 2 Asian School of the Environment, College of Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 3 School of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • 4 Joint Center for Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 5 GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
  • 6 Vanuatu Meteorology and Geo-hazards Department, Port Vila, Vanuatu

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Building damage from tephra falls can have a substantial impact on exposed communities around erupting volcanoes. There are limited empirical studies of tephra fall impacts on buildings, with none on tephra falls impacting traditional thatched timber buildings, despite their prevalence across South Pacific island nations and parts of Asia. The 2017/2018 explosive eruption of Manaro Voui, Ambae Island, Vanuatu, resulted in damage to traditional (thatched timber), non-traditional (masonry), and hybrid buildings from tephra falls in March/April and July 2018. Field and photographic surveys were conducted across three separate field studies with building characteristics and damage recorded for a total of 589 buildings. Buildings were classified using a damage state framework customised for this study. Overall, increasing tephra thicknesses were related to increasing severity of building damage, corroborating previous damage surveys and vulnerability estimates. Traditional buildings were found to be less resistant to tephra loading than non-traditional buildings, although there was variation in resistance within each building type. For example, some traditional buildings collapsed under ~40 mm thickness while others sustained no damage when exposed to >200 mm. We attribute this to differences in the pre-eruption condition of the building and the implementation of mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies included covering thatched roofs with tarpaulins, which helped shed tephra and consequently reduced loading, and providing an internal prop to the main roof beam, which aided structural resistance. As is typical of post-event building damage surveys, we had limited time and access to the exposed communities, and we note the limitations this had for our findings. Our results contribute to the limited empirical data available for tephra fall building damage and can be used to calibrate existing fragility functions, improving our evidence base for forecasting future impacts for similar construction types globally.

    Keywords: Tephra fall, Eruption impacts, Building damage, impact assessment, Ambae eruption

    Received: 26 Feb 2024; Accepted: 19 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Jenkins, McSporran, Wilson, Stewart, Leonard, Cevuard and Garaebiti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Susanna F. Jenkins, Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.