AUTHOR=Hering Philip , Lindenfeld Michael , Rümpker Georg TITLE=Automatized localization of induced geothermal seismicity using robust time-domain array processing JOURNAL=Frontiers in Earth Science VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1217587 DOI=10.3389/feart.2023.1217587 ISSN=2296-6463 ABSTRACT=

The surveillance of geothermal seismicity is typically conducted using seismic networks, deployed around the power plants and subject to noise conditions in often highly urbanized areas. In contrast, seismic arrays can be situated at greater distances and allow monitoring of different power plants from one central location, less affected by noise interference. However, the effectiveness of arrays to monitor geothermal reservoirs is not well investigated and the increased distance to the source coincides with a decreased accuracy of the earthquake localizations. It is therefore essential to establish robust data processing and to obtain precise estimates of the location uncertainties. Here, we use time-domain array data processing and solve for the full 3-D slowness vector using robust linear regression. The approach implements a Biweight M-estimator, which yields stable parameter estimates and is well suited for real-time applications. We compare its performance to conventional least squares regression and frequency wavenumber analysis. Additionally, we implement a statistical approach based on changepoint analysis to automatically identify P- and S-wave arrivals within the recorded waveforms. The method can be seen as a simplification of autoregressive prediction. The estimated onsets facilitate reliable calculations of epicentral distances. We assess the performance of our methodology by comparison to network localizations for 77 induced earthquakes from the Landau and Insheim deep-geothermal reservoirs, situated in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Our results demonstrate that we can differentiate earthquakes originating from both reservoirs and successfully localize the majority of events within the magnitude range of ML -0.2 to ML 1.3. The discrepancy between the two localization methods is mostly less than 1 km, which falls within the statistical errors. However, a few localizations deviate significantly, which can be attributed to poor observations during the winter of 2021/2022.