Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Earth Sci., 27 May 2022
Sec. Economic Geology
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in the Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas: From the Integration of Geology and Engineering View all 32 articles

Editorial: Advances in the Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas: From the Integration of Geology and Engineering

  • 1Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China
  • 2Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
  • 3School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China
  • 4Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
  • 5College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Introduction

Unconventional oil and gas resources are comprised of shale oil, shale gas, tight oil, tight gas, coalbed methane, etc (Zou, 2014). With the advancements of theory and technology, oil and gas exploration has transformed from conventional hydrocarbons outside of source rocks to unconventional hydrocarbon resources retained in source rocks. Unconventional oil and gas related to source rocks are sequence hydrocarbon resources. During the depositional period, the combination of high paleoproductivity and favorable preservation conditions result in the extensive distribution of organic-rich mudstones or shales (Bohacs et al., 2005; Tyson, 2005), deposited in marine or lacustrine sedimentary environments. At the stage of shallow burial, shales with high organic matter abundance are immature (Ro < 0.5%) and are commonly referred to as oil shale resources. When shales are buried deeper, once the thermal maturity of their organic matter reaches the oil generation threshold, liquid hydrocarbons are generated in shales. Oil maybe retained in these source rocks forming shale oil resources (Jin et al., 2021). At the early stage of shale oil, the organic matter has a low-maturity (Ro is between 0.5% and 1.0%). This kind of shale oil has a high density and viscosity, poor mobility, and low conversion efficiency of organic matter. Therefore, it is generally thought that these low-mature shale oil resources can be recovered through underground in situ transformation technology (Zhao et al., 2018). At the later stage of shale oil, the thermal maturity is relatively high (Ro is between 1.0% and 1.5%). This kind of highly mature shale oil has relatively low density and viscosity, and good mobility, and can be extracted through horizontal well drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies. However, the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing is highly dependent on the texture and mineral compositions of rocks. With increasing burial depth, kerogen and residual crude oil (shale oil) in organic-rich shales will further crack into natural gas (shale gas) (Bernard et al., 2012; Loucks and Reed, 2014). Simultaneously, abundant organic-matter hosted pores generate and act as important storage space for shale gas (Guo et al., 2017). If the burial depth is higher than 3,500 m, shale gas resources can be labeled as deep shale gas, and their formation pressures are usually overpressured. If shale formations have undergone intense tectonic uplift and their burial depths are lower than 3,500 m, natural gas in shale reservoirs is referred to as shallow shale gas. Due to the variation in preservation conditions and gas leakage during uplift, shallow shale gas resources are at various states of overpressure, weak overpressure, or geostatic pressure (Hao et al., 2013). Furthermore, oil and gas can migrate from their source rocks and accumulate in tight sandstone or carbonate beds (whether adjacent or interlayered beds) to form tight oil and gas resources. Certainly, there are significant differences in hydrocarbon generation, expulsion, storage, occurrence, and mobility in source rocks with different sedimentary environments, lithofacies, and organic matter (e.g., abundance, type, and maturity). Therefore, systematic theoretical and technical research are necessary for the effective exploration and development of different types of unconventional oil and gas resources.

Shale Gas

In the last decade, China has achieved significant success in the exploration and development of shale gas, benefited from the advanced petroleum geology theories and innovational engineering techniques. Commercial production successes are achieved in marine shales from Sichuan Basin. Tang et al. analyzed the controlling factors on the lithofacies spatial variations of Silurian Longmaxi shales in this basin. Pang et al. used a combination of reflected light microscopy, focused ion beam SEM (FIB-SEM), and Raman spectrum to describe the organic pore structure of different macerals of Longmaxi shales from Sichuan Basin. Yu et al. characterized pore connectivity of Longmaxi shales using Wood’s metal intrusion and high-resolution imaging. Guo et al. analyzed the gas composition and carbon isotopic characteristics of shale gas from the Cambrian Niutitang Formation. Lan et al. discussed the enrichment and accumulation of normal pressure shale gas in Anchang syncline outside of Sichuan Basin. In addition to the marine shales, there are also considerable amounts of lacustrine shale gas resources in China. Shale gas accumulation in lacustrine formations is likely to be significantly different from marine shales. Zhang et al. investigated the controls on the full-sized pore structure of the coal-bearing shales. Zhang et al. used petrographic observation and element geochemistry to analyze the origin of silica of lacustrine shales from the Ordos Basin. Chen et al. measured gas sorption capacities of lacustrine shales from the Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation from Sichuan Basin, and thought that temperature and water saturation significantly affected the gas capacity of shales.

Shale Oil

The study of shale lithofacies assemblages and pore systems is of great significance to reveal the enrichment mechanism of shale oil resources. Shu et al. discussed the significance of the lithofacies assemblages for shale oil and gas exploration. Guo et al. designed a series of high-temperature thermal simulation experiments to study the thermal evolution degree and hydrocarbon yield of kerogen under open and closed systems. Taking the Cangdong Sag of Bohai Bay Basin as an example, Zhao et al. investigated the geochemical, mineralogical, and lithofacies characterizations of lacustrine shale oil resources. Xu et al. discussed the geological controls on oil content of lacustrine shales with laminated, layered, and massive lithofacies. Pan et al. calculated the fractal dimensions of multi-scaled pores in lacustrine shales from the Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Liu et al. divided the lithofacies combinations of shale strata in the Shahejie Formation in Dongying depression according to the sedimentary environment, internal structure and the superposition relationship of vertical lithofacies. Yin et al. examined the wettability of lacustrine shales from Dongying depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Yin et al. studied the lithofacies architecture and distribution of Permian shales from Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin. Wei et al. investigated the sedimentary subfacies, mineral compositions, geochemical characteristics of shale oil formations from the Dongyuemiao Formation, Sichuan Basin. Jiang et al. used thermal simulation experiments to investigate the pore structure evolution of Cretaceous shales from the Nenjiang Formation of Songliao Basin. Ma et al. discussed the effects of sedimentary environment on the deposition of lacustrine shales from the Gaoyou depression, Subei Basin. Qi et al. evaluated the organic geochemistry and hydrocarbon potential of shales from the Qamdo Basin, eastern Tibet.

Tight Sandstone and Carbonate

Zhao et al. examined the characteristics of the Upper Paleozoic sandstone reservoir from the Dongpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Wu et al. used the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology to measure the movable fluid of tight sandstone reservoirs in Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. She et al. evaluated the hydrocarbons generation and expulsion capability of microbial carbonate rocks from the western Qaidam Basin. Zhang et al. summarized the accumulation model of a Silurian tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Shajingzi Belt, northwest Tarim Basin. Song et al. combined 2D and 3D fractal analysis for the pore structure characterization of tight sandstone in the Xujiahe Formation, and found that micro-fractures and clay cementation were the two main controlling factors on fractal dimensions. Zhang et al. measured the mechanical properties of ultra-deep tight carbonate rocks.

Hydraulic Fracturing Engineering

Wang et al. optimized hydraulic horizontal wells in Longmaxi shales based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Convolution Neural Network (CNN methods). Yang et al. proposed a hydraulic fracturing fluid-mechanical coupling numerical model based on a global cohesive zone model (GCZM) to study the effects of geological factors on hydraulic fracture networks. Ma et al. proposed an efficient and straightforward approach to predict the early-age elastic properties of cement pastes. Chen et al. reviewed the studies of incorporation of magnesia (magnesium oxide) into Portland cement material from the geotechnical well construction perspective. Cheng et al. used a combination of logging, seismic, fracturing and production data from 301 shale gas wells in Longmaxi Formation in Changning shale gas field of southern Sichuan Basin to analyze the main controlling factors of the stimulated reservoir potential.

Author Contributions

All authors wrote the primary paper, SX and FY revised the paper, all authors had reviewed the paper.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42122017, 41821002, 42072167), and the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2020ZLYS08).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all of the authors who responded to our call to participate in the compilation of this Topic. Our gratitude is also extended to all reviewers who kindly reviewed one or more of the manuscripts submitted to this Research Topic and provided valuable comments and recommendations. Special thanks are extended to Chief Editor DL who reviewed this manuscript and whose suggestions significantly improved the clarity and quality of this Editorial article.

References

Bernard, S., Wirth, R., Schreiber, A., Schulz, H.-M., and Horsfield, B. (2012). Formation of Nanoporous Pyrobitumen Residues during Maturation of the Barnett Shale (Fort Worth Basin). Int. J. Coal Geol. 103, 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2012.04.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bohacs, K. M., Jr, G. J. G., Carroll, A. R., Mankiewicz, P. J., Miskell-Gerhardt, K. J., Schwalbach, J. R., et al. (2005). Production, Destruction and Dilution-The Many Paths to Source-Rock Development. SEPM Spec. Publ. 82, 61–101.

Google Scholar

Guo, X., Hu, D., Li, Y., Wei, Z., Wei, X., and Liu, Z. (2017). Geological Factors Controlling Shale Gas Enrichment and High Production in Fuling Shale Gas Field. Petroleum Explor. Dev. 44, 513–523. doi:10.1016/s1876-3804(17)30060-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, F., Zou, H., and Lu, Y. (2013). Mechanisms of Shale Gas Storage: Implications for Shale Gas Exploration in China. Bulletin 97, 1325–1346. doi:10.1306/02141312091

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, Z., Zhu, R., Liang, X., and Shen, Y. (2021). Several Issues Worthy of Attention in Current Lacustrine Shale Oil Exploration and Development. Petroleum Explor. Dev. 48, 1471–1484. doi:10.1016/s1876-3804(21)60303-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loucks, R. G., and Reed, R. M. (2014). Scanning-electron-microscope Petrographic Evidence for Distinguishing Organic-Matter Pores Associated with Depositional Organic Matter versus Migrated Organic Matter in Mudrock. GCAGS J. 3, 51–60.

Google Scholar

Tyson, R. V. (2005). The “Productivity versus Preservation” Controversy: Cause, Flaws, and Resolution, 82. Society for Sedimentary Geology, Oklahoma, United States: SEPM Special Publications, 17–33.

Google Scholar

Zhao, W., Hu, S., and Hou, L. (2018). Connotation and Strategic Role of In-Situ Conversion Processing of Shale Oil Underground in the Onshore China. Petroleum Explor. Dev. 45, 563–572. doi:10.1016/s1876-3804(18)30063-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, C. N. (2014). Unconventional Oil and Gas Geology (In Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House.

Google Scholar

Keywords: sequence hydrocarbon resources, shale, tight sandstone and carbonate, unconventional oil and gas, hydraulic fracturing

Citation: Xu S, Yang F, Feng Z, Liu R and Lei G (2022) Editorial: Advances in the Exploration and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas: From the Integration of Geology and Engineering. Front. Earth Sci. 10:930704. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.930704

Received: 28 April 2022; Accepted: 10 May 2022;
Published: 27 May 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

David R. Lentz, University of New Brunswick Fredericton, Canada

Copyright © 2022 Xu, Yang, Feng, Liu and Lei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shang Xu, xushang0222@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.