Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296

Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany -a multicenter survey

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 2 Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie - Charite, Berlin, Germany
  • 3 Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 4 Hessing Klinik Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • 5 Move Ahead – Foot, Ankle and Sportsclinic, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Social media (SM) is increasingly used in the healthcare system and offers various benefits for patients such as accessible health information and communication with other patients and healthcare professionals. However, SM also poses risks, including the dissemination of medical misinformation and privacy concerns. This in turn can influence patients' health-related decision-making and the patient-physician relationship. There is limited data regarding which SM orthopaedic patients use and what benefits and risks of SM they perceive.Methods: An online survey was conducted from April to December 2023 among orthopedic and trauma patients in five German orthopedic clinics. The questionnaire with 32 variables was designed to assess internet and SM usage patterns, platform preferences, and perceived benefits and risks. Statistical analysis was performed, including subgroup analyses.Data was analyzed and plotted using descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses, with a focus on differences by age and gender using Python (version 3.11) and SPSS (Version 29).Results: A total of 267 patients participated, with 82.0% reporting regular SM use. In total 45.9% of the patients used SM for general health questions and 51.3% for orthopedic-related questions. SM use for health-related purposes was low. The most used information platforms were conventional websites, YouTube, Instagram, and messenger apps. A total of 45.9% used SM infrequently for general health questions, and 51.3% for orthopedic -related queries. Only 13.7% of patients agreed that SM helped in medical decision-making, and 31.1% felt confident in assessing the credibility of SM content. Additionally, 58.6% of patients were unsure about allowing physicians to present their cases on SM, and 62.3% were uncertain about posting their medical images.Among German orthopedic patients, the use of SM for health-related and gain of orthopedic information was low in the given study. While SM may offer valuable health information, their role in medical decision-making remains limited due to concerns over content credibility and privacy. Video-based content seems to achieve the best reach. Future research should explore these aspects longitudinally and across diverse populations to better understand and address the challenges and benefits of SM in healthcare.

    Keywords: Social Media, digitalization, Patients, Communication, Orthopedics

    Received: 08 Oct 2024; Accepted: 17 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Youssef, Vu-Han, Trauth, Osterhoff, Back and Gehlen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yasmin Youssef, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Lower Saxony, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more