Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1372062

Developing and testing a community based, online versus face-to-face peer led intervention to improve mental well-being in Cambodian adults with physical disabilities

Provisionally accepted
Paul Best Paul Best 1*Alan Maddock Alan Maddock 2Nil Ean Nil Ean 3Lorna Montgomery Lorna Montgomery 1Cherie Armour Cherie Armour 1Ciaran Mulholland Ciaran Mulholland 1Carolyn Blair Carolyn Blair 1
  • 1 Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • 2 Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, County Dublin, Ireland
  • 3 Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh Municipality, Cambodia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Despite growing international attention, there remains an urgent need to develop mental health services within low and middle income countries. The Khmer Rouge period in Cambodia saw the destruction of all health services infrastructure in the 1970s. Consequently, Cambodia has struggled to rebuild both its economy and healthcare system, with the number of qualified mental health clinicians remaining disproportionately low. Resultantly, there is a pressing need to develop low-cost community based alternatives of mental healthcare. Methods: Using a mixed methods design, researchers developed an 8-week peer-led intervention, known as a Friendship Group, for adults with physical disabilities using both face-to-face and online delivery methods. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to assess changes in pre-post survey scores and qualitative data was collected in form of five focus groups post intervention. Results: 41 participants were allocated across four Friendship groups – two were online and two face-to-face. Attrition rate was 22% post-intervention (n=32). ITT analyses showed a statistically significant decrease in psychological distress scores [Z = −3.808, p < .001] from pre [Mdn = 20, IQR = 16.5–25.5] to post [Mdn = 16, IQR = 14–18.5] intervention. A Wilcoxon signed-ranks test also showed a statistically significant decrease in PTSD scores [Z = −2.239, p < .025] from pre [Mdn = 4, IQR = 3–5] to post [Mdn = 3, IQR = 2.75–4] intervention. There was also a statistically significant decrease in worry scores [Z = −3.904, p < .001] from pre [Mdn = 5, IQR = 3.5–6.5] to post [Mdn = 3, IQR = 3–4] intervention. There were no significant group differences between the face to face and online groups. A number of interconnected themes emerged from focus group data (n= 5), these included the mental health benefits of Friendship Groups as conceptualised through knowledge acquisition, skill development and peer support. Conclusions: The Friendship group intervention delivered in both online and face-to-face formats appears feasible and acceptable within the Cambodian context. Initial data revealed positive findings in terms of reduction in psychological distress, worry and PTSD symptoms as well increased feeling as calm.

    Keywords: peer support, Cambodia, Mental Health, PTSD, Friendship group

    Received: 17 Jan 2024; Accepted: 05 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Best, Maddock, Ean, Montgomery, Armour, Mulholland and Blair. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Paul Best, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.