AUTHOR=Angelucci Alessandra , Canali Stefano , Aliverti Andrea TITLE=Digital technologies for step counting: between promises of reliability and risks of reductionism JOURNAL=Frontiers in Digital Health VOLUME=5 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1330189 DOI=10.3389/fdgth.2023.1330189 ISSN=2673-253X ABSTRACT=

Step counting is among the fundamental features of wearable technology, as it grounds several uses of wearables in biomedical research and clinical care, is at the center of emerging public health interventions and recommendations, and is gaining increasing scientific and political importance. This paper provides a perspective of step counting in wearable technology, identifying some limitations to the ways in which wearable technology measures steps and indicating caution in current uses of step counting as a proxy for physical activity. Based on an overview of the current state of the art of technologies and approaches to step counting in digital wearable technologies, we discuss limitations that are methodological as well as epistemic and ethical—limitations to the use of step counting as a basis to build scientific knowledge on physical activity (epistemic limitations) as well as limitations to the accessibility and representativity of these tools (ethical limitations). As such, using step counting as a proxy for physical activity should be considered a form of reductionism. This is not per se problematic, but there is a need for critical appreciation and awareness of the limitations of reductionistic approaches. Perspective research should focus on holistic approaches for better representation of physical activity levels and inclusivity of different user populations.