
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Animal Conservation
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1590562
This article is part of the Research Topic Understanding Rest-Activity Rhythms: Uncovering Factors Shaping Behavioural Rhythms in Diverse Ecological Contexts. View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Temporal patterns regulate biological processes across the animal kingdom, influencing how species allocate time to optimize survival. These patterns shape rest-activity rhythms and allow animals to balance energy, foraging, social interactions, predator avoidance, and anthropogenic disturbances. Because species must balance these competing demands, rest-activity cycles may vary across ecological contexts (Helm et al. 2017; Salguero-Gómez et al. 2022; Wong and Candolin 2015).Studying these patterns in the wild is challenging, but recent technological advancements, including bio-logging, remote sensing, and artificial intelligence, have transformed behavioral research. Autonomous recording units and passive acoustic monitoring provide valuable insights into vocalization patterns and behavioral rhythms without direct human interference (Penar et al. 2020; Rasmussen et al. 2024). Advancements in accelerometry and GPS tracking have also expanded our understanding of nocturnal activity budgets and species-specific rest-activity patterns providing insights into how animals allocate time (Chimienti et al. 2021; Kays et al. 2015).Beyond monitoring wildlife in natural habitats, technical tools also advance research in managed settings, where environmental factors can be controlled. In zoos, behavioral monitoring helps assess how enclosure design and human interactions influence rest-activity rhythms. As part of these efforts, broader welfare assessments emphasize the need for science-based tools to track zoo animal well-being (Tallo-Parra et al. 2023). Among these tools, acoustic research has demonstrated how environmental noise affects behavior including vocalization patterns, stress responses, and social interactions in captive animals (Clark and Dunn 2022), while deep learning applied to accelerometer data has improved the detection of subtle shifts in activity rhythms, providing insights into behavioral flexibility (Otsuka et al. 2024). These innovations enhance researchers’ ability to track behavioral adaptations more precisely, supporting conservation efforts and mitigating anthropogenic impacts in both captive and wild populations.Comparative research shows that while some behavioral traits remain stable across environments, others shift in response to ecological constraints and management conditions (Kelly et al. 2025). Recognizing these differences is key to assessing behavioral flexibility as species continually adjust their activity to environmental challenges. As environments change, animals must continuously adjust their behavior, balancing foraging, avoiding predators, and responding to human presence (Hairston Jr et al. 2005; Wong and Candolin 2015). These behavioral adjustments shape resilience to habitat changes, including human pressures and climatic conditions (Kelly et al. 2025). Understanding these shifts provides valuable insights into species persistence and ecosystem stability. To support adaptive management, long-term behavioral monitoring should be integrated with ecological analysis to assess how species respond to environmental change.In managed care, controlled environments allow researchers to examine how factors such as age, enclosure design, and social compositions and behaviors influence rest-activity rhythms (Kelly et al. 2025; Tallo-Parra et al. 2023). Understanding how these factors shape behavioral flexibility and species-specific activity patterns is essential for refining best practices in zoo management and improving animal welfare. The study ‘Overnight monitoring reveals the behavioral rhythms of a geriatric male elephant: an animal-centered case study of rest and stereotypy’ by McGuire et al., examines how habitat access, musth, and feeding schedules influence overnight behavior. The findings show that musth reduced recumbent rest, while access to both indoor and outdoor spaces decreased stereotypic behavior. However, automatic feeders did not significantly alter stereotypy. This study underscores the importance of adjusting management strategies to better support the well-being of aging elephants in zoos.Early-life behavioral development is equally important for welfare and conservation breeding. The study ‘From birth to weaning: maternal investment, cub development and behavior in Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sumatrae)’, examines how maternal care shapes a cub’s early development. Naidenov et al. found that as cubs grew, they nursed and groomed less frequently but remained socially close to one another. Moreover, the mother gradually interacted less with her cubs as they approached weaning, encouraging them to become more independent. These findings reinforce the value of evidence-based zoo management strategies that greatly support maternal care and enhance cub survival in conservation breeding programs.Social structure also plays a vital role in shaping behavioral rhythms in animals. In their study ‘Around the clock: unveiling giraffe rest-activity rhythms and social dynamics’, Mebus et al. investigated how group composition can have an effect on rest-activity cycles in zoo-housed giraffes. Their findings indicate that stable groups maintained consistent activity patterns, while alterations, particularly the introduction of a male, led to increased standing and reduced feeding during the day. Despite these shifts, nocturnal activity budgets remained relatively stable. These results highlight the significance of structured group management and continuous behavioral monitoring for ensuring welfare in captive giraffe populations.While zoos provide valuable insights into social influences on rest-activity patterns, examining these behaviors in the wild is essential for conservation. The final study by Hejcmanová et al. in this collection, ‘Diurnal activity and resting time allocation of the West African giraffe in an agropastoral human-dominated landscape’, shifts the focus to a free-ranging giraffe population. The authors showed that human presence had minimal impact on overall resting time, while giraffes rested more frequently in proximity to livestock and conspecifics. This pattern suggests that in modified landscapes, livestock presence might create a ‘safety effect’, and reduce the need for individual vigilance. Their findings highlight the importance of species-specific assessments in understanding how wildlife adapts to human-altered environments while maintaining key behavioral patterns.Taken together, these studies illustrate the complex interplay between environmental, social, and anthropogenic factors in shaping rest-activity rhythms. Integrating findings from both wild and captive settings can improve in situ and ex situ management strategies, ensuring that conservation efforts are informed by a deeper understanding of behavior.
Keywords: rest-activity rhythms, behavioral adaptation, zoo and field research, Anthropogenic influences on wildlife, Animal Welfare, wildlife conservation, bio-logging and monitoring
Received: 09 Mar 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Baotic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Anton Baotic, Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences (OeAW), Vienna, 1040, Austria
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.