Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Conserv. Sci.

Sec. Animal Conservation

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1546782

Do wild ungulates utilize at-grade fauna passages as effectively as fauna overpasses or underpasses?

Provisionally accepted
  • EnviroPlanning, Gothenburg, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    At-grade fauna passages are much less resources demanding to construct compared to wildlife overpasses or underpasses at infrastructure barriers. Because smaller and intermediate-sized roads are much more common than major roads in most landscapes, at-grade passages have a high potential for cost-efficient barrier mitigation for wildlife. However, at-grade passages have besides risk for vehicle collision involvement, a higher disturbance potential, compared to most over-and underpasses, considering foremost its multiuse with vehicle traffic. We tested if the crossing probability in common Scandinavian ungulates; wildboar (Sus scrofa), roedeer (Capreolus capreolus) and fallow deer (Dama dama), was impacted due to different types of crossing structure, while accounting for availability to alternative crossing sites and environmental factors. We found no differences in crossing probability in wild boar (851 visits), roedeer (1,556 visits) and fallow deer (941 visits) when comparing wildlife visits at 4 at-grade fauna passages and the combined result from 8 wildlife-designed over-/underpasses. This indicates that fauna passage at-grade (with average daily traffic volume of 3,000-8,000) can show similar functionality, in terms of comparable proportions of usage out of all visits, compared to wildlife designed overpasses or underpasses. In addition, when separating among over-, underpasses and at-grade passages, we found no differences in crossing probability in roe deer and fallow deer. Wildboar showed no difference in crossing probability between overpass and at-grade passage, but higher crossing probability at underpass than at-grade. This suggests that establishing several wildlife passages at-grade instead of only a few overor underpasses designed for wildlife at different grade may be an alternative to reduce infrastructure barriers also along fenced intermediate-sized roads.

    Keywords: connectivity, Ecoducts, Fauna passage, Permeability, wildlife passage 1

    Received: 02 Jan 2025; Accepted: 18 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Elfström and Olsson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Marcus Elfström, EnviroPlanning, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more