data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Conservation Social Sciences
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1541080
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing the Science of Environmental Justice in the International Wildlife Trade View all 8 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The international wildlife trade can be a significant driver of biodiversity loss, as well as a facilitator of zoonotic disease transmission with pandemic potential. Environmental justice has never been more relevant to the wildlife trade as it is today. Yet, environmental justice has not been sufficiently mainstreamed into conservation science, nor practice. Here, we propose a framework for advancing the transdisciplinary science of environmental justice in the international wildlife trade context. The framework is organized via three interrelated domains: a) social justice, b) wildlife species justice, c) ecological justice. Each of these domains is described in terms of transdisciplinary questions that are intended to foster the translation of science of environmental justice for wildlife trade and should be tailored to cultural and historical contexts. It is our hope that the framework stirs open, transparent, mutually respectful discussions about justice between conservation researchers, practitioners, and the vast array of wildlife trade stakeholders.
Keywords: conservation policy, Ecological justice, Social Justice, species justice, Research agenda
Received: 06 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Reaser, Arroyo-Quiroz and Gore. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jamie K. Reaser, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (SI), Front Royal, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.