Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Conserv. Sci.

Sec. Global Biodiversity Threats

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2025.1487428

This article is part of the Research Topic Impacts of Anchor Scour, Vessel Moorings and Associated Infrastructure on Marine Habitats View all articles

Dragging the chain: anchor scour impacts from high-tonnage commercial vessels on a soft bottom macrobenthic assemblage

Provisionally accepted
Andrew R. Davis Andrew R. Davis 1*Allison P Broad Allison P Broad 1Chantel Steele Chantel Steele 1Caitlin Woods Caitlin Woods 1Rachel Przeslawski Rachel Przeslawski 2Tony Nicholas Tony Nicholas 3Bill Maher Bill Maher 4Frank Krikowa Frank Krikowa 4Bradley Morris Bradley Morris 5Tim Ingleton Tim Ingleton 5Sarah O'Hea Miller Sarah O'Hea Miller 1Matt Rees Matt Rees 6
  • 1 University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
  • 2 RPS, Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 3 Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • 4 Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • 5 New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE), Sydney, Australia
  • 6 Department of Regional NSW, Parramatta, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    International shipping is the backbone of the global economy with ~80% of the world's trade (by volume) transported by ship. The potential environmental impacts of this multi-billion dollar industry have received considerable attention, particularly emissions into air and sea. Many of these large commercial vessels lay at anchor for extended periods while awaiting their turn to enter port, and yet the impacts associated with anchoring remain virtually unexamined. Anchors can exceed 20 tonnes, with chains up to hundreds of metres in length and individual links weighing up to 200kg; there is potential for significant effects on seafloor biota where anchoring is concentrated. Filling knowledge gaps in deep-water wave-exposed environments is logistically challenging and expensive. To do so we used sediment grabs collected offshore from the Port of Newcastle (SE Australia) -the world's largest coal export terminal -to sample infaunal assemblages in anchor-affected locations relative to reference locations (30 to 55m water depth). Polychaetes and crustaceans were the most abundant biota in the samples (~85%), whereas molluscs were very low in abundance (<3%), despite being well represented in terms of diversity (11 families of bivalves and 9 families of gastropods). Invertebrate abundance almost doubled in areas exposed to anchoring compared to reference areas.In contrast, invertebrate diversity declined with increasing anchoring activity, however this relationship was weak. Importantly, we observed major shifts in the overall invertebrate assemblage at anchored-affected locations -with reductions in suspension feeders mirrored by increases in scavengers and predators. We assert that suspension feeders were negatively impacted by sediment mobilisation or direct physical damage from anchor chains, while opportunistic scavengers and mobile predators benefitted from this disturbance. We contend that anchor disturbance is a global issue given burgeoning marine trade. Data on the effects of anchoring are urgently required to better inform the management of environments regularly used as anchorages.

    Keywords: anchoring, Infauna, marine invertebrates, Human impacts, disturbance, AIS, SDG14, sediment grain size

    Received: 28 Aug 2024; Accepted: 05 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Davis, Broad, Steele, Woods, Przeslawski, Nicholas, Maher, Krikowa, Morris, Ingleton, O'Hea Miller and Rees. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andrew R. Davis, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more